We run 87 octane gas in our 4 banger turbo rubicon. We typically get about 21 mpg around town. We haven't taken it on any long road trips, so don't know mpg on long runs. It works very well in our Alaskan snow.
@LoneWolvesMedia3 жыл бұрын
I work for Jeep and own a few 4.0 XJs but anyways honestly when they first came out I was never able to upsale it because Jeep fans know the 3.6 is a long proven motor but after 3 years of being around them I needed buying myself one ! Such a fun motor
@jothew57802 жыл бұрын
Just got the 2022 willys 2 door with the 2.0 turbo thing is a beast. nothing has stopped it yet
@Flips4202 жыл бұрын
Just got the 2022 2.0 I4, Rubicon. More power than any prior V6 Jeep owned. Very pleased with it and its towing capability as well.
@PerformanceOnWheels2 жыл бұрын
Congrats!
@azreed19764 жыл бұрын
Had my 2019 2.0L JLU Rubicon for almost 2 years now. 61k miles on her. She's been an absolute pleasure!!! I'm in Colorado Springs and go skiing every year and explore the abandoned gold mines every summer. There isn't anything this Jeep hasn't been able to overcome. 2" MOPAR lift with 35" tires on factory wheels. Only used the winch for other Jeeps and Fords. Absolutely love her but there have been times I have wondered if I went with the right engine (particularly when looking at aftermarket add-ons). The supreme fuel is more expensive but I'm okay with it.
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
Good write up. Thanks for sharing.
@azreed19764 жыл бұрын
@@PerformanceOnWheels Thanks! Nowhere near the quality or expertise you have, but I am very happy with my rig. It's only occasionally that I wonder if I should have gone with a different engine, but hasn't been performance related yet.
@randytorboli3 жыл бұрын
The 2.0L turbo is also used in the cherokee
@jonnuckles33443 жыл бұрын
I was very skeptical about the 2.0 turbo. I decided to go with it simply because the rest of the unlimited had everything we wanted. I am impressed. The power and the feeling of being pressed into the seat on acceleration is a hoot. We will be trading to a 2022 and I will chose the 2.0 Turbo
@PerformanceOnWheels3 жыл бұрын
Yep.... This video is old. At this point the 3.6 is outdated imo.
@dad35623 жыл бұрын
Are you using 91 octane or just good old 87?
@reddragon91823 жыл бұрын
@@dad3562 87. And it runs fine
@michelnault66673 жыл бұрын
I know.. that 2.0 Hurricane.. I never thought I could fall in love again :)
@mativataoipu3336 Жыл бұрын
They just discontinued the 2 liter turbo for 22
@trev114heusdens4 жыл бұрын
Love my 2020 2.0. Running 38s on factory 4.10 gears and this thing screams up the mountains and I have ample power at elevation unlike my V6 buddies.
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
Good insight!
@Eddy-094 жыл бұрын
I do have a question about the 2.0.. We rented one for Colorado, and we were driving around 12,000ft elevation like we had been the days before. All of a sudden it just drove lazy. The power just wasn’t there anymore, even on highway driving. We would floor it and the power was gone. Well the next morning it was back to normal without doing anything to it. Any experience with this issue? Any idea what could have done it?
@trev114heusdens4 жыл бұрын
@@Eddy-09 I have not had that issue. I know the E-torque has had power issues but I do not have that on my Jeep. Did you have an E-torque
@Eddy-094 жыл бұрын
Trevor Heusdens That’s actually a great question, I’m going to look into it. From what I understand only the Sahara comes with the e torque option, is that correct? If so, I did not have the Sahara.
@trev114heusdens4 жыл бұрын
@@Eddy-09 depending on the year some Rubicons had E-torque but it proved problematic off road I believe so they took it off
@F2FTech4 жыл бұрын
I’m enjoying my 2.0L Wrangler. You can use 87/89 octane, but you’ll definitely experience pinging under heavy acceleration. I use 93 octane in mine and avg 25 mpg on my back road commute to work. On the hwy it gets about 23 ish. I’ll probably grab a piggy back tuner at some point, adds around 40-50 HP for around $500. It’s already pretty quick, as I was able to hang with a Ford Raptor for awhile, but he eventually started pulling away. With a tune I’m sure I would of hung in there a lot longer. Anyway, thanks for the video.
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
Of course glad you liked it! Dont forget to like and subscribe!
@Eddy-094 жыл бұрын
Is there any word on how reliable these are in general, and with the tune? I rented one for Colorado this weekend and absolutely loved it. Had no idea it was the 2.0T until we popped the hood. Definitely a zippy car I was surprised with the power. Funny thing I didn’t even put 91 or 93 and it did amazing, I can imagine with premium it would have more power. What did you mean by experiencing “pinging under heavy acceleration”?
@TheRoadTaken2 жыл бұрын
@@Eddy-09 Pinging aka "engine knocks." It's when the fuel burns before the piston reaches full compression (maximum benefit of the combustion). The engine slightly misses maximum performance and thus why overall speed, power delivery, and fuel consumption takes a hit. Today's' computerized engines _can_ help combat this. As I understand it, it is not damaging to the engine.
@wallaceharris4490 Жыл бұрын
I am 69 years old and bought my first jeep in October 2022. It was a used 2018 Wrangler 2.0T 2D with 24K and we like it. We bought it for a daily driver to do our errands in and to keep from putting so much mileage on my truck and her car. I don't put my foot in it and am getting 24-26 mpg in town and have gotten up to 29.4 on the interstate on 93 octane gas. We don't have 91 octane here. I thought about running 87 in it and was told I could, but wonder how much it will affect the power and performance I am getting now. I don't want to do anything that would cut the life of the engine short. It is a personal decision I guess, what fits each person best.
@MeerkatMoon5 жыл бұрын
The 8.4 display also comes with the premium Alpine speaker system. Just fyi.
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching and sharing Graham.
@goldtiptimmy883 жыл бұрын
The 8.4" upgrade with the Alpine speaker system is an $1800 upgrade. Worth every cent. When I put Boom Mats on top the stereo with the sub sounds SO GOOD!
@scottlawrence13912 жыл бұрын
Love the Turbo 4. I was VERY apprehensive but it was loaded with Leather and the right color. I guarantee this thing is traded before the warranty is up though.
@ericwang6043 жыл бұрын
Just had mine 2.0T. Such a fun toy
@PerformanceOnWheels3 жыл бұрын
Heck ya!
@zendog573 жыл бұрын
The guy says this doesn't get good mileage! Wow! I have a 2020 2.0L turbo and it gets 27-28 consistently. And dont step on it unless you want to get pushed back in your seat.
@PerformanceOnWheels3 жыл бұрын
That is awesome! This video was made when they were brand new to the market. Glad they can put down those numbers!!
@DimplesChild4012 жыл бұрын
Exactly 💯💪🏽😎
@alansoto58226 ай бұрын
I have the same Jeep and it’s great but recently when I turn it on it sounds like there is a shortage somewhere it’s weird 😭
@shawnmccuen69084 жыл бұрын
My experience with 4cyl turbos is they are more zippy. But they burn themselves out faster and need more maintenance.
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
Sounds about right
@shawnmccuen69084 жыл бұрын
@@PerformanceOnWheels I'm actually very excited about finally being in a place financially to purchase my first Jeep. I'm leaning towards the 4 door Willy's editions.
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
@@shawnmccuen6908 I love the willys!! Congrats you will love it! Get a sweet color!
@shawnmccuen69084 жыл бұрын
@@PerformanceOnWheels It's the poor man's Rubicon package.
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
@@shawnmccuen6908 😂😂😂 Never thought of it like that
@Eddy-094 жыл бұрын
So knowing that the 2.0T doesn’t require premium, can we agree that it indeed does have better mpg even if both engines use 87?
@marylandestatetreasures69522 жыл бұрын
I just purchased a 2022 Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon. Jeep decreased the price by $500 on an ordered Wrangler for the 4 cyl and the 8.5 inch screen is now standard. Compared to a friend's 2020 Rubicon with a 3.6L V-6, I am getting 2 miles per gallon better mileage on regular gas. I get better highway mileage (23MPG v. 20 MPG) also on regular gas. He has not modded his Wrangler and my mods are sitting in the back waiting for the weather to warm up so that I can install them. And I like the push off the line. I get much better acceleration with the I-4 than he does with the V-6. I am very happy with the 4 cyl Wrangler!
@PerformanceOnWheels2 жыл бұрын
Good to hear!
@laura-leedaniels-smith89472 жыл бұрын
This makes me happy to hear! I’m purchasing the exact same wrangler as you and was wondering how it is
@KubanKevin7 ай бұрын
I’d recommend 91+ on the 3.6 as well. I have a gladiator and there is spark knock when using 87 or 89. The Pentastar has an 11.3:1 compression ratio which I think is the cause of the spark knock when using 87.
@RKmndo4 жыл бұрын
The biggest difference anybody is likely to see between the 2.0T and the 3.6 is at high altitudes. A 3.6 will feel considerably weaker above 5K feet, vs what a 2.0T probably feels like there.
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
Thats an excellent point no one has made yet
@jonnuckles33443 жыл бұрын
I had not thought about the altitude. Good point. I live at 5k feet so no wonder I'm a fan of the 2.0 Turbo
@19hundoc473 жыл бұрын
I have a 3.6 and live in Denver and it feels plenty powerful. Coming from a guy that owns 500 HP Mustang
@bobvedder24512 жыл бұрын
My jeep is the gladiator rubicon with the 3.6 automatic - a good rig!
@robsolf2 жыл бұрын
I don't get fake vents, either. I get the look, but my question is, "why not just make them functional?". I suppose they don't want to add the rain plumbing, I guess...
@ericsantiago91873 ай бұрын
Still running with a 2013 rubicon. 255,000 miles.
@30smsuperstrat5 жыл бұрын
Great video. The 4 feels great to drive. I was ready to buy one then I watched this video. This is the first and only video with the mention of this engine requiring 91 octane. I spent 15 years with an Acura with those requirements paying $.30-.50 more at the pump per gallon to get the stated mpg. NO WAY am I doing that again! That's like $300 more per year in fuel plus turbo maintenance. I know "recommended ", which means poor fuel economy and more maintenance if you don't.
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
This is one reason we love Costco. 92 octane there is typically around $.50 a gallon cheaper than other stations. Thanks for watching!
@30smsuperstrat5 жыл бұрын
@@PerformanceOnWheels i only fuel up at Costco and Fred Meyer with fuel discounts. Premium is still .30-.40 more then the regular at those stations too. 😏
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
@@30smsuperstrat Costco is the way to go! We do the same!
@futzalfan5 жыл бұрын
@@PerformanceOnWheels Costco is like 91 octane, it's not everywhere! And the long term cost of sub 91 is to be taken in consideration. Great Vid guys! May be good to mention the benefit of the turbo in higher elevation!
@gamerscouncil22623 жыл бұрын
Man great review, I really enjoyed this.
@PerformanceOnWheels3 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it! Check out some of our other videos as well!
@speedtriprr5374 жыл бұрын
Rented a Jeep this week for vacation. First thing I noticed was the engine was the best engine I have ever driven with. It’s the turbo. We are going to buy a Rubicon now. Coming from Mercedes we always said we would never own a Jeep but driving one changed our mind for sure.
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
Lol. We traded our last Jeep in for a Mercedes. Have been looking at buying a Jeep often since then..... Might buy a bronco.....?!?!
@speedtriprr5373 жыл бұрын
@Cano R no idea what your trying to say lol
@speedtriprr5373 жыл бұрын
@Cano R happy for you
@metthem883 жыл бұрын
@@speedtriprr537 how do you know someone has a jeep 'Rubicon'? They will tell you. Just like a vegetarian
@PerformanceOnWheels3 жыл бұрын
😲
@ting2006jd2 жыл бұрын
I am strongly considering buying one with a 2.0 litre turbo. This 2.0 turbo beats the new Ford Bronco in acceleration up to 3 to 4 car length and Bronco beats the Wrangler with a pentastar in a comparison video I watched last night. I won't be racing anyone but its nice to know the 2.0 turbo is a stronger and more efficient motor.
@PerformanceOnWheels2 жыл бұрын
I will fully admit I would love the V8 Defender....however the 2.0 is truly a solid motor. Great power train paired with the zf.
@slavakuznetsov49662 жыл бұрын
My 2.0L Rubicon stays above 21 all the time on regular gasoline (21 is the worst, normally 23 - 27). My buddy got himself V6 (auto) Willy and he got 18 from the same trip few weeks ago. Both jeeps are 100% stock.
@leenewman622 жыл бұрын
You must do mostly HWY, my 21 Rubi (stock) 2.0L hovers around 18-19 most of the time, but i'm driving city/hwy and in traffic alot of the time
@Connor_Dempsey2 жыл бұрын
Great review
@rtingdds5 жыл бұрын
This is not the 2020 Rubicon. 2020 Jeep remove the "e torque" from the Rubicon and Sports models, only Sahara come standard with 2.0 e torque. The Rubicon now offer 2.0 turbo without the e torque and use 87 Octane gas. How do I know? I just bought one yesterday and did all my research.
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
True! Is this your first Wrangler? I feel there is still confusion even from FCA on there recommendation on higher octane. I feel like I read something recently from FCA that said they recommend higher octane in warmer months but that was it?!?! There has been different and conflicting information release, since this video was made. We do appreciate the conversation and you taking the time to watch!
@rtingdds5 жыл бұрын
@@PerformanceOnWheels on the infotainment system, when I search for the fuel info, it said 87 octane is recommended. My jeep Rubicon is the 2.0 turbo without e torque
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
@@rtingdds good info!! Thanks.
@jasminesmith21124 жыл бұрын
I got a sport 2020 with a 2.0L 4cyl turbo with etorque just bought it Saturday
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
I would be willing to bet you are high on life right about now?
@PKDesigns20112 жыл бұрын
It feels ok n if ya leasing or renting these it be a kool thing to get ... but if ya looking to own then the extra parts will eventually ware out and need extra $$$, add the fuel price difference ontop n it's something to omit for me ... if they just reverted back to a normal 3.6l w/o auto start / stop and gave it bit more torque down low ( naturally not etorque) it be the perfect motor ...
@announcer916 күн бұрын
Hey..Fury motors! I’m looking at a used rubicon there now!!
@PerformanceOnWheels16 күн бұрын
That’s awesome!
@logger7115 жыл бұрын
Why dont they use the 3.0 turbo diesel in the 2019 grand cherokee 250hp 400ftlb
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
Based on very recent articles your wish will be granted soon . Thank you for the comment. Please subscribe. What do you think of the Gladiator?
@xaph00d785 жыл бұрын
I just bought a 2019 Rubicon. Dealer let me take home a 2.0L and 3.6L each for 48hrs --- Not sure if this makes any sense but the 3.6L felt like it was really meant to be in the Jeep, whereas the 2.0L didn't. I didn't notice any fuel difference, but then again both cars were brand new and by no means broken in. I ended up going with the 3.6L for 3 reasons 1- Reliability, the 3.6 has been around for a while and the 2019 (and 2018) have improvements on the last gen which was noticeable from the JK's I drove, 2-Up here in Canada (not sure in US) they charge about $1,000 more for the 2.0L. For some reason the 2.0L are sitting on the lots up here and many dealers are discounting them heavily. At least in my area, there doesn't seem to be an appetite for the 4 banger.and 3 - On my second day of driving the 2.0L I had a check engine light which turns out had to do with the hybrid system, most likely a fluke I ended up having the one 2.0L with issues, but didn't make me feel great) --- My first Jeep was a 1991 Jeep YJ with a naturally aspirated 4 cyl, and I absolutely loved it. I beat the crap out of it and it never let me down, but then again it was a very simple engine. The 2.0L Turbo is still a new engine, and I think they'll need a few years to iron out the bugs. Great video btw
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
Great write up you did. I get what your saying. 4cylnders are definitely sitting around on lots here as well. 1,000 more in the US as well. Thanks for watching!! Good luck with the new rig!
@futzalfan5 жыл бұрын
Very helpful comments! In the market now. Didn't know a dealer would let you take home one for a 48 hr test drive, and two! What a good way to go. Thanks again!
@DirtReborn3 жыл бұрын
Add exhaust and a CAI! It wakes up tremendously!
@larrys98797 ай бұрын
Turbos are just one more potential expensive maintenance issue. My grandson was a Mercedes mechanic. He has lots of stories about turbo problems and how expensive they are to repair or replace. And premium gas is required in turbo engines.
@dr.e.jordanblanche83094 жыл бұрын
The vents aren’t fake. Lead designer confirmed
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
Interesting.....you have an article to reference? Curious about it. Thanks for bringing it up.
@dr.e.jordanblanche83094 жыл бұрын
Performance On Wheels I can look for some written reference. I spoke with Brian Leyes at Jeep directly, who even emphasized, “I would never put a fake vent on a Jeep.”
@neilsenmarquez60583 жыл бұрын
Im bout to pick up the 2021 willys 2.0 litter turbo. Im torn between the 4 cy and v6
@alains76443 жыл бұрын
I drove both at the dealer the 4 cy and the v6 .The v6 felt a lot heavier and slow when you hit the gas but the 4 cy man they are fast and fun to drive. It was an easy decision for me I got a 2021 jeep wrangler unlimited rubicon 2.0 t with the sky one touch all black!!!
@kriswinger93914 жыл бұрын
Filmed in good ole Stillwater & Oak Park Heights Minnesota!👍
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
Yes sir!
@waynedickinson20963 жыл бұрын
We have a 2021 Sahara unlimited with 2.0. On the hwy it gets 15.5 mpg all day long.....
@mohamedomar11725 жыл бұрын
What about the Wrangler hybrid?
@meggabitz2 жыл бұрын
FYI it is Pentastar, not Penstar.
@frankENZC Жыл бұрын
Great video! I know I'm a bit slow in finding it. Right now, doing research on the 2023 or 24 Wrangler. The 2024 with that 12" infotainment screen. Now in regard to the 2.0L turbo. Just a thought. If you got the 2.0L and could get the same 4WD system that's on the 392 (with that Auto mode) wouldn't that aid acceleration? A drop in K&N air filter and a tune, as you mentioned. Also, I was thinking maybe the 2-door as its just me. Thanks.
@karmicforce014 жыл бұрын
The 2.0 should be more mod friendly... eventually.
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
Very true
@DavidMendoza-yc2pp4 жыл бұрын
Trying to decide between 4 cyl and 6 cyl. Very helpful! Thank you!
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
Awesome! Read through the comments as well I think other viewers have shared helpful insight.
@Kyle-ql5dz4 жыл бұрын
I have 4 cyl and it has some kick. Definitely not any Porsche or anything but way faster than a jk
@jaymatthews52513 жыл бұрын
I also just bought a 4. Very quick and has some punch.
@jonnuckles33443 жыл бұрын
chose the 2.0 Turbo. Change oil every 3or 4 thousand miles to keep the turbo clean. You will not regret it.
@blover85483 жыл бұрын
@@jonnuckles3344 I also have a 2021 4 cylinder turbo and it’s fast first Jeep in my life so I’m happy for now.
@gs989995 жыл бұрын
If that’s a 2020 rubicon you guys drove, it didn’t have the BSG system (etorque). They discontinued that for 2020 on all but the Sahara trim. The rubicon turbo is now non etorque. If you didn’t notice the lack of e assist that is awesome as it makes it less complex!
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
For sure! Thanks for the comment. This was the 2019 model. Shortly after the video was made we learned of the etorque going bye bye in the 4banger. I am still a fan of the 4cyl. I fear that many people are not though??
@wissamharb56843 жыл бұрын
How the etorque in comparison ? I am about to order a 2021 sahara and I'm still torn between the standard 4 cyl or the v6..
@PerformanceOnWheels3 жыл бұрын
Drive both!! I honestly don't think you can go wrong. Kind of a driver's preference deal.
@gs989993 жыл бұрын
@@wissamharb5684 Jeep has now flipped the Etorque system in 2021. It’s now standard on V6 and not available on turbo 4. (Automatic transmissions).
@wissamharb56843 жыл бұрын
@@gs98999 that's great! I'm still going to test drive this weekend although I'm sold on the 2.0 turbo. It'll save me $1,500 too. I'd use it on the selec trac 4wd + anti slip instead
@markim5087 Жыл бұрын
Start stop, lol I freaking hate that on anything but AA’battries which you can’t tell if it’s running or not anyway, unless your looking out the side window
@Arrivion8 ай бұрын
I admit it's better in every way EXCEPT SOUND and I care a lot about that so v6 all day
@mntgoat2.0Ай бұрын
The turbo shines at high altitude
@19hundoc473 жыл бұрын
I’ll keep the V6. It’ll go 200-300k miles no problem. A 4 cylinder turbo won’t do that without a turbo replacement or rebuild
@blover85483 жыл бұрын
The 2.0 you had and it didn’t last or you assume it’s a 4 cylinder it won’t last with good maintenance?
@MisterMikeTexas3 жыл бұрын
Is Mopar making a mistake not offering a stick with the Four?
@PerformanceOnWheels3 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure exactly...
@JLBREMER4 жыл бұрын
Had a Nissan Juke with Turbo and always put better gas in it. Sunday I traded my 2011 JKU for the 2019 2.0 4cyl sport. Wondering if this was a good decision! I drove both the v6 and the 4cyl. The v6 was super zippy and fast the 2.0 sounds like an RC car but it feels like a car engine in a Jeep. Kind of like a city Jeep. Interesting to see it get good reviews that I'm glad. Also I want to mention, my first thought after driving the 2.0 is IT NEEDS AN AGRESIVE SOUNDING EXHAUST lol that'll fix the sound.
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
It sure does! What brand you gonna go with?
@JLBREMER4 жыл бұрын
@@PerformanceOnWheels I got the 2.0 4 Cyl JL. So far it's fun but way different than the JKU. Can't wait to start customizing it.
@brucecollett86634 жыл бұрын
Got the 4. I use 87. 23 mpg in town. It will still get up and go.
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
Sweeeet
@cartermackenzie11354 жыл бұрын
I tuned mine and it really gets up and goes
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
@@cartermackenzie1135 I bet! MORRR BOOOSSST
@cartermackenzie11354 жыл бұрын
Performance On Wheels ok so after about 2000 miles or so on the jb4 I was pulling onto the loop in my town and I heard a giant pop and oil shot out everywhere. I’m getting it looked into rn
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
Oh boy 😳. Keep us/everyone in the loop. I had a Ram pick-up back in the day that had a similar experience. It needed a new motor.
@awall20004 жыл бұрын
I have a 2L Volkswagen with full bolt-ons, and I dyno-ed @325whp & 335wtq. If I can do that in a Jeep JL that comes with more horsepower, I'm buying a Jeep JL. I've been waiting for a jeep where I can tune the s*** out of the motor without having to spend 15K on a Hemi swap. I'm assuming by the stock power numbers that the motor has a Golf R size turbo tuned for torque.
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
Do it and keep us in the loop on progress!
@Eddy-094 жыл бұрын
I’m curious to see how these do with a tune, and maybe even an intake to help add a bit more power. I’d like to see how reliable they are in stock form, and after tuning.
@EricRaroha5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video. Its the only one I saw that mentioned the 91 octane recommendation for the 4cyl.
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
Thanks Eric! Subscribing would mean a lot to us. Do you own a Wrangler or in the market for one?
@goofsaddggkle73514 жыл бұрын
They have actually clarified since this has come out that 91 octane is really for when towing.
@zumezoom95934 жыл бұрын
is there aftermarket for diesel extended tank to go the extra mile? which will be more durable and reliable?
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
I bet there is! The after market for the wrangler world is huge and realibity between the 4 and the 6 the 6 will be more reliable
@josephbyrnhopf24815 жыл бұрын
Took a Jeep to 14k in the San Juans? Don't think so, dude! There're only two roads above 14k in Colo. They're both paved. Mt. Antero only goes to 13,900. An old good running '50s car is all you need for those. You need to drive Blanca Peak or Holy Cross to test that Rubi. Old locked/lifted Cherokees do it all the time. Those are appreciating now. Moab's Golden Spike and Rusty Nail are good practice trails before you follow a good vintage Cherokee up Pritchett Canyon.
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
Joseph thanks for commenting. I would love to try them all! The Telluride area experience was the first I had. Beautiful. It has been a handful of years now. I am almost certain I have a picture next to a 14k' sign? I believe Imogene pass was like 13,300 right? I would like to check out some red rocks in the near future!!
@josephbyrnhopf24814 жыл бұрын
@@PerformanceOnWheels Imogene is a little over 13,100. You can take an easy hike to 13, 400+ from the summit. I have a jpg of my 2wd '61 ford crew cab sitting at the summit of Imogene. A friend and I had just installed a granny gear before taking it up Imogene. Had a flat just below the summit. Luckily the other 4 held up returning to Ouray via Dallas Divide/Ridgeway. I would bet that sign was pointing to a fourteener.
@UporaFilms3 жыл бұрын
if it has auto start/stop does it also have auto brake hold? My 2014 is sluggish, it takes a little while to get it where I want it to on the highway. If you're saying the 4 cyl will solve this for me, then I'll go with the 4 cylinder.
@PerformanceOnWheels3 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure they don't have brake hold but I could be wrong
@MisterMikeTexas3 жыл бұрын
Can you get 200,000 miles out of the turbo 4 banger?
@PerformanceOnWheels3 жыл бұрын
You would've to check out fourms on that one
@tts425724 жыл бұрын
Good video! When this video was made, was the 2.0T more expensive than the 3.6? On my recent 2021 JLUR build, the 3.6 was $1,500 more than the 2.0T. Personally, didn't feel like the 3.6 was worth $1,500 more after driving them both and not really noticing a huge difference. And dealer showed me in the manual where it says 87 octane gas is just fine with the newer builds of the 2.0T. Not sure if they changed something with that from when this video was made. It does say performance can be optimized using 91 seems like 87 will be fine for most uses.
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
Yeah the 2.0 was more expensive. I do believe the 87 has always been acceptable. Although stated not clearly the point was to get all the claimed MPG and performance 91 or higher was needed. What one did you buy?
@tts425724 жыл бұрын
@@PerformanceOnWheels I ordered a 2021 JLUR with the 2.0T. Don't have it yet so can't comment on it besides the test drives I did. Hoping I made a good choice! I'm honestly mostly just wanted a cool vehicle for daily driving so hoping the 2.0 serves me well.
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
Awesome. Wranglers are fun for sure. I don't think you will be disappointed in anyway. Congrats on the new ride!
@goofsaddggkle73514 жыл бұрын
I’ve mentioned that point about the manual and 87 octane about 3 times in this comments section now lol 😂
@laura-leedaniels-smith89472 жыл бұрын
@@tts42572 hey dude! How is your JLUR treating you? I’m looking for a vehicle right now and thinking the same
@jasonuy33073 жыл бұрын
Nice one, rubicon. May I ask a favor from Jeep wranglers management. To please let the viewers or followers of "Jeep". That how come for decades now have had passed. The Jeep Wrangler company never improve its two front seats to POWERED one. What I mean to powered seats adjustment. They do improved/update its Engines/doors/tires/camera & in other parts yearly. But the two front seats in Jeep wrangler seems is likened to the tree of life in the garden of EDEN. "forbidden to be powered/improve "
@RobbieMraz2 жыл бұрын
How much did you spend on Gas for the 4 cylinder?
@TRUEEARTHQC3 жыл бұрын
proud owner of a fx4 ecoboost here... how would it compare to the 3.5 ecoboost feeling wise?
@PerformanceOnWheels2 жыл бұрын
I'm unsure....
@waynedickinson20963 жыл бұрын
Made a mistake on my commet it’s 25.5 mpg all day long....
@emtblife89443 жыл бұрын
And now Jeep has a hybrid Wrangler!
@PerformanceOnWheels3 жыл бұрын
4xE
@emtblife89443 жыл бұрын
@@PerformanceOnWheels I just bought a Sarge green one! Love it!
@PerformanceOnWheels3 жыл бұрын
I have yet to drive one I've herd it's a good system they got going on
@MatthiasNyberg11 ай бұрын
What happens if you're in very difficult terrain and the battery runs out?
@PerformanceOnWheels11 ай бұрын
it still has a gas motor
@07ArchAngel2 жыл бұрын
I have a 2018 JL 2 door sport with the 2.0 Turbo, no problems so far. Its very snappy and I have had no issues with it off road. I have also removed most of the turbo lag with some upgrades. When you drive it like grandma you can get 25 around town and near 30 on the HW and Its got 32x10.5 BFG mud tires on it. I do think the 6 will last longer for sure but that turbo is a lot of fun.
@spoolspeedbearings2 жыл бұрын
Drove both today and it was a no brainer! The V6 Pentastar is leaps and bounds better than the little Italian 4 cylinder. The 4 cyl turbo is loaded with turbo lag and thank God it is only teamed with the H-speed transmission because that is what makes it drivable. That little four-cylinder could not operate without that transmission. When you put that same eight speed transmission behind the V6, that is a combination that is 100% unbeatable. 99% of all day magazines and testers decide with the six also. If you are looking for Something that will be dependable many years down the road, that two is a no-brainer! A naturally aspirated v6 is much better
@rezamiri1004 жыл бұрын
I love American car i love jeep rubcon.. Hey Guies pray for me that i can have 1... 1day
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
We will!
@rideintothesun81062 жыл бұрын
The 2.0 turbo 4 cyl is now a $500 reduction in price!! The sticker will show -$500 for this engine.The penstar v6 is now a $750 option/ addition. Times are a changing.
@PerformanceOnWheels2 жыл бұрын
😲😲
@Ken-qq6gp Жыл бұрын
Remember that to achieve those power numbers the V4 requires premium fuel. Yup
@ronald86733 жыл бұрын
it has the turbo whine
@PerformanceOnWheels3 жыл бұрын
Weee psshshhhh
@jesuswasahermetic58715 жыл бұрын
I want the 2 door with gladiator bed J6 prototype made production. Check that one out.
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
I have not seen a prototype yet. But have always been a huge fan of the Brute conversations in years past.
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
@@jesuswasahermetic5871 pretty sweetttt
@jesuswasahermetic58715 жыл бұрын
Performance On Wheels IKR.... I wanna spend my money on that. Ps... Spread the word and maybe we can get that production
@atombomb671910 ай бұрын
Own a 2021 Jeep Wrangler Sahara 6 cyl 6-speed The gas mileage blows away the turbo No pun intended I average between 25 and 28 on the highway. Depends on how much luggage I'm dragging
@topofthegreen Жыл бұрын
How much will you love it when that expensive turbo system fails and its ridiculously expensive.
@PerformanceOnWheels Жыл бұрын
There is almost no getting around a turbo engine. I bet in 2-3 years, every vehicle will have a turbo if it is a combustion engine.
@edalabdali2 жыл бұрын
A 4 cylinder 2.0L engine on a heavy vehicle is obviously not a good idea. Engine will wear off faster
@rustybayonetcom4 жыл бұрын
If they pay me $1000 to take a 4 banger is it worth it?
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
If they pay you??
@zencoatlrios26484 жыл бұрын
I want a wrangler with V8... why not? :(
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
It can be done.....
@wyldsimon3 жыл бұрын
392, is on the Jeep.com website!
@blueweb005 жыл бұрын
What about the 2020 diesel option?
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
We will review it as soon as we can! Thanks for the comment and subscribe!!
@futzalfan5 жыл бұрын
@@PerformanceOnWheels don't do the same script as the others, Please! Besides added weight up front, many extra costs: def, oil changes, higher fuel costs, tune ups, reliability, and the fact that the CEO states no more diesels any of their vehicles in the next two years. Was so waiting for the Cummins.
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
@@futzalfan We actually did not watch one video on this topic before making ours, we 100% make all of our script as we go or based on our notes made going in. From there decide what to put in a put out while editing. Thank you for watching though! We appreciate the comment but we do not copy others!
@AllroundSwizzy4 жыл бұрын
When they call 91 octane 'higher octane'.....the lowest we can even get here is 95
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
😳 where is here?
@AllroundSwizzy4 жыл бұрын
Switzerland Europe. Getting my JLU Rubicon in 2 weeks. So hyped
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
@@AllroundSwizzy awesome! Let us know how it is!!
@RKmndo4 жыл бұрын
Octane is rated differently in the USA. Our Regular is 87 Octane (USA) High-altitude regions of the USA have 85 Octane as their Regular. Our 87-rated Regular is similar to EU Regular. The Octane rating is just measured differently.
@javiermorales18524 жыл бұрын
If you live in EU you need to use the 98 octane. That is the equivalent of U.S 91/93. The octane rating used in Europe is different than in the U.S. that is why the U.S has 87/89/91 options and Europe has 91/98⛽️. They are the same just use different number for measurement.I did my research when I moved to Europe and brought my challenger with me.
@LastRites4 жыл бұрын
That engine belongs in a Kia, this coming from someone that truly enjoys a 4 banger boosted motor...stoked that I'm running a few more cylinders in my Wrangler
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
Just wait for the 392
@TheSchmed4 жыл бұрын
Tell me in five years.
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
I agree. You cannot deny that smaller displacement and turbos are what is overtaking the industry. Five years from now it will be interesting to see how good of an idea it was.
@TheSchmed4 жыл бұрын
Performance On Wheels yep, higher RPMs, which causes higher temp, secondary electric motor. Now, 3.0L diesel, that’s a more viable option, I’m sure they can get 330HP from the Pentastar, and 10-20% more TQ, even naturally aspirated.
@davidecampana96147 ай бұрын
2 giovani sprovveduti 😀
@kitjeep5 жыл бұрын
The turbo is junk mine been in the shop 8 times already go with the 3.6 penastar
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
Sean knight I have heard rumbles on reliability. What issues are you seeing?
@phillyb45884 жыл бұрын
Crickets he is fake
@kitjeep4 жыл бұрын
Had so many issues with it FCA purchase it back with the lemon law I order the diesel
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
What were the issues if you don't mind sharing?
@kitjeep4 жыл бұрын
@@PerformanceOnWheels burning excessive amounts of oil and I would get up in the morning to go to work 11 times the jeep would not start I'm sure they're not all bad but I would stick with a 3.6 or the diesel
@78awhite Жыл бұрын
The title should say "Better than", not then.
@javierp2615 жыл бұрын
Which one would you recommend v4 or v6
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
I think the turbo 4 is more fun. I think the v6 is the safer bet however.
@javierp2615 жыл бұрын
Thank you when can i order a 2020 jeep wrangler
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
@@javierp261 you can order/buy 2020 Wranglers now. What one are you getting?
@AaronAL595 жыл бұрын
I got the 2020 2 door wrangler sport with the i4 turbo and It comes in next week
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
@@AaronAL59 color? Keeping stock or hitting the trails?
@slucas8258 Жыл бұрын
Bruh is trying to eat that steering wheel. Scoot back! You aren't supposed to sit that close.
@XX-td3lv Жыл бұрын
It’s “than” not “then” but great video.
@rustybayonetcom4 жыл бұрын
1939 Bantom
@Alexander845 жыл бұрын
Manual > Automatic, always.
@PerformanceOnWheels5 жыл бұрын
Yes.
@t.breeze86594 жыл бұрын
I’d agreed with your manual vs auto argument 100% for decades. I’m 50 and had only ever owned manual transmission vehicles. Just my preference as I like the control and overall experience of shifting. When I bought my first Jeep, it was a manual JKU. As much as I loved that Jeep, I hated its stick. It sometimes pops out of gear (very common among JKUs), sometimes scrapes when shifting and simply wasn’t a good experience - before or after mods (2.5” AEV lift, larger tires, etc). My JLU is automatic and I had to admit that the experience was just better.
@edcorona1914Ай бұрын
Hell no, have both 3.6 and 2.0. The 3.6 has common flaws but this 2.0 is absolute garbage, overheating, 02 sensors gone bad, timing chain tensioner bad, now dealing with what sounds like rod knock. All before 50k miles. The engine sounds like bearings tumbling in a drier and that’s apparently normal. Stay away!
@zcmdzpp1272 жыл бұрын
Hot and heavy and noises..no reason…
@v8felon4 жыл бұрын
Dude the diesel is better
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
The diesel was not out yet when we tested this
@robertcurtis3807 Жыл бұрын
I hate my turbo 2.0 Passat
@kennyabreu43574 жыл бұрын
That’s all BS Jajajajajaja never never a f turbo is going to be better than a normal naturally aspirated motor , plus that motor is from... fica /Chrysler Jajajajajaja garbage ,people you want reliability’ buy Toyota ..all this new Jeeps from 2012 to 2021 are from fica Chrysler company Jajajajajaja , all garbage...
@TGK4LSU2 жыл бұрын
Turbo engines WILL NOT LAST as long as naturally asperated engines. They generate too much heat, which will increase maintenance cost & reduce life expectancy. Manufacturers are using them to reduce cost & increase fuel economy.
@PerformanceOnWheels2 жыл бұрын
I think they have made leaps and bounds in realibity.
@joby121 күн бұрын
3.6 are junk 4.0l are goat
@rezamiri1004 жыл бұрын
😀😀😀
@Mac-pluto4 жыл бұрын
2.0 sounds disgusting
@PerformanceOnWheels4 жыл бұрын
Fair statement.
@RoninGamingFox2 жыл бұрын
So yea wranglers are absolutely shit vehicle archaic, vague and Jeep is an absolute trash company Fiat is killing Chrysler
@PerformanceOnWheels2 жыл бұрын
Ufdah. Bringing the heat!
@rjet43 Жыл бұрын
take the vents out and cut the back out out of them like i did and they wont be fake anymore! just saying!!