""WALKING AROUND ON DOWNTOWN STREETS WITH A CORROGATED-BOX 7X7 WITH OILSTAINS ON THATBOX IS NOT REASONABLE SUSPICION FORPOLICE TO CONDUCT A TERRYSTOP""!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

""THERE-MUST-BE SIX-ELEMENTS OF A CRIME""!!!!!!!!

What if the cops ticketed him for fleeing from the police. Being a felony charge that would of granted a warrant less search then?

Takes away the “arrest and dismiss” or “arrest and don’t charge” tactic police have been using to justify searches and questioning to find reasonable suspicion or probable cause.

What's crazy is my son open my door and the police came in here took my children put me in jail never Read me My Rights and I mean I'm going through a court case right now with a third-degree felony child abuse and they don't even have evidence at all they just want me to take something I need help what to do

Again the h.r department and NC2 because of all payroll hindi nila ibinigay o given for the personal argue of her employer dinamay

I'm glad the Vega v. Tekoh case got rid of the Miranda decision.

Hay...I appreciate the fact you're teaching us how to skirt the law and constitutional rights, but is there a way to lobby and just eliminate the constitution completely so we can get back to the good ol days?

You gave all that info and will still try to defend them when they're wrong?

So cops taking people out the car and immediately going to a pat down or cuffing people with no facts tied to it, it's illegal? Most cops just say "for my safety" or "I don't know you" or "in this day and age"

You're one of them that defends them POSes

I wonder if a litmus test would be to ask: Is there an alternative, non-criminal explanation for the same set of facts? Obviously, one then needs to judge the "reasonableness" of that alternative, but I assume the probability of that alternative explanation, once identified to exist, has even less stringent demands than the the criminal one. In your car example, the alternative explanation of "aliens teleported me here" is out, but something as unlikely as "I had a stressful day and am just clearing my mind" is fair game.

That shirt is creepy

It should be differentiated the totality of the moment when the officer is actively making decisions vs hindsight totality where facts that came after an action may have justified the action

All I got out of this video was you teaching cops how to violate peoples rights. Terry stops are unconstitutional, I don't care what mental gymnastics you want to use to justify them.

Law enforcement in our country is in dire need of education on so many levels. This video should be required for all officers to watch every year they are employed.

Police officers largely have the, “better safe than sorry” mentality, which translates to, it’s ok to trump people’s rights as long as there’s even a small chance to catch a criminal. People like me instead hold the constitution sacred, and believe that there is no amount or kind of crime that could possibly justify violating The People’s constitutional rights for.

also the blue line gang too

This court ruling is so flawed. They basically made their home a "Home base" for criminals. This can definitely cause more fleeing to peoples houses.

Do you have a video on probable cause?

Reasonable suspension: that person looks poor. ✔️ nothing else needed.

Hey man. Just wanted to let you know, when i worked at a small department, your videos were life saver. Id listen to your videos while on patrol. My command never gave me case law to learn and i had to search it out for myself. Your content and delviery is fantastic. Have you considered branching into case law for other states? Or regions? Im moving to OR next week as a leo and seeing some important case law breakdowns for out there would be great! Specifically search and seizure and use of force.

Does that mean that a reserve office cannot pull someone over for speeding and issue a ticket?

I would think the last case should have been ok if the officer was able to articulate possible intoxication by the erratic behavior of the driver giving him a right to collect the evidence for that.

New Mexico State court decisions aren’t binding in NY State. You get arrested in your vehicle, it gets towed & it gets inventoried. If the dept leaves the decision to tow up to the officer, then if he decides to tow every car, where does the court decide he didnt use discretion? Or enough discretion. How did this court decide he was on a “fishing expedition”? Did they ever hear of the Whren decision? His state of mind doesn’t matter. He tows every vehicle. If he was on a “fishing expedition” he’d tow the vehicles he thought had contraband & leave the other vehicles alone. Jeezus, 30 years of settled case law on vehicle searches was undone by Grant, and now this dumb appeals court decides to throw more roadblocks in the way. When a nuclear weapon goes off in Santa Fe those judges can pat themselves on the back & say; “well, at least it wasn’t discovered by an illegal vehicle search…”

Stopped for walking while poor. JUSTIFIED!!!

I'm from a small town in East Texas so I feel obligated as an aspiring janitor for the DEA to improve the quality of people around me and myself

Would two officers coming for a knock and talk regarding a dog biting another dog and one knocks on the door and the other one is caught on video looking into the windows of a car parked in the driveway and on the side of the house be a 4th Amendment violation then?!

Great work

They need to learn brown v texas

In the past, the DA could protect the police from some lawsuits by dropping the charge. Unfortunately the DA give broad latitude to police for all kinds of civil rights violations - the, when a big one, that the police, the police union and the DA cannot hide, everyone is suddenly shocked and dismayed... Here's the thing, Everyone knows when its "contempt of cop" charge. That is why the DA dismissed it. If you, as a cop, want to play that game.... well, now there is one more way justice.... i.e. the punishment of you and your department , can happen. Don't let you emotions get the better of you. Take a breath.

The Terry vs Ohio ruling was a serious mistake. It essentially turned the US into a police state where armed individuals (police) can arrest you, and hold you in custody at anytime for no crime. Yes, legally, the ruling doesn't give the police the right to do this, but in practice, that is exactly what they do. They play with semantics, and say it isn't an arrest, only a detainment. If the police handcuff you, and place you in custody in the back of their police car, or have you sit hand cuffed on a curve side, or wherever, it may not be a charge, but it is clearly an arrest. In practice, police can give any reason they want for your arrest, and it doesn't have to have anything to do with a crime. If they can't think of something to charge you with, they will let you go, but it was still an arrest. Moreover, the police will quickly esculate these non crime arrests (called detainment) with violence: sometimes deadly force, when the citizen who has committed no crime questions the arrest. Citizens are thrown down, often end up injured or killed when NO CRIME was committed. I have watched thousands of hours of video of police doing this. Innocent people don't like to be harassed. So the citizen might say something like "what crime have I committed"? And when the police don't have an answer, "then leave me alone. You can't just harass me like this when I have done nothing wrong". That's not acceptable to the police because they got a call of "suspicious" activity in the atea, so they arrest him by throwing him on the ground, and handcuffing him. This often ends in injury and death when no crime was committed. My point is that only in a police state can police come up to anyone for any reason and arrest them. In a free country, arrest should only be allowed when a crime is being committed. So I hope for all our sakes, the mistake of Terry vs Ohio is reversed. Policing in this country has gone way too far

You lost me when you said States have the right to give extra rights! That has never happened! How about my property is called Private, without a warrant the government needs to stay off it without a warrant! The court needs to pull there heads out!

Wooooooah... My boy went to the federal rule on hearsay to determine what it is... Slow clap👏....👏....👏....👏...👏👏👏👏👏👏 bravo sir. I heard your definition and was confused. Then i went to my blacks law and it was RIGHT there in the 2nd definition. You are 1000% right and thanks for this explanation.

The police say what they want when they want the 1% of the police that get prosecuted why not

And why are these body cams always shutting off or their is no sound what the this is a cops world unfair should be illegal I’m scared to call the police if I’m in danger they are too busy arresting innocent people and sitting around hurting and planting seeds on innocent people

I know the funds aren’t spent on the county jails !!! It seems all the money is being used on the police cars west palm beach road force are driving Bentleys

Police officers have zero training in self defense this results in the police force using guns and weapons .. now their vehicals- can the police be required to train in martial arts or some type of defense to retain the potential criminal too many innocent deaths

First off I love that you used that song on the Intro. from the Deja Entendu album. #2 on the CD If I remember correctly. Anyhow that's the only thing I like about this video haha. 8:13 Absolutely NOT, The Key is NOT Reasonable Suspicion, the key is Criminal Activity. Without a specific crime to attach the suspicious behavior too, any and all actions or movements will raise endless numbers of different suspicions. Remember the "Scientific Method" you form a Hypothesis (the end result) then do experiments(brief investigation) to see if your right. If not then your suspicion is unreasonable. Scientifically and Legally that is. OK not a science person, remember 8th grade math? Solve for X or (reasonableness of your suspicion) 2+X=4 see how you have to have the crime.. I mean answer (the number 4) FIRST. to get the correct answer. If you have reasonable suspicion but no crime...I mean answer 2+X=__ which ever number or level of suspicious you have at the time and act on will give you the wrong crime.. I mean answer. Making your suspicion UNreasonable. Legally and Mathematically. Now in your assertion the KEY being Reasonable Suspicion, this Scenario should help explain what Im trying to convey. A cop is in a parking lot on lunch and Hears a voice say "OMG I dont wanna break the door, maybe me can get this in there and pull up on the automatic lock." the other voice says "ok well do it quick, I dont wanna draw attention to this, We will be in a whole lotta trouble if our Boss found out...... REASONABLE TO BELIEVE THEY ARE CAR JACKERS? 100% yes valid suspicion Ignore everything else now you can touch his inner leg area legally. Upon walking up to these 2 fellas would see a Mcdonalds shirt on both of them, Mcdonalds hats, a togo bag on the hood of the car Mcdonalds, The car they were trying to gain access to has Mcdonalds logos all over it. Sure enough they are in the Mcdonalds parking lot. Did the arrest stop a possible car jacking? or DId the cops arrest and innocent man with a job and no record infront of his bosses for trying to save 80$ for a locksmith to take forever

The open field is your property it should have the same constitutional protection as the house. The 4th amendment says person, papers, and property.

Top shelf on the right, disrespectful flag. 3:15

Don't you love how he's telling cops how to violate your rights

GREAT ! 😂

What about national guards or police firing upon you when there are no state of emergencies or protests going on and youre sitting on your porch and they demand you go inside and holler out "light em up" and shoot paintball guns at you? This happened in harris' vp picks state.

How about the cops follow the law and get a warrant and there isn't a grey area

Cops can always break the 4th amendment by saying they "heard" someone calling for help

What if they live in the city and have front steps and front porch. Can we go around back to the alley and inspect a vehicle thats parked behind the house. If it was suspected of a hit and run? There was no fence but car was parked right next to back of house. Can we open the door to get the vin number and arrest the suspect if they are sitting in it. Probable cause right? This is in Missouri

😮

This answered all my questions !

Criminals have more rights than anyone in the U.S.