LEGO Star Wars First Order AT-ST review 😠 75201

[@JANGBRiCKS]

I thoroughly enjoyed the vast majority of The Last Jedi, which I've seen now *twice* including this scene which I watched carefully. Not including a *removable head* to complete *the actual scene* (and the titular vehicle which appears multiple times *full and complete with head* for longer than its very brief comic relief headless form), while charging the full price of an existing stunningly beautiful and complete walker? Nope. No way I'll get behind that.

[@JoMotionStudios]

JANGBRiCKS yeah!!!

[@lewismx8815]

JANGBRiCKS I 100% agree with your rants

[@BDSMaestro]

Good. Good. Let the hate flow.

[@yogbert911]

It would be cool if they added extra pieces to make the head and make it an action feature to blow it off. I think that this set is quite a shame. It could have been good.

[@yogbert911]

Also do a destruction video on gnajbricks! Pls

[@thatoneguy__1966]

This set is like producing a X-wing set but with 2 of the wings torn off and calling it a 'Battle damaged X-wing'.

[@hokage64th]

Thats hilarious!

[@thewanted-officialchannel3602]

Actually It's be more like a Z-95 Headhunter

[@just--facts]

this set makes me an angry clone

[@playerthree38]

Having a complete collapsible cabin would be nice. Friendly reminder that Lego made a ship that was in Force Awakens for about 14 frames before exploding. And that was the play feature. Edit: Jakku Quadjumper - 75178

[@spider-manthecrip783]

Alex Henley at least that was a whole ship

[@alakazam03]

And it’s a really good set

[@len9117]

that was a good set though

[@icecoyote764]

A minute of silence for Jang, who sacrificed himself by buying this Set to warn us not to buy it

[@caydenmongolo7187]

Jang: it would’ve been nice with a face reveal Me: they did an eye reveal

[@Gaybullfrog385]

Well they did show Gwendolyn's hair (barely)

[@dualmoldedb3088]

I can’t believe this is more expensive than a complete at st

[@provablegrub4581]

The old Brick But did you not release it came with a lift. It's completely worth it ; )

[@Andrew-bb7ci]

Wow... just wow. That’s absolutely stupid. This was a throw away moment in the movie. But they legit made it into a set over a lot of things

[@magikal_madz5351]

They seem to be doing a lot of that with the new star wars movies, maybe it is disney's secretive policy thats being detrimental to the merchandise available, for instance, the resistance troop transport, the is only a Lego version and a micro machine of it.

[@ilikemovies22]

Wait a minute, this is an actual set? I thought it was just a joke!

[@snakekid4475]

iLikeMovies when I saw the gnajbricks review I thought it was a moc

[@xcalibur3106]

Don't worry, the AT-ST head will come out eventually as a $20 DLC 😂😂😂

[@harrybenjamin6666]

Next set: that tie fighter that’s lost it’s wings when it crashed on jakku

[@thecommentboyidonotdovideo1946]

I think it should have the head of the at st and a play feature that when you press a button or flick a switch that the head comes off and there's bb8 sitting there, I also think it should have came with at least 1 execution trooper and the figures that we see now. It will be a bit high on price but put what you think of my idea.

[@someoneperson3794]

Not a button or switch, because the head would fall of A LOT but a lock mechanism seems bettet

[@Dirge419]

The real tell here is that Lego's own online store doesn't advertise or even have this set, makes me wonder who thought that this was OK to release...how it got past product quality checks i will never know.

[@Nobody-nw9gy]

Its made by EA you can get the head dlc by only paying 50$ and they can add better articulation for just 5$

[@memeboij5656]

We need micro transactions for free dlc

[@pelegocan4929]

Wait this is a real set... lol I thought Gnajbricks just threw this together with random spare parts xD.

[@drewc2492]

sub boost he did but he was making fun of it.

[@ARCcommand]

Dang....this is a pretty pathetic excuse for a set.....it seems like Lego has been making a lot of mistakes like this recently....over priced sets, or just plain dumb stuff like this or that Hoth Ultimate Collector's series thing.... I'm glad you're blunt and honest about it Jang!

[@Thannus]

The lack of a top half while there was one in the movie disappointed me.

[@JigglyPKMN]

Running around like a chicken walker with it’s head cut off ...

[@StormX6]

I don’t think I’ve ever heard Jang this angry about a LEGO set before.

[@emilianobarrios1388]

Timberwulfx6 neither did I. It really surprises me, even the music is sad.

[@BufferUnderrun]

Man, I love it when Janbricks rips a bad Lego set apart.

[@smoothkins]

BufferUnderrun Yeah LEGO EXPOSED

[@gehacktthahahahahha1320]

BufferUnderrun please if u can make it better

[@darthj1174]

I get the gnaj reference with rose

[@kuroyume1818]

I prefer Gnajbrick's review of this particular set

[@bluex6348]

Yeah he always tells the truth

[@DirtyDanRichards]

Wait this set is real?

[@WeirdNekoGirl]

MegalaDan Sadly, yes.

[@ethancalvano3371]

They should have made the head blowing off an action feature instead

[@antonborisov6324]

Jangbricks you seriously made my days after I turned 10 years old and I started to watch your videos. This is what you gave me: insparation, choice between sets. I even started making stop motion. Thank you!!!!

[@sawus9538]

We did it bois! The most hated LEGO Star Wars set in history!

[@bigeboye6000]

What about the UCS Assault on Hoth?

[@just--facts]

@@bigeboye6000 Nahhh this is way worse

[@coraldiamond1922]

captain loophole I mean at least the assault on hoth has enough stuff there that I feel it is kinda worth the price where as this is at full price £55 in the uk which is even more expensive than the imperial walker.

[@imjusthavingfun7629]

They should've included a removable head, I would get it then

[@operatorbutt4265]

Mike Baseball indeed

[@martijnwillemsen5870]

This thing shows how greedy Disney/Star Wars / Lego have become. If they think people buy this, they are WAY lost in a Galaxy of profit and greed.

[@biovox1386]

Nah, its not greed, they still make fantastic sets. XD

[@wbtvwtbwtbwfbabta]

I Don't Feel Lego Is Greedy,Disney Just Doesn't Give Lego Enough Info,I Mean Look At Kylo Ren's Shuttle(Then Again The Summer 2018 Wave Was Pretty Overpriced)

[@cooperm6864]

I love how mad he is and makes a point to be totally unenthusiastic

[@testv284]

They should build the real WHOLE walker and add a mechanism to pop off the head,just like the movie.They should also increase the height of that tower thing.

[@testv284]

Maybe a smaller at-st with a small head would work with the mechanism.A big head would just be too heavy and hit the childs hand

[@legohistorysam]

Worst Lego Star Wars set

[@lukabogdan6238]

jang i am really sorry you were wright.this set is realy overpriced and under featured.

[@theredbrick3249]

I thought this was a joke

[@samenneking7930]

I never thought Lego would do something this bad.

[@roycezaro1998]

I love the sad jazz in the background lol

[@amethyst_dawn]

Jangbricks, the most strictly family-friendly personality on KZbin, and a thoroughly optimistic fellow.... Just used the "Disappointed Father" tone with Lego. Hehe, that was awesome.

[@ChloeAriT]

The Rogue One AT-ST is still available! Buy that one.

[@reaven2535]

I don't necessarily mind this set. It's an important scene to the movie. I really think they could have fixed everything by giving the ability to turn it into a full AT-ST instead of leaving it off like it is. There even could have been a play feature to rip off the top of it.

[@georgelinford5576]

I hate this set *almost* as much as I hate the Last Jedi. *Almost.*

[@julielee6830]

I hate this E-to the power of 657656544754 times more and I don't even have the set And because I didn't hate the last jedi

[@donnellydominoes1134]

They should have modified this set so that a pop off head would have been an action feature. Then I’d buy it, a little like the Jakku Quadjumper

[@thanoscar9746]

next set: blown up death star

[@anthraxmacabre5200]

Bilgewater boi wait I got it! dead Obi-Wan...

[@harryw1643]

During the film when the top was about to blow off I thought there would be loads of porgs inside.That would have been a lot better

[@EnginebrandingNl]

Worst. Lego Star Wars set. Ever. Best. Jangbricks review. Ever.

[@jcm9097]

Why couldn’t Lego just make a complete FO AT-ST and make a cool ‘explosion’ feature that pops off the head and reveals BB-8 controlling it? Then just take away the elevator and it’s as easy as that, you get the figures, and the walker and it’s a good set.

[@brycebitetti1402]

It's not everyday you see Jang so mad. When I originally saw the leaked figures I was really excited, and thought that it was going to be a playset with some exploding functions and maybe even an executioner trooper or two. As it is, what a mess.

[@burntchicken9704]

They should’ve made an action feature where you can take the top off of the atst and revel the broken part

[@callumnemeth2723]

Ultimate review yes! that's what I've been saying!

[@lord_scrubington]

they should have made a normal ATST, and just given it an action feature to blow the head of.

[@commentpro8959]

i agree

[@Alex-vu4ze]

"If I sound like I'm being cynical it's because I am"

[@mathewvollmer9730]

Got this set for 50% off on amazon. Mainly bought it for the Phasma minifig, because I’m not paying $100+ for the troop transport.

[@coraldiamond1922]

mathew vollmer At half of that sounds about right. I don’t blame you for wanting to get it for the figure though as that other set is retired and is expensive anyways.

[@andrewmaddox9786]

Couldn’t they at least have given the AT ST a head that could be pulled off as a play feature????

[@entity1566]

An angry emoji in the title of a jangbricks video. Uh oh, he really is angry now...

[@satellachannel6423]

Dont worry they will sold the head in limited edition at the Comicon.

[@sawus9538]

They really should’ve just added a head and make it removable

[@vodenmyshi]

The difference with Kylo Ren's Shuttle is that it's still a good and solid set, even if if isnt screen accurate. THIS is literal junk.

[@beholdthejuice]

Jang: This set is so cool, it deserves it's own special place. *Throws it in a trash can*

[@NuuttiRannanpaa]

this set leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering.

[@LostOlympusStudios]

Jang just sounds so heart broken by this set

[@calebbuck6767]

This would be a good set if it was $25. Though it would probably be used by mostly children who pretend it's one of this smaller AT-ST (I forget the name)

[@jenkinsey7676]

I'm a fan of clones you are probably thinking of an AT-rt

[@kelseybaker682]

Half an at st is like getting a tiefighter with no wings

[@staplesoap]

I know right.

[@Thomas-lq6pf]

you have to buy the special 20 dollar dlc to get the rest of the head

[@thesheeper0873]

To make set actually good just have a first order atst with a removable head as a feature.

[@kail9777]

Next up, the Millennium Falcon blown up with LEGS ONLY and 4 figures for $39.99.

[@shockthetoast]

Leaf42 next up, Cloud City Luke Skywalker with only one hand. (Wait, I would actually buy that....)

[@JANGBRiCKS]

More like Cloud City Luke Skywalker hand... set. You can build! The 4-piece gas processing vane sensor rod! Movie accurate!

[@colesephhh9546]

*Shows This Set* Top 10 images that will make a grown man cry

[@Youngboybetta]

Only buying for the minifigs. Hopefully Lego will realize their mistake and remake this set with a full head...That and the AT-ST from 2016 had an extra 100 pieces, was complete and was cheaper...

[@2dick528]

Imperialdude94 Gaming did you buy the set? I would feel sorry for you if you did.

[@SaturnCanuck]

I agree they made a big mistake. The scene in the movie is funny, but does not deserve its own set. What they should have done is made the normal First Order AT-ST with a removable head to do the BB-8 scene if you want -- like how the DeLorean (Lego Ideas) was made to convert to the various configurations.

[@Scorpion-ww1ie]

They should at least include the head but can be remove to recreate the scene

[@ArtemisEros]

What would’ve been better is if they had a destructive feature that blows the head off and then you can seat bb8 inside.

[@themarcusismael13]

People, let's not give this set money. It's absurd they'd charge full price for half a walker that only occupies a minute in the movie.

[@StarScapesOG]

They should have made the head, but made it so it could have the head ripped off.

[@thepurpleprince9691]

It would have been fine if it came with the head that would was removable so you could recreate the scene in the movie

[@emilianobarrios1388]

The Purple Prince I thought the same

[@benjee7164]

They should of made the actual AT-ST and then had an action feature to rip the head off

[@jimsquire9048]

Right on the money Butterman5216. This set......FAIL!!!

[@austinsheets8314]

Butterman5216 this guy is a genius

[@krinklehinkle]

Same...

[@Matthewvikki]

Jang just roasted this set for the majority of the video

[@jesusayala8130]

LEGO please make a 100% complete first order at st

[@Neil-qg9cw]

Probably the worst set I've ever seen by Lego. I can't believe anyone at Lego thought this was acceptable.

[@spookwavevevo]

It should have a head and then a function to pop it off.

[@evergreen7754]

SpookWave dude exactlyyyy. this was just a lazy attempt to rake in a few bucks (from those who are looking to collect the entire series, that is)

[@troyp9155]

They would have charged $80 for that

[@moonman8450]

Couldn’t they just make an AT ST with a removable top?

[@macaroni7]

Exactly

[@dariusrat6468]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Just starts showing clouds at the end. BEST REVIEW HE HAS EVER DONE!!

[@loboros3458]

Jang sounds pissed And I dont blame him

[@alexandahazy6325]

The first time I saw this set was from Gnaj's review, and just assumed that it was an intentionally bad fake set for the sake of the joke

[@aphra2390]

I thought this was fake, but boy was I wrong

[@JTM610]

Trehan solo ikr thought it was a joke

[@SezMisery]

In the set description on the LEGO Shop website it says "Play out a daring LEGO® Star Wars mission to make off with the partially constructed First Order AT-ST walker" So not only did they realize that this wasn't a "complete" version of the thing, but they also had the scene wrong. I think if they would have been more well informed we might have seen a version with a removable head.

[@lorcan0c]

OH MY GOD, Lego are charging €64.99 for this in Ireland, that's nearly 80 dollars!! *FOR SHAME.*

[@pinkguy9122]

I love that he tries not to spoil the movie, its great

[@GlitchyCorpse]

Got to say, I like cynical Jang! Great review as always.

[@iamkvd]

I’m trying to think of a worse Lego Star Wars set, and you’re right Mr. Jangbricks, I can’t. This is it. I would say I was disappointed at how Kylo Ren’s Command Shuttle ended up, but this is a terrible pile of plastic. Thanks for always giving us your honest feedback. Happy Life Day, and may the force be with you.

[@omeyara0749]

they should have included the head but with a play feature that you're able to pop off the head.

[@spencemundorf7998]

That was probably the funniest review you've made Jang. Honestly I'm glad you let us know about the poor quality because I was actually giving this set some thought (mostly because of the figures, I need Phasma) but now I know better. Thank you Jang

[@k-874]

"First Order AT-ST LEGO set is great" . . . . . AND OTHER HILARIOUS JOKES YOU CAN TELL YOURSELF

[@AlecFortescue]

why not just make a removable cockpit instead of the skeleton elevator? Wish they make an "add-on" in a poly or small box and send it to people upon request and proof that they own the set.

[@markpowell7395]

Brilliant review, perhaps the most brutally honest I've ever seen. Good for you for telling it straight.

[@tylerpeterson4684]

I agree that it should come with the full head and just make it easy to remove.

[@valdemarbndinghansen3109]

When i saw your review video of this on gnajbricks i actually thought that you had just taken the head of an at-st and made a quick build on the side

[@NuuttiRannanpaa]

Valdemar BH same lol

[@CaptBlock]

Use your hate. Use your anger, Jang, and your journey to the dark side will be complete.

[@StarMiners0416]

*Do it* (insert Palpatine's laugh)

[@animationstation5802]

I think it was a risk. What I think might have worked better either have a full at st with a removable head to make it look like this. Or perhaps make it part of some huge set called... idk “escape from the star destroyer”

[@thinwhitedukestar]

animation station yeah i think a set this size should have the at-st with a head and a ucs set should have this one

[@gwpandia]

Lego should rename the title to "Headless First Order ATST" or sth like that, this is not an ATST, this is scam for those not seeing the movie.

[@RyCitrus]

I think the set would've been A LOT better if they included the head or frame that was blown off the at-st in the movie and made that as a feature. I guess it wouldn't be that bad.

[@IARESMART8]

I saw the gnajbricks video and didn't realize he was basing it of a real set

[@DarthVader-jw9bt]

Definitely not buying this when I can just behead my rogue one at st. Thanks for the review!

[@fireangel9753]

This set is depressing

[@CT--my4lf]

This: 40$ Rogue One AT-ST: 40$ GET THE ONE FROM ROGUE ONE!!!!!!!! P.S: Maybe Gnajbricks could do a video taking his apart, and smashing the box? XD

[@DarthVaderOfficial]

MYYY ATST!!!! *crushes ATST like that piece of paper*