2023 Mazda CX-50 | MotorWeek Road Test

Over the last few years, Mazda has been re-thinking their SUV lineup, enhancing off-road performance and even adding battery-electric powertrains; all without sacrificing style or the on-road performance the brand has long been known for. And that leads us to this CX-50. Its all-new from Mazda! #Mazda #CX50 #MazdaCX-50
READ THE REVIEW HERE: www.motorweek.org/reviews/roa...
See more of our Road Tests on our website: www.motorweek.org/reviews/roa...
Find airdates on your local PBS station HERE: www.motorweek.org/about/stati...
Want to watch full episodes of MotorWeek? Download the PBS video app for FREE or watch here: www.pbs.org/show/motor-week/
Stay connected with MotorWeek on social media!
Twitter: / motorweek
Facebook: / motorweektv
Instagram: / motorweek
MotorWeek, PBS' award-winning weekly automotive magazine provides unbiased, consumer-oriented car news with feature stories on related topics.

[@sammyt3514]

I remember when John would've called a 7.2 sec 0-60 blistering as opposed to 'leisurely', lol.

[@domjfante8140]

Engine performance has made leaps and bounds since those days

[@sammyt3514]

@@domjfante8140 Indeed.

[@matt4398]

Lets be honest. He's reading a script

[@sammyt3514]

@@matt4398 A script that he wrote.

[@EndeavorsDnB]

Yes, either when u watch a “retro-review” or if u watched him on tv 30 years ago 🥴

[@Billbeheler89]

I like the fact Mazda has made the 6spd transmission work regardless of what other car companies have been doing with 9spd and 10spd transmissions.

[@jbs68]

why?

[@iamalazydog]

6spd automatic more durable and handle more horsepower and torque.

[@fp5495]

Why? It slows the car down significantly, and the gas mileage is below average compared to its rivals with a CVT or a more advanced conventional automatic with more gears. The acceleration would probably improve greatly even with just one more gear, and the MPGs would improve as well. Mazda isn't choosing to use this dated trans because they want to, it's because they have to.

[@fp5495]

​@@iamalazydog LOL. So are all the other conventional transmissions.

[@thetechlibrarian]

⁠@@fp5495 yeah but what are we asking for ? 4 more gear for 1-2mpg with a annoying shift behavior. The transmission is not a normal 6 speed that Mazda uses it locks up a 5 mph and feel direct as a manual transmission or dual clutch. I’m not saying it’s perfect but for all the compromises it’s really not that big of a deal.

[@MetikalMan]

105ft braking is insane for any SUV, let alone a non premium compact model. Wow

[@brianlee9233]

Agreed it is. Also, I thought Mazda wouldn't do stop-start in their cars? Why did they do it in the CX-50?

[@Montana270]

@@brianlee9233 It's not your average Start stop system, doesn't use a starter, look it up 👍

[@jaycobmelo1904]

@@brianlee9233 yeah i don’t like it even if it’s different

[@Eelgnotsa]

I remember when 120 feet was the benchmark for sports cars

[@iamalazydog]

6spd automatic is excellent for good reliability and longevity the newer transmissions with 9 speed or more gears equal more complexity unreliability. What would be awesome would be 6spd manual which is offered over seas.

[@fp5495]

The BMW 8-speed automatic, probably the best in the industry, begs to differ.

[@jbar_85]

Mazda does not play. I saw this on the road recently- gorgeous! Another hit!

[@lukerinderknecht2982]

3:27 Clarification, it is a touchscreen while using Apple CarPlay or Android Auto.

[@Eelgnotsa]

A lot of testers, fail mention, that fact

[@jamesd6801]

9 and 10 speed transmissions seem to be lacking in reliability, while 6 & 8 speed transmissions have been quite reliable. Mazda is being smart here

[@noahboy6349]

Big difference is the CX5 is manufactured in Japan where quality assurance is top priority.

[@jeffpowell4324]

The CX50 engine and transmission are made in Japan..I have a top trim turbo model and can tell you the fit and finish is great!

[@MonicaHolly143]

@@jeffpowell4324 wait till the engine give up on u Mazda's reliability is one of the best but that is only for their na engines turbo models are not that great

[@anthonymiccijr6380]

John is a legend. Great work sir!

[@derspeed5796]

I’m cross shopping this with the RDX. I’ve driven the CX50 with both motors. The turbo is definitely worth the extra money. It does ride a bit firm, but it feels a lot like BMW SUVs I’ve owned. I didn’t find the 6 speed to be an issue. I’m waiting for the Meridian package before I decide.

[@derspeed5796]

@@layne4376 I agree 100%. I’ve driven both. The Mazda is a lot of car for the money. Plus it looks really great. I almost have to convince myself to like the looks of the RDX. I wish It looked more like the MDX. I absolutely hate floating C pillars. I know those are superficial reasons, but I have to look at it every day. The A spec package really helps thec RDX. Neither are BMWs, but I’m done with BMW headaches.

[@googleleavemynamealone9145]

@@derspeed5796 THey might update the looks with a rumored new Type-S RDX?

[@derspeed5796]

@@layne4376 I can’t give BMW any more money. 😬

[@derspeed5796]

@@googleleavemynamealone9145 I don’t think I’m going to buy anything until spring, so hopefully we’ll know by then.

[@derspeed5796]

@@layne4376 I learned a lesson with my first one. I sold my second BMW two years ago when it hit 51,000 miles. They’re definitely awesome to drive until the warranty expires. After that, it’s a white knuckle journey. It wasn’t even really the money, it was just how many times I had to take it to the dealership. I drove so many new BMW loaner cars, I lost count.

[@SaidAlSeveres]

Not gonna complain on the lagging if we are getting 90 in 15 seconds. I’m not a race car driver & I don’t think anyone else around me is. This car is just checking every freaking box imaginable.

[@ezrashonor]

I'd have to see the size in person. We shopped Mazda when we got our 2020 Santa Fe but the CX5 seemed too small and the CX9 a little bulbous. Missing was the long discontinued CX7 which likely would have been just right...

[@ChrisDIYerOklahoma]

Saw one parked at the casino last night. My jaw dropped. I am 53 yrs old and have owned two Mazda 3's and a CX7 (turbo). They were all great and sporty running machines. I am looking for a small vehicle (like this CX-50) that isn't too "girly" or grandma's grocery getter looking. As I watched this video, it seemed MotorWeek is kinda hard on this new CX-50...to me, 7.2 seconds to 0-60 is plenty fast and the braking distance is exemplary for this category. So, don't bash Mazda...their soul is on Germany's Autobahn and actually listen to what Americans want.

[@kevincaldwell4707]

I have a 2022 Mazda CX-30, works for me so far, might go for this CX-50 in a few years

[@glsracer]

Seems like a nice addition to Mazda's lineup but that 9k USD jump to get the turbo is an interesting gamble. It jumps from great value to entry level luxury pricing, which it might deserve, but may give some pause.

[@alwaysup22]

When you can buy a well equipped Toyota Camry for $35k, this does not seem like such a bad deal. Try getting a compact luxury SUV for $38K these days... not gonna happen

[@potownrob]

Part of it is you have to step up to the higher trims to get the turbo engine.

[@spinedoc893]

As potownrob says the reason the turbo seems expensive is that it's only available on higher trim levels. If you compare equivalent trim levels with and without the turbo the price difference is about $2500 which is actually pretty good value for the increase in power you get. I think a vehicle of this size with the 187hp naturally aspirated engine would be pretty sluggish.

[@glsracer]

@@spinedoc893 yeah it's definitely a market segmentation game.

[@gregholman2930]

I'm diggin' the exterior a lot more than the interior, I had a 2017 Mazda 6 and this CX-50 has essentially the same set up except for the seats & dash stitching. I also could do without the plastic moulding, much too much for my taste.

[@donaldames124]

Better than CX-5? I don't think so, and I'm disappointed that you would make such a statement. Better? No! Different? Yes!

[@jeffreye4537]

We’re trading our 5 for the 50. It’s worlds better. The 5 just feels old now since it’s relatively unchanged since 2017.

[@nibinsasidharan55]

Nicely made video..! I mean reminds me of the old videos..!

[@MetikalMan]

I just saw one of these on the road. Lots of presence. They really should have marketed it as the CX5 replacement since that is what it is.

[@Funkoattic]

It is it's replacement. Mazda just has not formally announced it because it has tons of CX5's that still need to be sold. One more model year for the CX5 , then say goodbye 🫂

[@nitroforce87]

@@Funkoattic exactly, they still need to sell all the CX-5s they can, give it one or two more model years and then it's gone. That being said, I do want to see how the CX-70 and CX-90 turn out, all that we know about them at the moment is that they'll be RWD and have the new inline-6 engine

[@qnzman578]

Cx5 is mazdas best selling vehicle and this cx50 is different enough that they can both coexist in mazdas lineup, they're catered towards different audiences I'm doubtful the cx5 is getting discontinued anytime soon

[@MadStyle1911]

It's not a replacement, CX5 is not going anywhere, it's Mazda bread and butter and Mazda already said the CX-5 is not going anywhere..

[@architecturedraft5559]

They are 2 separate cars for two separate markets. The cx5 is sleek and city, while the cx 50 is suppose to cater to a more outdoorsy person. Cx5 isn’t going any where it’s the best selling vehicle why would they stop selling it. Me however cx50 all the way

[@hertzair1186]

How times have changed…I remember when 0-60 in 7.2 was fast for a sports car (1984 300ZX Turbo and 1984 Corvette)

[@Eelgnotsa]

Same thing with 120 feet breaking from 60 was sports car territory

[@AndresSalazarAutos]

105ft is impressive, there are some sport cars that take longer, amazing actually

[@arxx9580]

This video looks like its from the early 2000’s 😂

[@duhitsbautista]

idk why, but I'm into it 😅

[@M167A1]

Ordered one... Hopefully here by the end of the month

[@dennisd4452]

How does the headlights do at night time?

[@AtlasCroc]

Not sure why everyone bags on the 6 speed - the 8 & 10 speeds are there pretty much to mask the inadequate engines most makers put in their cars now, and to appease the fuel nazis. I'd rather have something that winds out a bit and holds a gear a bit longer. 8 and 10 speeds are constantly changing gears in normal driving - it can be an annoyance. Get on the throttle - they jump down 3 gears - as soon as you let off, they are back at 10. Don't care about a couple tenths of a second - much rather have something I want to drive. This thing sounds awesome on the road and doesn't appear to be slow at all. BTW - most other road tests have the 0-60 much lower. Car and Driver had it at 6.6 seconds and praised the acceleration.

[@broeheemed32]

You can say that again. All of it. I had the displeasure of renting a 2021 Camry with the 8-speed, and you're spot on about the acceleration. At about 50 MPH, I swear it went from 7th or 8th (I didn't bother counting gears) to what felt like 2nd........ then wouldn't let go until it redlined for a couple seconds, then dropped to 7th...... or maybe 6th. Who even knows? If every car didn't top out with a buzzy turbo 4, all those gears wouldn't be necessary at all. Even most pickups are all about buzzy 4's now....... shameful. It's a dark day for cars.

[@wholespeed]

Is the crash helmet necessary in a vehicle with these handling limits?

[@robpiazza3033]

I've had the pleasure of riding in one of these. Inside out an outstanding vehicle.

[@gregania9037]

I have this car, I have driven it 15,000 miles and I will tell you about the serious flaws, which surprised me. The first is the windshield wipers not working properly in heavy rain. They seem to take a 1-second break, which is very dangerous while driving! The second disadvantage is the wide windshield pillars, which greatly limit visibility when leaving an unmanageable road... The third disadvantage is the LED headlights, replacing the bulb would cost $30, but it can't be done here, you have to buy the entire headlight for $1,000!!! The fourth disadvantage is the lack of illumination of the glove compartments, no heating of the mirrors, and very awkward switching on of the air conditioning (no visible indicator light). The fifth disadvantage is that, according to the manufacturer, the car has 260 HP, but for me it has no more than 180 HP in normal operation... It only starts driving after switching to sport mode. quite good.... For me, a car that costs 50,000 should have better refined details, although the finish inside the car is very satisfactory... .......... ----- I forgot about one rather serious fault of the car... Even though the car has 4-wheel drive, it behaves in corners like a front-wheel drive oversteer... You have to hold the steering wheel very hard to avoid falling out of the corner during quick maneuvers, although it must be admitted that the system is very precise and responds well in extreme conditions... I'm talking about speeds of 70-100 miles per hour...... If the drive was distributed 60% to 40%, there would be no need to take the steering wheel out of your hands...

[@abcdLeeXY]

I'm liking the more masculine line on these new Mazda products. Can't wait for the NE to release.

[@JohnsTrainVideos]

How is it both lower to the ground, and yet it has more ground clearance?

[@WeAreNotSheep2023]

Beautiful SUV!

[@wbwayne8887]

Not a fan of the squared off wheel wells. Or the vast areas of plastic cladding, however after seeing one in white yesterday, have to admit it looks better in person. It has alot of presence on the road.

[@dave1956]

Me too on the lower body plastic cladding. It’s a little too much.

[@wbwayne8887]

@@sandiegoavgeek6 I look at ALL cars and critique all designs. Haven't found a perfect car, truck, crossover, or suv yet. That's why everyone has their own OPINIONS. I value yours as well.

[@dave1956]

@@sandiegoavgeek6 It’s entirely individual taste. I don’t believe that there is a vehicle currently made that I like every element of the styling. It doesn’t mean that I wouldn’t buy the vehicle, I am merely stating that there are some elements of the design that don’t excite me.

[@frederickmiller5492]

@@sandiegoavgeek6 have you seen the CX-30? it's body cladding is out of control. I'm shocked Mazda has put so much effort into cladding, since their cars usually are so streamlined and beautiful. To be fair - MANY other manufacturers have also convinced themselves that cladding = SUV. I'm not sure I agree.

[@coastalbeer]

People like the SUVs and crossovers because of the elevated view of the road and the space inside. The added benefit of extra ground clearance and a more rugged chassis handling potholes is a bonus. It's a no- brainer!

[@NoToBigBro]

Is that a roof rack or just an oversized rain gutter?

[@nateapostol7932]

I wished CX 50 Is more economical in mpg. Is Hi brid in d making?

[@JolliAllGenGamer]

I agree with John this CX-50 needs an 8, 9, or 10 speed auto or even a 6 speed manual. Unfortunately the CX-5 will be discontinued prob in 2023 or 2024.

[@MrMuchachos75]

Nope. It’s being redesigned. Where do u get that info

[@rafal4052]

Love my cx5

[@ebenezerkittoe9115]

John Davis has been reviewing cars for Motorweek for 40 years. That's what I call job experience!

[@thepar7575]

He is a good reporter, yet reports on information given to him by the team that has changed significantly over the years.

[@chuckers40]

Over 40 years . The show is in its 42nd season.

[@thepar7575]

Know that and watch it.

[@coletrickle581]

I like the current lineup at Mazda, but it sucks that the 6 is gone. That was a beautiful sedan in the right colors. The MX-5 is the crown jewel, but once it becomes electric only, it's days are numbered.

[@user-tb7rn1il3q]

The sedan has gone extinct. You can’t blame Mazda. No one wants them.

[@jimb-dallas4349]

I very much like the new CX-50. Love the look, like the updated interior design and for sure getting wireless Android and CarPlay. I got to drive one out on the freeway today. Below 55 it is nice and quiet. But 60 and above there was a strong higher frequency sound that seemed to come from the rear. Not sure if it is the solid torsion bar suspension or what, but a long road trip with that high roar would be NO fun. Salesman said, but it was designed for the off-road folks. It is marginally more capable than a CX-5, not really bowling over the off road market. Silence or seriously mute that roar and I would own one in a minute. But I would prefer to be able to hear when I arrive.

[@mackfar27]

The reason why the turbo engine in this particular Mazda is lagging is because they are using the same engine in the Mazda 3 turbo hatchback, Mazda 6, CX5, and CX9. All have the same performances specs. Just different output due to the applications weight.

[@jaydibernardo4320]

No mention of mpg? Just curious as my CX-30 N/A is averaging just over 31. 36 mpg on the highway. I met a man with a CX-5 Turbo model, he said he was averaging 25mpg. I would expect this heavier CX-50 to do less then that.

[@jeffpowell4324]

Recently did a road trip in a CX50 Turbo... real-world MPG is around 21.

[@jaydibernardo4320]

@@jeffpowell4324 Thx for the info

[@morganlingsweiler9813]

Dang man, is that with a heavy foot though?!@@jeffpowell4324

[@T2HeadedEagle]

Can you get this without the Turbo?

[@thepar7575]

Not sure how they can criticize the performance of the CX-5 vs CX-50. The CX-5 has been a good seller and reliable vehicle for Mazda. We own a 2020 with nearly 28,000 miles and have made long trips and for this size car, can not be more satisfied. Only disadvantage the CX-5 did not have the turbo.

[@WSNO]

This is the car for you if your only personality trait is making sure that the autobody shop remembers the chrome trim on the rear bumper, no not the plastic trim the CHROME trim i paid $500 extra for it put it on

[@mfranklinism]

I have a 16.5 CX5 that was bought new. Have 86k miles on it, and it has been great. I still don’t see the value from 28 to 40k for turbo. I would get a X3 at that point. View Mazda is a slow BMW with better quality interior and reliability.

[@johnbrennan9584]

I remember a more thorough video review. I guess this was shortened for KZbin.

[@squonk2902]

This is a possible new car for me soon. I really like that Mazda does NOT use a CVT transmission.

[@capitanothegreat3994]

Only the Zonk is No Touch Screen but what a Majestic Vehicle

[@jeffpowell4324]

It's a non-issue...the interface is great and very intuative.

[@mbox314]

Another small SUV! Just what the world needs!

[@jeremybriseno9570]

I mean, yeah, it is what the world needs, because it's obviously what sells? They wouldn't keep making these if it wasn't what people wanted. You are in the vocal minority here, because as much as people love to complain about crossovers, they sell like hot cakes and the dealers can't keep the more popular models on the lots right now.

[@cgreenfield6655]

This is a super handsome vehicle!

[@markwarchol3139]

Really nice looking vehicle but when you pack on all the options and go the high end this car will end up costing you close to $50,000! Which in my thought mind is a little more expensive than what I think it should be worth! Although it looks like a superior vehicle but price is a bit too high!

[@coflyer2949]

I added all the options to the high end turbo and only got to 45K. The way I'd spec it is 37k

[@Smileydudekxy]

I paid 50k for this after taxes

[@Smileydudekxy]

@@coflyer2949 I bought this mazda after taxes it was 50k

[@bryton2890]

As someone with a '21 CX-5 signature, I'm having a hard time finding exactly what this car does better.. I do love its looks, and the subtle interior differences, but it just seems difficult to justify.

[@theforgottenorg]

I didn't get it either from this video.

[@MadStyle1911]

It comes down to aesthetics, some do not like the look of the Cx5 but like the Cx-50.

[@architecturedraft5559]

Cx5 is catered to city life the other more outdoorsy environment

[@1vw4me]

We've got the same. It's really just a beefier exterior appearance package on a lifted CX-30, and made in America. I wouldn't trade our Japan-made CX-5's for an American-made CX-50 in a million years. The Japanese know what "quality control" is, the hicks in Alabama DO NOT.

[@architecturedraft5559]

@@1vw4me disagree entirely. That’s messed up btw

[@ivan72087]

1st love mazda! Zoom zoom

[@triphop7600]

Um the CX50 infotainment DOES have a touchscreen while using Apple Carplay.

[@IVR02]

I find it odd that Mazda is keeping the CX5 alongside this, but disconintuining the 6. I feel like this could've shared a nice co-existence with the 6, whereas it makes the CX5 a bit redundant. Plus, correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the CX30 replace the CX3? I like the styling of it, although I think in some ways it looks a bit awkward compared to the CX30. It definitely looks more like a wagon than an SUV, like how the CX30 feels more like a hatchback than an SUV, to the point where I feel like the term "SUV" has really just become a trendy way to refer to wagons. I've had positive experiences with the CX30, since a friend of mine has one as his daily driver, and from what I see here, the CX50 seems to be more of the same. Still, I think it sucks to see the 6 go. I've had equally good experiences with the 6, since that same friend's mother has one as her daily driver, so I feel that cutting it out of the lineup is a foolish choice on Mazda's behalf.

[@terrellrobertson2258]

N86th st

[@redneon06]

It’s so pretty!

[@ShanerTheGrey]

Wow everybody is still alive!

[@harrybaulz666]

Has john ever given an honest review

[@K03sport]

I would have thought by now Mazda would have added a 7th gear to this transmission by now. This (CX-50 turbo) or the CX-9...have a '16 CX-5 and want more space and no cvt. Atlas/Crossport are also on the list and maybe even a Grand Cherokee (maybe)

[@thepar7575]

Additional gears do not necessarily translate to better performance, especially MPG.

[@tootsie5052]

I'll keep my 2016 CX-5.

[@thekhakiobserver3128]

It looks good, except for 9k to add a turbo?!

[@mulletsquirrel]

Turbo only comes on higher trims

[@Mx5pro]

Need this car in dark forest green color

[@farcinue]

You had me at “drives like a Mazda”. If you are shopping for a cuv, make sure to test drive a cx5 or cx50 and you will understand why reviewers always say that phrase. I finally saw a cx50 on the road, and it looked sharp. I want Mazda to update the cx30 along this design theme.

[@foxtrot685]

I want Mazda to paint those awful huge swaths of black plastic on the wheel well arches or get rid of them entirely. It ruins a not bad design and makes it look super cheap.

[@tmklunk]

Recently bought a Cx-3 and love the handling

[@revelare_xvii6269]

This thing would’ve melted the brains of 1980s muscle car enthusiasts with that speed.

[@cdnsilentk]

Hmm... I have a 2019 CX-5 Signature and the ONLY thing on this that seems better is the pano roof. I'm sure the next gen of CX-5 will have it. I wouldn't buy a Mazda that isn't made in Japan, so I'll wait.

[@bobb.7899]

And not one mention of road noise. It is NOT superior to the CX-5. I drove both back to back and twice the noise in the CX-50. Also a much harsher ride. As a plus CX-4 built in Japan. After driving I bought a CX-5. I got rid of my RAV4 as the noise was driving me crazy. Have owned 3 RAV4’s. I love my CX-5. Fun to drive and a lot quieter than the CX-50 and RAV4. Test drive each before you buy and you will thank me.

[@imdone1965]

I did , bought the CX-50

[@antoniograves2293]

That transmission is holding this back should be way quicker off the line IMO.

[@ethany7708]

I don't understand why they don't source the ZF 8 speed which is a fantastic transmission. Might not be the latest but would make it perform well.

[@antoniograves2293]

@@ethany7708 absolutely agree I have a Grand Cherokee and the zf is amazing Esp under throttle

[@allentoyokawa9068]

@@ethany7708 zf is german made junk

[@terence4427]

How is this vehicle really different than any other soccer mom CUV you find on the road? I test drove the CX-50 because I thought it was supposed to be more off-road capable than other CUVs but I wasn't very impressed. I'm sure mom's and dad's toting kids to soccer practice might like it.

[@jordanimatedstreaming]

music is too loud

[@nickcascioli7436]

I absolutely love the look of this Mazda inside and out. But, I’m sure like many others feel, the performance off the line is disappointing for a crossover with such impressive power figures. Mazda needs a new automatic and hopefully will put that into production with this vehicle soon. With something more modern it should easily post sub 7 0 to 60 times.

[@imdone1965]

It's a crossover , not a sports car!

[@frankcandor6896]

10k for a turbo?

[@user-cj4sm8hv9y]

Ten Times Better

[@riotfiftyk5508]

12 months later, any updates?

[@1vw4me]

This is built upon the CX-30's frame, NOT the CX-5. The interior layout is the same as well. It's basically a CX-30 with a beefed up Subaru-looking exterior trim package. The CX-5 isn't going anywhere, that's MAZDA's #1 selling vehicle. The CX-5 is also fully made in Japan. The quality sure shows it. I wouldn't trade a Japan-made vehicle for a USA one in a million years. They can keep it.

[@user-tb7rn1il3q]

There is not much difference in cars made in Japan vs the US. In fact US made is generally a little better.

[@AtlasCroc]

Were you not listening? The plant where this is made is a join effort between Toyota and Mazda. Now I'm not a fan of Toyota simply because they don't sell anything I like - but there is no denying they know the right methods to build a solid / reliable car. I'd also rather buy something well designed and implemented - and then built in the US. We have done it great in the past - and can do it again. I will be looking at one of these this week for sure.

[@saintsubie6661]

The modern Subaru "SUVs" (Crosstrek, Outback, Forester) actually have very little standard body cladding.

[@nosah8415]

I think it looks awesome. I love that paint. But that infotainment system sucks and it needs at least an 8 speed.

[@allentoyokawa9068]

NO

[@nosah8415]

@@allentoyokawa9068 YES

[@sandiegoavgeek6]

@@nosah8415 Explain how 2 more gears would help the car, are you SURE an 8 speed would improve performance? A 6 speed isn't capable of being upgraded to where it might out perform an 8 speed?

[@bigbige559]

I’ll never understand why more and more people are gravitating towards SUVs and crossovers. :/

[@imdone1965]

Space....any other questions?

[@kevinbreese5739]

Looks fantastic inside and out but 7.2 seconds 0-60, and 15.3/90mph 1/4 mile in 2022 is very slow. Seems almost like the HP/TQ numbers are inflated. Maybe they were only running regular unleaded which drops the numbers to like 220hp/310 tq, but even then, it's still slow.

[@TimZ007]

Old Turbo mazdaspeed 3 was about 5.8 with FWD only. This should be mid 5s at least. I am disappointed to say the least.

[@morrisf3957]

cx5 mazda best seller.its staying

[@krismine99]

This gives off mid 2000s vibes

[@noseefood1943]

Still 6 spd?

[@wantapgt]

Those acceleration specs seem way off. Our CX-5 turbo can run in the high 5’s and the 1/4 in 14’s. Something ain’t right. This CX50 is not that much heavier to justify so much slower times.

[@sasothestrategizer]

@DavidRC That is correct. Mazda doesn’t do acceleration times well. I still like them though.

[@wantapgt]

@DavidRC maybe I’m off. We traded it a year ago for an Explorer ST.

[@xeong5]

Perhaps you were dreaming and thinking of the Golf R.

[@rightlanehog3151]

Unless someone else is paying for your gas, wait for the Hybrid .

[@officialyasir]

Please turn down the background music, it's a car review not a party. 😂

[@CalvinHikes]

Bru thats a Rav4

[@755hp]

This thing is going to sell…

[@pgslotwatch6458]

Cx50 looks chiseled compared to the jelly bean Cx5, needs 8 speed to be current. Interior looks a little odd too, missing something just below the screen.

[@user-pg9fv7su8q]

Mazda get rid of the plastic body cladding!!! Ugg

[@allentoyokawa9068]

looks fine

[@user-pg9fv7su8q]

@@allentoyokawa9068 give it another 5 to 7 years and it'll be all faded

[@qnzman578]

That's my main issue with the cx-30, way too plastic cladding

[@allentoyokawa9068]

WILL SELL LIKE HOTCAKES!

[@jaffarbaqi]

Mazdas ride generally stiffer than the competition, sadly removing them from my short list. This one has the looks and the space. Shame that firmness continues.

[@xeong5]

This man wants magnetic suspension without actually paying for magnetic suspension. You can’t have both unless it’s a GM vehicle with that type of setup.

[@paranromallover4543]

I find my cx-30 suspension just perfect. Remember you don't want a super soft suspension so you can fall asleep behind the wheel. You have to feel the road and be alert so you don't cause an accident.

[@donaldames124]

I've owned several BMWs during my driving life, and find the CX-5s handling, steering and ride very similar to what BMW offers.

[@sportsMike87]

Eating at their own sales. Remember the cx3 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@wwjj64]

poor review.....the info system is touch now.

[@MoMo-ve7yq]

37k for that ? I take Toyota RAV4 hybrid all year long

[@tedschmitt178]

It needs a 6-speed and a third pedal to make it perfect.

[@jneptune1540]

These car makers….

[@martinfarrell5778]

The 9 and 10 speeds are very problematic, will stay with the 6 speed.

[@dbrxsdgo]

Leisurely jog? 7.2 seconds is more than adequate. Auto industry, in all regards, really needs to stop pushing unnecessary acceleration, speed, power, etc. aspirations. Every vehicle is a potential deadly weapon on wheels. Let's do our best to mitigate this. 🙄🤦‍♂️

[@justmy2cents_]

Mazda seems to be unsure of which direction they really want to go these days? Nothing exciting or top notch to even consider them as first option! Don't understand their emphasis on success,or are they just content on being mediocre! Hyundai & Kia has long surpassed their innovation & aggressiveness sadly! What happened to Zoom Zoom?? They have no passion or design philosophy it seems!

[@imdone1965]

Kia , Hyundai... You can have that garbage!

[@419rlanthony]

Pretty much only 1 vehicle road test each week. Don't over do yourselves now... 😧

[@wbwayne8887]

Motorweek is a TV show as well as a YT channel. For the almost 40 years I have followed MW, they have always done one road test a week. There are plenty of other dedicated you tubers that will fill your itch. 😂

[@Lrules364]

Just another bland and boring crossover, in a field filled with bland and boring crossovers. Nothing new, exciting, or even interesting here.