Why Kamala Harris Beat Donald Trump in the Debate

[@pottingsoil]

I was surprised at how awful Trump did, so I went and rewatched the first debate with Biden, and it made me realize that Trump did awful in that debate too. Biden just did much, much worse lol.

[@Talisguy]

Trump is and always has been easy to manipulate. He can't stand people not thinking he's cool and will lash out at any insinuation that he's not awesome. It's not like Harris played 4-D political chess here, he's just absurdly easy to play.

[@DarkKnight52365]

@@Talisguy more like she's playing chess meanwhile he's playing checkers

[@dealbreakerc]

Trump has always been a terrible debater and speaker. It was the case back in 2016 and 2020 as well. The only difference is he has somehow gotten even worse and more rambling.

[@DennisTheInternationalMenace]

You were surprised at how awful Trump did? What rock are you living under? 😂 Out of all the debates he has done, He only did good at 1 of them, and that's bc Biden made him look good by comparison.

[@wile123456]

@@Talisguy Anti-social and narcasistic personality disorcer plus a heavy dose of autism means he can't read social cues and gets hug up on anything that hurts his ego, wish someone would call him a diva already

[@MOB-Lee]

It's disappointing that people need a debate to decide like this crap hasn't been going on since 2016, nothing has changed

[@frosty_mentos1238]

Wasn't it going on since 2012? Though he didn't get that high before to presidency he just kept on climbing and bsing his way up either way.

[@oisinquinn9469]

If the Americans get a Russian sympathiser back in the office things will change.

[@75echo]

You seem to forget that the majority of the American population are not very bright. Trump team knows this and exploits it very well.

[@miliba]

Thats what happens when the Democrats didnt let Trump candidate for their party back in 2015

[@terminalimpact2771]

@@frosty_mentos1238the first was all the way in 1960, with JFK v Nixon

[@javasiege]

“We have concepts of plans on healthcare” - Trump ‘24

[@JM-jk9vz]

Right? Considering how long they've been railing against Obamacare you would think they would have a suitable replacement by now.

[@GCMapping]

He says that every year. Since before he became president.

[@DennisTheInternationalMenace]

I lmao when he said that bc that's all of his policy ideas. Besides Project 2025, the rest are concepts!😂

[@svenrio8521]

"I have hearsay and conjecture, those are kinds of evidence" Lionel Hutz

[@jimidando]

He really be misquoting Starlord lol

[@JCPolarBear]

I don't have plans.... I have concepts. Sums up the current GOP

[@DarkKnight52365]

the only plans they have are "tax cuts for the rich and deregulation"

[@lexi1031]

There “concepts” is just project 2025

[@Natalieowomeow]

He has a whole project of plans….

[@blankityblankblank2321]

thank you for saying current GOP. They used to be respectable, or at least leagues more respectable.

[@TihetrisWeathersby]

Harris easily baited Trump, That was insane

[@louisbeerreviews8964]

No she didn’t

[@TihetrisWeathersby]

​@@louisbeerreviews8964 explain his rants and demanding responses only to double down on non-sense

[@orangeslime1878]

​@@louisbeerreviews8964Cope is strong with this one

[@TwentyZZ24]

Leftist creating their own happiness. Delusional as always

[@AetherUtopia]

Harris truly is a master baiter.

[@dux_bellorum]

Old man yells about ppl eating pets and rambles incoherently.

[@dunnowy123]

Yep

[@miliba]

Haitians and Venezuelans have indeed been killing people's pets and hunting other animals to eat

[@ErmisSouldatos]

by the way this has happened, meanwhile Harris never got fact-checked by the "unbiased" hosts

[@TheRealVenom448]

It is happening tho, look at Ohio and Alabama.

[@xiphoid2011]

​@@TheRealVenom448no.

[@GCMapping]

"Immigrants eat Cats & Dogs in Ohio" Even the Ohio Meme isn't that unrealistic.

[@user-hn3uu3gj2g]

You should actually look into it

[@adamk.7177]

@@user-hn3uu3gj2g you should stop wasting space and air

[@user-hn3uu3gj2g]

@@adamk.7177 typical peaceful response once you stop seething and find out the goose picture was real and was taken in Columbus Ohio come back and apologize and remember we aren’t on twitter

[@__-my3qz]

@@user-hn3uu3gj2gTrump said cats and dogs

[@blankityblankblank2321]

@@user-hn3uu3gj2g The police and gov officials over there have straight up said they haven't seen any cases. What more is there to look into?

[@TheAmericanAmerican]

"They're eating the dogs! They're eating the cats! I saw it on TV!" Ok grandpa, let's get you to bed and get you your meds 🤣

[@ryanfoo5286]

I mean isnt it real?

[@TheAmericanAmerican]

@@ryanfoo5286 nope. Zero evidence. 100% Nothing Burger. Donny is cooked.

[@caze701]

​@@TheAmericanAmerican it is real though

[@TheAmericanAmerican]

@@caze701 proof? Evidence? I'll wait.

[@skybum6040]

⁠@@TheAmericanAmerican there is a nonemergency call reporting four migrants taking geese into their car out of a local park it’s on the ny post YT,

[@Homer-OJ-Simpson]

Orange man literally said Kamala doesn’t have any details but just vague arguments…then Orange proceeds to say he has concepts but not details / plans

[@justinlumpkin1874]

please ignore the comments about "bias". your job is to present the news with reasoning. you cited polling showing that she definitely won. you dont have to make up a story in contravention of reality just to appear "balanced". it drives me crazy. i feel like these people would ask you to do a "why climate change might be fake" video. some things that are inconvenient for one side are just observable reality

[@thesmity31]

I've seen basically the same comments about supposed bias on a few videos I've seen today about the debate. I know it's straying into conspiracy theory territory, but I definitely feel there is some botting going.

[@sr.s6852]

@@thesmity31 nah, there's definitely a ton of bots

[@dunnowy123]

Apparently, the moderators were "biased." Because they didn't just let him say insane shit without challenging it. Republicans don't understand words or concepts anymore, just anything that makes their guy look bad is BAD.

[@CirBam24]

He only includes CNN's polls, a famously left-leaning news network. Fox had the numbers flipped with Trump at around 68%. In my opinion, Trump didn't lose but in the end Kamala got a positive boost in exposure.

[@TheAztecGamer123]

​@CirBam24 CNN is as left wing as Putin. Bruh what you Americans (I assume you're American) consider American is right wing literally anywhere else

[@xandr4870]

An additional point. Trump does not appear as sharp or as aggressive as I remember him. We talked about Biden being too old. Is trumps age also showing?

[@geoffreywlotzka]

no he calmed down to win over more normal people.

[@SC831]

@@geoffreywlotzkanah he’s old. Look at earlier videos in 2015 and videos now. He’s def old now and slippin

[@ChuffedLemon]

When was he ever “sharp?”

[@dealbreakerc]

He was mostly 'calmer' because the candidates had to remain behind their podiums (no stalking Kamala around the stage like Trump did with Clinton) and the mics were muted while the other was speaking (except for a few heated response moments, and thus he only would have looked like a moron if he was trying to talk over her without audio).

[@honeycomblord9384]

I'd say so, though the media doesn't go after his declining cognitive abilities quite as much as they went after Biden's

[@Husky_Passion]

trump : mexico is gonna pay for the wall... Remember that (and a billion other absurdities) ?

[@brandonn.1275]

Hilariously enough Biden was the one to get Mexico to pay for American border security.

[@wile123456]

And he hasn't mentioned the wall in years now, he knows its a dead policy

[@gp-1542]

I reliably trust trump not to change his behavior In fact, I expected it to get worse

[@bobhope4288]

Maya Angelou said it best: "When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time."

[@fishor6527]

Couldn't believe how easily trump was destroyed in this debate its like he didn't prepare at all

[@greyghost2492]

you're right, the moderators pretty decisively won that debate

[@fishor6527]

Yea they gave him extra time when he asked to dig his own grave telling lies it was hilarious 🤣

[@nickt2822]

@@greyghost2492 cringe.

[@segiraldovi]

@@nickt2822 bro there was a specific section for racial issues exclusively of what Trump once said about kamala and one for what happened on January 6. Trump said a lot of things that were not true and he was corrected. Kamala lied too and was not told anything. Don't get me wrong, Trump had a disastrous debate but to come and say that the debate did not favor Kamala is to turn a blind eye.

[@deansmith6593]

@@greyghost2492 Playing the victim. Who would have guessed it :/

[@Khaoki]

Trump was terrible in that debate in Biden as well, it was simply overshadowed by the all-time horrible performance from Biden. Without that you get... this

[@TihetrisWeathersby]

That was a terrible debate for Trump, It was such an easy win for Harris

[@segiraldovi]

Honestly I am rewatching the debate again while working and with a clear mind I don't see Kamala as such making good points, I see a defensive and very picky trump with stupid issues like pets eaten at the border, the opinion of a former governor that no one cares about the abortion and which does not refute lies that Kamala says. Kamala was only expected not to make the mess that Joe Biden did, Trump was expected to do more (and it must be said, the interviewers and the debate clearly favored Kamala with issues that hurt trump leaving aside more important issues). Turmp's only redeemable feature was his closing, which was much better than Kamala's. Kamala did a little better than what was expected of her, Trump did poorly. She wins

[@Fluxwux]

@@segiraldoviDid we watch the same debate? Trump barely answered a single question, never disclosed his policies in detail, had zero structure to his sentences and switched topics constantly - not to mention the outrageous rambling, obvious lies/making stuff up and confusing stuff like Asylum seeker with “Insane asylum”. He also didn’t attack Harris at the topics where she was the weakest because he wasted like half the time falling for her bait (he cares more about personal attacks on his ego than policy). He also didn’t get any stinger one-liners and slam dunks (except the “sound familiar?” line) people will remember - while he also spent most of the time talking about the past and not the future. You can’t tell me with a straight face that this debate was even close. Harris compared to Trump was a much better speaker and stayed on topic, came across as more likable, sharp and easier to understand. Trumps bookie odds to win has dropped significantly after the debate, FOX news even admitted it was a train wreck for Trump and just minutes ago sources in the Trump campaign are reporting a deep frustration with the debate. I like neither candidate, but objectively it was a horrible night for Trump and a great night for Harris.

[@mr.x817]

@@Fluxwuxwhat topic was Harris clear on? Trump had moments throughout the debate. He even said if your policies could work wake up Biden & implement them right now. Stop it. Trump didn’t win but he did hurt his chances. The debate didn’t show him as confusing at all & I’m a first time voter with no political party I back.

[@Fluxwux]

@@mr.x817 Harris was quite clear on policy regarding her tax proposals, child credits and housing where she went pretty extensively in detail with numbers and how she planned on implementing these proposals - she was also clear on abortion, leadership style and foreign policy where her positions, values and some policies/veto powers were made clear. Harris is a different person than Biden and every sitting president or VP has always proposed new policies before an election they plan to implement the coming 4 years - the federal budget, congress and senate negotiations and mandatory reviews to make laws/budget adjustments etc makes it so that Kamala or Biden can’t “just can implement it right now” - politics doesn’t work like that, and I’m pretty sure you know that very well. Otherwise Trump in 2020 or Obama in 2012 would just have implemented everything they promised for the coming 4 years and squeeze those 4 years of laws, budget adjustments and policies in before Election Day. Which is obviously impossible and not how it works! The major issue for Harris was migration - but she did correctly explain that republicans in congress put a stop to the proposed tougher border laws and funding in order to prolong the crisis to help Trump in the election (Congress and the senate are powerful and can stop the president from doing many things). Trump didn’t make it better by spending what would be his best chance to slam dunk Harris on migration - to instead talk about his campaign rallies after being baited, confusing “asylum seekers” with “insane asylum patients” or the myth that immigrants are eating cats 😅 What was Trump clear on regarding policy? I honestly can’t think of a single policy proposal he made and described in detail.

[@mr.x817]

@@Fluxwux let’s be clear the eating a animal story was real, it happened on August in Ohio. The rumor that it was a migrant might have been fake but the story & arrest was real. Simple google search would lead you to it. _____ Harris was unclear in solving the Ukraine & Gaza war. She reaffirmed she supports Israel but avoided saying Israel has been committing war crimes. As far as abortion I expected her to win that, JD Vance will clear it up for Trump when he debates. ___ I disagree with you Biden has the power to implement Harris plans especially to save the economy. She said she agree with everything Biden has done but stood by & watched the economy slowly decline. ___ Trump had never been a great debater. He’s all humor which his base likes. Watch him on podcasts he’s great at talking & explaining his goals & who he will hire. As long as he put the right people around him he could get policies done. He said it himself he would fire those who vision he doesn’t agree with. I wish he had talked about why he fired some individuals. ___ While I don’t believe Trump lost I do believe Harris gain a few independent voters. But what helps Trump is Biden a terrible president with a failing economy & waging wars. ____ Underestimating Trump appeal is how he won the first time. Just taking CNN bias voters opinions isn’t conclusive. Social media was divided at least from what I was on who won. I’ve seen different influencers poll their audiences & the outcome says different to who CNN & these other networks invited.

[@neondemon5137]

Trump rn: uh uh release the lovely russian troll army, we need to do damage control, blyat, I mean, dang.

[@nightthemoon8481]

Ironically the Russians ended up being his own maga people like tim people

[@goldenfiberwheat238]

Trump is not a Russian puppet. He’s an Israeli puppet

[@thomastakesatollforthedark2231]

You guys should make a video about the judicial reforms in Mexico

[@AduckButSpain]

""Reforms""

[@tempestmars123]

When Viktor Orban becomes Trump’s only character witness 😂😂

[@larryalvares1369]

Waiting for MAGA to fill the chat…..

[@verrico7536]

Theyre already malding

[@davidescristofaros2241]

They're already crying in the comments

[@bamaramify]

As an independent it was sad how bad she did so idk I'm convinced you'd say this no matter what

[@colddogs]

*maga bots

[@zachweyrauch2988]

​@@bamaramifyyou get those marching orders on Truth social?

[@dominator1914]

A lot of coping from MAGA Trumpster’s right now.

[@bamaramify]

As an independent it's honestly just been Harris supporters coping

[@kmsedgy2115]

​@@bamaramify then you're a blind independent😂

[@MetallicReg]

@@kmsedgy2115 Don't think so. Most Europeans can be counted as "independent" since we don't fall into the american duocracy system of tribalism. Honestly, we laugh at both of these incompetent figures equally. If this is really the best that your country can produce in form of leaders, you should just go the way of the Romans.

[@bamaramify]

@@kmsedgy2115 treating those that don't agree completely as less than human is cringe

[@Vandel96]

@@bamaramify imagine implying that blind people are subhuman, ableism has no place in the modern day.

[@albevanhanoy]

The Olympic and Paralympic Games were such a good time, I am sad it's over

[@getnohappy]

That the race is so tight between a dull but competent centrist and "they're eating cats and dogs" indicates democracy might have had its day.

[@agodelianshock9422]

Dull but incompetent centrist. There's a big difference there. This is a leader from the party of peace and tolerance who has NEVER spoken to the leaders we are at war with. That is scary to me.

[@JerzyFeliksKlein]

Could we get a more detailed video on the Mexican reforms?

[@user-hn3uu3gj2g]

According to the media sure… according to the people commenting online not at all lol

[@thepax2621]

For a second I thought this is a re-upload 😅

[@RhombusOfTheJ]

Are you not even going to note that THAT ISN'T HOW TARIFFS WORK

[@cscmusictv]

8:01 there's no such link anywhere, not even in the description

[@regolyth]

The speed at which you managed to get this out at this quality is ridic. Like, we appreciate it, but also, sleep is good 💚

[@robert2375]

Mexico, why would you want the public to vote for judges? The public has no idea what is needed to become a good judge. This will be bad news for mx if this happens.

[@TheEmiljoergensen]

Maybe the gov trying to break a deadlock in the system, that they see as preventing them from addressing eg. the Cartels by shuffling the deck. If the judiciary is dominated by a 'faction' that is blocking the gov policies in some regard, that the gov deems critical. Or more cynically ofc, it could be a self-serving attempt to centralise power, if the gov party somehow rig these elections to co-opt the judicial branch. But I agree, it's not hard to see that causing more problems in turn, so idk. And I have not looked into it enough, so this is just pure speculation based on very little.

[@blankityblankblank2321]

The current Mexican president has wanted to push through lots of policies and projects, and the courts have pushed back on it more than he would like. So he wants to put them in his court of public opinion, where he has an edge because his welfare policies and general populist appeal.

[@sdb2885]

@@TheEmiljoergensenour president has 2 choices, admit that he proposed unconstitucional reforms and check the constitution next time or blame the courts and subjugate them to his will…

[@najex1]

I listened to a report here in belgium, about a reporter who was in a room with undecided voters. She said that people were mostly disappointed in both candidates and nobodies mind was really changed. I believe the quote that was taken was 'I wish either one of the candidates had just admitted that they were wrong about something. That would have meant a lot to me.'

[@SpencerTuom]

Ok WTF USA Is a great marketing choice 😂😂

[@skybum6040]

You can say that you think Kamala did better which I personally disagree with (I think it was the moderators constantly helping Kamala), but saying this was a “reversal” making trump similar to Biden in debate performance is a horrible assessment.

[@danielrvms573]

"journalism" hahahaha

[@HellDuke-]

The ICC arrest warrant might get ignored by EU allies in light of Mongolia doing the same for Putins warrant, given that there is no downside to doing so.

[@user-sh3cf7kd6e]

Mainly because you can't f@**ing compare between an actual war criminal to sham political persecution.

[@SC831]

Trump’s out of gas. He’s old

[@nathanaelsmith3553]

Make Dementia Great Again

[@KensaiProductions]

I'm curious, do you have any Americans on staff or at least available for consultation for your WTF America?

[@fosyay1780]

Lol, NO

[@FalconsEye58094]

Trust us on this one Mexico, you do not want that system, look at your neighbors to the north and how chaotic our judiciary is

[@Piensamalyacertaras]

No

[@AduckButSpain]

It's also undemocratic. There is no democracy without separation of power.

[@julianmuller766]

A CNN poll isn't exactly an unbiased measure of who 'won' the debate.

[@victorconway444]

And yet I bet when the CNN poll showed Trump overwhelmingly winning the Biden v Trump debate, you ate that right up. Didn't see too many people accusing CNN of pro-Trump bias.

[@julianmuller766]

@@victorconway444 Your point would hit a little better if you'd cited a Fox poll in the Trump-Biden debate. Given CNN's lean to the left, if a CNN poll shows favour to Trump, it's natural to assume that support for Trump was so overwhelming that even CNN viewers couldn't deny it.

[@victorconway444]

@@julianmuller766 That's completely irrelevant. CNN (and I would at least hope fox does this as well) hired an independent agency to conduct a poll among registered voters *in general* who watched the debate, via text messaging. Not just liberal CNN regulars. That's pretty standard practice. So if you wanna accuse SSRS of faking the statistics in some way to favor Harris, you'd have to prove that.

[@julianmuller766]

@@victorconway444 If the CNN poll is from an independent agency (SSRS) claiming to poll general voters, fair enough. I don't want to accuse anyone of faking anything; chill. That being said, even ABC's own 538 doesn't exactly have excellent ratings for SSRS, which does potentially raise questions. Fairly certain that, overall, most reputable polls would put Harris ahead of Trump in the debate. All things considered, it would be interesting to look at a number of polls rather than just one, wouldn't you say?

[@Bogfrog1]

The debate is a test to validate one’s own views. I don’t think anything unexpected came from it to make people flip positions. The Senate ruling in Mexico and the German border issues are a lot more important on the macroscale but everyone is obsessed with pointless arguing and drama so I guess the lead story is the debate.

[@hometownboy6537]

Never thought I'd go into 9/11 on a good note, after a debate no less, but here we are.

[@MrRabbit772]

That’s a cursed date even 20 + years later

[@ScrotoloOttavoNano]

The title is misleading about the content of the video. It's not being explained why she won, but rather just quoting polls about who won and after-debate opinions.

[@williamthatsmyname]

The reason the Paris Olympics sold more tickets is because France has less requirements for tourist visas.

[@georgecoman8448]

Because nobody cared to fact check her? At this point JP Sears is more informative than this 😂

[@kgb9600]

Gotta love that CNN poll

[@SomeoneFromBeijing]

"Overcapacity" is a weird term in this context. Germany and Japan also have "overcapacities" when it comes to building cars. It is better to call it "comparative advantage".

[@yapisaiah5307]

why does trump want the governments of other countries to pay for everything XD

[@gilbertohernandez2409]

Also how’s he going to do that. He couldn’t even get Mexico to pay for the border wall, how’s he gonna get the eu or China to pay

[@geoffreywlotzka]

because the interest on the national debt is more then all the spending on the us military. and if turmp works it down the next person who is elected will just spend it all on buying votes.

[@dagroth123]

the man won't pay his own lawyers, why would you expect him to want to pay for anything?

[@MrBurnsExcellent]

For the defence of other countries that are not the US? so why do you want the US to pay all the nato bills?

[@ligius3]

​@@MrBurnsExcellent While US is pouring money into its own military, which is part of NATO, it doesn't actually throw money at other countries. There is some spending with joint exercises and remote bases, but that also serves US's interest. Plus the defence policy was to make other countries dependent on its army, so it can have the last word, so this part worked. Now that the countries are regaining military independence, US will find it much harder to impose a one-sided argument, e.g. for Israel. Regarding putting tariffs on everything: this can work, for a while, but will quickly erode the current hegemony. Imagine going out to lunch with friends, splitting the bill and suddenly you pay less than what you eat. The others will just stop going to lunch with you. America already created a lot of trade friction in the past 4-8 years.

[@giuseppers1956]

Trump always says someone else will pay for America's problems, but with the knowledge of hindsight on our side we can clearly see that it is Americans that end up paying the bill!

[@paradigm2266]

Kinda messed up that one pop star can influence an election like that.

[@Lucasal1296]

Elon is sort of doing the same for trump, but this always happened tbf

[@paradigm2266]

​@@Lucasal1296you're right, still messed up

[@crankykransky2979]

All this debate proved to me is that there is bugger all difference between the democratic and republican parties.

[@hughjass1044]

In keeping with this election season's hottest trend of "ya blow a debate, yer outta here!", can we expect Republicans to now start scheming for a replacement? Stupid question, I know but, hadda ask.

[@Baldilocks88]

A couple of minutes and Trumpeteers have already thrown in their 2p

[@HeliumFreak]

As a trump fan i would say that i harris did better in the debate. Trump got flustered far too often and was like a broken record, really show his lack of experience as a politician. Although harris didn't really have many good responses either but she at least answered like a professional

[@xAmpriderx]

I watched it as well, I would consider it a draw. We didn't learn anything new about either position and nobody was swayed to either side.

[@victorconway444]

In full honesty, I think Harris would look like a pretty mediocre debater with anyone else. But she's practically John Kennedy when compared to Trump.

[@olegat]

I was sort of indifferent about the presidential candidates. But after watching the debate I totally love Kamala Harris so much. She's brilliant. I really hope that she wins.

[@LongTran-kp3kz]

....Why is thus race even close!?

[@jackdavenport4303]

Americans gonna American I guess

[@tony3]

Harris did not win the debate. What a joke

[@Harshil2456]

Why Kamala Harris beat Donald Trump? Because she’s much younger than Biden and she was debating Donald Trump. 😂

[@victorconway444]

Yeah, you're right. This isn't really a demonstration of how "good" Harris is as a debater. Just how overwhelmingly senile, delusional, and narcissistic Trump is when paired with anyone of baseline maturity and competence. He should try arguing with opponents who are more his own speed, like maybe some clouds outside.

[@LK_Elodyr]

Both of them did badly, but kinda hard to win a debate 1v3

[@haydencantthink]

That was not a 1v3 debate lol. Harris did a pretty good job at making Trump look really bad such as baiting trump into egotistical rants although she did less well but still decent enough at making herself look like an attractive candidate. Harris definitely did well compared to Trump. To say otherwise is would be pretty silly.

[@blankityblankblank2321]

1:38, how many retakes did it take to keep a straight face with this bit?

[@pokegan52]

It’s nothing new, Brit’s have been supporting democrats since the civil war here in America 😂😂 good to know TLDR isn’t bias telling by the thumbnail of this video, great job lads!

[@shamrock141]

Ah the good old "let's ignore 200 years of relevant history" gimmick

[@Triro]

Lol that dog eating thing isn't false. People are elgit doing this. And it's disgusting

[@shamrock141]

Moderator's source: "We reached out to the Springfield city mayor's office for comment and they said it was false" Trump's source: "I watched it on TV so it must be true!" Wow tough choice

[@TitusFlavius11]

Because the “moderators” were also participating

[@fosyay1780]

Who gives a shit what billionaire Swift thinks??

[@michaela9079]

I’m confused why people in Mexico is upset that the judiciary would be elected by the people, shouldn’t they be happy that they have more of a say?

[@sdb2885]

No, judges in Mexico have been chosen by their competency. This had led them to defend the constitution in a manner independant from politics. For example they legalized gay marriage, personal weed consumption and abortion becuase these actions are not banned by the constitution. No political party would have taken the political risk of supporting this causes. In another case the president picked a fight a fight with a labortstory over the prive of chemotherapies for children and stoped purchasing medicine until the laboratory lowered it’s prices but our constitution guaranteed health to children so they forced him to pay the price. You can imagine how angry he got when the judges told him he cannot use sick children as political hostages nor deny them life-saving medicine

[@tonygq9267]

My state is supposed to elect 253 judicial positions with at least 6 candidates each, how are people supposed to analyze over 1,500 candidates? Most people didn't even know what the campaign proposals of the three presidential candidates were. I'm sure if you asked a random person on the street who their local and federal congressman is, they wouldn't know. Judges are not supposed to be political, they are not supposed to be popular, they should stick to the law even if its unpopular, so why would they do a campaing?

[@Pieman2889]

THEY’RE EATING THE DAWGS THEY’RE EATING THE CATS

[@jstr4hire]

yes, by all means, please continue to tell me about a show I cannot see, on another network I already tried out, and left for the very reason I am on this platform. But please, tell me how you want me to stop using this platform, which is making you money, to use an inferior one, that lets you make even more money... please just stop, pick a platform and stick with it. I'm personally tired of trying to re-invent the wheel because someone else owns this one. You better make an incredibly nice wheel, and nebula isn't it

[@Gnybr]

This was literally a 3v1 and Trump still prevailed

[@PingSharp]

so spewing nonsense and lies is how you do a winning performance now? You're gonna need to explain yourself buddy

[@Gnybr]

@@PingSharp What lies exactly are you talking about buddy?

[@jkabrams341]

@@GnybrEating pets thing for one, the other about the ninth month abortion. Cope harder.

[@PingSharp]

@@Gnybr You maggots really talked about Biden's cognitive decline while Trump is on that exact path. "I have concepts of a plan" lol

[@shamrock141]

​​​if Trump didn't spew rubbish like doctors offing newborn babies the moderators wouldn't have to shut him down

[@BrightWendigo]

Yes media 😩 tell me what to think

[@rum-z1966]

never forget

[@userxiaomi4365]

WTF???? US

[@bolingbroke92]

I really don't know how anyone can say that this debate was won by anyone .... They both did bad , they dodged questions one after the other.. Trump had the same nonsense , Harris had non answers for all questions .... We are F- ed either way ...

[@shahankhan7685]

Icc is doing good

[@caseclosed9342]

For being an independent news outlet you’re sure towing the party line when it comes to the debate. Trump did horrible, but Harris did horrible as well. The difference was the moderators softballed her and let her lie repeatedly about various issues and never fact-checked her on it. Corporate media says Harris won but in reality everyone lost.

[@alexlehrersh9951]

1

[@notoriousfly9260]

Harris 2024

[@segevamir18]

What's a spinroom?

[@GreatEmuWarChief]

A collective sigh of relief that Harris performed well and is a legitimate candidate. A creeping fear that Trump can still win and this can all get so much worse

[@teutonicheart2532]

Cry harder

[@caendiumdivum6060]

Prepare for the Russian bots

[@Tovigonbar]

Think Trump won the debate, but it was overall a clown show:p

[@987jof]

You should probably rewatch it without your earplugs 😂

[@Tovigonbar]

@@987jof what?

[@aabbccdd4710]

TL;DR not even ATTEMPTING to be unbiased anymore lmao

[@felixgarcia9650]

If you didnt think trump lost then you are in too deep

[@18bagabooo]

Wondering if they sold the channel off yet? 🥲. Recent content is all about pushing legacy media narrative.

[@Jimmyni-kk4em]

Wat a woke channel. Get real man. The moderators are bias

[@18bagabooo]

Unsubscribed - you should remain unbiased, latest few videos are very much on part with legacy media narratives. Did you sell channel yet? Long way off from early videos, i used to enjoy being one of your early subscribers.

[@TheEinharjar]

Bro they've always been super biased

[@vvoid8416]

Everyone is saying Harris beat Trump but honestly everyone lost. Harris just tossed out buzzwords while the moderators covered for her lack of answers, and Trump lost his edge and just went around proclaiming he was the greatest. The post debate panel actually made me angry with how much bias they displayed with lines like "kamala is hope, trump is anger".

[@Fluxwux]

Tell me a single presidential debate in history that hasn’t been an orgy of buzzwords and avoiding questions like a pro.

[@vvoid8416]

@@Fluxwux well the last one biden couldn't even form the buzzwords but yeah it's true, at least for recent history. Still a horrible thing.

[@dannydubois174]

lol I tuned in to hear what (I thought) an unbiased news source would report on to get the flavour of the middle market. However, you only spoke on lwft talking points and didn’t mention right talking points, most obviously what they’re saying regarding the 3 to 1 nature of the debate, including no fact check for Harris but many for Trump. Unsubscribe.

[@Blo55]

You spelled left wrong.

[@louisbeerreviews8964]

You are so wrong

[@ErmisSouldatos]

Trump was not debating Harris he was debating the biased hosts, and they never fact-checked her

[@unigaming9921]

Unbiased new doesn't say who it's editor thinks won. It simply says what the opponents said or did.

[@fufumccuddlypoops5502]

What if the news is reporting the public consensus about who won?

[@unigaming9921]

@fufumccuddlypoops5502 not how that works. "People believe x" is a different statement from "x". Even then, "people believe x" is a dangerous statement is a group wishes to maintain neutrality.

[@molt45]

​@unigaming9921 since there is no *objective* definition of "won" in this context, the only way won can be defined would be whoever convinced most people of their agenda, which Harris obviously did

[@aabbccdd4710]

​@@fufumccuddlypoops5502the public consensus of CNN viewers?

[@unigaming9921]

@molt45 lol no. That's pure mental and semantic gymnastics. And given almost everyone decides who won based off who they already plan to vote for, your definition fails from the start lol

[@Homer-OJ-Simpson]

I must be one of the few who think Benjamin Netanyahu deserves prison AND 🇵🇸 people don not deserve a free state nor much empathy for putting “hummus” in power, not wanting them to surrender, and 72% think Oct 7 was good

[@xAmpriderx]

I have a genuine question, trying to avoid the miscommunication through text. I can understand the position of wanting Netanyahu in prison, but what confuses me is the statement after. (Not being snarky) Can I assume your position is that the government allowed and aided the control of Gaza by 'hummus' and then acted surprised? (I'm actually interested in your point but I don't think I'm grasping what you're laying down. Not judging either way, just interested in clarification......Let me circle back) (The let me circle back is a joke)

[@Homer-OJ-Simpson]

​@@xAmpriderx The statement afterwards was backed by the stats & facts I provided though I'm not sure what government you mean with "the government allowed and aided the control of gaza by hummus then acted surprise". It was the people of Gaza that put Hummus in power in 2006 after Isr withdrew...and hummus ran on ending Isr & it's people.

[@Homer-OJ-Simpson]

@@xAmpriderx To expand, gaza people (sometimes using the Pal..word makes comments not...well you know and I can't write that word for the same reason) in 2006 had a chance to go in a new direction but they doubled down on trying to end Isr & its people. Then when they cheered the Oct 7 events and 72% in polling think Oct 7 was good (that figure was 50 something in gaza, 80 something in WBank), I lost any care for Gaza and WB.

[@Homer-OJ-Simpson]

@@xAmpriderx At the same time, regardless if Gaza & WB people don't get any empathy / sympathy, it doesn't justify Benjamin conducting the operation like he has. This is dangerous precedence he has set if it isn't punished. Having zero care for the civilization population even if they are lots of bad people in that group cannot be tolerated and cannot become the norm. Ben N should be locked up.

[@xAmpriderx]

@@Homer-OJ-Simpson So first off thank you for answering (sorry for the long response time, work was doing work things). I think I understand your position more, so thank you for clarifying. I only find myself disagreeing on a moral base rather than a logical one on the Israel action but I understand your point. While I get they voted for it, we should still aim to avoid civilian causalities. (We meaning the world) But again I see the merit of your statement but can't find myself to endorse it on emotional grounds. EDIT: I understand it's not an argument but instead of not answering you I thought I should.

[@marianorivas8537]

Something I'm seeing absolutely no one clarify is that while the reform calls for justices and judges to be elected, nothing wrong with that... It also calls for anonymous/faceless justices... Now that's the problem

[@EarhirX]

The problem with judges being elected is that right now in Mexico an overwhelming majority of the legislative and executive powers are with the ruling party, the current president has so far shown that he's gone out of the norm of political neutrality for presidents, to endorse his favourite candidates to other positions in government like his endorsement of his successor and now elected president. With that, current ruling party has but to hint to a preferred judge to make it almost certain to be elected. Also lowering the level of education and experience for judges in the highest instances of the judicial power is worrying. It also opens the doors for lobbying for judges. I would not be surprised if suddenly celebrities and sons of politicians turned out to have a law degree and would be eligible for a position in the supreme court or something like that

[@marianorivas8537]

@@EarhirX bro I'm Mexican and I've lived here my whole life, no President before AMLO had a single gram of respect in my whole lifetime. Hell, former President Peña Nieto invited DONALD TRUMP of all people to Mexico City after his outrageous remarks about my country STILL ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL

[@EarhirX]

@@marianorivas8537 well I don’t know what that has to do with what I said but that’s not new and it is not exclusive to Mexico. All political classes from all countries do the same thing. They just hop from one charge to another. A governor becomes a senator and then a secretary of something they have no idea of, they changes parties, they come up with new parties and the ruling class remains the same, not just the same ways, the same people. It’s an oligarchy that we try to portray as a democracy. The ruling class don’t care about anything but the money they certainly make both as a direct result of their charges and as an indirect result if you catch my meaning

[@guavaguy4397]

The debate was a draw, nothing new nothing changed.

[@archockencanto1645]

63% voted for Kamala winning... >Cnn poll... 🤔🤔🧐🧐🤣🤣🤣

[@Killerqueen69420]

Even fox said he lost, get out the echo chamber

[@Awesomewithaz]

Are you crying cause you found out your traitor is losing

[@archockencanto1645]

@@Awesomewithaz I'm not even an American. It's just obvious that CNN has biased polling. Are they going to the countryside for these polls? I doubt it. It's biased towards Kamala and the Democrats. The sampling is not reflective of all voters.

[@archockencanto1645]

@@Killerqueen69420 Fox is literally owned and run by Billionaires. It's not even a real news organization. Whatever they say is of zero value. I'm simply referencing the bias of the sample.

[@archockencanto1645]

I'd respond to the two comments above but my comments get insta-deleted if they contain more than 50 words, too bad. As a response to both: Biased - non reflective of voters - sampling.

[@herbivorethecarnivore8447]

I don't really like the clear bias here, but it is fairly obvious that Trump made himself look stupid.

[@Kevin-xk3me]

Yeah I agree. I like Trump but he honestly lost.

[@kusadasi8641]

Bro what clear bias when even you admit he lost

[@Jay_Frank]

This channel just gives the facts. Facts don't care about your feelings, they're unbiased.

[@brendan8593]

Quote a sentence or portion where the show is biased according to you.

[@herbivorethecarnivore8447]

@@brendan8593 Literally the title. It's subjective who you think "won" a debate.

[@greyghost2492]

According to the debate transcript: Trump was fact checked 4 times, Harris 0 times Muir and Davis pressed Trump 6 times for follow ups, pressed Harris 0 times for follow ups Trump made 14 false statements, Harris made 16 false statements

[@1337Adabed]

Thank you

[@zachweyrauch2988]

That's what it looks like when you lose.

[@nickt2822]

cope harder.

[@greyghost2492]

@@nickt2822 NPC response

[@RespectTheGanja]

Holy bias😂

[@jaredhogan1235]

What happened to the unbiased news? About to find something else for my daily news.

[@nak3rbott]

What is biased about this? Republicans shouldn't get any special treatment, he lost the debate and it wasn't even close. He was rambling the entire debate and Kamala maintained her composure the whole way through. I would love to know how you think he won or tied that debate.

[@jaredhogan1235]

@@nak3rbott He was being attacked by both of the moderators. All of his questions were harder and more directed at him trying to get a bad response from him. Kamala was getting thrown softballs all night and failed to answer anything in depth. Her “composure” could matter less. We need a leader that is not willing to put up with any nonsense, not just “look cool”. But to answer your question, saying “Kamala won the debate” is a very biased statement regardless it was true or not. A title like “who won the debate” or “takeaways from last nights debate” would have been much better titles and less biased.

[@felixgarcia9650]

​@@jaredhogan1235why do you care, you're voting trump anyways

[@123456789bassy1]

​@@jaredhogan1235If performance polls say one person won, and if general polls go up for onre candidate and down for the other, then you can say that person "won" the debate in a politcal sense. Now of course we can discuss the minutiae of each candidates talking points, ethics of their strategy etc etc, of course there is "winning" a conversation in a broad sense. However this is a political performance and should be judged as such.

[@madcat789]

Man thats some intense bias. I dont think any of them won, I think we lost.

[@Gre1ems]

i believe in conservative ideals but i agree that trump didn't really do well in the debate.

[@BONKY-JONES]

She got the debate questions before hand, and all the questions were like why does trump suck, etc.

[@natonic8483]

least biased harris supporter:

[@joshez1]

Ok trumpet

[@lunkycultist5519]

They're British, there gonna be less bias than most American news

[@natonic8483]

@@lunkycultist5519 their*

[@lunkycultist5519]

@@natonic8483 *they're

[@natonic8483]

@@lunkycultist5519 lol

[@blitzneyo7780]

It really didnt feel like she won, but ok

[@davidescristofaros2241]

Well you're in the 35% of people who think she lost. The majority thinks otherwise. Cope

[@liltatorvert5583]

Please explain why? Genuinely interested in your perspective

[@normanwei529]

It didn't feel like trump winning either tho Kamala did dominate I'm sorry

[@greyghost2492]

@@liltatorvert5583 The moderators were pretty biased, and Harris actually lied more often than Trump did.

[@TheAmericanPrometheus]

@@liltatorvert5583 Harris did win, but to be fair to Trump the moderators were biased against him.