5 Common Rumors About the Bible that Aren't True

Have you ever heard a rumor about the Bible or a Bible character only to search Bible for yourself only to find out it's not actually in there? Today we'll talk about some common "rumors" about the Bible that aren't actually true. Have you ever heard any of these rumors?
To order Alisa’s book, “Another Gospel”: www.alisachilders.com/anotherg...
This video is not sponsored. Product links are affiliate links which means if you buy something we'll receive a small commission.
For all links to Alisa’s recommended reading, podcast studio gear and other items,
visit the Alisa Childers Amazon Store at www.amazon.com/shop/alisachilders

[@mariusvorster6680]

Apparently it's Biblical for a husband to make coffee for his wife... it's written somewhere in "He-brews"

[@nanyummyify]

😆

[@6059nuy]

I heard that too from Joel Osteen.

[@francesbethodendahl8527]

😅 Brewing coffee, for your spouse is fine. Love your wives, as you love your own body. Or as Jesus loves the church.

[@mbgrafix]

The rumor is true that the disciples all had to share one, small car, manufactured by Honda... _"And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with _*_one accord_*_ in one place."_ - Acts 2:1

[@GodGirl254]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@sonofblessed]

Mike, Pentecost (Shavuot) is a _yom tov,_ and so the disciples wouldn't have been driving, _unless_ they drove to Shul before it started and parked it nearby.

[@lexxbrown2075]

Im screaming 😂😂😂🚮

[@faithbarbara1990]

Not funny at all.

[@AButterflyinChrist]

😂😂😂😂😂👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

[@samanthabotha3456]

I once read an article, I wish I had this article to show as reference now! Anyway I remember that it was written by a Jewish man who said that the historical manger was not a feeding trough. A manger was a room (probably at the bottom of the house)where they kept the white lambs. It was swept clean and the lambs legs were bandaged in swaddling to prevent them from getting dirty. These were the lambs (without spot or blemish) taken to the temple for sacrifice. This makes so much sense to me. That Jesus (the Lamb of God) would be born in a "manger", the ultimate sacrificial Lamb. It would be suitable because it was kept so clean. Interesting!

[@el-sig2249]

You're absolutely right! And that's why sola scriptura doesn't work, because it can never account for such details and nuances. It also demonstrates His divine humility! How wonderful is our God! 👏🏽

[@el-sig2249]

You're absolutely right! And that's why sola scriptura doesn't work, because it can never account for such details and nuances. It also demonstrates His divine humility! How wonderful is our God! 👏🏽

[@mickqQ]

@el-sig Not at all wonderful

[@sonofblessed]

@@el-sig2249 Be careful. :) Keep questioning Sola Scriptura and you'll end up understanding why Orthodox Jews observe the Oral Law.

[@el-sig2249]

@@sonofblessed Right! 👍🏽

[@BackToLife2]

My only question is why do a lot of us call ppl in the Bible characters when they were actually ppl?

[@allenbates4163]

Amen

[@attieschutte7116]

99% of it is mythology that tries to explains the relations between star constilations and various tribes. Esau and Jacob just jumps to mind. There is almost zero historical proof for any of it. Mark the first gospel had no nativity or ascention into heaven. Moses and Abraham is entirely fictional.

[@theolajola]

@@attieschutte7116 Says who?

[@attieschutte7116]

@@theolajola It is called history and those researching it is called historians. If you really want to learn something different watch a few vids by critical Bible scholars like dr Robert Price and Dr Richard Carrier. They reignited my love of the Bible.

[@godgiven3374]

@@attieschutte7116 what do you say to this? kzbin.info/www/bejne/bGjYm2Wnq7aclc0

[@tomsinclair1264]

It's interesting what you discover when you actually read the Bible.

[@mbsilver]

I learned that there wasn’t 3 wise men! The bible teaches there were wise men and they brought 3 gifts.

[@damarismbatia2029]

Read Mathew 2 isn't good to say something you don't know

[@mbsilver]

@@damarismbatia2029 please correct me where I am wrong?

[@damarismbatia2029]

@@mbsilver you learned that there was no 3 wise men😲😲😲

[@mbsilver]

@@damarismbatia2029 that is correct, the bible teaches, in Matthew 2, that wise men came from the east, verse 1. In verse 11 3 gifts are mentioned, but never once is it said that there were only 3 wise men, in fact, no number of men are given.

[@benantell5452]

@@mbsilver The Old Testament mentions them. They came on camels, and they were many...look it up!

[@allenbates4163]

Yes, these aren’t characters. They were people.

[@brandonmshrock]

I'm kind of relieved about the "Lucifer not being the worship leader" one. I've always felt that was held against me as a musician!

[@michaelmichael11]

I think most of these rumors got started because Jesus spoke in a slightly different English dialect than the King James authors 😉

[@el-sig2249]

🤣

[@ClarifyingChrist]

😂😂

[@aimeekreutzer-malkawi]

🤣

[@w.d.2018]

😂😂😂

[@sonarsinger]

😆

[@RaChElRoBiNsOn1555]

As long as we understand the Gospel we can sort the rest out later, no need to stress to much about this stuff. If we just keep praying and reading the Bible God will teach us what he wants us to learn 😀❤️

[@velkyn1]

so how does that work with every sect of Christianity claiming this and you all disagreeing?

[@RaChElRoBiNsOn1555]

@Aaron W. C. I'm not from the USA but that's an interesting opinion that Thomas had, I wish you the best. 😀

[@donjon2023]

The church is the pillar of truth, so says the Bible.

[@RaChElRoBiNsOn1555]

@Aaron W. C. I'm sensing a lot of anger coming from you. I'll pray for you 🙏😂😂

[@classicalteacher]

@Aaron W. C. What happened to you that caused you to hate Christianity? Did someone hurt you?

[@tendermercies8601]

Read your own Bible y'all! See it for yourself. Thank you Mrs Childers! This is amazing, I actually love all of your videos. Keep speaking the truth.

[@CluelessPictures]

Sticking with Christmas, the number of "wise men" that came to see Jesus is a very common misconception. I heard it nonstop growing up (plus virtually every nativity scene/play/movie depicts it) that there were 3 "wise men". Of course the Bible doesn't give a hard number. It just says magi(translated to wise men). Many traditions assume 3 because they brought 3 distinct gifts.

[@maxiomburrows2099]

also the "wise men" most likely showed up anywhere between 40days to 2years after the birth, only the shepherds were directed to go. Might also want to add that the account of his birth were not written by witnesses.

[@NicholasproclaimerofMessiah]

@@maxiomburrows2099 God witnessed the birth, and God wrote the accounts; so they were written by a witness.

[@maxiomburrows2099]

@@NicholasproclaimerofMessiah As a fellow brother in the Christ Yeshua I would agree, however if presenting such to those of another faith be it a religion or science alone, It is good to be ready to defend your trust in the evidence available from all angles.

[@brianjohnson8666]

The word Magi doea not mean wise men per se. It is loosely translated magician, a member is a priestly caste of ancient Persia.

[@rockandsandapologetics7254]

@@brianjohnson8666 According to Strong's Concordance the word translated as "wise men," is "magos" and means "a magus, sage of the magician religion, magician, astrologer, wise man." Making the terms "magi," "wise men," and "astrologers" all proper translations. Since they are coming from the East it is altogether possible these were astrologers out of Persia. Yet even that, like there number, is not specified in the Bible.

[@michaelglass9604]

I used to visit my grandmother's church when 8 year old. I spent Christmas vacation with her one time and all the parts in the Christmas play had been filled by the regularly attending children . I was very sad and a woman managing the play said I could be the yule log carrier. I accepted the role but later after reading the passage I remember protesting that there was no such thing as a yule log. I was criticized for refusing to carry this log. I ended up just following the Wiseman up the church aisle. Yes I was just 8 but I could read.

[@LivingOnPurpose1]

Very good 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾 Not easily deceived.

[@michelemoneywell8765]

Yahushua was no longer an infant when the wise men appeared. I don't know why they didn't make you a shepherd.

[@carolberubee]

Excellent! Yule logs were added to the festivities centuries later, not at His birth in Bethlehem.

[@joyfulpreterist7532]

Well make sure everyone cuts Santa Claus out of their Christmas because he's not in the bible. Neither is Christmas for that matter. So much pagan stuff that Christians are happy to use so they can have one foot in the world

[@RameshRambling]

Some scholars believe that Moses was making reference to his inability to speak Hebrew fluently. Because he grew up in the “ways of Egypt” - and was mighty in word and deed, as Stephen said - he didn’t speak Hebrew with the right accent. Therefore, he wouldn’t have the social equity to be the leader of the Israelites.

[@vinkelheimer]

I really appreciate your thorough reading of scripture. As Paul instructed Timothy, we should diligently study so that we can "rightly divide" the word of God (2 Tim. 2:15).

[@danaegore3815]

Today, a lady at my church was talking about Elijah being taken up in the chariot and I corrected her, saying it was a whirlwind. She was shocked and thankful for the correction. She had always been taught he was taken up in the chariot through art and songs as she grew up; she’s in her70’s. I used to think similar as well, and it’s why I always encourage people to read their bibles. The smallest change can make a huge difference. Som people are shocked to find that Elisha was with him, and that if he wanted a double portion, he had to see when he was taken; the chariot was a distraction. Elisha kept his eyes on his master and that is such a powerful lesson.

[@NicholasproclaimerofMessiah]

I think the chariot is a prophetic expression of the spirit/wind that carried Eliyah away. The word "spirit" means "gust of air" so a whirlwind is symbolic of spirit. I don't think it was a distraction, rather I find it ironic that you offered an extra-biblical interpretation. Now, I've offered an interpretation too, but I said "I think" whereas you stated your interpretation as fact. If my thought is correct, then the chariot is one and the same as the whirlwind; so that's a significant possibility unless we have reason to reject it. I mean, I don't have that text memorized or anything, maybe I'm missing something. I'm going to start daily Scripture reviews soon (as in KZbin videos on my channel), so in a few years I'll know our Bible much more exactly than I do now.

[@TheBlubunni]

And it came to pass, when they were gone over, that Elijah said unto Elisha, Ask what I shall do for thee, before I be taken away from thee. And Elisha said, I pray thee, let a double portion of thy spirit be upon me. And he said, Thou hast asked a hard thing: nevertheless, if thou see me when I am taken from thee, it shall be so unto thee; but if not, it shall not be so. And it came to pass, as they still went on, and talked, that, behold, there appeared a chariot of fire, and horses of fire, and parted them both asunder; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven. And Elisha saw it, and he cried, My father, my father, the chariot of Israel, and the horsemen thereof. And he saw him no more: and he took hold of his own clothes, and rent them in two pieces. He took up also the mantle of Elijah that fell from him, and went back, and stood by the bank of Jordan; 2 Kings 2:9‭-‬13 KJV

[@nmariejenkins2041]

Yes there was a whirlwind, but God wanted Elijah to have nice wheels in which to travel. Ha!

[@BlessedGrant]

@@nmariejenkins2041 lol

[@ruthiemay4799]

Amazing what people think they know without reading the Bible for themselves. There is a verse that reads, "the traditions of men make the Word of GOD to no effect."

[@lavie-enlyons8692]

I was always taught that the teaching of the Satan being a sort of worship leader before his rebellion was related to the understanding that he is a cherub/seraphim- one of the living creatures that are directly beneath the throne of God. In Revelation, the four living creatures seem to have a connection to when worship starts and stops. I thought that was why the Satan is said to have once been a “worship leader.” Either way, thank you for this video and information! It’s always a joy to try to learn and understand Scripture more, and correct any misconceptions I hold.

[@nickwadson5731]

Here's another missed point of a Bible passage: The Widow's Mite. It is often thought it is an admonition for sacrificial giving - perhaps but that is secondary. The passage is an implied rebuke from Jesus concerning the Pharisees who put this woman in her penury. This theme flows from the previous chapter. There are NO adjectives commending the widow for her offering or condemning those who gave out of their abundance. Jesus made a stark observation.

[@MrsYoung-in9ov]

He also wasn’t born on December 25 😉

[@alesiamcwilliams8878]

Wait. WHAT?!😱

[@MrsYoung-in9ov]

@@alesiamcwilliams8878 most likely in the fall on Sukkot or some think in the spring during Passover (I personally think Sukkot). He may have been “conceived” on Hanukkah in December however. It has to do with the dates that Zachariah would have been in the temple in his rotation when John the Baptist was conceived and then calculating Mary’s pregnancy by Elizabeth’s.

[@MrsYoung-in9ov]

@@alesiamcwilliams8878 one big giveaway is that the shepherds wouldn’t have been in the fields in December.

[@BOBANDVEG]

@@alesiamcwilliams8878 Well...... if its summer on this side of the globe, then its winter on that side. Vice versa

[@TheTraindriver85]

From things I’ve seen, it’s about March 20th

[@WillEhrendreich]

Fantastic stuff as always, Mrs Childers!

[@ronmortimer252]

I could add a sixth common rumour. Adam and Eve ate an apple from an apple tree and that was their sin for which God condemned mankind to guaranteed eventual death. That's one I believed until a pastor's wife, way back when I was converted in the 1970's, told me there was no apple involved. It was a tree called the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Talk about an eye opening moment.

[@wisewoman4950]

Lol at the eye opening moment. 😄😁 "...and their eyes were opened"

[@EricPement]

The word "apple" in Old English (16th century and before) was a generic term that could designate any fruit, and was not limited to the red or yellow apples we eat today. Over the centuries, the denotation changed, becoming progressively more specific. Words change meaning over time, and this is one.

[@rockandsandapologetics7254]

William Branham taught that the first sin was Eve having intercourse with Satan and giving birth to Cain. It's the Serpent's Seed Doctrine. Some of the New Apostolic Reformation churches still believe that. I'd rather be wrong calling the fruit an apple.

[@ronmortimer252]

The naivety of spiritual insight here is alarming. The tree of the knowledge of good and evil is not any natural fruit tree - I don't care what the apple has represented over the years. The tree of good and evil is the 'way of Satan' or the modus operandi of Satan, the adversary of God. Once Adam and Eve's eyes were open to that, once they got it into their system there was no going back. They couldn't unlearn it. It was the test we had to pass. For the record, the 'tree of life' is Jesus Christ or the way of God. The tree that Jesus was crucified on was, spiritually speaking, the tree of the knowledge of good and evil and in so doing He rendered it powerless for everyone who believes in Him.

[@megaoldskool76]

Ron Mortimer 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

[@JayaSavannah]

These are great. I wasn’t raised with religion but picked up several Catholic beliefs in pop culture. After I was born again and started reading the Bible, I was shocked to realize long time Christians were so unbiblical. Another common one: Guardian angels not assigned to watch over individual people their whole life. Also cherubim don’t look like babies! Cherubim sound pretty freaky looking actually ,with eye-covered wheels. 👀

[@Outrider74]

I'm glad you did this, Alisa, because this is an important thing to remember: it's an unwise practice to go beyond what is stated in Scripture with our own imaginings, even if those speculations are innocently intended.

[@NicholasproclaimerofMessiah]

@Team Jesus Unity Sounds like you are going outside the text to refute the text; a not so innocently intended speculation in this case. We are not allowed to shape the Cornerstone; He is a Stone not hewn by human hands.

[@NicholasproclaimerofMessiah]

@Team Jesus Unity There are two possible interpretations. One is simply that people shared beds to not freeze to death at night before modern furnaces; so nothing to do with eroticism at all. The other possibility is the old-man and new-man, but the old-man is taken and destroyed and we are made new. What is not possible is that God is casually referencing a sin which is rightly punished with death according to Christ's own righteous Torah which He gave to Moses. Please wait until you trust and obey Christ before you tell people you are Christian. We know you by your fruit. You are a liar, twisting Scripture to your own destruction. You reject Christ and His righteousness because you love the world and those which are in the world, the craving of the flesh which you now justify; but whosoever loves the world, the love of the Father is NOT in you. Homosexuality comes out from of the world, not from of the Father. Read 1st John... You reject Christ so you may have the world. Amen Christ says to us that you have your reward, and to you He says "depart from me, yall who are Torahless, I never knew you."

[@NicholasproclaimerofMessiah]

@Team Jesus Unity And I have an open exchange of ideas where Christ gives me His ideas for me to keep and I give Christ my ideas for Him to destroy. I have no interest in your ideas, nor my own, but only in Christ's ideas. "Exchange of ideas" that may be your problem. I trust Christ to tell me what ideas to receive, I am a Christian (slave to Christ).

[@Outrider74]

@Team Jesus Unity I'm so GLAD you brought that passage up, Team Jesus Unity! Because if you look at the original Greek for Luke 17:34, it doesn't say "two men" shall be in one bed; it says TWO shall be in one bed. There is no word for "man" in that passage; the word "men" is actually added by the KJV translators. The actual translation should say "two shall be in one bed." So that changes things a bit. Plus, I would add that, prior to our oversexualized spin on life and culture, it was not an unheard of thing for two people to need to share a bed without engaging in sexual activity. That may be a foreign concept to people who cannot segregate sexual behavior and lust from all of life like mature adults used to be able to do, but it wasn't for people in earlier generations. But thank you very much for allowing us to clear up that misunderstanding!

[@villemiyymhmmlummhmmville603]

@Team Jesus Unity two men in one bed... one man, one Wo man.... woman has man in it....

[@ClarifyingChrist]

Well said at the end, "It is always best to investigate the truth before believing a rumor". Keep the good videos coming!

[@iworship6951]

Great quality. Thank you!

[@theWordinRed]

I like these kind of videos! I think there are so many details and tid bits like these that are widely accepted, but that are not actually in the Bible

[@Michelle-zz7no]

Love your channel name!!! We are a family of redheads. 😊

[@ItsjustMorgan89]

These aren’t really rumors, these are thing actively taught in church...

[@danielb2789]

Basicly

[@chuksdagamer6523]

@Kyle Isaacson what? yes God had just wrath on the earth, don't you think he would have thought of the babies

[@chuksdagamer6523]

@Kyle Isaacson he's God are you trying to tell him how to run the universe he created? and don't you think he would have known about the babies?

[@chuksdagamer6523]

@Kyle Isaacson first off, you're talking about the flood and "drowning babies" the main question I would ask was didn't God know about the babies, of course he did, the Babies are obviously making it to heaven the earth was evil, if God wiped them off the earth... wouldn't they just go to heaven "Mass genocide", y'all acting like the people on earth were innocent people, they literally killed each other and all, he gave them so much time to repent, like hell he gave them 100 - 400 years to repent, they didn't want to listen God doesn't force people into slavery, not even once, they were the ones that sold them off to pay debt and were allowed to be set free at the last 7 years or so, if they loved their master so much they decided to stay, how is that forcing slavery? My point still stands what makes you think you as a mortal and not all knowing person have a say what an all powerful being does on his earth? God created every HUMAN BEING, he can take their lives how he sees fit. HIS WORLD HIS CHOICE

[@chuksdagamer6523]

@Kyle Isaacson okay first off answer the question, does God not have the right to take the person he gave life off the earth, does God not have the power? the babies don't know anything and are not at the age of accountability so therefore it can't understand or have the knowledge to know let me answer the slavery questions for you Exodus 21:7, "If a man sells his daughter as a female slave, she is not to go free as the male slaves do." When a daughter was placed into slavery by her father, it was often to pay a debt combined with a way for her to find a husband. Of course, in modern times, this sounds odd. But the fact is in the Old Testament context, marriage was a very important institution. Daughters were expected to marry early and produce children. If they did not marry, they were sometimes considered cursed, and this was shameful for the family and the father's reputation. Love was sometimes a deciding factor in marriage. But, most often, marriages were arranged. Such is the case with a female slave. This is why the text says they are not to go free as a male slave does because she has more rights than a male in this case. Consider the rest of the text. Exodus 21:7-11, "If a man sells his daughter as a female slave, she is not to go free as the male slaves do. 8 “If she is displeasing in the eyes of her master who designated her for himself, then he shall let her be redeemed. He does not have authority to sell her to a foreign people because of his unfairness to her. 9 “If he designates her for his son, he shall deal with her according to the custom of daughters. 10 “If he takes to himself another woman, he may not reduce her food, her clothing, or her conjugal rights. 11 “If he will not do these three things for her, then she shall go out for nothing, without payment of money." We see from the following verses that she could be redeemed (v. 8), could not be sold to foreign people (v. 8) and could marry the master's son (v. 9). But if she did not marry the son, her food and clothing could not then be reduced (v. 10). And, if these conditions were not met, she was to go free. No such requirements were made of a male slave. "Provision for a woman in one’s charge throughout the ancient Near East consisted of food, clothing and oil. The third in the series here (NIV: “marital rights”) is an attempt to translate a word that occurs only here in the Old Testament. The frequent occurrence of “oil” in that position in numerous ancient Near Eastern documents has led some to suspect that the word in the Hebrew text might also be an obscure term for oil (compare Hos 2:7; Eccles 9:7-9)." (Matthews, Victor Harold, Mark W. Chavalas, and John H. Walton. The IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament. Electronic ed. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2000. The reason a female slave was treated differently than a male slave in the context of Exodus 21:7, is due to the issue of marriage. Women were to be married early and produce children as was the Jewish custom based on God telling Adam and Eve to multiply and fill the earth (Genesis 1:22). Women who are not married were often considered cursed and could bring shame on the family. In addition, daughters who were placed into slavery were sometimes expected to marry a member of that household in which she served. This was yet another way for a father to find a husband for his daughter in the Ancient Near East culture. In the context, the female 'slave' could be redeemed (v. 8), could not be sold to foreign people (v. 8) and could marry the master's son (v. 9). But if she did not marry the son, her food and clothing could not then be reduced (v. 10). And, if these conditions were not met, she was to go free. No such requirements were made of a male slave.

[@jack_skeean]

Hi Alisa, I saw your interview on Matt Fradd's channel! Love the work you're doing here, God bless you and your ministry!

[@MicahGoring]

This is so good Alisa! Thank you

[@carolberubee]

Luke 2:7 -- "room" is _topos,_ which just means "location," or "lodging place." The interesting part is that "inn" is not what we think of as a secure dwelling, like a "hotel," but probably refers to the caravanserai at Bethlehem, which is mentioned by Jeremiah (41:17). A caravanserai was an open area for travellers that included a roof and walls with a dirt floor. The animals would be situated around the caravanserai, while the people would sleep under the roof. But because there was no room under the roof, Mary and Joseph lodged outside the caravanserai, among the animals, perhaps in the nearby limestone cave attached to the caravanserai (that has been noted, historically). In any case, we know that He was not born in a nice place, but really did come in humility.

[@amybee40]

Great description of caravanserai in the novel Ben Hur.

[@carolberubee]

@@amybee40 cool. I've never read that book. I know I saw the movie decades ago. haha.

[@richardrice1032]

Hi Carol! Alisa talks about this "inn" again in a later Video, "Alternative Facts About Christmas You've Always Believed That Aren't True", as Myth #5 Guest Room, Vs Lower level of a house. Check out the following link. Similar houses were built in Colonial America. Please note the ladder leading to the Upper Level. "4.bp.blogspot.com/-u4qJ2R3i7uo/U_O4c4m3LAI/AAAAAAAACQ0/7yU0jDBH3Ck/s1600/american-colonial-period-interior-decorating-jamestown.jpg"'. I actually saw one one of these at an Early Colonial Re-creation site outside of Washington D.C. a few years ago. We are, in my opinion, quite spoiled these days compared to how folks lived back then. Merry Christmas and very best wishes for a Blessed New Year from an "older Brother"!

[@carolberubee]

@@richardrice1032 Merry Christmas, Richard! I lived in a house built in the 1790s (in New Hampshire). Sadly, it burned in 1975. It had just a crude dug out path under part of the house for a crawl space. The attic was accessible by a ladder. But we had four fireplaces, and a woodstove!

[@richardrice1032]

@@carolberubee LOL indeed, doubled over no less! I also have a New England background. I can almost picture that house. Keep the Faith!

[@debsad7500]

No mention of an innkeeper.

[@jenniferhumphries5794]

This was helpful. Thank you.

[@DrKeziahSabu]

Loves this video! Thank you 🙌 God bless you Sister!

[@Will4fun]

I have heard many sermons about Paul being struck off his horse by a blinding light on the way to Damascus. However, the Scriptures never say he was on a horse. “As I made my journey and drew near to Damascus, about noon a great light from heaven suddenly shone about me. And I fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to me, ‘Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?’” (Acts 22:6-7)

[@carolberubee]

You're right, the text does not say that Saul was on a horse. However, the Lord tells Saul that it is hard to kick against the goads. I think the Lord was using the fact that Saul was on a horse to make that connection. I can't prove that, but it makes sense.

[@carolberubee]

@Billy Rader oh, I understand the metaphor as the Lord had been working in Saul's life. Absolutely. And you know what? You're right, the goads were commonly used for oxen. And you know what else I learned? That this is a textual variant. The phrase is not in most MSS. So, maybe it's a moot point. Thanks for pointing that out. I had been taught by a pastor that the goads referred to spur-like devices used by horse riders. I still haven't learned my lesson that most pastors have no idea what they're talking about. lol. I can't trust anything anyone says. I have to take the time to study the Greek and the MSS myself. Always.

[@gigimimi3224]

Good stuff. I loved watching the movie Ten Commandments growing up. It wasn’t until I was older and read the Bible that I realized the inaccuracies in the movie.

[@megaoldskool76]

And there are many!!

[@zhihanlim3500]

@Iron Weed exodus probably didnt happen under Rameses II for one thing

[@russofam.1090]

This is great stuff. Thanks

[@Monpris0590]

Thank you, good.way to address these rumors. I often wondered about these rumors, now I know

[@mryesnno4301]

Noah never intended to save the people by inviting them on the ark, it was only for his family and the animals. Genesis 6:11-13

[@warpnin3]

It was not up to Noah; their own deeds sentenced them to death. Still he preached to them for 120 years then. None were converted. Just like when Lot pleaded with the Lord about the least amount of righteous people that had to be in Sodom and Gomorra, to prevent Him from destroying the cities. Again, none were found. When Jonah preached to Nineveh, that their city would be destroyed if they did not repent, and they listened to him, God preserved them and their city.

[@heathers4961]

And nobody mocked Noah either, at least not in scripture

[@stevendunn9676]

There's a common belief that Jesus was born on Christmas.

[@AmericanBerean]

Well, it is possible. Just not dogmatic.

[@seanrathmakedisciples1508]

@@AmericanBerean the word became flesh and tabernacled among us. Jesus was born on the Feast of Tabernacles. Jesus was sacrificed on the Feast of Passover ( 14th of Nisan) for Christ our Passover lamb has been sacrificed. 1 Corinthians 5:7) Jesus arose from the dead on the Feast of First Fruits ( 17th of Nisan

[@craiglees5631]

@@AmericanBerean ot sure it is possible.... all the surrounding events describe a differnt time to winter time in Israel

[@ruthiemay4799]

@@seanrathmakedisciples1508 YESHUA was born in the spring during the lambing season. HE was the Lamb of GOD. Bethlehem is where the sacrificial lambs were born. Bethlehem means basket of bread, so the Bread of Life was born there, probably Nisan 1. He could NOT be born on Sukkot because that is one of 3 pilgrimage feasts when Jews were required to be in Jerusalem. A census would NOT have occurred during Sukkot. When YESHUA came the first time HE fulfilled the spring FEASTS OF THE LORD. When he returns, HE will fulfill the Fall FEASTS OF THE LORD.

[@AmericanBerean]

@@seanrathmakedisciples1508 OK. But it's still not dogmatic.

[@TheRevering]

Great vid Alisa!

[@rmvicary4215]

Thank you! Love these!

[@lah_nee_sha615]

Be careful sis...make sure your not just making content just to make content for your channel pray about how your can truly be a vessel I love you 🙏🏽

[@knowleybendane668]

You sound awake... God bless yew 💗💖💙

[@lah_nee_sha615]

@@rysloan lol I was very clear with my comment, but ppl try to find hidden meanings in plain language all the time smh...I'm not sure why your confused but have a great day!!

[@ImCarolB]

About David, I've heard people claim that David was red-haired, because he is described as "ruddy". This simply means that he had a bright, youthful complexion.

[@TheRazmotaz]

You have to give information for why you believe that ruddy doesn’t mean “red” or why you believe it has something to do with youthful. Just making a statement doesn’t help. Here, I’ll show you. People think that David had red hair, but “ruddy” can after mean “toothless”. See how easy that was?

[@rockandsandapologetics7254]

I agree. The phrase is actually "ruddy of complexion" which has nothing to do with his hair color. Although being a red head it was fun to identify with the boy giant killer ;-)

[@TheRazmotaz]

Rock and Sand Apologetics well, you ain’t out of the fight yet. The Hebrew root word translated as “ruddy” is used Exodus 25 of dying rams skins “red”. But Gen 25:25 makes the best case for “ruddy” being of red hair (and associated complexion) when it says that Esau was “red” and hairy. Yep, same Hebrew word there! When trying to determine what a word means, you really want to return to the original language to see if it provides clarity. Think about it this way, we are currently looking at an English word that is no longer used while trying to determine not only what it meant in the 1600’s, but also drawing a conclusion from that of what it meant in Hebrew! How accurate do you think we will be without going to the actual Hebrew text?

[@ImCarolB]

@@TheRazmotaz I really don't "have to". I was just making a comment, not positing an argument. I would back it up with some Hebrew interpretations, but I saw no reason to do that, since this is not a strictly apologetics episode, but more light-hearted.

[@rockandsandapologetics7254]

@@TheRazmotaz Let's have some fun. Someone once said, "Keep your eye on the ball, your hand on the plow, and your shoulder to the wheel. There, now try to work in that position." I am, in like vain, going to give you a passage of Scripture. It describes someone. After reading it please write back and tell me what this person looked like. Here goes, Lamentations 4:7-8, "Her princes were purer than snow, whiter than milk; their bodies were more ruddy than rubies, their appearance like sapphire. Their form is blacker than coal; they are not recognized in the streets; their skin cleaves to their bones, it has become as dry as wood." Specifically I want to know if "her princes" were whiter or red (ruddy) or sapphire (blue) or black.

[@davetelling]

Thank you for this!

[@bendelaughter]

This video is so cool. Thanks for this. Also, I love the production quality!

[@Mark-ql5ni]

The verse in Ezekiel names a musical instrument, “timbrels,” a musical term used throughout the Old Testament. Immediately following the word, is another word that is quite possibly another musical term. I would be careful to rule out that he wasn't involved in worship music in some way as we don't know what the translated word 'pipes' actually means b/c 'neqeb' in Hebrew only appears in this place in the bible, it may or may not mean a wind instrument, it could be a jewel setting. Whether he was the worship leader, we don't know. Was he a musician? We don't know. I understand what you're saying. Either way, he was the "anointed guardian cherub" which sounds like a leader in some way. Overall, the issue of him being a Musician or Worship Leader doesn't really matter but I wouldn't rule it out, look at how demonic music is, and how many musicians have claimed to make a deal with the devil or sell their soul for fame and fortune. I suggest checking out Good Fight Ministries Documentary called "They Sold Their Souls For Rock and Roll" if you haven't seen it. I don't agree with everything Pastor Joel teaches but the documentary is eye-opening.

[@JustusPaul]

All the angels are involved in worship actually as the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy? Job 38:7

[@cherylk2299]

Mark I agree, I think this is a bold statement that she really can’t back up Biblically.

[@nickwadson5731]

Yes in my Life Application Bible Ezekiel 28:13 the translation of tabrets and pipes means mountings and settings for jewels.

[@nickwadson5731]

But to say all musicians are by default ( satanically anointed just by being musicians ) is untenable theologically. I know the Church of Christ ( the denomination ) forbids the use of mechanical instruments in worship. Also, to say all rock/heavy metal music is satanic is also ridiculous ( see Pastor Bob Beeman ). And if you think classical music somehow gets a :" holy pass " boy oh boy do I have some videos to show you....

[@TheExastrologer]

Ezekiel 28 is addressed to a pagan ruler. Some think there is an indirect reference to Satan but that is not explicit in the text. Even if it refers to Satan, it does not mean he necessarily was a musician (since the meaning of those terms as musical is disputed) and it especially gives no evidence he was a worship leader as so many claim.

[@eladiocofresi5202]

Good point concerning Moses. And taken into context of the passage (which are in Exodus 3 and 4,) wouldn't someone find it odd that something such as stuttering would be mentioned so late in the conversation?

[@alanredfern4512]

Apparently ch spurgeon believed Satan was some kids

[@sirsleepy2472]

This is an awesome video. Make more of these! Short, educational and entertaining. 🥰👍🏽

[@daneesledge1626]

I am so glad KZbin put this on my homepage! As a woman who loves the scared text and has been bothered by a few things you talk about, bothered by a lot of “rumors” in Western Christianity, I admire how lovingly you present this truth. Thank you for using your voice and your brain to help people come to a more whole Biblical understanding.

[@seanmick3093]

I gave my life to the Lord of Jesus Christ as my personal savior on February 16, 1996. Each day, I pray for peace of everyone, take up his cross daily, read daily devotions, and confess on a daily basis in obedience to God. To receive Jesus Christ as your personal savior, please refer to John 3:16, 6:47, 14:6, Mark 16:16, Romans 3:23, 6:23, 10:9, 10:10, and 10:13. Bless you sister, and everyone else.

[@devinrowe2725]

Isaiah 14 is very similar to Ezekiel 28 in that it is talking about a ruler but also about Satan. Look at verse 11 where it mentions "Your pomps and the music of your harps have been brought down to sheol". Is it only talking about the King of Babylon or is Satan alluded to in that verse?

[@nikokapanen82]

Yes and the fact that music industry clearly belongs to the devil and it is extremely proffessional, also indicates that devil has something to do with music.

[@craiglees5631]

Could be, but we must be honest ans say we read into it that it is Satan, doesn't clearly say. We will need to go beyond what is actually written to accept that thought

[@Danielshalomjnr]

How is Satan alluded to?

[@jimmccarthy80]

...in the same way Jesus rebuked satan for speaking through Peter, The Lord rebuked satan through the king of Tyrus in Ezekiel. It's the Holy Spirit that compels men to do righteously and it's satan's spirit that tempts men to wickedness. Of course we are the ones who make the final decision and therefore "the devil made me do it" will never stand before the judgment bar in the courts of heaven...

[@nikokapanen82]

@@jimmccarthy80 I believe "the devil made you do it" will be the words Jesus himself will say to many on the Judgement Day. Remember what it is said in the revelation what will happen to this world when the devil will be imprisoned for a 1000 years? Peace. Peace will come to this world, because devil will no longer seduce people into wrong behavior and remeber what will happen when the devil will be released once again? He will gather countless of souls to go against God again. So i believe devil will be greatly responsible for many many sins of people on the Judgement Day. This does not mean that people who fall into seductions of satan will not face the consequences, they will, by ending into hell, but after hell, on the Judgement Day Satan will get many blames upon himself.

[@coreymanuelbrown99]

my friend - thank you so much for Another Gospel - a great resource to the young Millenials, Gen Z's, and the rest of us.

[@breathofgodministries3955]

Very cool video. 🙂 I must say, that backdrop is beautiful and the accent lighting is well done. Also my favorite color! ❤️✝️🕊 God is good.

[@smoochypooh7700]

All my life (I’m currently 52) I believed angels had wings. Maybe 6 months ago a pastor said that nowhere in the Bible does it say angels had/have wings. That’s the cherubim and seraphim. Angels are messengers and warriors. So silly how we can buy “angel” statues (beautiful and dainty women with wings) in our Christian bookstores. We’re so deceived.

[@tonybasoni8443]

SP,.....You are still deceived. An angel is a messenger, a human. A human that brings you the truth of God and his word, like I have just done for you. The only other angels are all God/Jesus. Lucifer, Michael, Gabriel are all God/Jesus. Those that bring the message of God. God uses humans to bring his message to the world, not anyone/anything else. Do not listen to anyone from the church, they have no idea what they are talking about. The church is not of God, it is of the world. Anyone listening to anything the church teaches is the blind following the blind.

[@smoochypooh7700]

@@tonybasoni8443 okay, thanks Tony.

[@tonybasoni8443]

@@smoochypooh7700 ,....You are very welcome.

[@joshuabakker5838]

Sauls name changing to Paul on the road to Demascus

[@olusolaisrael6776]

This. Paul was just his other name. His name didn't actually change due to conversion but probably not to be confused with King Saul that fell from grace (and they were both from the tribe of Benjamin as well).

[@joshuabakker5838]

Mandy G his name wasn’t changed. Paul is the Greek for Saul in Hebrew. A common misconception is to tell the story of his conversion with Jesus changing his name which didn’t actually happen

[@PulsechainX]

Great series :)

[@melindamercier6811]

Yes! Some of these I recall reading on as a child and asking where people got from the text these commonly shared rumors. Glad you addressed them because I found myself correcting people which is quite awkward when you are younger and they are older lol. 😅

[@tarapauls6812]

Thanks for that. I had actually never heard the rumour about satan being a worship leader. I am wondering if you could address the common misunderstanding about angels as being sweet creatures with wings as opposed to terrifying beings which usually brought on fear. Thanks.

[@christopherquerry7769]

People say that God or Jesus changed Paul ‘s name from Saul; like when Simon was called Peter. However it is my understanding that Paul could go by either name depending upon his audience.

[@heathers4961]

His name was changed. So was Peter's.

[@dearbrave4183]

Thank you for these clarifications!♥️

[@michaelmorris6575]

Great teaching. Thank you.

[@ewaldrempel9924]

There are a lot more doctrines taught in many evangelical churches which also are nowhere found in the bible...like the secret rapture of the church as shown in the „left behind movies“, like the idea that there are 2 peoples of God, christians and jews, like the idea idea that there are 2 „second-comings“ of Christ and that the church is coming together with Jesus at his second „second coming“...and so many more....!

[@fe8199]

Thank you for mentioning that great myth! I believe it is doing great harm to the gospel. It takes away the urgency to preach the gospel and the finality of mans eternal state when Christ comes in His Judgement. Giving man a hope of salvation after Christ has come to "rapture" his church. Its borderline blasphemous. When I have this conversation with those that hold to that view dont appreciate it when I tell them that in their view Christ has a bride....and a mistress lol

[@daffodil4500]

Let's not forget all these pagan holidays such as Christmas, Easter, Thanksgiving etc. Most High Yahuah never not once appointed or claimed those days as His. The Roman Catholics did. The appointed feast days are all there in the bible🤷🏾‍♀️.

[@RichardKentMatthews]

The Roman Church started it all. Even the Atonement is borrowed from paganism. Sadly, the Protestants kept a lot of the RC nonsense and passed it down to the cult called Charismatic. Oh well.

[@davidleebrown3956]

Excellent! -Thank you

[@lincolnisrael1634]

You are doing great.

[@jt08250]

You stated that no where does the Bible tell us who the woman is that anointed Jesus with the perfume and dried his feet with her hair. It actually does tell us exactly who she is in John 11:1-2. She is the sister of Lazarus or Mary of Bethany.

[@IamGrimalkin]

That's under the assumption it was the same occasion. I don't think it was. Yes, in both occasions you had a woman using perfume on Jesus and even wiping it with her hair, but that's where the similarities end. Perhaps the two occasions are linked in the sense that maybe one inspired the other, or God arranged for them to happen twice to prove a point; but I don't think they were the same occasion. The John passage (and the Matthew and Mark passages, which were I think of the same occasion as in John) does not at all imply Mary of Bethany was a prostitute.

[@jt08250]

IamGrimalkin I never said she was a prostitute and John speaks of two different occasions. The first is referring to a past event with Mary and tell us who she is and then another anointing before his crucifixion. We should see a difference in three different accounts of the same scene as you would now with police questioning witnesses. Different perspective not a different event. To assume they are different because the are accounted differently is not a good bet. If you read on any of the eye witness accounts throughout the new and Old Testament they are all slightly different as they should be or anyone would assume they collaborated their stories ask any police investigator. If they are to similar something isn’t right.

[@patarikisoterion9899]

No that is incorrect. Two different occasions two different women.

[@IamGrimalkin]

@@jt08250 They are different in almost every aspect, apart from the details you mentioned initially. The accounts in Matthew, Mark and John do have small differences between them, that you can indeed just see as different perspectives. The account in Luke 7 is completely different: it's a different event. As mentioned, the event with Mary was just before Jesus's crucifixion, and specifically happened because Mary what prophetically anointing Jesus for his death. The Luke 7 event was not: it was earlier in his ministry, probably in or near Capernaum. It's reasonable to think the woman described in Luke 7 might have been a prostitute or something similar, given the Pharisee's reaction . When Mary poured perfume on Jesus, it's unlikely any Pharisees were even present: the party was held at a leper's house (not the Pharisee's house).

[@jt08250]

IamGrimalkin you are not reading what I am saying John 11:1-2 1 ¶ Now a man was sick, Lazarus from Bethany, the village of Mary and her sister Martha. 2 Mary was the one who anointed the Lord with perfume and wiped his feet with her hair, and it was her brother Lazarus who was sick This is telling us who Mary is by telling us a past event. It’s not until John 12 where she anoints him again before his crucifixion. Why would John in chapter 11 tell us about an event so we knew what Mary he was speaking that hadn’t happened yet.

[@omarperez4010]

Alisa, what was Paul’s thorn in the flesh... that by what Jesus answered to him revealed or caused him weaknesses yet His strength / power were showcased by His grace in his life and ministry, thank you 🌿

[@teddycampbellband2648]

The Bible seems to suggest False Apostles being his thorn. frankviola.org/2012/04/24/paulsthornintheflesh/

[@carolberubee]

Probably ophthalmia, an eye disease that was somewhat common in that day. See Galatians 4:13-15, 6:11; Acts 23:1-5. In the Acts account, it would have been clear to someone with normal sight to have known which man was the high priest because of the way he would have been dressed.

[@carolberubee]

@@teddycampbellband2648 The problem with that theory is that Timothy, Titus, Apollos, and many others also had to deal with the false apostles. All Christians are burdened by false teachers to one degree or another. So, I'm not sure that that would qualify as a thorn in the flesh sent by God specifically for Paul.

[@robertcain3426]

I think the phrase 'thorn in the flesh' gives its own meaning through the word used - flesh. It's not something external, but in Paul's flesh that is either a physical or mental handicap that would serve to remind Paul of his weakness as a man so that his reliance would be increased upon God.

[@thelthrythquezada8397]

Thank you for this. I have been wanting to do a video like this, confirmationVille.

[@MuMu-fu7qe]

Thank you!!!

[@Timothy1987]

Growing up it seemed that Samson was thought of as this innocent man that was captured and called on the Lord for strength and was freed... Not the case at all biblically lol

[@Jonkabore]

Thanks for the video, much appreciated however I can see you are also making assumptions that are not in the text: The text does not mention a birth at any relatives at all regarding Jesus, also the text states that Moses said:"I am slow of speech and tongue." as you said however the interpretation that he was just expressing insecurities and he did not mean it literally is not in the text, keeping in mind that Stephen that you mentioned actually never met Moses in person to make comments on his speech, the only way for Stephen to be familiar with Moses Words was through reading what he wrote - "...Mighty in words and deeds." means just that, not mighty in "speech", the text does not state mighty in speech. Thanks again.

[@timbaines3562]

I have thoroughly LOVED your book Another Gospel. This was very helpful to me in my sermons on What Christian Parents Are Up Against - preparing children to resist Progressive Christianity. So proud of you Alisa. Thanks for the book. You are so loved here in Nashville, TN

[@terrencesimpson6079]

Great job Sister Childers.

[@lexle6203]

Hey sister I would want to know about your theological position whether your a calvinist, provisionist or arminian? Continuationist or cessationist? Pre-, post, or amillennial? Grace to you and thanks for this great video.

[@theresaqueenan9456]

It doesn't say he was born down under a relative house

[@michaeljones7465]

A cave, near a palm tree & found in a manger, for it is written.

[@darrenplumpton8900]

@@michaeljones7465 Where does the pine 🌲 tree come in? The pine tree is one of God's favourite trees and He asked that His Temple would be decorated with it's branches.

[@cloudhupernikos]

Thank you! God bless and Shalom!

[@amberhebert2062]

Love this!

[@colorado353]

Yeshua was born in a "sukkah" during the Feast of Tabernacles.

[@ericlaylon]

One about the birth of Jesus...there were 3 wise men. The Bible never says how many

[@helloitsme7553]

and people even made up names for them! while the bible doesnr give names

[@adriaanvanderwalt3006]

True, the Bible only refers to wise men. In reality the wise men had an entourage of servants and guards. The three gifts they brought might be a fairly good indicator of the number of wise men. One assume each of the wise men would offer a gift.

[@ericlaylon]

@Zena Blackhawk Correct because it doesn't matter

[@helloitsme7553]

@Zena Blackhawk oh my church did teach that. depends on church I suppose

[@derricklawson7986]

Excellent! There are so many rumors and misinterpretations out there you will have plenty stuff to talk about.

[@temucodon]

Just finished your book. I enjoyed it immensely.

[@eddiespitelle178]

1. Its been said Adam and Eve ate an apple. 2. The story is told that Jonah was in the belly of a whale. 3. Most people teach that Peter cut off the ear of one of the soldiers in the garden.

[@massey904]

The worship leader Lucifer lost his position in heaven and became Satan during his fall.

[@kimthetruthofit6965]

That's why the music industry is so corrupt. Satan is a great singer !

[@tonybasoni8443]

CM, HB, You are both totally wrong, and have no idea what you are talking about. There is no such person as satan and Lucifer is Jesus. You both need to stop listening to church leaders that have zero understanding of the Bible and read the Bible yourselves. The church is 100% apostate and there is no Biblical truth to be found there, only perversions of scripture and deception.

[@tonybasoni8443]

@Hank Bridges ,...Please read what I wrote to CM, it applies to you as well.

[@tonybasoni8443]

@@kimthetruthofit6965 ,....You also are 100% wrong, and have been deceived.

[@massey904]

@@tonybasoni8443 Are you getting what you're claiming from the Bible or are you just making it up?

[@trustchristnotmyselfextran6298]

We need more of these rumor debunk videos. Thanks. God bless.

[@believewithyourheart5627]

Brilliant! Thankyou :)

[@toenailtom654]

She said Jesus "probably" would have been born in the lower part of the house. That probably, is assumption. She too has no bible for that

[@classicalteacher]

@saladdogger that's funny you state archaeology since there is the archaeological site in Israel for Jesus' birth. I have to check, but I think it's the Church of the Nativity. And if I'm not getting mixed up with the site of Jesus' tomb, the Nativity was in a cave. But I'll let you discover this on your own and make corrections.

[@classicalteacher]

@saladdogger I am Catholic. I'm a Catholic convert. And I trust the Catholic Church because of apostolic succession and because of church history which is Christian history. So I am biased that I believe these sites are true because the Catholic church has no reason to try to lie. It wants people to have the fullest relationship with Jesus Christ and to become everything that God created them to be. These sites are a testament to the Life of Christ and how we can actually touch and walk where Jesus was. That should Inspire us and encourage us. But if you think that God's left Christianity and didn't come back until after the Reformation, then none of this will bring true to you.

[@classicalteacher]

@saladdogger interesting. You are your own authority on what is correct and what is not. I guess that makes you your own Pope and magisterium. I can't argue with you since I I don't have your Authority.

[@classicalteacher]

@saladdogger that's so weird. it's still your interpretation of the Bible. And you implicitly stated that you're the authority on this. When somebody has an interpretation that's different from you, what do you do then? Are you the first person in 2,000 years to know exactly how the Bible supposed to be interpreted and everybody else was wrong or at least had inaccuracies?

[@classicalteacher]

@saladdogger you said you can't see apostolic succession in Scripture? How many times have you actually read the Bible? Or do you just not read the Bible because Thomas Payne doesn't believe it? Either you're very young and haven't read that much, or you read something that immediately validated your worldview and you ascribe to that philosophy. Either way you're dealing with a very small deck of cards and lack wisdom to actually communicate in a thoughtful discussion. There's too many holes in your argument to go into. And I'm taking away time for my family to talk to you. That's insanity

[@denniscrumbley8274]

Another rumor: David and Jonathan had a homosexual relationship.

[@dianefoster3059]

Yes! This would be a GREAT one to address!

[@ServantStatusMinistries]

People also slander and claim that Paul was homosexual because he wanted to remain unmarried. It disgusts me because people talk about people today who prefer to be single and prefer to better themselves with Jesus only are told that they do not want to marry, are gay, or that they do not want to be in a relationship.

[@seeqr9]

Servant Status Ministries paul having that burden wouldn’t diminish who he was one bit tho.

[@ServantStatusMinistries]

@@seeqr9 oh most definitely. People have said things about me and their words mean nothing when they are lies and we are told that this would happen when we do things in Jesus' name.

[@seeqr9]

Servant Status Ministries yes of course. But I mean specifically if Paul did indeed struggle with such desires it wouldn’t diminish who he was. In fact I’d say it would speak to his faith even more as well as Gods faithfulness that he would and could put to death such a difficult, fleshly burden daily.

[@gideon5223]

Well done for correcting these rumors

[@newday7849]

Well done

[@randalljewell679]

I hope you aren't presuming to teach men.

[@flowerpink33]

This was great.

[@theouterplanet]

Can you post a video explaining the specifics of what caused your faith crisis and how you resolved those issues ?

[@Colthrone]

Love the background.

[@Monorail-Beyond-the-Veil]

Interesting video.

[@Obikron123]

Also the the forbidden fruit is never described as an apple but simply a piece of fruit. Also the serpent in the garden of eden is never directly stated as a snake but a serpent. Some people theorize it could actually be a drake or wyvern thus making the curse to crawl on its belly more applicable.

[@hamiltonkoelmeyer5680]

Thanks

[@advancedadam.7699]

Alisa childers welldone.

[@briteddy9759]

While I am not convinced most of these misconceptions are of extreme significance, they serve a reminder or wake up call to read the Bible carefully. There are doctrines that easily could be misunderstood or twisted if you only do a surface reading. Thanks for these insights.

[@socialillz]

Moses was selected because he was someone that someone would not think to be used by God. God uses the least among us. Yeah Stephen said that about Moses, because he was referencing the Moses that was already in God's presence for over 40 years.

[@sarw9294]

I had heard the one about Jesus’ birth before, but I can’t remember where now! You just backed it up, thanks!

[@rodneyspencer1996]

Nice! Attack bumper sticker theology next. Things like "God will never give you more than you can bear" , "words have power", the "power of positive thinking", faith can literally move mountains, "don't judge" etc... If this page has already covered these topics can I get a link?