Sovereign Citizen Court Fail #14

Real Attorney reacts to Sovereign Citizens Court Fail - David Rodriguez
New Camera
amzn.to/3fzByDF
The new microphone! (Tonor Q9)
amzn.to/3dPei3L
streamyard.com?pal=6179087342370816
Merch law-talk-with-...
Judge Kicks Sovereign Citizen out of Zoom Court
• Judge Kicks Sovereign ...
new intro
Song: Xenogenesis
Artist: TheFatRat
Artist's channel: / thisisth. .
Sovereign Citizens In Court #17
• Sovereign Citizens In ...
Sovereign Citizens In Court #5
• Sovereign Citizens In ...
Sovereign Citizens Traffic Stop #1
• Sovereign Citizen Traf...
Sovereign Citizens In Court Playlist
• Sovereign Citizens In ...
Sovereign Citizens In Court #1
• Sovereign Citizens In ...
Funny Old Lady In Court
• Funny Old Lady In Court
Drunk Attorney In Court
• Real Attorney Reacts T...
No Pants Court Appearance
• Real Attorney Reacts T...
This commentary remix work constitutes a fair use of any copyrighted materials under section 107 of the US copyright law.
paid links
law-talk-with-...
The new microphone! (Tonor Q9)
amzn.to/3dPei3L
www.amazon.com...

[@LawTalkWithMike]

"I just wanted make sure everything here today uhhh is on the record." 😂

[@Notta_Brat]

On the record... for the record... and let the record show!!!

[@ronfullerton3162]

I would sure hate to have this all lost for others not to get, watch, and appreciate.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

😂😂😂

[@justajeepgirlandherdogs]

No, Sir. As with everything that happens in United States court, we do not have multiple redundant processes to cover ever conceivable issue in all court cases. (We need to make a sarcasm font).

[@dg20120]

It’s like they’ve never heard of a court reporter.

[@irishbears2103]

It's nice to watch a judge who doesn't allow for the sovereign citizen jargon.

[@manfredflyingcircus1232]

I am absolutely against prosecution of Sovereign citizens in a court of law. How can a judge be so heartless to expect a person of this group answer to the law that clearly has no functioning brain. We should treat these sovereign citizens with pity and change their diapers more regularly as well and just maybe they won't be so cranky

[@lisawatson9570]

😂😂😂😂. Good one.

[@RangerMan2002]

"Mr. Rodriguez, this conversation is being terminated." Finally, a judge who gets it!

[@neilholmes8200]

Mr Rodriguez: I won't be back... (Sorry)

[@grouchydropbear3981]

It's been said before and here it is again, "Anyone who represents themselves in court has a fool for a client and a scoundrel for a lawyer!"

[@robertheinkel6225]

We had a recent murder case in FL, where the defendant represented himself. During the trial, he admitted to killing three people, but with less knife thrusts than the state documented. He was found guilty, and now wants a retrial.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

🤦‍♂️

[@sydmichel]

If the judge did not have jurisdiction, he would not have the authority to dismiss the case due to lack of jurisdiction. So work that one out.

[@gerardodwyer5908]

I like this judge and his no nonsense approach. He knows exactly what he is dealing with.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Agreed

[@grimbo73]

they should send P. Barnes after him if he doesn't show...

[@tomgraves6463]

Yea, and after all, it is on the record that P Barns knows how to use a *AAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGHHHH.*

[@LawTalkWithMike]

😂

[@lisawatson9570]

Yessss. 😅😅😅

[@diannabyrne5931]

They do not have jurisdiction yet he is there in the courthouse in front of a judge making his insane arguments and not answering any questions asked. Why did he come to court if they don't have jurisdiction?

[@jeffvanmeter1330]

It reminds me of a judge, who when challenged on jurisdiction, told the defendant, “Prove jurisdiction? How about I have the bailiffs take you into custody and throw you in jail? Will that prove jurisdiction?”

[@jeffvanmeter1330]

@@danquaylesitsspeltpotatoe8307 And if neither the court nor judge has jurisdiction, why make a motion to them to dismiss the charges? And when threatening either law enforcement or the judge that they are in “Violation,” to whom will they complain? Who’s going to enforce the consequences? In what court will they bring their lawsuit? I don’t think they really thought this through.

[@balancedaccounting2332]

That’s a great question.

[@jeffvanmeter1330]

@@balancedaccounting2332 In a contest between critical thinking vs. delusion, the former usually wins.

[@kriss3d]

@@jeffvanmeter1330 judge Middleton. He knows his sovcits..

[@candleburner2006]

I've never heard of anyone that was arrested/charged for something that DOES consent to it

[@boooster101]

They treat it like some kinky play where you are 'forced' but always have a safeword to opt out

[@kriss3d]

They really love to do the "I was shackled, kidnapped and thrown in a cage". No. You got lawfully arrested. Put in cuffs and taken to a jail. Theres a world of difference. One is a highly illegal act. The other is you having done an illegal act.

[@thelatinist5024]

The best explanation for all of these Sovereigns is the one Andrew Torres of the Opening Arguments podcast gives: they have been convinced-or convinced themselves-that legal jargon are magic words, and they believe that if they can just find the right formula all of their legal problems will magically disappear.

[@MickeyMousePark]

i agree..also i think that the Sov Cits listen to court trials and hear the lawyers saying words that they do not understand so they assume they can do the same...

[@kriss3d]

The quickest way to get out of a court case is "I plea guilty". That ends the trial right there.

[@bartsutra]

Ever since I heard that explanation from Andrew, the idea of a Nam Shub from Snow Crash attached to the things they say. A Nam Shub is essentially human programming language, kinda magic words that make humans do things. An example given in that book would be saying a specific bread making Nam Shub to someone and they go make bread, even if they’ve never known how to make bread before. This seems like that’s what they literally believe some times.

[@sis.flossiebuttski]

What amazes me is these people will not shut up. They just talk themselves into a deeper and deeper hole🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

[@BCM1959]

It starts at the traffic stop and when that doesn't work they try it again in court with the same results. They all have the same learning disability.

[@falseking989]

It’s like when a child tells their mom “I hate you!”, then on the way home asks “Are we still getting ice cream?” In reference to the jurisdiction thing.

[@aeroscout7595]

I hope the follow up can be found. It promises endless entertainment.

[@probablynotmyname8521]

This is the verbal equivalent of waving your hands in of the judges face and hoping they become hypnotized.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

😂

[@cherylcarnes4207]

He said that he goes by the name of "David Rodriguez" without all benefits and privileges. I bet he didn't turn down those stimulus checks in the name of "David Rodriguez", which would definitely be a privilege and benefit...riiiight!!!!

[@lunaknights3539]

When you respond to a yes or no question by babbling nonsense. I suggest he should get an attorney quick.

[@boilerup9985]

But he won't, because an attorney will not go with his arguments

[@LawTalkWithMike]

No they sure won’t 😇

[@Bolgernow]

Mr Rodriguez's entire life will be met with "Welcome to contempt & jail, this conversation is being terminated"

[@ronfullerton3162]

I hope you do find the continuation of this matter. After what we have seen of him already, I am sure his appearance in court is going to be a special treat. If he goes after the judge as he did the LEO's, I imagine we will be seeing a contempt of court.

[@fenix6297]

The level of delusion with these people is unreal. I had a lengthy chat with one regarding this individual and (according to her) the US Constitution and all Federal/State laws are only for government employees and that there was no such thing as a criminal code. To "prove" this - she pulled a page out of the Federal Civil Court Code which basically said "this court only deals with Civil matters" and tried to claim it was saying ALL laws are "civil" and "required a contract". She then went on to pull a page out of the Federal Code for Government employees that said the laws in that section only applied to people in the government and tried to claim it was saying ALL laws 'only apply to people in the government' because they are "persons". I showed her the Criminal Code, and the Federal Code that literally said US legal definition of a "person" is all members of the species homo sapiens - she dismissed it as "Corporate definitions". You heard it here, Mike. *We have confirmation that SovCits are either lizard people living among us or are simply too dumb to realize they are homo sapiens.*

[@LawTalkWithMike]

😂😂😂

[@luxonlex4453]

Fenix, well done. I am sure it was a frustrating conversation. I have had simular, and it is common practice for the Sov Cit to pull a nugget from an archaic reference without the forward or post verbiage to the quote or disregard the context of the provision all together. I gave up debating with most as they tend to dig in their heels and use what yours stated "That applies to corporate definitions". Or, this provision was written first in 188? - 190?, so it takes precident. Umm, no. They do not understand the theory of amendment and superseding provisions over the original assertion or establishment of a rule, code, provision,... essentally law. There are some that are early in their brain washing that can be saved, but not many. I had one ask me "Do You know what Stare Decisis means?" I said yes, it is latin for let the previous decision or rule stand. There response was "Oh, no,... absolutely not. Actually, it means nearly the exact opposite of that." Well, my introduction to law class may have been over two decades ago, but that is one peice of legal Latin that I see almost daily, so I better know what it means or I'm in trouble and owe some clients, attorneys and judges some apologies. Basically, gaslighting the answer I provided. So, if you chose to engage in future debates, stand your ground and don't get duped by their line of crap'ola. Take care and again, well done!

[@hythekent]

Mike, You should know that many of us here in the UK 🇬🇧 have a firm, good faith reliance that this show brightens up our breakfast times most days. But my complaint is that we do not see enough of the puppies

[@Fezz-]

He was taken into custody during his arraignment and held without bail until a psych evaluation was done. He was released in July. He is competent to stand trial.

[@jakeeschen7868]

It's a different case. This video is of a case last year in Santa Clara County. You are referring to a case this year in Santa Cruz County.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Thank You

[@Fezz-]

Sorry. My bad.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

No bad

[@jnagarya519]

Being a bullshitter isn't the equivalent of being mentally incompetent.

[@dreamcruzer4743]

I’m only watching this video under duress.🤪

[@SimonJM]

I felt my IQ pack a suitcase and head for holiday after listening to this muppet! ;)

[@crabbyj]

You're lucky...mine just leapt out a window on the 30th floor... didn't even leave a note. 🥺

[@LawTalkWithMike]

😂

[@lisawatson9570]

​@@crabbyj😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@christopheroconnor2632]

Enjoying theme music. I wrote it so be prepared to meet my fee schedule, bill of lading and commercial lien if not you can join the 250 judges I removed from the bench. Hahahaha

[@christopheroconnor2632]

@DAK Surfacing does the unicorn constitution give them the right to fly around without getting their horn licensed, registered and insured .

[@Candigale]

I loved when the judge tells him he isn’t threatening him, but rather simply setting up a pre-trial conference. So serious, it sounded deadpan. 🤭

[@1Adam20]

@2:56 Judge: Do you want an attorney? Me: [smart answer should be "yes", so he will say.....wait for it....]

[@debrastarr8436]

This is the guy who was hopping around the tow truck when his car was getting towed for thousands in parking tickets and no registration!!

[@JohnKing-ig3df]

"On the record." Damn!. Too early for SovCit drinking bingo isn't it?

[@nikitaelizarov7444]

His motion to dismiss is like Russel's paradox within legal framework. If you put forward the motion to dismiss due to the lack of jurisdiction, you recognise the jurisdiction. If you don't recognise the jurisdiction, you can't put forward the motion. This is hilarious.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

It is🤣

[@alexcue6509]

“I do not consent”. Who consents to being arrested? Imagine if that was actually an option. “You just watched me hose down a playground with a dozen mags from an automatic weapon, but I do not consent to being arrested”. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[@michaelcranston5660]

Well have you met the first amendment auditors? They seem to enjoy, even going out of their way to ensure it happens, being arrested. Maybe they have a handcuff fetish.

[@alexcue6509]

@@michaelcranston5660 a handcuff fetish might be a useful condition for them.

[@cliff8669]

@@michaelcranston5660 Maybe it's one of those Tic Toc challenges. See who can get the most arrest.

[@Axelcat11]

@@alexcue6509 MMB

[@DozensOfViewers]

Hey - if he didn’t hit anyone there’s no crime!

[@thaddeuscosse9527]

I don't recognize you the judge as having jurisdiction, so I request you dismiss the case that you do not have jurisdiction over. Did I get that right lol

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Yup😂

[@martinfield9667]

Starts speaking, sounds articulate……continues speaking….and there it is!

[@brayhill]

If you can't coherently answer the question, "Do you need an attorney appointed for you," then you really need an attorney appointed for you.

[@kimspringer9518]

Omg, i would have to stuff his mouth with something, he's nuts! 😂😂😂👍

[@trock6577]

One would think that after losing thousands of cases using this nonsense as a defense, these idiot sovcits would abandon this strategy but nooooooo! They keep trying and are providing endless hours of entertainment for us normal people. Thank you for that.

[@cxidp]

Is the defendant at home? Would the judge hold him in contempt if he was in person? I ask because this defendant seems so disrespectful.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Probably helped the defendant that it was on zoom.👍

[@markrumfola9833]

90 days in jail to think will help him grow up.

[@chriscroumbie-brown6914]

Gone from "Want an Attorney?" to Need an Attorney in about 60 seconds - Something tells me that there is a Taser deployment in his very near future

[@nigellill3222]

There are times where I think judges should be more like Dr evil when they're dealing with these sovereign citizens, specifically the "Dr evil shh Scott" scene. It might just get court proceedings to move along a bit more smoothly if the judge has a bag of Shhh he can dip into. Stay safe & keep on smiling 👍 🦘

[@Toranaboy634]

In my neck of the woods we object to the tender of evidence, and protest at procedural "outrages".

[@Liutgard]

Well, if the Magic Word Salad doesn't work the first time, rearrange them and try again! They're magic words! They have to work!

[@johnholmes6897]

The guy was doing the "My Cousin Vinny" routine

[@ahmadgaming576]

I'm not an american citizen, but if I went to America or any country in the world I'd recognize and follow their rules and regulations. Not willing to do so? Then establish your own country / society and follow your own rules. It's as simple as that!

[@kriss3d]

Yes. I could travel from Denmark to USA and do things that are perfectly legal here in Denmark. But if I did it in USA I'd be thrown in jail and be a registered sex offender. Likewise if an American comes here but brought his AR15 then he would get in so much trouble. Especially moorish Americans loves to argue that they aren't a part of the society of the Americans. First of all. Yes they damn well are because they too are Americans. Secondly even if they somehow weren't. Then it wouldn't matter because they are there! They are in USA and thus the American laws including the ones of whatever state they happen to be in apply to them as well.

[@colin6769]

What a glorified waste of the court's time and now it's been scheduled to waste the court's time again. There should be a better way to deal with this crap. Don't get me wrong Mike, these are very entertaining videos and I appreciate your time presenting them. Sub'd

[@Josef_R]

Why is it we never see any actual trials? I'd like to see what happens once it gets real for these fools.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

They are usually not recorded and too long.👍

[@Josef_R]

@@LawTalkWithMike Dammit.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

😂

[@robertheinkel6225]

Agreed

[@taniaye2598]

Whatever you say judge. I do not consent. I’m not with this to lower my standard from man to toddler. So you gotta let me go

[@Denza.]

As much as i love Your videos on wacky Ronnie Davis, David Rodriguez is right up there too b/c he has so much current and ongoing Drama that we can continue to follow!!

[@williamdawkins4731]

You probably can’t find anything else because he most likely got arrested for contempt of court or something else!

[@jeffvanmeter1330]

Must be a record. He achieves SovCit bingo, within 30 seconds.

[@nbeasley2]

Sometimes I wonder what kinds of friends these nuts have and if they sit around in a coffee shop with their laptops or what not. Then ride off on their skateboards?

[@williamroberts6803]

It’s not sir with all due respect. It’s your honor and that is the respect.

[@pantarkan7]

My suspicion is that somewhere, way back in the weeds, someone (possessed of some really, truly remarkable stupid) looked at the phrase 'deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed'; completely ignored the fact that it wasn't talking about individual level consent, and decided that you could only interact with the justice system - at any level, starting with law enforcement - with your consent.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Yup

[@user-bx2bc7nu3v]

If he didn’t have a script to perpetuate he’d be standing there with his finger up his ying yang.

[@sunny-td2qz]

Isnt this the same David Rodriquez that had his car towed? Jumped on top of the tow truck?

[@jackthebongripper4520]

Don't go to court or listen to the cops if they don't have jurisdiction 😂

[@erudite60]

This man needs a straight jacket!!!

[@coladict]

I like how this judge handled his bullshit. BOOM! Overruled! BOOM! Denied! No non-sense, not getting confused by it, just does what is needed.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

🙌

[@PorkPieNews]

On the record, for the record, let the record show...😂😂😂😂😂

[@mamaly90210]

Mike, you do realize that making fun & laughing at people with mental disabilities is not appropriate and it’s frowned upon.

[@gregwasserman2635]

This response is coming from NW Ohio, as usual (sorry, couldn't resist!). I already like this judge and would like to see a follow up. This guy doesn't understand what he was there for and he certainly doesn't understand the law. I guess this is why we never see these people post the results of their sovcidiocy anywhere. What is the record of success vs. failure with this yo-yos?

[@jeffvanmeter1330]

Judges are getting wise to the SovCit song and dance. Many of them are already prepared, with responses ranging from merely clever to outright brilliance.

[@crabbyj]

I agree with half of what you're saying...he doesn't understand the law, but he damn sure knows what why he was there. It's unfortunate, for the sake of the court's limited time resources, that this huckleberry thinks that he's smarter than everyone, and has found the loophole that will allow him to not face the consequences of his actions.

[@garycolley3770]

There in CA. 148 (a)(1) is resisting delaying and obstructing a peace officer.

[@ChaCha.44]

“…from a man to a respondent.” Wait - wha-??!! 🤣 😂 Serious word salad again, and it’s giving me a headache! 🤦🏻‍♀️

[@nikitaelizarov7444]

The concept he's struggling with is coercion. Put simply, it is how normal people are persuaded to abide by the law. Normal people are those who want to avoid penalties, restrictions, and (when they're truly boneheaded) violence. Coercion is not violence. It is a persuasion technique based on a threat of force. And a state has the sole authority to use this technique legally. People can deny it all they want, but the consequences of that will prove that it actually exist, as the sovcits' traffic stops routinely show.

[@DozensOfViewers]

Is this the guy that jumped on the tow truck?

[@lhvinny]

We need clips from My Cousin Vinny in these segments. They are so fitting.

[@dharmagirl5889]

I'm pretty sure no defendant goes to the court voluntarily.

[@markrumfola9833]

As a Lawyer you do have a blast on these nuts.

[@Willysmb44]

The question HAS to be asked, has anyone ever won one of these Sovereign Citizen arguments before a court? I've watched several of these and agree that the judge's reaction is refreshingly original in that he doesn't tolerate the foolishness. You do have to wonder why no judges ever seem to say, "Sir, you might want to have a discussion with someone who actually understands the law, instead of using random words and phrases that have no basis on legality..."

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Nope😂

[@65cj55]

That's him in the Picture, he's the Guy that jumped on the Tow Truck when his Car was being Towed, he's a loony.

[@darthbubba866]

This guy mistakes an attorney's thoughtful application of words with simply speaking great numbers of words as a sign of legal prowess. But now he's faced with a judge who is a man of few words - all of which count.

[@irishbears2103]

You mean people have consequences for their actions according to the law? What an interesting concept.

[@johnmorgan1629]

Judge: No Mr Rodriguez, the answer to do you want representation, is yes or no.

[@jacksonpaller2196]

I've been interning at a Public Defenders Office all this summer and I've done a ton of both bond hearings and felony preliminary hearings and I have yet to even see a sovereign citizen or anyone comparably crazy to the guy in the video show up on our call, and I am very disappointed.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

😂 yup well that is what KZbin is for

[@mikegracie3212]

I was afraid that he would miss the injured party argument

[@danielrn133]

I love how they expect everyone else to "uphold the law", but then they can do whatever they want. He also uses very dramatic words for effect. "will I be thrown in a cage an chained up". Make it sound dramatic and way over the top.

[@jimgregory6185]

How do you reserve rights and waive all benefits and privileges at the same time? What a tool.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

🤦‍♂️😂

[@TheNewSoda]

Objection my dog stepped on a bee so I'm a special victim

[@Boomge666]

Was about to comment and ask if there had been a follow up but then I saw that this was uploaded today which sadly means I've now caught up with all your stuff xD

[@frogmad13]

Off work and now to relax with a funny video.

[@passqualecaiazza7728]

I think if he was in person, they can find him in contempt.

[@KCODacey]

Mr. Rodriguez forget to mention the "blanket party" & morning wake up call to which all new prisoners are entitled. And, if all goes well, the several proposals of marriage/civil union on jail day #2.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

😂

[@sunshi1583]

Resisting arrest is the underlying charge 148. (a) (1) Every person who willfully resists, delays, or obstructs any public officer, peace officer, or an emergency medical technician, as defined in Division 2.5 (commencing with Section 1797) of the Health and Safety Code, in the discharge or attempt to discharge any duty of his or her office or employment, when no other punishment is prescribed, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment.

[@katiem9644]

If the idiots say the judge has no jurisdiction, then how can the judge dismiss? Id love to see a judge answer one of them that way.

[@CausalityLoop]

Fine, I'll watch this video. Under threat, duress, and corrosion.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

😂

[@russellonearrow2154]

The Judge just wants this guy to be gone. Pass him on to the next Judge.

[@blackened144]

Thats the problem. SovCits consider that to be total victory. Anything less than being arrested for contempt of court is a win for them, making them dig in even deeper the next time.

[@bubbasmith179]

I'm here as a wizard . As a wizard of the high council of Bunny Rabbits you have no right to judge me unless you have carrots

[@CptColumbo]

It's not a threat. It's a consequence of not obeying the law and/or court order.

[@LT1HILLINGHOE]

He's living in jurisfiction.

[@uhtredshorse7564]

That is a picture of him, before he fell over and lost his damn mind.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

😂

[@alunchurcher7060]

He can resent as much as he likes but he will end up in court and be sentenced even if they can't find him.

[@lareeseblaque8303]

How is he allowed to not be present? He's showing his mugshot.

[@KShea11]

Threat! Coercion! Let the record show! Capitalism! Jurisdiction! I do not consent! Objection! Duress! Special appearance! Did I get most of them?

[@phaexus]

I wonder why they keep going on about consent as if it's a requirement when appearing in court or being pulled over by the police?

[@LawTalkWithMike]

Yes 😂

[@shaughnziech2193]

Start charging contempt of court for being a Marc Stevens jack wagon

[@WoodworkerDon]

"I have a firm, good-faith reliance" that we will continue to see more of these videos.

[@LawTalkWithMike]

🤩

[@HappyHoboRecovery]

Another sad victim of SovCit MLM products. Hopefully he didn't use their Tax filing advice too... 🦉🍸

[@grouchydropbear3981]

148 (a) (1) Every person who willfully resists, delays, or obstructs any public officer, peace officer, or an emergency medical technician, as defined in Division 2.5 (commencing with Section 1797) of the Health and Safety Code, in the discharge or attempt to discharge any duty of his or her office or employment, when no other punishment is prescribed, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment.

[@mathprofii7877]

Why do these fools believe that, as long as you know the right words and phrases, that you can do whatever you want against society without consequences??

[@soundpreacher]

“Personal subject matter jurisdiction.” Proof he has no idea what he’s saying. Personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction are two different things.