The Cheapest Watches from the Best Watch Brands | Watchfinder & Co.

[@watchfinder]

We know you want more watches…. click here: linktr.ee/watchfinder

[@M123OCT]

Quite often, I find that these 'cheaper' models are actually the most attractive of the range. For example, the Oyster Perpetual is simply perfection. As soon as you add cyclops, gold, diamonds, complications etc., I think you lose the essential beauty of well-made classic simplicity.

[@melody3741]

That's why people love the sub so much. It's simple. No complications but a date. Yeah a cyclops but you can get it removed and it's purely for utility.

[@monwhooperinvasive8064]

Yeah but a date is quite nice

[@SDBASKURT]

Hahaha I thought the same watching this, like the simple beauty with the brand and great quality is so much more attractive than them adding little complications and pricing it 3-4x more makes me wonder who the hell prefers that?

[@kyoukan91]

I disagree with your statement about it happening quite often. I do agree about the Oyster perpetual though. It's among my favorite in the Rolex lineup.

[@dude...are-you-sure]

@@melody3741 or just get a no date Submariner?

[@paulbugoni2846]

Great video again! How about a part 2 featuring brands like Zenith, Ulysses, IWC and Grand Seiko?

[@apeace9800]

I'm with you Andrew. No contest whatsoever. Classiest name in all watchmaking. Superlative quality. Beautiful design. Just esoteric enough. Vacheron.

[@GEMSofGOD_com]

No one's talking about Cartier and I'm ordering one right now. The best of like 10.000 watches for me eventually, no matter the price. Ballon 42 in steel.

[@Valera_Scotland]

I still feel that buying something from the 2000s - 2010s is the best option. My old Omega Aqua Terra from 2002 was £2300... my current IWC Mark 16 was £2700..a really lovely classic beautiful watch with serious heritage and just super cool.. then there's JLC ultra thins for £3000-4000... Bond seamasters for £3000 or less..... i recently saw a full gold Omega Constellation for £3500 and a Blancpain Villeret stunner for under £4k...When you can get stuff like that, I have no idea why people wait for a year and spend 4-5k on a simple Rolex OP...or even £1000 on a quartz Tag... yes they're solid but no, they're not special, not very thin and not very refined.... I say go older and see what's out there. Buying new is fun, but I'm hooked on value and old elegance. Funny how tastes change. I was lusting after Rolex for years... From the choices in this video, 100% Vacheron is the winner here. If only it was 36-38mm

[@idcook]

Value wise, I much prefer the Omega. For one, I. always prefer mechanical to quartz. HOWEVER … That Cartier nearly grabbed me into the screen. I just love the neat classic design. You can’t help but project class with that on your wrist. The Tudor also has a clean look. The Reverso, alas, for me, the copy doesn't quite measure up to the original. The AP I can do without. I just don’t feel it’s worth the price.

[@FazerWiz]

The VC is based on the Cartier 1904 MC movement, which I have in a 40mm Santos. It's a brilliant movement with modern features and is the most accurate of all my mechanical watches, keeping within 1-2 seconds per week! I'd be very happy with a VC finished version of it!

[@thereismoretolifethanrolex]

I fell for a 1926 with the blue indices and it's an exceptionally well put together watch. The case is equally tactile to a Datejust, although the bracelet is nowhere near an Oyster, but critically, it registers +1 second per day on the timegrapher. incredible value.

[@benh715]

41mm seems a bit big for that type of watch. Very pretty though.

[@thereismoretolifethanrolex]

@@benh715 An interesting observation. While it's generally perceived as more of a dress watch, the steel bracelet and 100m water resistance suggest otherwise. In practice, it is good for everything.

[@ApurtureSci]

@@benh715 I think the 41 is far too big for the style and simplicity of the dial, which is why I went for a 36mm version (17cm wrist)

[@markstarmer3677]

I think the Omega and Cartier are superb value for what you get. Well respected brands.

[@cajanir]

My challenge with most of these options (other than the obviously too-small ladies' versions) is that they are only appealing because of the name on the dial. Would you really get that model if it wasn't a Tudor? I'm not a big fan of Breitling but at least that one legit looked like something a Breitling fan might want.

[@nintendokings]

Exactly. The Tudor is great value…but if it said Tissot I wouldn’t look at it twice

[@CAIDMASTEROFPYRO]

But it's 2000pounds for a quartz watch with no precious metals or anything, the cost of production on that watch would be in the 10s if not single digits

[@cajanir]

@@CAIDMASTEROFPYRO Yep, the value of the Breitling is highly SUS. But it's not a Moonswatch, so I'm sure it costs a lot more to produce than single digits or 10s.

[@CAIDMASTEROFPYRO]

@@cajanir Probably true, the movement though definitely sub 100, the case and dial are probably finished to the usual breitling standard

[@hotpeppermovie]

@@nintendokings same. I think its good to ask if you want it because you really like the design or you're looking for brand recognition. If it was a tissot I wouldn't buy it either. Better save up for a design that is distinct and has brand recognition to make your moneys worth

[@Wise.Wealth.Wisdom.]

I have a 2022 Vacheron Constantin FiftySix... great watch ⌚️

[@Wise.Wealth.Wisdom.]

@theradbrad103 thank you

[@MisterKnightly]

As a fan of the Breitling Colt Skyracer, I can confirm that Breitlight is wonderful. I lust after those Endurance watches daily.

[@billmankin6204]

For me, the biggest surprise was the Cartier. That's one hell of a good looking and well finished watch for the price. That said, the Santos line is always what I have lusted after, and sadly, no chance of those being in my price range.

[@Armoer]

Good looking is debatable but well finished is nonsense. It is a cheap steel case with 30m water resistance and just simple all-polished finish, a flat white dial. Better off in any way buying a Nomos for half the price. Or if you want a brand name a tudor with diamonds for that price.

[@Entertainment-]

You can get a Quartz Santos for the same price

[@ericmarseille2]

The Vacheron Constantin is an absolute beauty.

[@willnzsurf]

A. Lange & Söhne Saxonia would be my pick, also agree with the VC & Tudor being the best "value."

[@leepenney6104]

Was surprised this didn’t get a mention. Yes it’s £18k but it’s mechanical (unlike the AP), its movement is in-house (unlike the VC) and it’s precious metal to boot

[@Kevinmychael87]

It's interesting how you made the point of quartz during your debate for TAG Heuer vs the Omega you had just mentioned, however, the Breitling with a quartz movement was about the same price as the Omega mechanical. Love the channel, hope to hear back from you.

[@ryanfritz8903]

I have 2 quartz Seamasters (Red text blue Bond, 2221.80 and a Peter Blake 2264.50. I love how its based on the 60s military Seamasters plus its on the speedy bracelet). I got both in pristine condition for around 2k each. Great build quality, great price, low servicing costs. I want to use my watches and not have to worry about what happens to the them. Love the channel, keep it up guys.

[@jamesrobert4106]

Excellent choices 👌. I have had my 2541.80 Goldeneye from new in 2001 and it is flawless to this day.

[@ryanfritz8903]

@@jamesrobert4106 Quartz got shammed for being a better movement and getting rid of the art of mechanical. While I can see that argument. The whole point of watches is accurate time. While I have automatic watches, if big name companies offered quartz variants still they’d fly off the shelves. Same build quality, brand name, cheaper servicing costs for your entire ownership. Can’t beat that imo. I do want to get a BB58 tho. Love the looks.

[@jamesrobert4106]

@@ryanfritz8903 I also have automatic watches. I appreciate the skill and beauty of a fine mechanical movement, but to look down on a Quartz watch is nothing but posturing by people who are not genuinely fans of horology. Audemars Piguet still make a Quartz Royal Oak and F P Journe makes the Quartz Elegante. Both VERY expensive, incredible pieces. Nobody argues with their Quartz variants. The Black bays are superb. I have recently bought a Tudor Royal 41 and the build quality of the brand is exceptional. You will not be disappointed.

[@sylversyrfer6894]

Winner: VC - especially in the grey colorway - gorgeous! Runner-up: Omega.

[@billybenson3834]

Lol, I'm the guy that goes to Hamilton & Tissot, they're hard to beat. But I also think Longines and Bulova put out some great looking affordable watches for guys like me who are stuck driving 20 year old cars.

[@TheNextMarx]

Same I think the Vacheron Constantin is great value for the brand, but the Tudor is definitely the winner. With so much hype around Tudor rn the brand definitely stands out for the money.

[@Todd.T]

ALS Saxonia series Breguet Classique series Breguet Type XX-XXI-XXII series Blancpain Villeret series Chopard LUC Glashutte Original Senator Jaeger Le Coultre Master series Zenith Captain series

[@d7r_tv]

Not big into dress watches but that blue Vacheron Constantin is gorgeous with the sector dial.

[@dBsdecibels]

Would have loved to see Breguet. I love their style and hand working.

[@barfymann362]

I own two GS Quartz watches now, absolutely stunning.

[@chevy4x466]

Quartz is better. Mechanical cases r too think. I would enjoy a gs quartz, that and the citizen 100 r the watches I aspire to

[@SanderEvers]

Now do the reverse: most expensive watch from cheap watch brands.

[@Salikaan]

As the owners of a Grey Dial Deville I can say it's great value for the name brand and $$$, it's certainly not cheap by any means though. I'd vote for that and Tudor. The VC isn't a bad price proposition for a VC but you really open yourself up to a lot of really nice pieces at that price range. Also I can't imagine spending 15k for an Steel/Quartz AP good grief, and I like AP but yikes.

[@AndreasGeorgiades]

Vacheron and Omega were the winners in this round for me.

[@basselamjad958]

11:54 😆 now this escalated quickly...Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 with the gold fluted bezel and chocolate 🍫 dial is staring through a window 🪟 somewhere afar

[@spencerneal6476]

Thanks guys. Good work as usual. How about digging up some stunning quartz watches for a later episode 👌

[@kehlew0160]

100% agree. The VC FiftySix is my next and last watch.

[@TheWitchfinderGenral]

That Vacheron is lovely. Out of all of these, I think that's the one I'd spend cash on. VC must have watched this video because the price has gone up to £11,900

[@ranonkhoo533]

Cartier and the VC are just timeless designs, beautiful!

[@danlee944]

Great lineup! However, no Grand Seiko or ALS? Title should be the Best *Swiss* Watch Brands! And if Tag is getting a shout out, I think Hamilton might deserve a shout out also.

[@riccaregio]

To me the best value for money is the Omega De Ville. Mainly because I can't afford the Vacheron Which I agree is hands down the best value for money overall

[@HelibertATheSushi]

i bought a vintage Deville and I absolutely love it. All in all with the restoration, €300.

[@dominiccallaghan1176]

I bought the Tag GMT caliber 7 automatic for a grand ten years ago, (approx) brand new and it is still a favorite. Looking at it now next to my Air King which cost 7 times more (approx), and gets way less wrist time, I know which one is better value. I have been offered 1.5 up for the Tag so it is, unusually for the brand, not a bad investment either.

[@Lawrence64]

Great video. Omega De Vile date window is at 6 , actually. Cartier has a wonderful weight attached to its name. Tudor to me is the most versatile brand out there, if people think of their ones outside of the boring Rolex like models.

[@MerlinsTeaboy]

Problem with the Tudor is that it looks like a Rotary.

[@mordeth1964]

I went on the good old interweb and had a squiz at a photo of the VC 56 movement, and it looks fantastic. I have to say that, even though I'll never be able to afford one, over time Vacheron Constantine has overtaken Omega as my favourite watch brand 👍

[@st1tch87]

The Cartier is insane money for value, you get an 8 year warranty right now and an excellent movement with the Cartier name to boot. Can't go wrong. That being said im still saving for a Santos XD

[@TheMrFishnDucks]

Awesome watches. Might get one of those Breitling as a hiking watch or for cycling. Nice video. Keep up the good work.

[@Harpreet06]

The problem I have with Tudor is that it seems like the poor mans rolex if that makes sense. Similar to how people say a Skoda is a poor mans Audi etc.

[@RoelfvanderMerwe]

That Vacheron is stunning.... And it's about the same price as a Submariner. That's just insane!

[@junhaoxu2724]

I know right?! Funnily enough I have both, and the Fiftysix makes the Submariner seem like a terrible deal 😂

[@juniorjr5328]

Yep CArtier movement

[@comment1637]

@@junhaoxu2724 it’s not a Vacheron movement tho. If Rolls Royce builds a car with a Kia engine it’s not a RR.

[@junhaoxu2724]

@@comment1637 You know who else doesn't have a Vacheron movement? Rolex. I honestly don't think there is any other watch under $15k that has a better-finished movement than this one, and I reaaaally like JLC. The better analogy is probably more like a RR car that is built with a BMW engine. The latter is undoubtedly inferior, but not by much.

[@srw6772]

@@junhaoxu2724 The Submariner is a terrible deal lol The Seamaster is much better value imo

[@sharadskywalker]

Tudor is the winner here. Everyday office watch with mechanical movement for 1500

[@garyboyle695]

That would be half the price with any other brand name on it. Nothing special about the watch at all.

[@pwally2714]

Tudor 1926 - 36mm, 39mm 41mm Mine is a 39mm with same opaline dial with rose gold indices. The bracelet is 80% as good as a DJ Jubilee bracelet minus the immediate adjustability. I still have my white dial Tudor 1926 in the rotation with the DJ41, Zenith, Vacheron Constantin, Tudor Black Bay Steel, 18k Universal Geneve Polerouter Date, Seagull 1963

[@statlerwaldorf7130]

For me it is the Vacheron, I'll keep saving!!

[@AtheistOrphan]

I have a Watches of Switzerland catalogue from 1988 showing a small quartz plastic-cased Tag Heuer (in a variety of colours) new for £79.95. That’s just £198.55 in 2022! Admittedly all the other Tags were considerably more expensive.

[@AnggaTirtaFL]

I personally don't feel Tag appealing enough to my liking. As they said, with that much value on a Tag Heuer instead what can i get from Tissot or Hamilton. But again if you chasing Brands name you go with Tag (but i doubt nowadays Tag are not so much respectful), and if you seek for a more spec and functionality then go with Tissot or Hamilton. And don't forget Oris and Mido also.

[@kelechinobi3085]

Honestly? I’m never really sure what to make of Tag. There seem to me to be a bunch of watches in the tissot / Hamilton, oris range... a bunch of watches above them (Rolex, Omega, JLC, Gs). And then there’s Tag 🤷🏾‍♂️

[@jamesrobert4106]

It is hard to fathom. I bought a brand new F1 Khaki rubber strap, Quartz in 2013 for £435.00 Now discontinued and worth more, but I will never sell it.

[@hypersynesthesia]

I think what this all comes down to is not just “which brand do you want” but “why do you want it so badly?”. As you said, with some of these watches, you can get all the looks or functionality with a less high status brand. So if it’s the status of the brand, rather than the specific build quality/unique looks…why does that matter so much? Why does wearing the logo matter to you if you aren’t really buying the characteristics that, on paper, justify the fat price tag? (Don’t let me go into where marketing sits on the balance sheet 👀) To kinda rhetorically answer that, I have some high-end wishlist items, and they’re watches where, if I were to wear a similar looking piece by a cheaper brand, I think I would feel like I was trying too hard to pretend I had the more expensive option. And then you’d never want people to look closely at it. That feels on a par with clinging to the lowest rung of an expensive brand just to have something by them. Neither feel like great options. So until I can afford the specific watches I want, I prefer to look for models from less expensive brands (and vintage options) whose own designs speak for themselves.

[@justingalore123]

That cartier is lovely - the solarbeat tank isn’t much more..

[@lightningleaf23]

Thought the Caltrava was the cheapest from Patek Philippe. Agree that VC in silver is beautiful. 10 grand for an automatic from the big 3 that looks that good takes it

[@06lanevomr]

Calatrava are made with precious metals. Nautilus and aquanaut is cheapest because of it being steel with an outdated movement that doesn't hack.

[@lightningleaf23]

@@06lanevomr the amount of precious metal is negligible when considering the prices of these watches the movement is probably the factor

[@06lanevomr]

@@lightningleaf23 in the watch world, the amount of precious metal is a fraction of what companies are charging for.

[@DrTerryBooth]

Omega Vs Tag. Omega for me. The co-ax movement has a story (althought arguably that story really went another way), I prefer a dress watch. Other than having the name Tag on it, it could have been made by another maker - Pulsar, maybe.

[@KamBoat11]

I honestly love the aquanaut more than the nautilus, so glad I'm not alone on this 😂

[@spazz27]

£3000 for a co-axial movement? What’s the cheapest co-axial watch by George Daniels (or that isn’t an Omega), that’s how good a deal that is… loved this video and idea… you could easily have called this “the best watch from every brand” and you wouldn’t be far off! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

[@marcjudge680]

Would love to own a Lange & Sohne Odessas. The V.C 56 is a affordable option. Would like to see Zenith vids as a ownership of a few and other brands Great entertaining viewing.

[@jazzman5598]

The 2 hander AP in quartz………I have my Dad’s 2 hander Omega dress watch. It needs a service but still runs. I love it because…how is it possible to hack it, lol 😂 You get close and call it a day. If the watch is a 2 hander, regardless of quartz vs mechanical, you won’t be able to tell. But £18K……….whoa……..I’ll go see about homages on Ali Express 🤪 Really enjoyed this one guys. Good job!

[@msfasa]

13:55 “There’s something about this that’s waffle” had me snort coffee out my nose so thanks for that 😂

[@euanmorse]

Bought a DeVille Prestige and I have to say I love it. Simple and elegeant.

[@seattlegrrlie]

That Vacheron won hands down. I'd probably still be disappointed that I wasn't wearing the 1921 which is my ultimate dream. I'll echo what you said... $14K for quartz? Yeah, I don't care whose name is on the dial

[@lukerabin5079]

The VC 56 is easily the best value. Haute horology heights, with Ford Capri money.

[@thomasdawe1837]

A colleague of mine had the Cartier, and it looked fantastic in person. I definitely would have priced it at 5kish

[@lukerabin5079]

I do love that London-esque accent you two to rock. Carti-yay! Cracks me up every time.

[@betog.6229]

Agreed with the Vacheron. But I would love to see it in person first.

[@arcadevampire]

The omega for me. OP cool too. The look and dimensions of OP 34 in black/silver has a vintage vibe of the 5500.

[@johnturnerjr7221]

Agreed, but, I'd choose a different dial combo. It could be a nice dress watch.

[@Megingiard]

5:11 "date window at 3" shows a version where it is at 6 :D

[@mrdisco99]

Andrew kind of alluded to it... The Tudor has a bog standard movement and a case and dial that look like they came from Tissot... which you could get for a third the price... with a better movement! My vote goes to Omega... brand prestige, exclusive movement, and design that belies the fact that you sorted by price on the website.

[@ivanharlokin]

That Breitling is like a less good G-Shock, for £2000.... bargain, and that BREITLING logo strap, is revolting beyond the dreams of Invicta.

[@youtubeappreciator]

I bought a 90s quartz Seamaster for ~$700 plus shipping - the 2511.81. The whole 2511 series is really great value IMO.

[@Caledfryn]

Quartz Grand Seiko! Fantastic finishing and top quality quartz movement.

[@edn.3442]

I agree with Andrew. The Vacheron is the clear value winner of the bunch.

[@emanuelebalestra2097]

I'd get the Cartier. It just looks too good.

[@brianmsahin]

How about a "Best watches from the cheapest watch brands." next? 😉

[@younusimam-thesalamproject6340]

Its crazy what different prices brands can charge. For the price of a single base Oyster Perpetual, you can get a very high level Oris or Christopher Ward.

[@KeepingWatchUK]

Respectfully, a base OP from Rolex trumps any Oris or CW on every single level! (Nothing wrong with those two latter brands btw)

[@younusimam-thesalamproject6340]

@@KeepingWatchUK not going to disagree there!

[@thewatchverdict]

The Tudor 1926 is a great watch that many people sleep on. It feels great on wrist and they have a variety of sizes which means that it fits well on all wrist sizes.

[@BabyJesus66]

The problem with it is you're paying that much for a Selita movement. You could get the same thing in many other brands for like half the price.

[@jpdemer5]

@@BabyJesus66 But it won't say "Tudor" on the dial . . . _which is the whole point of this video_ .

[@silv3rArrow]

Might as well go for a Longines Hydroconquest quartz for the price of that Tag Heuer quartz. Ceramic bezel and if you go for the previous version you can get it with a 2824-2

[@watcheswithabdullah]

10:30 'Yes I hadn't heard of it either' - I literally spat out water at that! Tom is too hilarious! 😂

[@astridvetter8035]

Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Sector Dial 😉

[@philjones6449]

That VC is amazing ‘value’ compared to some of the crazy inflated grey market prices.

[@jauharshahbaz]

That sector dial of VC 56 is just 👌

[@mattilatvala4164]

Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Control Date Sector Dial is 5900 €. An extremely beautiful watch. 😎 And you said Vacheron movement is not in-house. Where is it from? 🤔

[@mattilatvala4164]

Vacheron movement is from the same that makes movements of Baume Mercier: ValFleurier.

[@ceecee130x]

How about: Cartier Tank Must Solarbeat? Longines Dolce Vita (rectangular sector)?

[@georgegopiao4411]

I agree on both counts. Best value is the Tudor and the VC.

[@thehistoryprof6750]

Speaking of brands. This reminds me of a couple of young professionals I worked with in LA many yrs ago. They were thrilled when they purchased his and her BMWs, the small 3 series. Fast forward a couple of yrs later they had gotten rid of both cars...saying, the only thing special about them was the blue and white label !

[@johnturnerjr7221]

I think out of this list, the V.C. is the clear winner with the Omega coming in a closer second.

[@E-jit]

I really like the looks and the under the radar aspect of the Omega. The 1926 is a great watch but it’s hardly under the radar anymore.

[@mikegeary2112]

Thank you, lads. Very nice list you've put together. Some surprises there, too be sure.

[@thomasont]

Best value watch I've known from brand power public perspective and monetary value plus good value retention would be, Rolex Oyster Royal Precision, Air-King Precision and Oyster Date Precision, which I've own, hands down. 👑⌚👍

[@BabyJesus66]

Cool video but I wish you had done the cheapest mechanical and cheapest quartz from each brand, and maybe a couple sizes for each (like one 34-36mm, and one 38-42mm). I have large wrists 34mm would look like a baby watch on me, and I'm not a fan of quartz 99% of the time. So most of these wouldn't be of interest to someone like me.

[@ZCherish]

I know we enter a different discussion if we start going grey market, BUT...the Tudor 1926 39mm is $1,499 USD on Jomashop. At that price, it's even more of a no brainer. And their Royal automatic 34mm is only a little more, at $1,645. So it looks like Tudor is easily the best of the highline brands to touch on affordability.

[@matthewdale956]

The problem with the 1926 is the shit power reserve

[@BabyJesus66]

Still too much for a Selita movement unless you only care about the name on the watch.

[@KimSE4]

I'd have liked to see Grand Seiko on there - would have been fascinated to get your take on them as I do think they deliver value for the premium price.

[@kor3xican104]

id take the omega. if I wanted a quartz, I'd get a GShock

[@junhaoxu2724]

I have the Fiftysix pictured here, and can confirm that the movement is indeed stunning (definitely up to the Holy Trinity standards)! As soon as I saw it, the concerns surrounding the ValFleurier movement went away.

[@saisriramtekumalla6109]

I agree to that omega de ville is more valuable that Tag even if I pay more for it

[@GadgetyMV]

The Omega with co-axial is attractive, but I've read that the 2500 movement, the first co-axial, based on an ETA has had a history of trouble. There are various versions of the 2500 so it depends on which one is in the watch. While I assume it'll be the latest, I'm not sure. So, which version is it, in the watch I'm getting? As for the TAG Heuer, it's a good looking watch and WR to 200m is nice. There is no spec on the quartz accuracy. If I get quartz I'd prefer a solar/light charged watch that doesn't require being taken in for battery replacement, and I'd probably go for the emperor of quartz, Citizen. Their titanium Promaster Marine CC5006-06L eco-drive with black dlc, and satellite wave, always showing the correct time. It also has the coolest world time zone with some of the time references being diving locations in light blue font.

[@ddeboy002]

Wow... the Tudor is actually nice without the cut off hour hand. I like it. Might pick me up one.

[@pskupferman]

Longine Flagship for 5000 in yellow gold and incredible case back with cote geneve and perlage

[@JJPalma-lx5yn]

Very enjoyable and Educational video! Thanks guys!

[@legendus1159]

VC hands down,, it is so well prpoprtioned and all.. great stuff

[@folumb]

I went to the Patek Phillipe boutique in Miami 3 weeks ago and was quoted $31,000 for a calatrava. The associate said that was entry level patek. Nice to know there's a "cheaper" entry level

[@snapascrew]

Got me an oyster perpetual 39 in rhodium back in 2019. Great decision.