It's all about storytelling dude

Dreamworks movies either does an atom perfect bullseye or a complete miss

Why nobody remember Spirit to me is one of the best DreamWorks movie, with an incredible soundtrack ❤

Mid in one peak year

You expect Pixar to be perfect and get disappointed when they aren't DreamWorks isn't perfect but you expect it

They made Kung Fu Panda 4 with no passion, just to make money. But they made The Wild Robot with passion like they did to Kung Fu Panda Trilogy.

I love this movie because you can follow EXACTLY how they turn from the characters at the start to the ones at the end. You can see how D-16's aggressiveness turns into Megatron's violence, and how Orion Pax's pluck turns into Optimus Prime's leadership. I only wish it was 2 hours so the High Guard could get more scenes.

The Best animation movies list in my option 1- how to train your dragon 1 2- the wild robot 3- Kung Fu Panda 1 4- polar Express 5- the iron giant 6- Kung Fu Panda 2 , 3 7- how to train your dragon 2 8- beauty and the beast 9- The Lion King 10- Ratatouille 11- the bad guys 12- puss in boots the last wish 13- Aladdin 14- Christmas Carol 15- mulan , Incredibles 16- 101 dalmatians 17- mulan I knew there was many movies was good but not in my favourite list Zootopia Tangled megamind Spirit Tarzan Alice in wonderland Spider-Man There was some movies Started very well But the entire movie is not like the first half hour of the movie Up Wall-e Big hero 6 . But there are films that are distinctive, but they do not suit my taste : Monster enk Coco Soul

I have always been mixed on Cars 2 rather than straight up hating it. I was obsessed with the original, as well as the tie-in video game, tho that fixation slowly began to fade by the time Cars 2 rolled around to contentious reception. Again I enjoyed and to this day respect the original Cars, for what it is it actually has a pretty mature and surprisingly complex story that in any other medium with actual human characters would be championed as something special. ..Cars two by contrast is imo a very simple film, with a fairly paint by numbers plot you can see from a mile away, and lacks a lot of that maturity the original Cars had. ..All said, it's an incredibly fun film, --in premise alone it's ridiculous; a James Bond style spy film, but set in the Cars universe using the Cars characters. I can see the train of logic, from spy cars to a Cars film about cars that are spies, but it still feels amusingly absurd. Mater getting wrapped up in it as opposed to McQueen, or the two as a duo is also an interesting twist akin to Pink Panther or Johnny English that leads to all kind of amusing or creative situations. It's not the sequel to Cars I would've asked for, or would've expected, ..but I'm not sure honestly how I would follow up the first film given the opportunity. Overall it's a fun ride, but I also get why it doesn't sit with people. And if nothing else, the Pope being made canon to Cars through this film is hysterical. --Like do the Cars have their own version of the bible? Are the characters within the cars bible humans, or are they cars? Did car Jesus turn gasoline into nitro fuel? Was car Jesus crucified on a cross? Did they prophesize there would be a cars rapture? Re-donkulous, and we have this movie to thank for all of this absurdity.

DON’T TALK BAD ON SHARK TALES

One, The Movie, and Bumblebee are the best.

Bill is the best!

Mater is relatable.. for me

If Marcy would kiss me on the cheek, I'd die happy. I wish she was my friend so badly! I love her so goddamn much!

If someone watched anakin (clone wars) then anakin (RotS) then they wouldve felt the same way about D16-Megatron. The underlying 'turn-to-evil' is there. Couldve been to quick or not, is subjective.

I prefer cars 2 over the 1st movie

I don’t get people who say it doesn’t have emotional depth. The scene where Finn was talking about how Mater acts stupid that leads into Mater saying it wasn’t an act in the clocktower is really emotional. To this day, I can remember Mater yelling and how the words echoed in that space. I remember it as this gut-wrenching moment because Mater has been looked down on the entire movie, and for a moment, he considers himself just a stupid joke, too.

I feel like this argument mostly just boils down to "I like this movie. Full stop." The arguments' evidence is purely SUBJECTIVE and not OBJECTIVE which is not a great deffense. I'm not saying you can't like the movie because it is not objectively good, you are in your right to enjoy the movie and no one else is in their right to change your mind and vice versa. OBJECTIVELY SPEAKING - this movie is subpar at best. But SUBJECTIVITY is an entirely different kind of argument. Me personally, I don't hate Cars 2. I don't love it, but I don't hate it either. Let's just say that Cars 2 is one of my least revisited Pixar movies of all time. But I agree in saying that it's not terrible. (That honour goes to The Good Dinosaur). The movie has some great action and I really do think the idea of some conspiracy surrounding car fuel is a creative one. That being said, it doesn't really add onto the themes too much of the first movie nor does it progress Lightning's or Mater's characters in a major way. And Mater is just kind of annoying in this movie... I just think Cars 2 is a poor sequel to Cars 1. I think Cars 2 would have worked BETTER as a spinoff movie. Here's what I'd do to change Cars 2. Keep the two plots, one about Lightning and Mater and the other about the spy cars trying to uncover a conspiracy surrounding the World Grand Prix. I would also take Mater OUT of the spy plotline entirely and replace him with a new rookie spy where this is his first assignment under the guidance of Finn McMissle. This rookie spy initially approaches the mystery with arrogance, but learns quickly the severeity of the situation. Where Lightning's story in the first film was to learn how to take life slowly and appreciate the value in it that isn't just seeking glory and admiration from others, this new rookie spy would learn about the responsibilities of having such a high status and how to take accountability for mistakes. If you really wanna keep Mater in the film in a semi-major role, perhaps the rookie spy and Mater could have a segment where this rookie has to trust a bumbling idiot to help him accomplish his goal which could give the rookie spy a new insight on people who may not be a fully-fletched spy, but are intelligent and powerful in other ways. But, again, I think this would work better as a SPINOFF MOVIE and not a true successor to the first Cars. Essentially, just get rid of the "2" in Cars 2 and add "Spy" before cars, making it "SPY CARS" or something like that. We got Spy Kids and Spy Cars XD

I cried like 4 times watching the wild robot, it's such a good movie and book and I would say this is probably my favourite movie of all time.

YES! I LOVE THIS MOVIE!

People either love sharktale or hate sharktale

They should have marketed it as “Cars: Mater’s Tallest Tale” since the maters tall tales had already been established as the wackier part of the franchise.

The Hardest Thing is a masterpiece, even if it is the hardest thing to swallow

Still doooseny sucks

I understand this perspective, however i disagree with a few points. I am glad that they mentioned the fact that characters do not have to be relatable, I'm also glad that they mentioned the extent of the expectations that fell short and the fact the animation was stunning. saying that however i had a few gripes with some of the points made. 1. Plot rohan mentioned that the plot was very enjoyable, clear and concise. In my opinion, the plot was very messy and lacked clear motives from the antagonist. miles axelrod wanted to make alternative fuels look bad by making race cars using the substance blow up upon using it. as a kid, I'm not sure about how others experienced the movie but it honestly took me till my 3rd or 4th watch of the movie to actually understand why miles would do that, and even now i question why he thought that would work, if anything, he's just promoting cars to be electric, if alternative fuel is bad, and fossil fuels killed the dinosaurs then why would the public choose fossil fuels...? the rest of the plot also just feels like action for the sake of action and if were being honest could have excluded mater entirely and made more sense. the fact the spys believe mater is a spy is a huge stretch, McQueen facing an F1 and being even with it is unrealistic in itself for moterheads watching, the world were placed in is very confusing and there are scenes where the bad guys could have killed the spys like the big ben scene that feel meaningless. the fact holly can fly and there technology can do basically anything is really random, i could go on... 2. Emotional depth i seriously don't know what rohan meant by there being emotional depth, it is such a shallow message and barely gets any focus, the closest it gets to emotion is when McQueen is yelling at mater. i have to admit that had some emotion in the vocals, nonetheless the climax to this message, where McQueen apologises to mater is over shadowed by the spy stuff, we never get to delve on emotion properly or take a moment to absorb a scene, and the emotion in the actual colour theory and music score just don't hit the mark in my opinion. compare this to cars 3, if you somehow get through the scene in smokeys garage without going silent and being fully absorbed, or to some extent getting a tear, you must be emotional developed in a very different direction to me haha. In cars 1 the score alone where McQueen and sally drive through the waterfall trumps any emotion cars 2 gives me, that scene serves so much of the movies message without saying anything, its quite literally poetry in motion. Considering I've watched all these movies an unhealthy amount of times and i cant think of any scenes from cars 2 that give me chills is concerning for rohans point on emotional depth. 3. world expansion this is just a minor nit pick, Rohan mentioned that the world building was great. i don't necessarily disagree fully, however i feel the world building served a huge problem for the franchise. in cars 1 and cars 3, we see segments of the world that don't really make us think which sounds bad, but is actually really good. a world full of sentiant cars is fundamentally flawed, it makes no sense where they come from or how they function, however in cars 1 and 3 we don't really think about that, however at least to me, cars 2 made me just question the universe so much it took a bit of the believability out of the movie. I'm not sure how others felt about that, but that's just my personal thoughts. 4. Characters and mater i don't know if rohan mentioned this very much, but the characters in cars 2, due to there dilouge mainly just feel soooo... bland, McQueen just has no personality, fin mcmissile is actually so stupid if you think about it, holly just feels unrealistic and boring and mater is heavily over done. the scene in cars 3 where McQueen calls mater, that's how mater should have acted during cars 2 for him to actually be a good character, mater is not stupid, he was never explicitly stupid in cars 1, just a bit silly and loud, but not annoying and socially inept. in cars 1 and 3, he's patient, loyal and actually actually funny, not just lol random. the pistachio ice cream scene can be funny to some, but honestly compare it to in cars 1 where he said "you owe me 32 thousand dollars in legal fees" and tell me that's not funnier. conclusion: thanks for reading this far if you bothered. At the end of the day if you enjoy the film that's fine, its a fun movie and if that's good enough for you that's great! for someone that enjoys movies because of the emotional depth, for visual metaphores, colour theory, deep dialogue and just want to feel something from this amazing art form that make our monkey brains feel all tingly and utterly change our neurological pathways, its most likely not quite a mature enough movie for those viewers haha.

this should have more views :)

here before this gets 100K views

11:02 I still love this.

05:11. Or maybe their characters changed?

These movies are not for movie reviewers. It was for people who like Cars.

It’s not

2:45 nah I am Tow-Mater I'm a little special.

If be a good films to remove the Mater scences out

Here's another reason why Cars 2 is so overhated (and the whole Cars franchise in general), is because people for some reason can't take anthropomorphic vehicles seriously, and treat it as a kids thing. But for some reason those same people can take anthropomorphic toys seriously (Toy Story), a kids thing that's actually a kids thing.

It's still far more enjoyable than movies like The Good Dinosaur, Toy Story 4, and Lightyear :D

cars is a franchise for car guys. not movie critics. cars 2 is a spy thriller james bond style as a car guy i just wanna see cars go fast, idc about the other parts. cars 2 has more other parts even if cars entire francize is bad car guys will still watch it, but cars 2 isnt even focused on that neice

I remember my dad taking me to theters to watch this movie. And I really loved it, and it became my favorite cars movie. you should have seen my surprise when I learned years later that people didn't like it. Which I understand because it was more focused on Mater then the racing that made the original cars so great in the first place. but ignoring that, Cars two is still pretty good.

Quite similar to Naruto vs sasuke backstory

I watched Cars 2 yesterday after years without watching it, and lemme say, it was great.

The fact she met anne at 3 years old makes her desperation so much harder. Personally I would not move my daughter away from one of her only friends, especially if they've been friends since being toddlers

This movie was always a really good watch imo and I loved it as a kid, seeing this in cinema when I was young was awesome I know it was toned down a bit, but I still like the darker atmosphere this movie had going for it too even if it was an odd sequel in comparison to the first Cars film. If you haven't seen some of the deleted scenes, they're actually kinda brutal and interesting, I'd recommend looking into them. I know people trash on Cars 2 a lot, and I get it from some points, but I think as it's own standalone thing it really shines, I reckon it would've done better if not treated like a sequel but rather a spin off movie. Also Finn McMissile's oil rig escape sequence was peak, and of course Giacchino had to score his theme for it I'm convinced Giacchino can't physically compose a bad song for any movies he scores for even if he tried.

Long time T fans here. Groeing up watching g one to all the bay films and have to agree, this T One is above them all.

One thing I would like to point out is how for D-16's "Villain's" Journey, Starscream is a better fit for the Old Mentor figure than Alpha Trion. D-16 take's Starscream's "might (cog) makes right" philosophy whereas Orion takes Trion's "spark is what matters not cog," philosophy

aside from dysney and pixar, dreamworks effected your childhood the most? So which is it? Did dysney, and pixar, or dreamworks effect your childhood the most? Kind of a confusing statement. Personally the dreamworks movies are far better than disney, and pixar.

This movies just entertaining which is all that it needs to be. Most problems I have with the movie really apply to the other two, like how they created such advanced architecture and technology with tire hands

it's a great movie but a bad sequel.

cars two is the best of the bunch, much more racing, much more cool spy gadgets, mater was cringey but other than that 😙 moá

Stan and Ford ARE like Dipper and Mabel, Dipper is supposed to be the smart one, but he too makes dumb decisions from time to time, not Just in Sock Opera, and he admits that he uses big words and he doesn’t know what they mean. Mabel is the supposed ‘lovable dummy’, but can also make smart decisions as well.