Deus Ex: Human Revolution - Hugh Darrow's Ending (HD)

Hugh Darrow's ending from Deus Ex: Human Revolution in 1080p HD.
Links to the 3 other endings and credit roll (with easter egg):
Self Destruct Ending: • Deus Ex: Human Revolut...
Bill Taggart's Ending: • Deus Ex: Human Revolut...
David Sarif's Ending: • Deus Ex: Human Revolut...
Ending Credits: • Deus Ex: Human Revolut...
The Deus Ex Franchise, and Human Revolution are all owned by Edios Montreal and Square Enix. No Copyright infringement is intended.
Enjoy!
Remember if you enjoyed this video, comment, rate, and subscribe.

[@Luxai]

Some people don't seem to be getting the point. This ending doesn't say we should live like cavemen. It doesn't say we are all luddites. It's not saying that augmentations should be abolished. It's merely saying that in the technology race, we must not sacrifice the things that makes us more than just any other animal. Because blind hunt for personal evolution is what every other animal does. We are the one species with the intelligence to second guess ourselves and reflect on our nature. Darrow used the technology embraced by so many to prove the dangers. It's a cautionary ending that urges us to think before we act, to value more things than just technological advancements. That's why there were so many clips of happy children and wartime soldiers in this ending. It's symbolic if human value and the misuse of power. I thought that much was obvious. We should use our human intelligence to think twice and act wise.

[@Tarik360]

​@Fungo Slungo Wasn't his point more about self-sufficiency and to better connect with people and your own human nature? Avoid organization dependent tech, terrorism aside and all that?

[@Utheree]

I stopped reading when you said "We are the one species with the intelligence to second guess ourselves and reflect on our nature"... Looks like you know nothing about nature, let me remind you that trees are more intelligent than humans, they were here the first, using their intelligence they avoid all the big exterminations that earth has seen. Humans can't survive any big extermination, cause they are less intelligent, quite simple. If we represent the period between the first day of earth and today as 24 hours, the humans appeared at 23:58:50! so we have been on earth for just one minute and 10 secs, which is nothing.

[@quentoncollins8861]

It's also a nice warning on what kind of power technology (especially modern) can give to evil men. Madmen of the past would *kill* to have the kind of control over people technology could enable. What mad despot(s) who believes his vision superior to others wouldn't want you completely dependent on him in all capacities of your life? A glance at the implication of digital currencies with the removal of paper cash is an excellent example of this.

[@Dennis-nc3vw]

I actually kind of see it the opposite way. What make us more than animals is that we are about more than self-perpetuation. It's the people who criticize others for "rejecting their own humanity" who are the "animals", because they want self-perpetuation rather than transcendence. Its the ability to acknowledge there could be something better than being human that makes us more than animals.

[@Luxai]

@@Dennis-nc3vw You misunderstand my original statement. I'm arguing balance, not one extreme or another.

[@trevorfulton9958]

This entire game gave me intense feels

[@kerkezpavle]

0:46- 0:57 Glad you didn't cheat in Call of Duty, Adam.

[@KRoOoOoZ]

ShootInPutIn Adam is MLG m8

[@rvh1702]

😂😂😅

[@Dennis-nc3vw]

It's amazing how right JC Denton was when he called honesty a "forgotten virtue." Didn't anyone else just choose thing ending because it was the truth? Don't you see an ethical problem with lying to the world about something this big?

[@TheSwiftFX]

Great point.

[@seanjenkins6947]

There isn't much honor in the west

[@bloodrosereaper2099]

If anything, this ending proves that progression should never come before safety. Darrow saw just how wrong this kind of power and technology was destroying everything he had tried to protect and build up, even if his reaction to such a revelation wasn't at all ethical or justified.

[@JoaoGa210]

I chose this ending because that's how I feel about our real world, i don't regret it.

[@Zeralop]

Respect👍

[@renegade_patriot]

In 2022 this ending is prophetic

[@Dennis-nc3vw]

I'm almost hoping someone pulls a Hugh Darrow with AI before we go too far.

[@dianabarnett6886]

I used to choose Sarif. I now see Darrow's point.

[@rippingthroughmetal]

I remember growing up and playing outside with all the kids. Nowadays, from home all the way to work; through at least two neighborhoods I don't see ONE kid outside, even in the summer. Speaking of Facebook/twitter-- Literally everything electronic is being taken over by the internet now. It's like we're being herded into a digital universe. I could be overreacting, but I just feel like the more we get into this stuff, the more individuality we hand over to a machine.

[@technokl]

💭

[@dianabarnett6886]

Well you sure called it!

[@PsychoRavager]

Got this ending just today... June 4, 2024, more relevant today than ever before. BRAVO!

[@lucastrevisani99]

The true and definitive ending!

[@danutmh]

in my opinion this isnt just a game...this showed me how life really is..and could be.this actualy showed me how could industries and and the rulers of the world can control us.

[@liquidpersuasion]

Sarif's ending: too ambitious Darrow's ending: the "ideal" good ending Taggart's ending: the realistic, balanced ending Self destruct ending: too good to be true, easy way out ending.

[@notfound7902]

The truth.

[@olechristianhenne6583]

indeed the self destruct is dumb as fuck

[@Handler2000]

I picked this ending without even hesitating. The main reason was that after all bastards like bob page were still out there and augmentation would be a menace with them around: might as well start from scratch. It had to be exposed, despite the consequences. "Never compromise. Not even in the face of Armageddon" (if you guess who said this, you win a cookie ^^)

[@lovesurfbunny]

Best game ever! I choose this ending everytime I play it. Many things change in this world, but some will never change, love is eternal! Thumbs up.

[@rippingthroughmetal]

I was driving out in the country side once, and came across an old, OLD gas pump that was no longer in use. So old, that when I looked at it, I actually had no idea how I would operate it. Technology is becoming so easy to use, doing all the little things for us, that we forget how to do things ourselves. How long until the technology we build becomes what we completely rely on to survive? It's just something to think about.

[@ethanbowie3050]

CHANGE DID NOT COME WITHOUT PAIN..................THATS THE POINT MAN////////PROPHETIC GAME......ETERNAL.......

[@daviddolmatch9363]

The real ending

[@KiLLuCH]

I agree with some of you here. I think this is the most appropriate ending. Thank you for this very thoughtful game, Eidos! Human Revolution is not only an important influence for modern gaming. More importantly it confronts us with moral questions we quickly forget to ask ourselves in a fast spinning world.

[@GDIgenGT]

I liked this ending the best. Humanity shouldn't be lead by cowards behind a curtain, nor should we feel the need to "improve" ourselves by cyborgification. Darrow may have been a bit extreme with his methods, but sometimes we need the medicine of truth, no matter how bitter it is.

[@TheGamerSkill]

wonderful music , deep philosophical story , rich gameplay and environment.........what else do u need to name Deus Ex Human Revolution as GOTY 2011

[@raresmocanu1743]

Reminds me of a certain Starbound mod that had in it's lore a race of advanced beings living in a utopia,fueled by technology.The society was not at all ready for disaster,and a problem in Nexus,some sort of wikipedia-facebook combination, made enough damage to create anarchy.This is the perfect example of what to not become.

[@Sinuev1]

But we may also want to look into ways to diversify our basic net protocols, because much like how a retrovirus works by highjacking the cells process of reverse transcriptase to duplicate itself, some cyber threats may be specific to the function standard protocols... such as DDoS. This is the flipside of bioengineering. It's not just our creating new organisms, but understanding ecosystems and how those organisms interact that we can model and improve the stability of our own systems.

[@reftu1489]

I chose this ending not because augmentation should be completely disappeared from the history, but rather it must be regulated and treated with extreme cautions. The technology once developed never dies off and history proves that. Hugh dialogues will remind people what sorts of toys people are playing with and make them think twice about receiving augmentations. Having said that, Sariff Ending is my second best ending because the other options are plain stupid. Handing over the power to control billions of people into the very small yet the influential group among the world? Well you can see how this shit is going to be dark from get go if you understand how easily men get corrupted. Destroying all evidence from the world so that people can choose their own destiny? This doesn't solve anything, at all. Illuminati lives on and their attempts to enslave augmented people as well. Many augmented addicts will suffer and die as the cure(your gene sample) is gone. The worst ending ever.

[@bankaikun94]

Technology won't always be the downfall for humans. It just depends, on whose hands it lands on. Just like a gun, used for protection, or murder.

[@sebastianfigueroa8623]

Amen

[@TheGabukun]

Einstein's quote reminds me of Martin Luther King saying that "Our technological power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men." With respect to the gametrailer's words, Deus Ex could well rephrase that to "Man, your body (be it of knowledge, technology, or your actual physics) may develop ever faster. But your mind may have lost pace at one point."

[@NASTAR01]

I chose this ending because I thought I'd leave humanity to decide on the best course of action after learning of the horrible truth kept behind closed doors. I don't regret exposing the truth, but it is disappointing that they chose to completely abandon technological enhancements. I thought they would have used the knowledge to deal with their issues far better in the future.

[@bobobsen]

That wasn't because of this

[@dianabarnett6886]

Took me a while. But I finally see his point.

[@hallerd]

Tears rolled down my cheeks upon seeing this for the first time.

[@renegade_patriot]

It aged like fine wine in 2022

[@Dennis-nc3vw]

@@renegade_patriot I'm definitely more sympathetic to Hugh Darrow now than I was when I played this game. That story about Amazon locking someone out of his home due to a false racism accusation made me think about this game. That's one step away from "They even have the power to turn off your limbs, the potential to turn off your eyes."

[@renegade_patriot]

@@Dennis-nc3vw this game/story is so prophetic its unbelievable.

[@HauntingEchoesOfLost]

@breeeegs : I played the second Deus Ex first (and was grateful, it introduced me to the kickass band "kidneythieves"), and that one was phenomenal. Last year I finally played the first Deus Ex; it was really good, and I imagine it must have been mindblowing back when it was released. But each sequel has definitely improved on the last, imho.

[@Erdross]

@alienbishop I thought that thing at the end was just a LIMB clinic shutting down with an abandoned aug project left on the operating table, showing that people had turned their backs on the idea of augmentation. I wasn't aware that it is/might be Adam's arm or any of his other implants.

[@Dennis-nc3vw]

I went with the Darrow Ending, but I hate how they assumed that made me a Luddite. I just wanted mankind to know the truth. The monologue for "Destroy" reflected my reasoning.

[@bobobsen]

I wouldn't call this being a luddite. He's saying that irresponsible technical progress has taken precedence over morality and safety for too long. He only specifically calls out augmentations for going too far.

[@kakroom3407]

It's hard to parse but what Jensen is saying in this ending is actually quite simple: "The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy. If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later. We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence; it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We can’t predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society."

[@crapposter8201]

Ted Kaczynski Moment.

[@Ghostsk141]

I think the right thing to do would be to learn how to use technology properly and not to overdo it and abuse it. If you take away one if mankinds toys it will find another one and do the same all over again without learning from mistakes. I think the right thing to do would be to stick together and figure out together how to use it properly and make the right choice so mankind can learn from its mistakes.

[@PinehatLarry]

What I used to get me through picking this solution is that I felt that someway, somehow, humanity would re-incorporate technology back into their lives. Humans have always thrived to make things better, and easier, and I felt this would be a big setback for humanity but not a permanent one.

[@gr77552]

So true...

[@hkbloodjunkie]

@MintyHippo30 Take nuclear technology for an example. Just because there have been major incidents, and major rallies against the technology as a whole doesn't mean that we, as people, have given up all electronics, or the power to harness electricity. At most, even cataclysmic events like Chernobyl have only slowed the progress of that specific technology.

[@rippingthroughmetal]

The more and more we rely on technological progress, the more we become fused with it. Almost every aspect of your life is on a database somewhere now. The most valuable things to you no longer just apply to your physical life, but your digital life, too. At a moment's notice, you can become subject to complete and utter dominance by anyone with the technology to do so, and they don't even need a gun or to even see you. We are becoming too reliant on devices that can be used against us.

[@Emrald7]

So long as we are humans, and we look at ourselves as such, we all understanding what it means to be Humans, should hopefully understand what it means to be Human. And When I say Hope, I use it for a reason. The existance of such an emotion, and that we have emotions, gives us a Moral compass. And from that, we can be some incredible people, all with just a little Hope.

[@iki8782]

Birisi bu videoyu keşfedicek ve milyonlarca izlenicek yıllar önce çıkan bir oyunun günümüzü anlatması hiçte basit değil

[@rippingthroughmetal]

Just the other day I heard on the radio that new cars made with wifi are now at risk of being hacked. How you use internet to control a car, I don't know, but it still begs the question: With our increasing reliance on these things, with their continuous creep into our humanity, how much independence do we surrender to them?

[@adamrussell3952]

Best ending, in my opinion.

[@kidslovesatan]

@Gabe2590 Or an insane puppet because of Darrow's fit of anguish.

[@knduong]

I self-destructed, decisions should be chosen by everyone, not myself.

[@hkbloodjunkie]

@Greatdictator I pretty much responded to the exact same thing on MintyHippo30's post so you can read it as my response. To me, this ending just felt the truest to what would become the world of Deus Ex 1. I can understand why Silhouette and other resistance movements have gained so much ground in the context of this ending. But rationality tells me that people would not give up technology completely because of this ending. Just look at it more carefully.

[@rippingthroughmetal]

And how much do we surrender to they who can control these things?

[@himalayan_stroller]

technology is progress as well as destruction as a view point of nature technology has limit a boundary that human is already crossed...and after some time we...ll all be punished in various forms...

[@Sinuev1]

The issue is, ultimately, extinction isn't it? Whether we trudge on half-realized until some disaster or disease wipes us out, or whether we embrace evolution as a tool and turn it inward to expand into a new form which will usher in a new paradigm the likes of which haven't been seen since the Cambrian. I say we roll the dice and take the only option available to us that allows us a chance of long-term survival. If we fail, better to burn out in a blaze of glory, then to fade away in atrophy.

[@LawGivah12]

Were not talking about the how "right this game is" i completely agree with it... your Call of Duty reference is what were talking about. I'm not quite sure how it was a joke, or any humor in it at all.

[@PlanetDead]

Or perhaps, it is the moral codes and norms which must steer the progress (but NOT halt it) into a as universally desired direction as possible, so that all of the progress wont go to hell.

[@Sinuev1]

Oh, and about vulnerabilities. Yes, we open ourselves up to systemic risk, but the effects can be minimized by taking preventative measures. Redundancy and diversification in software platforms, for example... much in the way nature minimizes the effects of mass extinction via adaptive populations and speciation. A heavy cyber attack may be able to cripple a Microsoft server, but the same vulnerability may not be present in Cisco servers, one that targets Windows PCs won't affect iPhones, etc.

[@nurba_nurba]

Best ending

[@CuteFuzzyWeasel]

who says we have to chose? What part of our moral compass is tied to our biological forms? If we can not trust what we create, then how can we even trust our selves? What makes us human, beyond what we are physically is our compassion our willingness to move above what we are and strive to be something better. If care is taken and cooler head prevail, then the ascension to singularity wont mean abandoning morality. But if we start thinking in absolutes now then we have already chosen a path.

[@rippingthroughmetal]

And if you don't think we rely so disturbingly on these electronics, try going a week without any of them. No phones, no computer, internet, television, music players, etc. You would be surprised at what you will discover.

[@alienbishop]

What about that arm in the end? Adam has all his implants removed? and blinkering thing in the end? is that his eye removal?

[@ProductioDestruction]

Links to other endings and credits in the video description

[@Navak_]

Both technological progress and our biological moral compass are absolutely integral parts of what it is to be human. Though these two parts of our nature have generally worked in tandem in the past, the coming human revolution represents the point at which their goals diverge. We can only choose one. So what's it gonna be? Progress at the cost of morality, or morality at the cost of progress?

[@hkbloodjunkie]

@bojo0noja I think this ending is the most appropriate. It leaves the future to humanity as a whole, but informs them enough to make it. The entire game you work, as Jensen, to uncover the layers of manipulation that shape the world, and to expose those that have brought so much suffering to it under pretense of righteousness, greater knowledge, and authority. All you destroy with Panchaea are those few that know the truth, leaving the invisible forces in place, their authority unchallenged.

[@OrbitComposer]

In first we must learn to control us and take control of our behavior and then we can improve ourselfs...

[@clamchowder138]

And at the same time, there is no progress without some kind of downside in one way or another.

[@CBleck]

@hkbloodjunkie however, considering the events of the first game, this can't possibly be the cannonical ending.

[@Luciferke]

1 dude is from sarif industries

[@SkyeFische]

The only sacrifice that comes with making the impossible a reality is the sacrifice of your own timidness and fear. You have to give up the fear of falling in order to fly. Technology only offers us the ability to fly.

[@angelfire3000]

The only aspects that technology has approved human life if advancement one medicine and better ways to communicate with loved ones far away. Where is the line drawn after that though? I mean think about it, what form of technology hasn't somehow fallen into the hands of those who intend to abuse it?

[@TheWoodenChainsaw]

Did the flickering augment at the end signify that augments didn't quite die with this ending?

[@Hauteur723]

I chose this one because, the truth shall set us free.

[@KnowingDasEin]

All things in nature are dual; each thesis gives birth to its antithesis. Let that downside be only for the psychopaths and amoral of the world, while the moral shoulder their responsibilities with fortitude.

[@skytop082]

@schafbo You only need to turn off your futuristic augmented arm with the ability to transform into a minigun, and stop kidnapping people and turning them into robotic super-soldiers.....Oh wait...

[@pepsik1234]

tronger. U can't just the way we were born. Each one of us was born different and with something unique. Making ourselves what we aren't is wrong. By the end of the day nothing will change, there will be chaos, conspiracy. Saving live, making people walk again is good but making a weapon to accomplish what a madman wants is wrong. Self distract: new man will rise, have the same power. As ppl said, it's like taking the easy way out. All the ending make sense and pretty genius if u think about i

[@HarpoTheVillain]

@ExplodingFistInVag You and me both, man. You and me both.

[@gr77552]

The problem is that the tech companies want to take everything they invent as progression. On the other hand, the technology connected to the Internet is vulnerable and will remain so, and if important things are entrusted to it, those important things can be destroyed in a cyber war, and in peace they can be used for espionage. In the world of Deus Ex, people are connected to vulnerable technology, this does not make them "gods", but vulnerable for hackers and the government, who could paralyze them with the push of a button.

[@SingaporeLoveItachi]

The idols should value their humanity and revolt against their management. The management will fall if everyone can unite and let those management understand that humanity is important if one must to ascend beyond as one human race, which will lead to Sarif's ending.

[@DeshtarXallum]

@Gonaho To be honest, I've only seen one Let's Play of MGS1 and only the cutscenes for the rest. I'll admit that MGS2 is outlandish, and the 4 sports some ridiculous things, as a whole, I'll let everyone to his/her own opinion. Concerning the two games, I still remember the original having more dialogues going this way. I'm not sure, in the end, that DE is the "most philosophical game ever".

[@Sinuev1]

As for the potential loss of privacy and control of personal information, yes, there is certainly cause for concern here. But it's worth noting that in the larger perspective, we are merely returning to the "small village" settings of our ancestors for the vast majority of our history... where everybody in the tribe knew the business of everybody else... and gossip or disclosure could ostracize you or get you banished. Lots of people hate small towns because of that, and I understand why.

[@mayaayam9361]

I choose this ending because I had it in mind before knowing Darrow's opinion. I hope there won't be human augmentation technology neither in the near furture nor in the far future. The problems that would erupt from this technology are countless.

[@hkbloodjunkie]

@MintyHippo30 I understand your argument, and why this would be a good reason not to choose Darrows message. But in my opinion it is just a message, and however convincing Adam is to the public, it will not lead to complete forgoing of technology. It is a path that inspires caution, and I could see it severely crippling technological 'advance'. But I just can't imagine people destroying the more established technologies out of fear, however persuasive the argument.

[@AdorableUKe]

I preffered Sarif's ending and i truely hope that advanced prosthetic augmentations like the one in this game, exist in my lifetime. I love fictional universes like this one and Ghost in the Shell.

[@renegade_patriot]

Did you skip the part of the game where the "updated" biochip was malware to control the masses?

[@Wega93]

I like this one the best.

[@15comebackkid]

I would want to push the envelope as much as possible on, trust me, but there has to be a line where you stop and say: "we're not ready for this yet". Maybe we will be someday, but not yet. Not in the Deus Ex universe they're not, I think everything that happened in the game shows that lol. So as much as it would pain me to see technological advancement slowed down in any way, I would have had to pick the regulations ending (taggart's). It just makes the most sense to me considering everything

[@PlanetDead]

@asaqe3 Man, in first Deus Ex there were references to some sayings of particular person on each endings. This should have been shown at this ending :D

[@doc2455]

You always win, if you telling the truth.

[@rippingthroughmetal]

All great feats, but they only reduce the chances of hacking, they do not prevent them completely. As possible as it is to create it, it is possible to hijack and control it. The more of your own personal information to expose to databases, the higher your risk of having your entire life digitally destroyed, without having any idea who did it, or how to find who did it. Imagine such a thing happening to our entire society.

[@dinodino6]

@alienbishop wouldn't he die? i thought it was a robocop mission, they 'auged' him up to save his life... or did they just screw him over and decided to just take advantage

[@AndyRaslan]

@PorscheLover87 This was, in my opinion, the only option. Sarif would have created monsters, Taggart would have borne slaves and killing everyone, including yourself, didn't solve a damn thing - it just delayed the inevitable need to find a way to work things out.

[@MisanthropicMarxist]

@adam100115 I did, and let me explain why. Technological progress is the absolute only hope humanity has to eliminate the problems facing us. We can't just will the problems away, we can't rely on the good will of a few individuals to do it, we need to come together and develop new means of interacting with the world, and the universe, around us. Sure, I wouldn't like to see all the power in corporate hands, but at least there it can one day be claimed by the people.

[@argonoch]

@Srky6P I thought this is a sequel to the game released in 2000

[@mibbleyt]

is that's Adams hand in end?

[@providencebreaker22]

philosophical shit baby

[@peterng8229]

I can see your reasoning and I can see why you would not trust others to decide the path of evolution. I chose Sarif's ending because I believe that augs have the ability to give us the chance to uphold our best virtues. What makes us human isn't our biology alone, I believe what makes us human is our ability to think and choose. Even with augmentations we can think for ourselves. Conflicts are inevitable but what if we never had to feel weak again, if we never have to worry for our future?

[@SkyeFische]

This is a different argument entirely, but it is highly irrational, yes, to believe that human beings have some intrinsic mental sense of morality. Morality is taught.

[@hkbloodjunkie]

@JCLounon I don't exactly know where you came up with that response. I wasn't arguing against nuclear technology, just referencing it as a parallel. Personally I support nuclear technology. But if I didn't, Chernobyl is a good example of nuclear technology's worst case scenario. If you don't believe me maybe you should ask a Belarusian... That being said, the Chernobyl disaster was completely avoidable, and mostly caused by the errors and ignorance of a few select workers.

[@ingarsss]

This ending is non-canon. In Deus Ex, there is still augmentation, and Nano-Augmentation, even.

[@Avantime]

@liquidpersuasion IMO Darrow's ending is the best, but technological progress should not be hamstrung by irrational fear, which I think is what Darrow's trying to provoke. This ending reminded me about the MMR Vaccine controversy where parents refused to give their children the Measles vaccine because of irrational (and now disproved) fears of Autism risks. During that time Measles and Mumps returned with a vengeance.

[@ChompChain]

@Sarcasmses Anarchists do believe that will create a better world, but who knows? Certainly not you and I. Although the message is simplified it is still reasonable and relevant to modern day. And @lingocode, it isn't has no "luddite" connotations at all; Jensen only portrays it as such in his speech. Personally, I thought about it more as valuing the freedom of choice and letting humanity as a whole decide where to take this technology and what to make of this incident

[@olaokolaok]

@liquidpersuasion I find hugh darrow's ending the best, sarif i like it because i often think about we going to the top with technology acting like gods but if you see the world as a whole we should not exist, we are a cancer. I dont want sarif's ending (because even if it is the canon) Is like the guy said "ambitious" Hugh darrow's is like a combination of every ending, self destruct ending is pretty cool for a movie not for my choice, if a movie had that ending i would be like :O wow shit...

[@SamuraiKai]

Wow!

[@drumstickNL]

Every video has some good points, the three of them should be welded together to form a better decision. I picked that one for regulations, people shouldn't cut off limbs and remove other stuff and replace it with metal parts.

[@rippingthroughmetal]

For those who created these devices, yes. But the long-term affects can be damaging to the people they create things for. There are many old-world machines that you and I will not even understand, because machines do all of that for us. And so much of our personal information is saved to a database somewhere, which could leave us at the mercy of anyone with powerful data connections. A single hack of our infrastructure (which relies more and more on computers) could devastate all of society.

[@LawGivah12]

You do understand what the phrase "Call of Duty" means right? its not just some video game title.

[@33bigmoney]

the best line is how technology brings advancement and advancement brings dominance and dominance paves the way for abuse (cough USA)