Goethe's problem with Hegel's philosophy was his own impatience. Judging from the fact that he only cut the first page in his copy of the Phenomenology and wrote "no" after a first statement (which Hegel on the next page contradicted), he gave up.
@stanleyhumphrey74049 сағат бұрын
Language can be used to illuminate or conceal, to aid or to trick, for selfless and selfish reasons. It maters little if the wielder be poet or philosopher, the structure of their argument will differ, but both possess these capacities.
@user-wk2dn2pv4c10 сағат бұрын
19:27
@matviyk306610 сағат бұрын
So we can practice master morality among competitors but treat those beneath us with a slave morality? Since they don’t have the resources(habits) to take the punishment the ones above can?
@timber75021 сағат бұрын
Good job. You might be interested to consider the views of Morse Peckham on the master-slave encounter, because he extends the logic of Hegel's paradigm explicitly to sex and politics in his essay "Eroticism=Politics; Politics=Eroticism". You can find this essay in his Collected Papers. Cheers.
@jcoop3660Күн бұрын
God isnt dead, it never existed.
@cautionary_taleСағат бұрын
You're still a Christian, maybe not in belief but you've still extracted from their practices, they tolerate your atheism but you live along side them without a second thought. This thing that never existed still shaped you. Something died though along the way, with us all, you're just in front of the wave in this case, you didn't account for what caused the wave. Sorry I'm.... under the influence *rubs hooves together*
@komando5102Күн бұрын
Kalos send me
@lonelycubicleКүн бұрын
In this video was struck by the idea of Goethe thinking Hegel’s influence was bad on the nation because of not focusing enough on studying nature. Stumbled on an article about the philosophical movement and Hegel’s involvement in the Wikipedia article “Naturphilosophie” (KZbin deletes my comments with links which is why none is included here.)
@HokShunPoonКүн бұрын
Excellent summary. Thanks so much :)
@JPDeshaies-y3iКүн бұрын
Cause you guys are my slaves😂😂😂😂😂😂This is all backward😂😂😂😂And you are going to please me now😂😂😂😂😂
@troublemaker9899Күн бұрын
Setting Christianity as the "slave morality" is hilarious. This is why I can never take Nietzsche seriously. He always has ideas which sound good, but if you scratch beneath the surface in any way they fall apart. Imagine misunderstanding Christianity so much that you think it is based on resentment.
@requiem2382Күн бұрын
Thanks for this, just read Twilight of the Idols and this is very helpful for my understanding of the text.
@kensmith81522 күн бұрын
Schopenhauer comes across as definitely someone who not only saw the world as a glass half empty, but saw it necessary to smash the glass all together! What amazes me is that he didn’t slash his own throat with the shards!
@venuswilliamsinfurs2 күн бұрын
More book summaries / interps please!
@sekarmaltum16952 күн бұрын
reminds me to my personal process: WHOLENESS > LeftHandPath (Unholiness) > RightHandPath (Holiness)
@nguyenquangminh48142 күн бұрын
1:59 Both critiqued the stress on reason (or intellect) in the enlightenment age 2:19 - 2:37 powerful concept and quote
@nguyenquangminh48142 күн бұрын
Related: 23:17 “purer” French skepticism of Montaigne that is not a means to an end as Cartesian skepticism is just a different kind of arrogance. Whereas one celebrates reason in Cartesian arrogance, the other celebrates ignorance or a kind of nihilism. “Everything is uncertain so who cares.” 24:06 - 24:28 Universal skepticism is simply a more complete surrender to that insatiable will to truth that undergirds the enlightenment and that drives the enlightenment project and that inevitably ends with the destruction of all faith. 24:46 Durant’s quote about Pascal 1 and 24:59 - 25:13 Durant’s quote about Pascal 2. 25:29 Pascal wrote of Montaigne
@nguyenquangminh48142 күн бұрын
25:39 lead up to Pascal’s view of Montaigne as what could go wrong when one is blessed with great intellect 25:48 analysis of that. 26:18 - 26:39 Pascal’s conclusion about Montaigne as evil and 26:42 Pascal’s rationale for that conclusion 26:53 “Pascal feared these same tendencies within himself”
@nguyenquangminh48142 күн бұрын
27:09 - 27:33 Lead up to Pascal’s view on why it’s a matter of life and death to uphold Faith and the Will as opposed to Reason or Skepticism and Ignorance or Nihilism. 27:42 - 27:59 and 28:03 - 28:26 and 28:40 Pascal’s existential view, which opposes both Descartes and Montaigne 29:02 another Pascal quote to make the point
@nguyenquangminh48142 күн бұрын
29:34 the 2nd division of pascal’s pensées “on the misery of man without God” 30:36 - 31:01 Pascal prefigures Nietzsche on the impactfulness of Christianity but 31:06 he stands on the opposite side to Nietzsche when deciding if Christianity should be kept or discarded. 31:23 - 32:01 (view on the natural sciences and man’s vanity of trying to grasp and bind the boundless) lead in to section 72, which is 32:20 - 37:59 (nice excerpt from that excerpt 35:34)
@nguyenquangminh48142 күн бұрын
39:17, 39:33 - 39:48 Pascal shows disdain for hubris of the intellectual
@PermjitBir2 күн бұрын
Thank you for this lecture, I was confused a few times but the thought that in Germany they had the idea that 'work sets you free', just wondering who that was applied to. Is it a Hegelian idea?
@NewfolderD3 күн бұрын
For me there's a paradox of master/slave morality. People free internally are willing to serve some cause willingly and with joy. Mental slaves are always in rebellion against something. Isn't that interesting 😂
@dirtybloomers70683 күн бұрын
Man does this sound all to familiar with the behavior of the cadre surrounding Biden and the way Biden encouraged it. Voters sound about the same too. The older I get, the bigger the kick I get out of 'connecting' with those I can recognize as ~Moderns. When I was younger I sought out the opposite. Children rebel.
@DonutGuard3 күн бұрын
It sounds like the various forms of gradual degradation of the different forms of governments could be described as entropy.
@Poopsmear3 күн бұрын
This shit is gay
@marshalepage53303 күн бұрын
I heard stories as a child that the Germans pushed the Romans out of Germania, then seduced the powerful, then drugged the powerful, then overthrow the supposed powers that be by sowing the seeds of doubt into the recently drugged getting the powerful to turn on themselves. The powers that be have to be careful not to overstep in a territory of proud people, who are intelligent and don't think like slaves.
@marshalepage53303 күн бұрын
To describe the exploiter and the exploited as a form of morality, is to ignore how easy it really is to overthrow power. Drug one lunatic with power into turning on his own, and bam they overthrow themselves.
@netguy733 күн бұрын
Nietzsche didn't write the book. he "subconciously recalled key points" thinking he's writing it, he was actually recalling the book he read as a kid in 1800s. As mentioned in "Man and his Symbols" book by Jung.
@nPr26_503 күн бұрын
Nietzsche’s value lies in making you self-critical. Are your conclusions truly based on merit, or do they serve hidden self-interest? This constant self-interrogation leads to greater honesty, i think. However, it just sounds like ad hominem. Even if Schopenhauer had the flaws Nietzsche claims, it doesn’t invalidate his arguments.
@OfficialFACEplant3 күн бұрын
Brilliant!
@Game7Mode3 күн бұрын
just popped over to your patreon to see where you are at. sorry to hear you're going through a tough time. just wanted to say you are one of the coolest dudes i've encountered. lots of love brother.
@kalervolatoniittu20113 күн бұрын
Hear hear ! ❤
@eric.aaron.castro3 күн бұрын
Can you do Plato’s Gorgias and Nietzsche?
@Game7Mode3 күн бұрын
"explain the categorical imperative to the dude mugging you" LOL
@Game7Mode3 күн бұрын
libertarianism annoys me as a concept because it is a loaded term with the word liberal in there which has changed its meaning over time as well as having a specifically American spin at least in my experience with the term. I like to keeps things simple. I am an anarchist. I see power structures as inherently corrupt (even if they aren't acting abusively at the time) and when the chips are well and truly down I will support (if only in sympathy) the individual over the power structure (well beyond traditional political realms). Not enough time to start unpacking it in this comment but this commitment of mine runs down the level of the individual human mind (spiritual implications).
@tomdalsin51753 күн бұрын
I struggle a bit to understand the details of Nietzsche's proposed morality. Could it be almost like Jungian psychology, but mapped onto a moral philosophy? *Psychology:* Integrate the shadow, rather than deny or fight it. Employ the shadow as a means of strength and confidence to make yourself and your world better. *Conscious Innocence:* Integrate Human propensity for cruelty, rather than hate it. Seek strength and beauty without being shamed, because strength and beauty are how our species prospers. I'm just curious how the ubermensche treats those he has disgust for. Is the ubermensche cruel, callous or disdainful?
@murrik3 күн бұрын
1:04:00
@Qima13 күн бұрын
Yes, that story is horseshit.
@Game7Mode4 күн бұрын
thanks for doing this, you do everything you do well, but this is really making me crave one of your Nietzsche videos lol.
@olivier54 күн бұрын
Does anyone know what is the painting in background?
@Game7Mode4 күн бұрын
Donald Trump is, whether me or anyone else likes it or motherfking not, him.