Waves: Light, Sound, and the nature of Reality

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

To see subtitles in other languages: Click on the gear symbol under the video, then click on "subtitles." Then select the language (You may need to scroll up and down to see all the languages available). --To change subtitle appearance: Scroll to the top of the language selection window and click "options." In the options window you can, for example, choose a different font color and background color, and set the "background opacity" to 100% to help make the subtitles more readable. --To turn the subtitles "on" or "off" altogether: Click the "CC" button under the video. --If you believe that the translation in the subtitles can be improved, please send me an email.

[@micahwright1578]

you are a genius

[@karthik829]

Lol.

[@معاذ-ل7م]

Thank you.

[@EGMAG]

IN THIS PHYSICAL UNIVERSE : Do you believe photons of light , are just tiny little quantum physical particles of energy , claimed to be massless ; even though they interact physically with solids through energy transference , bending , reflecting & absorbing ?

[@ashleylaw]

Er...No. False model.

[@wilcoxandrew88]

This video taught me more in 20 minutes than 7 years of studying science in high school and university ever did.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Glad my video was helpful. Thanks.

[@ianmoone2359]

It’s just a shame it was all wrong! I guess you wasted your time learning something false! It’s OK, you can blame faulty science by Mitchellson Morley in the experimental design flaw in their linear light speed experiment, and Albert Einstein’s goof with special relativity as a result. Ahh well, most will not see or believe it even if shown the error of their ways!

[@odyseuszkoskiniotis6266]

@@ianmoone2359 Very well. Now please explain what is the true theory, and if you write that the Earth is flat - just don't reply.

[@ianmoone2359]

Odyseusz Koskiniotis Mitchellson Morleys linear light speed experiment was fundamentally flawed in its design. It employed a light beam split into 2 beams by passing through a 50% silvered mirror at 45 degrees to create 2 light beams travelling at right angles to each other. The experiment was designed to determine if there was any effect of the ether of space upon the speed of light travelling in 2 different directions at 90 degrees to each other for equidistant length. Up to here the theory / experimental design was sound. Next, to measure the speed of each beam of light, they employed 100% silvered mirrors to return the light beams on their original path back to the interferometer, and look to see if there was any phase shift (toward the red spectrum) of either beam to show a variation in the speed of light in either beam. What they found was that the speed was the same in both beams (& was ~186000 miles /second, or 3x10^8 meters/ second squared ie 9x10^16 meters / second). The conclusion they erroneously reached was that the ether of space either had no effect on the speed of light or that the ether of space didn’t exist, & that the speed of light is constant. They chose that the ether of space didn’t exist! And the missing mass of the Universe vanished! Because the ether of space does exist. I’ll use a nautical example with two equal speed boats as a similie to explain the obvious experimental design flaw - where the boats are photons of light A & B & the water is the ether of space. In a Stillwater lake situation 2 identical boats leave a common point and travel in opposite directions at the same speed for half an hour, turn around 180 degrees and travel back at again the same speed and simple math says they each arrive back to the common starting point at the same time! However, When we put those same two boats in a river flowing to the sea at say 10 knots. They each start at a common point, and boat A travels upstream for one half hour at 20 knots, it will only make 10knots over ground (the river bed) for half an hour or 5 nautical miles because it’s battling a head current of 10 knots travelling in the opposite direction. When after that half hour & 5 nautical miles it turns around and travels at 20 knots back towards it’s starting point - it will now be making 30 knots over ground (river bed) because it’s now being assisted by the 10 knot current and will cover 15 nautical miles, or 10 nautical miles past it’s starting point downstream. So in that remaining half hour it will travel 15 nautical miles overshooting it’s start point by 10 nautical miles. Boat B that starts out downstream assisted by the 10 knots current, will thus be doing 30 knots combined speed over ground, for half an hour & travel 15 nautical miles toward the rivermouth. Then it will turn around 180 degrees and fight the head current of 10 knots making its speed over ground only 10 knots for half an hour or 5 nautical miles upstream and undershoot its original starting point by 10 nautical miles in the downstream direction. The two boats will meet at that same point at the same time after 1 hour but the meeting point will be 10 nautical miles downstream from their common starting point which is the 10 knots effect of the river current. If we average their individual speeds over ground (Boat A = 5 nautical miles upstream + 15 nautical miles downstream in one hour = 20 knots average speed) Boat B travels 15 nautical miles downstream + then battles back upstream for 5 nautical miles = total 20 nautical miles in one hour equals 20 knots average speed! Each boat was both assisted by the current, and then battled upstream against the current. Boat A battled first Boat B battled second but their average speed was the same, just as in the Stillwater lake example. By returning along their path the effect of the current in the river is averaged out! Both identical boats averaged the same speed 20 knots because they are identical boats after all - but in these two examples the lake water & river water are the same (even tho we know the lake is still water & the river is flowing at 10 knots so they are different, but the experiment doesn’t show that!)., the average speeds are identical in both examples. The affect if any of the current is “hidden” by virtue of the effect of turning around 180 degrees to reverse course! In the Mitchellson Morley experiment, the boats are the 2 light beams, turning around 180 degrees is the two 100% silvered mirrors used to return the light beams to the interferometer upon their original path “averages out” any effect on the speed of light such that any observable affect of the Ether of space (river current) is effectively hidden! Go back to the boat in river example and half the elapsed time to only half an hour, and boat A only makes it 5 nautical miles upstream, while boat B makes it 15 nautical miles downstream! Boat A = 10 knots speed over ground, Boat B = 30 knots speed over ground! But both boats are identical. The extra 20 knots speed over ground on boat B is attributable to the 10 knot current in the river! Mitchellson Morleys linear light speed experiment assumed incorrectly that the speed of light is constant (which it isn’t if the ether of space through which it passes is itself moving ( has current). The AVERAGE speed of light (just like the average speed of the two boats) might be 186,000 miles per second, but that doesn’t mean it’s constant. Einstein seized upon Mitchellson Morleys flawed linear light speed experiment design flaw conclusions that light speed is constant & that there is no ether of space, and concocted his non peer reviewed “theory of special relativity” e=mc^2. In doing so he totally ignored a mathematical law that any 14 year old math student who paid attention knows! Any negative integer when squares yields a positive outcome. -2 squared =+4. For e=mc^2 to be true, a single photon of light must be able to travel both east (-ve) at C & West (+ve) at the same time! 🙄 Clearly paradoxical! Some will say that light is a wave form, and can thus travel east and west at the same time, BUT they can’t explain how that wave propagates across non inertial space! Return the ether & maybe they are right, but not without it! 😜 Any system of logic that commenced with a false premise will yield a paradoxical outcome! Example:- Premise 1. All dogs have 4 legs. (True), Premise 2. All 4 legged animals are cats! (false). Therefore;- All dogs are cats, Or All cats are dogs! Clearly paradoxical. In Einstein’s special relativity theorem, the paradox is called the “Twin Paradox”. Google it. So Mitchellson Morley goofed & Einstein compounded on their errors. Mathematically there is ONLY one speed for light that makes e=mc^2 correct. That speed is infinity! The speed of light is infinite, it might be infinitely fast or infinitely slow but it AVERAGES 186,000 miles per second, it certainly isn’t constant! Infinity squared is infinity! The ether of space appears to be dragged along with the planets at the same rotational velocity as the planets that spin and orbit within it much like a “space blanket”. You can google the solar tea cup analogy for an explanation of that! Your welcome. No flat earthier here, just someone who won’t accept junk science, just because everyone else does! Einstein said e=mc^2 Bearden said e= Delta Tc^2 Resolving by multiplying each side by the inverse of c^2 (1/c^2), we get M = Delta T Mass = Change in Time! Or There’s as much energy in Mass (splitting the atom) as there is in Time. One second of time is approx 9x10^16 joules per second. The time bomb will be equally as devastating as the atom / nuclear bomb. Again your welcome. M=Delta T is the GUT ( Grand Unification Theorem). 😉👍🇦🇺t

[@ianmoone2359]

And silence is the response, because anyone with even half a brain can see that my explanation makes 100% truth & cannot be argued against! The truth has a habit of being self evident! Albert Einstein’s own university professor Dr Hendrik Lorentz always referred to Einstein’s special relativity theorem in mock derision as “Einstein’s Theorem” because he saw the obvious negative integer squared error, and knew that had he been given the chance to peer review his former students paper it would never have been published. Einstein won his Nobel for his peer reviewed paper published on the photo electric effect. The two editors of the esteemed science journal Annerlynne De Physique published Einstein’s Avant Guarde non peer reviewed “Special Relativity” paper in the peer reviewed journal at the same time as his peer reviewed Photo Electric Effect paper for which he won his Nobel prize because there wasn’t time to send it out before the publishing deadline & they felt that because he’d won a Nobel Prize for his photo electric effects paper - that he was such a genius he had no peer. Wein & Plank went on to successful later careers in physics themselves BUT their bending of the rules about publishing non peer reviewed papers in the esteemed French physics journal has led science astray for the next 100 years. Einstein is remembered for special relativity - his biggest unwitting goof, but no one remembers his brilliant photo electric effect paper for which he won his Nobel prize! His mistake is still taught in high schools & universities to this day almost like a religious doctrine that must be accepted upon faith, even when it’s easily disproven as I have just done. And any time I do so publicly the entire world falls silent! In the world of Physics one must not point out that the emperor has no clothes! 🙄 You see this sort of stupidity is why aliens won’t speak with us! 😂😂😂👍🇦🇺

[@Berniebud]

How is this so well made. Like Im legit amazed the way this is structured is so perfect. Every piece of information is the backbone for other pieces of information and it strengthens each concept inside your head so well.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment about my video. I am glad you like it.

[@exxodas]

These videos are going to be timeless. Students hundreds of years from now will be watching these.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment. I hope you are right.

[@anuja6978]

Amazingly simple, thanks to the animation. I don't know why more professors don't use such tools while teaching. This made me actually appreciate the intuitive idea, compared to the mechanical way of double integrals I have been taught till date. Thank you so much.

[@JohnDuthie]

Breaking down some seriously complex topics with amazing visuals! I'm still hella confused but I think the probability of learning more strengthens with each video.

[@cenkersengoz1498]

Your channel is one of the most impressive scientific/educational channels on youtube and I've been in love with every single video you've published for years. Thank you for all the wisdom, time and effort you put in these contents and thank you for caring enough to share them with the world. You are a blessed person. Regards.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Cenker Şengöz Thanks for that really great compliment. I am glad to hear that you enjoy all my videos that much. I plan on making videos more frequently in the near future. Thanks again.

[@ProjectFleek]

Cenker Şengöz Agreed The dude is not only clearly HIGHLY intelligent, but explains and illustrates to a level that is easy to grasp if you've got a decent IQ running.

[@kimchiman1000]

Seems like a labor of love. Very altruistic.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

You can help translate this video by adding subtitles in other languages. To add a translation, click on the following link: kzbin.info_video?ref=share&v=Io-HXZTepH4 You will then be able to add translations for all the subtitles. You will also be able to provide a translation for the title of the video. Please remember to hit the submit button for both the title and for the subtitles, as they are submitted separately. Details about adding translations is available at support.google.com/youtube/answer/6054623?hl=en Thanks.

[@johnnysparks44]

The Piano is a lil Dominate in your Mix... other than That... Great Work Bra...

[@johnnysparks44]

Archimedes Screw seems closer to me... to the forward motion of energy ,,,for the magnetic 90 to line up with Electron flow vector... up down is closer to round and round,,, Spin,,,

[@mrjodoe]

9:10 - would love to see this animation with two holes. I think this must be a analogy to the double gap experiment

[@uploadJ]

It would be **great** if you could take some of Dr. Mills work in GUTCP and animate, say, the electron orbitsphere (as he describes it) in anticipation of the wide-spread acceptance of his theories in the upcoming years.

[@АлександрМагнитов-в7э]

Женя Хуторянский

[@indsbt2920]

Best ever explanation of waves i have ever seen or read. Made my concepts absolutely clear. Students in school should be taught with such videos. Excellent educational video in fact one of the best

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment about my video.

[@kneegrease]

The background music is driving me crazy. Therefore, some sound waves cause craziness.

[@tonyclark7882]

This is of course known as 'Jerome Cooper's Syndrome', where the person applying the background music thinks he is much more important than the graphics designer or the narrator. The worst offender is the UK's BBC.

[@elaineweitz2595]

Yes ! I agree ! 😂

[@Pandawill123]

me too, I am so confused, I wish i could go back to school to study physics

[@iam1smiley1]

The background drives us nuts because sound creates "frequency following response" in our brain. It's basically why our brainwaves copy sound waves and why we like music. Our eyes also control our brainwaves, it's why epileptics can have seizures from flashing light. When the waves we see visually are so relaxing but the music is irritating because it's making our brain go at a faster stimulation rate than the visual stimuli.

[@alphacore4332]

I liked the background music. I think it is a matter of attribution, depending on association or how you interpret it. ex: I thought the guitar music was more fitting than piano, while other people think the opposite.

[@Colariboo]

It blows my mind how simple the explanations are, I've never learned about these things so simply in school.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Colariboo I am glad you liked the video. Thanks.

[@wistfulwaves000]

The way you explain and animate these videos coupled with the tremendous choice of music as well, kind of force people to develop a mystical intuition towards physics.Just fantastic man.I learnt more about waves in these 25 minutes than in my whole undergraduate course.❤️❤️❤️

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments and I am glad my video was helpful.

[@anandkerhalkar1126]

Thanks Eugene Khurtoryansky for all your efforts to make complex science understandable even to lay man. No other school can teach science in a better way than this. In this highly commercialized world, your efforts will inspire generations and transform our understanding of science. Pl keep it up and inform if we can support in anyway.

[@br6768]

Id like to thank whoever absolutely nailed that guitar solo the last 5 minutes of the video. Shreddin for physics ...Woo!!

[@Fulikia]

yessssss loved that

[@jamesporter6288]

Lol

[@mautrindade]

Darkness Rises - Daniel Robinson

[@AleArzMusic]

Sounded like Steve Vai! My bet is he used an Ibanez

[@MaximusMuleti]

For freaking real, I'm glad someone else noticed that too!!

[@mmmmSmegma]

I just wanna say that your videos are some of the best I've seen on youtube. Be it educational, or entertaining, your videos set the example for what education could, and should be like. I think what sets your videos apart from everyone else's is the 3D illustrations your videos provide. After you present a concept you allow 10-15 seconds to allow the illustration to sink in while we are watching (I absolutely love this.). The narrator also has a very clear voice. The music you choose for your videos is also always at just the right volume and it never interferes with the video. Honestly, I could go on if I wanted to. Overall, your videos are outstanding. I wish I could meet you in person so I could relate to you the impact your videos have had on my life.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

+mmmmSmegma, thanks for that really great compliment. I am glad to hear that you like my videos that much, and that they have made a positive impact. Thanks.

[@Yagyaansh]

mmmmSmegma same here

[@postmachine]

i also agree with Spider Jerusalem

[@krush_77]

i really appreaciate their effort on making all these very clear and nice educational videos, but the only thing that I would not like for improvements are those 3D visualisation...it kinda made me motion sick...I think its because my brain is just too bad to interpret those informations, same as while I'm playing 3D video games...hate this motion sickness

[@TheNoBSZone]

I promise you: These video's will catch very soon -- you will be made an educational hero.

[@ekilosurp]

Oh my goodness, I was looking for this since years. I'm a visual learner, it's very hard to imagine things by just reading the text. Thank you so very much. 😍

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Glad it was helpful. Thanks.

[@kazenriq]

Animation, edition, sound tracks, narration, everything! Simply amazing...

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment.

[@breakingawayfromyou]

REALLY LOVE THE METAL MUSIC♡

[@robertcalkjr.8325]

yami I think it is Rush. Sounds like something that Geddy Lee would write.

[@kazenriq]

@John Smith why would I?

[@misterchrissy]

@John Smith "3rd world shithole"... if you talk like that, i don't think anyone is really gonna be interested in your opinion because you sound like trash.

[@shaiofthehighlands5792]

If only I had found your channel years ago, I might have shifted my major to Physics. I took Biology as my major but I'm slowly gaining much interest in Physics because of your videos. It is also more fun to teach I think.

[@jeffcook8501]

Better be good at math

[@gericko4931]

I'm at physics but I'm also interested in biology

[@Pain-Addict]

No problem bro you can still study for your personal interest apart of your field. My major is math but I do know biology a lot and I am keep studying a lot of subjects that are not even related to my field. Cuz I love learning about new things.

[@thegoodlistenerslistenwell2646]

@@Pain-Addict wanna play cod mobile with another nerd? I need good teammates

[@Pain-Addict]

thegoodlisteners listenwell my guy you know what I have pushed my ranked from rookie to legendary in just 12 days my highest kills is 44 average is 20 in multiplayer in battle royal I win 7 out of 10 I use cordite gun. Are you good in COD Mobile. And afcourse we can play together I also need good teammates as you no in legendary rank search and destroys is annoying as a solo pusher with dumb ass clueless stupid random teammates. Since its been to months I didn’t play the game so I need to download it again send me your Profile ID and name once the download loud complete I will send you invite.

[@VlanimationTales]

I have no words to describe how beautifully these concepts were explained. The more I watch this video, the more I start to see waves around me! As always, keep up the fantastic work! ❤

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments.

[@VlanimationTales]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky You're welcome! Anything I can do to support you and your work. :)

[@Neomadra]

Explaining refraction with cars. You are ingenius. :D

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Neomadra Thanks. I am glad you liked the explanation of refraction with the cars.

[@jayti1827]

That's some real good thinking.

[@kseriousr]

@Jørgen Johannessen Well the part that hits the optically denser material first does slow down compared to the other parts. Speed of light is constant 'in vacuum', in everything else it slows down by the index of refraction.

[@larsalfredhenrikstahlin8012]

​@Jørgen Johannessen It's an analogy. How can you say it's utter nonsense? This professor is teaching people stuff for free and all you could contribute with is a toxic remark that doesn't even make any sense. The cars he used were a perfectly reasonable and clear way to visualize a rather abstract concept. If you have a problem with it then instead state exactly what your problem is and how it should be instead. You should try being more humble. You have been watching lectures by prof Lewin. Congrats. That doesn't make you omnipotent in physics. Prof. Khutoryansky is teaching concepts and physics you probably didn't even know existed. So if you're saying his analogy is "utter nonsense" you're wagering your intellect and knowledge in this area against him. I for one know where I'd put my money... But even if you are right, you could have said "Thank you for the great video! I have a problem however with the analogy with the cars ..." etc or something similar and you'd not only get a reply but also either learn something or teach someone else something. That's better than just being toxic don't you think?

[@johnbaldwin2948]

Only problem is...he has it BACKWARDS...the violet and blue cars turn the most...the red the least. Who didn't catch that?

[@sr-kt9ml]

The soundtrack for your videos is freaking amazing. I'm so impressed by the quality

[@Jibrillhakim]

Nah the video too good it veils the ugliness of bg sound 😂😂😂

[@Sourav_504kishor]

This video game me the correct explaination and cleared many of my doubts from atomic structure! Why psi is called a wave function and what a wave of an object moving in 3D looks like is actually amazing ! Love you guys

[@NoosaHeads]

It takes someone with a profound understand of a topic, to teach it in this superb manner. I'm university educated (in sciences) but I never had such insight into waveforms, as I did after seeing this presentation. My humble and sincere thanks for the fine work you've accomplished.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments.

[@nanaabenanyamekye9708]

WOOOOOOOOOWWW!!! The least I expected was to see my parts of my secondary school hybridization Chemistry here. You certainly are a genius Eugene. God bless you!

[@lvintagenerd]

So do you believe in God, or in quantum mechanics?

[@Pain-Addict]

I do believe in Quantum Mechanics. But GOD does not throw dices.

[@manu6074]

The background music is a wave that annihilates concentration effort.

[@tharealmikezee3165]

I kinda like it! It was stuck in my head actually I was just thinking bout that

[@instagramat_xtacee_money4516]

She taught us psychology too 😂

[@whatabouttheearth]

I thnk the background music makes it better and the level at times is a little high but thats not bad since they have long gaps between the voice overs. There is more time without voice than with it so music makes sense. Its essentially subjective and the person doing the music was more than likely the same person who made the whole thing and hired Kira Vincent Davis. Your subjective opinions are not shared by all.

[@whatabouttheearth]

12:23 😄 that songs on Mr. Robot isnt it?

[@manu6074]

@@whatabouttheearth Relax, I’ve never had the claim to express a generality. Even in the form of a wave 😅😉

[@bartkwezelstaart9306]

Thanks Eugene. You're by far the best when it comes to the visualisation of physics!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Bart Kwezelstaart Thanks for that really great compliment. That is really great to hear. Thanks.

[@Lykaios0311]

Waves are at the core of existence itself. This is Sacred Knowledge.

[@Jackieception]

You are right. Light is a place of non-duality where time is 0. All is formed from light so the statement "Let there be light" is truth.

[@ProjectFleek]

Yeah, it seems to definitely have a MAJOR key to this thing we're in on a spiritual level. It's funny, I I to be a HARD core atheist. Studying these concepts DEEP, and I mean I've got them down and know what the mainstream says, and what fringe theories say. Along with some personal experiences and deep thought I know am 100% there is a "creator force" that seems to be basically pure love/ light energy and creation. I don't know, that's just a glimpse of what I saw, other things raised so many more questions but did give me a whole new level to view the world. I like it much better.

[@ProjectFleek]

Jackieception Interesting you bring that up. I had a POWERFUL epiphany the other day about that exact concept.

[@ProjectFleek]

Keylanos Lokj No, as light can "be" a wave or collapsed particle.

[@ProjectFleek]

Keylanos Lokj Show me your source on this, as particles exist as waves and collapse to particles...

[@123100ozzy]

This channel is the weirdest and the best physics channel on KZbin.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment.

[@LaEspriella]

Finally I have found my answer to why if light is a wave objects cast a shadow!

[@TheMrTape]

"When light is in its wave form, it because no one have observed it yet." That's so very bullshit. Very hard to bother explaining. Just massive *facepalm*.. Relative to our "reality", nothing exists while not being observed by consciousness; it's not waves, it doesn't actually exist whatsoever. Relative to outside our reality, nothing inside our reality ever exists, like your dream realities, our reality is entirely made up by consciousness, in parts that of you and me, consciousness entirely residing outside our reality as one and everything.

[@frodorob]

To say that a photon "can be absolutely anywhere in the universe" is a bit misleading. The wave equation gives the probability that it's instantaneous position at any given time is at a particular point along the photon's trajectory. That probability is highest at the point where everyone sort of agrees that it "really" is at that moment, and drops off discontinuously going fore and aft of that point. Theoretically it could be anywhere along that line, but not "absolutely anywhere in the universe." Another pet peeve: I hate to see the putative collapse of the waveform being taken literally. It enables too many New Agey quasireligio-pseudoscientific fever dreams about the nature of reality. The particle, behaving in a waveform-ish kind of way can't possibly know whether I'm peeking around the corner trying to catch it with it's knickers down in mid-particle-wave transformation. Maybe I just got a gnat in my eye -- it doesn't know. Good grief. It's a particle, albeit a massless and dimensionless particle, whatever that is. It pops in and out of existence instantaneously with a positional probability determined by the wave equation. So it's a particle-oid entity behaving wavishly. Clear?

[@theb166-er3]

@@frodorob A few minutes ago I thought I know why lightbulbs emit light... Now I'm puzzled... Thank you, guys...

[@LukePaciocco]

@@frodorob im just commenting here so one day ill come back to this.... that was pretty deep what you guys just conversed over.

[@coreyfoster3978]

TheMrTape I feel that way but couldn’t articulate it like that seems more and more clear to me it’s the only thing that actually makes since

[@phasematerialsresearch9319]

This is one of the best videos to ever exist on KZbin.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment about my video.

[@Xirrious]

whoa, reflections can just be thought of as waves behaving according to the principle of conservation of energy! sweet

[@commie281]

I would like to know something kind of unrelated to the video. When an electromagnetic wave or a photon hits a particle and reflects or refracts, is the wave or photon absorbed by the particle making the particle vibrate and release a new wave or photon or does the wave or photon just bounce off in a different way? I didn’t get much of a clear answer on google.

[@jaydeepvipradas8606]

Well explained 👍 - Energy of wave appears to be how fast it is oscillating, rather than frequency or amplitude. Time becomes integral part in wave definition, to specify its energy. - As wave can exist at atom level, bigger waves like water waves are collection of smaller waves. Thus, at the point of resistance, like an opening in obstacle, some waves collide with surface within the path and we get interference. Collection of waves and their collaboration can be explained more. - Wave has a direction, still an atom can be part of multiple waves, as it does't change position. May be it can rotate and spin in presence of multiple multi-directional waves. - Moving particle exists only at peaks, implying particle does not exist at flat wave level and gets recreated by energy of wave at the peaks level. This implies we don't exist at all times, but only when energy of waves is at peaks. Just that structure waves create recreates us. Exact of us getting created implies bonded waves.

[@olbluelips]

How fast a wave is oscillating is its frequency! Well, frequency across time rather than frequency across space

[@jaydeepvipradas8606]

@@olbluelips Energy of wave would be then time frequency multiplied by amplitude. However, energy could be Ability of wave to interface with matter. There could be high amplitude and high time frequency, yet impact on matter particles could be less. Lower amplitude and lower time frequency may impact matter harshly. Example, air being fast has less impact on a rock as compared to slower water waves due to lack of interface. In quantum world everything is waves, and Energy could be maximum interface/impact in minimum possible time, without compromising self properties (much).

[@jaydeepvipradas8606]

@@olbluelips also, finding wave energy is tricky, depends on observation device... observations also affect reality.

[@IgorAherne]

Eugene your videos are incredible So much of precise, simple and spot-on explanations ...of quantum physics! One would think such a topic would never be explained in simple terms, - yet here it is, thanks to you Big thanks for your work, it's clear from all the videos -you are very good in this science!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment. I am glad you like my videos.

[@FrancisMaxino]

I knew it, photons are just tiny little quantum cars.

[@Cyberplayer5]

Quantum race cars...XD

[@havesomecoffeeand6085]

@@Cyberplayer5 Quantum race cars with different colors and speed limits. XD

[@RobH.]

@Francis Maxino - Photons do not exist, they are just brain farts of Quantum Mechanics!

[@rmxevbio5889]

@@RobH. You can not prove it neither negate it so...

[@qualia765]

more like the tiers but yeah

[@erickmacias5153]

The only video so far that explains in so detail the "wave", thank you so much, this has been so useful.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Glad my video was helpful. Thanks.

[@75blackviking]

Thank you for taking the time to explain a very complex subject in such a well presented, and easy to understand way. Please keep this great content coming. You are truly gifted.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment.

[@TheWeirdSide1]

Surfs up. ..."Waves are at the heart of the very nature of reality"

[@divinemother5138]

God bless you man million times. You have actually made me visualize physics which was not possible at all when I was a student. I humbly request you to make more videos of physics for the benefit of students . Stay blessed always

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad my videos are helpful. More videos are on their way.

[@viregis]

Wow!!!!! I have to say, I´ve tried watching a lot of other waves explaining videos, including some university courses, but this one is the best one so far!!! I´d never understood the block relation between the distance of the wave peaks and the size of an object. Finally an animation that did its work! Congratulations, and thank you so very much!! :))) This is definitely one of the best physics channels in KZbin, if not the best one! The other videos are just as great!

[@ed.puckett]

Thank you for making this so clear and sensible.

[@KarTandir]

I sometimes rewatch your videos when I get overwhelmed by life, just to get overwhelmed again by the beauty of physics and to realise how much more there is to it. But maybe we'll figure out our universe someday. Thank you.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

I am glad you enjoy my videos. Thanks.

[@euengelion]

I like to think that the universe is a song, and we're all part of its symphony. Thank you so much for the upload. I really like how approachable your explanation is while still offer some form of depth!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Shakir Othman Thanks for the compliment. I am glad that you like my explanations in the video.

[@choosetolivefree]

Yay educational videos that aren't packed with ads. Thank you. Thumbed up

[@ooffoo5130]

god this is the best youtube video ever, I think I have learnt more in 25 minutes than I have in the past 4 years of highschool

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment about my video.

[@yeahimaokiguess4399]

I am totally aggred☺

[@jamesrobertson4955]

Really like the way you moved from basics to the quantum realm and electron orbitals. Thank you!

[@cappnzak]

Narration by Kira Vincent. And here was I thinking it was a digitally created voice. Go figure. Great vid,thanks.Still,it seems no matter how many of these wonderfully presented explanations I watch, I still only manage a very tenuous grasp of the main concepts. I'm glad the associated feelings of inadequacy that I sometimes get,are fleeting.I can live with that.;) It permits me to continue to strive to understand this subject.I don't know if I ever will,but what a ride it is, -just trying!

[@jamessconiers1968]

This information resonated with me, it's almost like a real cheat code if you really allow yourself to be aware about the different polarities that are present, and the energy that is created.

[@emilvansteenwijk]

Hi Eugene, if you need music for one of your new videos, I would be more than happy to contribute by composing something for you. I have nothing but respect for the fact that you put so much energy and work in making and sharing these great videos to celebrate the wonder of nature and the science behind it. Thnx

[@darcisutherland6770]

This is great, thank you. The many visuals you give aid in the understanding of how light and waves behave.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments.

[@偏差値50が一年後に東大]

日本の学生です。 英語と物理の勉強が両立できて嬉しい。

[@khananiel-joshuashimunov4561]

Wow. I'm blown away. I learned so much about the "why" of phenomenon! I wish I had learned this years ago!

[@y5mgisi]

The more I watch stuff like this the more I believe this is all just a dream and my mind is making all this stuff up to convince me to not see behind the veil.

[@nerd2544]

wow this is 6 months of high school wave physics in just 25 mins. (reflection, diffraction, interference, refraction and standing waves all explained clearly in a single vid) 🔥

[@Nightcore1675]

I'm so happy I found this channel

[@speeshers]

This channel is one of a kind. The intuitive understanding of concepts you are able to convey is amazing

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@daniel-ek9kf]

This is amazing. Metal background music intensifies.

[@joseantonioandradeperez650]

Gracias por hacer este vídeo son de lo mejor aprendo y me explico cosas que ni siquiera se mencionan gracias a lo intuitivo de las animaciones

[@aatt3209]

OMG, the maker of this video rendered concepts through artistic visualization that makes me speechless, so powerful and beautiful, my struggle to understand and explain wave properties to others, which in some sense all vaporized by watching this video, I am very grateful for this maker's talent and hardwwork to bring physics to a whole new different level that brings tears to my eyes and joy to my soul - writing from California on Jan 2 2020 as a physicist/engineer/photographer in biotech/biomed.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment about my video. I am glad you liked it.

[@sauce8277]

The idea of using the car to explain the moment of light was a great idea.

[@guitarheroprince123]

Why aren't they so popular :/.. They're a very good explainer

[@frodorob]

It might be the music, which is a bit off-putting, even for a musical omnivore like me. Yevgeny: May I suggest retiring the symphonic warhorses, and trying out solo instrumental works, like Eric Satie, Bach solo violin, at a lower volume (!)?

[@jyoti9426]

This video is pure genius. Highly recommended. Although a physicist knows all the facts but the explanation behind the facts is fabulous. Thanks a ton for bringing it all together. A must watch.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment.

[@bluelilyism]

Thanks for the video. The final part about orbital waves explains the action of the heart and should be used to show how this works in medicine schools.

[@stevenschilizzi4104]

Stupendous! This is an amazing piece of work. Thanks so much for your effort. One understands at the end what the whole video was aiming at. Perhaps you could have added that “and here is why quantum phenomena appear as whole numbers - multiples of wave packets which increase with energy. Our brains are not accustomed to think in that way. Your visualizations help the intuition heaps! Bravo!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments about my video. I am glad you liked it.

[@wamp10000]

ENERGIA (ELEKTROMAGNETICKÉ VLNENIE) je základom všetkého, presne ako je to opísané v tomto videu ... SUPER VIDEO. REALITA JE MATRIX. Môžme s ňou manipulovať ... S energiou sme spojený ....

[@wellrose17]

Thank you for taking the (time?) and effort working on this. I am also someone who doesn't do well in school yet find learning about things I am interested in ( art, music ,quantum physics and the humanity) fun and attractive.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. Glad you like my videos.

[@qpzmwoxneicbv]

It's just so good! I could found every vivid image through this video, the images I tried to draw in my brain by reading the text but I failed. Thanks! (Indeed, your explanations are so good :D)

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments. I am glad you like my visualizations.

[@jayaramanganapathi9385]

For the first time, i see such a well explained wave concept. This video should be part of school curriculum, kids should get it the first or second time and not wait for years to understand the underlying. This may help curious minds to move to the next level of complexity, which will may lead to more new discoveries and utlity.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment about my video.

[@rakinmunim1110]

One of the most informative wave videos I have ever seen... thank you greatly!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment about my video.

[@Mike-oj9mo]

The music, so intense

[@alanmacdonald3763]

I agree not a good match.

[@MarcoLLucas]

I like the metal music. So well arranged! lol

[@berthold64]

It feels like I watched medieval movie. I liked it

[@ivocanevo]

Most amount of learning for least amount of words award.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@dgetzin]

7:35 Invisible lyrics “this is the wave going through a large HOLE - a LARGE hole, this is the wave going through a large hole.

[@nano7586]

4:55 oh man that guitar solo is so badass

[@rhalfik]

Yeah and it consists of infinite waves that spread out in all directions.

[@haydenmcleroy5579]

This is the first time I’ve understood what light as a wave actually means. Thank you so much

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@lizgarcini1492]

Dear Eugene, I bow to you. You're a master. Could you make a short movie reflecting Quarks, sound......

[@Skynet_the_AI]

#BOOM #BOW

[@juniorrs5896]

Lmao duhh duhh

[@rphuntarchive1]

This was great. I always wished for a overview of wave physics in general. As shown here, a lot of different different fields have this in common. I would have made the wheel bases of the cars wider for longer wavelengths, but otherwise this makes a lot of things much more clear that kind of get taken for granted.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@Steph-dz9jb]

This is the basic information I’ve been desperately trying to grasp about waves and how they function. This has helped me better understand physics/quantum videos I have been watching. 👏👏👏👏👏👏👍

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

I am glad my video was helpful.

[@cavejohnson3898]

Thank you so much. As soon as I saw this was uploaded I had to stop everything I was doing so I could watch. Amazing work.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

***** Thanks. It is nice to hear that you enjoy my videos that much.

[@Iamreal11xingping]

ur videos are epic, its like re-visiting those same old places that you felt you knew and hence might find boring... but then kaaaabooom its awesome, fundamentally strong and packs a power punch every time in every single video...freaking awesome, ur videos can make any panda a dragon warrior :D..Thanks for making these videos basic doubt (kinda losing track in switch from classic to quantum).... isn't the energy related to area under curve which would amount to amplitude of the wave rather than oscillation of the particle which would amount to pitch(not talking in terms of excited and ground state).....further zero probability doesn't amount to impossible event so the particle can exist at zero probability (sob :[ however in quantum like electron is never at any location so represented by probability cloud kinda thing which is influenced by consciousness) ...; so is it possible that you put explanation of quantum realm in later half of video which talks specifically /dedicated to quantum related to the topic at hand

[@phanupongasvakiat337]

Higher frequency/oscillation also have more area under the curve?

[@MichaelRainabbaRichardson]

I think this video finally taught me RF in a way that nobody else has been able to.

[@husamuddinbaha247]

you are awesome, truly helped me to visualize theoretical concepts.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Glad to hear my video was helpful. Thanks.

[@aidenwinter1117]

22:26 """DVD SCREENSAVER INTENSIFIES"""

[@Shreymani2]

😂😂

[@Just_Sara]

Did we all scream when it almost hit the corner? or was it just me?

[@commie281]

23:11

[@i.t.t.i.4777]

Thank You so much Mr Khutoryansky!. This illustration of reality was brilliant!!! Bravo! Благодарю Вас!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments.

[@breakingawayfromyou]

Lovely metal music, super on point the epicness with the topic of the video. My english is a work in progress btw(? Amaaaaaazing data♡

[@LusidDreaming]

Best background music to an educational video ever! 4:20 (no pun intended)

[@chantalx388]

🎸🤘😄

[@zmartkooky244]

This is maybe the best teaching video of any subject that I have ever seen.

[@imaginaryuniverse632]

Great video! Very informative. I wonder how waves would interact when confined to sphere and if all waves are in fact confined to a sphere? I don't know but it would make for an interesting video.

[@AlverSaGaBlack1]

KZbin se está portando bien conmigo, me recomienda cosas utiles.

[@abuzawad3192]

The way this channel makes videos is worth a billion view. Unfortunately almost a million have watched.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@Li-bn2tw]

Thank you so much for your teaching!❤❤

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@darknight92414]

I know this is a physics video but that sounds makes me feel like I'm playing the kingdom warrior games where Lu Bu shows up.

[@backslash68]

This video makes me realize how awfully wrong was the way I was taught physics at university: just pounding on formulas right from the start, taking for granted that the student knows most of what is shown in this video. Alone the first 10 minutes should be REQUIRED viewing, even before reading about the double slit experiment. Thank you Mr. Khutoryansky.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments about my video. Yes, this is a major problem with the way these subjects are taught.

[@alenkova30]

We need a video on gravitational waves and black holes!

[@rmxevbio5889]

Al fin comprendo los niveles energéticos de forma "tangible". WOW

[@jjheske]

Wow, the pictorial explanations for diffraction and especially the total reflection are great, thanks Eugene, please never stop making these brilliant informative Videos!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments. More videos are on their way.

[@Jordan_C777]

If quantum "particles" are in fact areas of amplitude in a field, why even call them particles? It sounds like "atomism" to me. If they are in fact waves then why cause the illusion of points or billiard ball-like objects if they are instead actually waves and not anything like that at all?

[@CesarRodriguez-oy5vr]

Jordan Craig I think we're getting to it man, I agree that some of them concepts are outdated. School itself is outdated, videos like this, a good physics book and a 'teacher' that only answers questions or guide us the correct way and only people that are interested in science should be in school. But I guess we have to start the change from ourselves and then the system will eventually change.

[@CesarRodriguez-oy5vr]

But yeah I've started to think of probability and punctuation on quantum fields for particles instead of billiards but the first one seems too counterintuitive lmao that I cant grasp my mind around it and actually see it in the real world

[@younessidbakkasse9742]

Uts coz they have masse

[@Inj3x]

Waves on waves on waves on waves, the intersecting waves will inevitably be the concentrated vertices where matter can gain strength.

[@howtodoit4204]

Who thought waves were this deep

[@ecmswagger]

👋

[@jamescharles1588]

This was one of the most well put together videos I’ve seen - perfect illustrations made it easy to understand the mechanics of waves. I’ve been looking for videos like this about things that are hard to understand when scientists or professors lose me in all their vocabulary crap. I don’t feel stupid after watching this video

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. Glad you like my video and thanks for the compliment.

[@bertin5273]

The background music is driving me crazy.

[@BR-vd2ux]

Weakness of your mind. Get a grip.

[@ChrisBrooker]

This is such a great explanation of the physics of waves! Love the video! This music is sooooo distracting tho 😂 I feel like I’m getting taught by Iron Maiden.

[@odyseuszkoskiniotis6266]

That's the only way to study physics