Well given the Tories have been engaged in a decade long process of self-mutilation by going through four PMs in a row while enjoying a majority, someone was bound to show up to pick up the disaffected voters on the fringes.
@andylewis73609 ай бұрын
And the entire party is “fringes”
@jamesarnold72539 ай бұрын
Has anyone ever wasted such a big majority before? I remember after the election it was generally believed it would take Labour at least 10 years to recover. It's amazing that the tories used their majority so badly
@specialandroid16039 ай бұрын
A majority that Boris obtained and not the Tory party. They got rid of the goose that lays the golden egg and along with it the Boris won majority.
@blackbeard64239 ай бұрын
Seriously, it's the bulk sides, the love handles, if you will. Many, many life-long Tory voters are fuming right now. There is no conservative party in the UK apart from Reform UK. All we got is high taxes, more welfare culture and mass immigration that is set to make the true British a minority on their own island eventually.@@andylewis7360
@blackbeard64239 ай бұрын
They had absolute power, true electoral dictatorship. Every party's dream scenario. And they absolutely f*c*k'd it.@@jamesarnold7253
@JaiAcuneIdeeQuoiMettreIci9 ай бұрын
Seems a little similar to what happened to Canada’s conservatives in the 1990s. They faced a MASSIVE (178 seats down to 2 seats) defeat in parliament. The Bloc Québécois formed official opposition and the « Reform Party of Canada » came in third .
@oliverleonard77309 ай бұрын
In the UK Labour will likely win a 1997 style landslide and the Liberal Democrats could go back to around their 2005 levels and form the official opposition.
@Dorgpoop9 ай бұрын
Yeah I think TLDR made this comparison before.
@jackwilliamsmith87349 ай бұрын
I’m very familiar. Kim Campbell’s Progressive Conservative Party were annihilated in spectacular electoral fashion and eclipsed by the Reform Party of Canada. Bloc Québécois was also a newly founded party and like you say, their party leader became Leader of the Opposition. This was bizarre for a nationalist party that stood candidates only in Quebec. It’d be like the SNP leading the opposition in the United Kingdom. The Reform Party of Canada would be succeeded by the Canadian Conservative-Reform Alliance and this political party would still beat the Progressive Conservative Party at the polls. However, these two parties were splitting the conservative voting base and eventually they agreed to merge thus the Conservative Party of Canada was founded.
@bretonneux33899 ай бұрын
@@jackwilliamsmith8734 is that this same party under Pierre Poilievre that seems to come in power soon ? i heard that Trudeau became very unpopular, i know that edgy comment sections with comments from the whole anglo saxon world under Jordan Peterson and Joe Rogan videos must not be confused with what the canadian people actually think, but with spiralling housing crisis and cost of living crisis, to which Trudeau's answer is to not touch its neoliberal doxa while pretending to be progressive with crazy and ridiculous identity politics that only gets the right wing pissed, while at the same time the opioids crisis is spreading in Canada.
@bigiman62419 ай бұрын
And now they have an 99.9% chance of winning an majority victory. Go Pierre
@frasersteen9 ай бұрын
I think you missed out on their immigration focus. Although they aren't explicit about how they will achieve it immigration is clearly the hill they would die on and the main source of their support.
@maxharbig11679 ай бұрын
Are they explicit, i.e. detailed about anything?
@michaelblower73639 ай бұрын
They are just a bunch of xenophobics.
@useodyseeorbitchute94509 ай бұрын
@@michaelblower7363 Still better than bunch of self-hating virtue signalers...
@gamingllama74649 ай бұрын
It is the main source of our issues. A lot of vacancies that the gov has been trying fill with mass immigration is quite literally sourced from the mass immigration itself. We’re not getting the doctors or engineers we’re getting dependants, meaning that for every NHS job that needs filled and is filled by an immigrant, they bring their whole families (who create more pressure on schools the NHS and other public services). Additionally, house prices haven’t been this bad as compared to the average wage since 1876, you must be choosing ignorance to think that not building anymore housing and then importing 10 million people within a decade wouldn’t drive up house prices and that’s just an add on from 2008.
@gibospartan61859 ай бұрын
They likely didn’t mention it because immigration is their campaign issue whereas the video concerns their actual agenda.
@swan14719 ай бұрын
Reform are very strategic, as they know they don't expect to win the upcoming GE, instead expect Labour to win inturn permanently ending the Conserative party and taking their votes. Btw good on TLDR for actually visually showing their policies directly from their site and not making it some ambiguous biased description.
@LukeofSmeg9 ай бұрын
Simply existing right now is strategy for them? What? 😂What policies aswell? Last time I checked they wanted to introduce healthcare stamps. They haven't got a clue.
@swan14719 ай бұрын
@@LukeofSmeg Existing? Brudda are you not paying attention, Reform are already winning over Conservative votes. Reform just need to bide their time and watch Labour do the exact same amount of damage the Tories have been doing as Labour don't have any real radical policies. Re NHS: "Patients will receive a voucher for private treatment if they can't see a GP within 3 days. For a consultant, the time limit would be 3 weeks. For an operation, 9 weeks." Mate just go to Google type Reform UK Policy and have a read for yourself, it don't need to be this vague, forbidden text no one is allowed to see for themselves. Or if you struggle with that just ask and I shall respond.
@swan14719 ай бұрын
@@LukeofSmeg Existing? Brudda have you not been paying attention, Reform are already winning over Conservative vote. Reform just needs to bide their time and watch Labour do the exact same damage the Tories have been doing, as they have no real radical policies. Re NHS: "Patients will receive a voucher for private treatment if they can't see a GP within 3 days. For a consultant, the time limit would be 3 weeks. For an operation, 9 weeks. My guy, just Google Reform UK policy and have a read for yourself, it doesn't need to be this vague, forbidden piece of text that no one is allowed to read. Or if you struggle with that just ask and I shall respond.
@whtwht9 ай бұрын
They are a bunch of chancers and clowns. But carry on people keep voting for shite.
@matthewtalbot-paine79776 ай бұрын
@SKUK97 Sure but that's not really worth anything if it doesn't continue. Fastest growing is never a good metric. Don't get me wrong I like the sounds of some of their policies, I've been harping on about increasing the tax free allowance for a decade now so them saying it will be £20k is only going to help the poorest people.
@godlaydying9 ай бұрын
Why is Reform UK unlike other parties? The other parties are parties.
@WhichDoctor19 ай бұрын
I for one look forward to the day we elect our first privately owned corporation into government /s
@Based_Stuhlinger9 ай бұрын
Keep voting for the establishment and getting nothing in return.
@kkho21989 ай бұрын
deform uk is funded by putin
@bababababababa61249 ай бұрын
@wotermelon_lol found the reform voter 😂🫵😬
@SubjectiveFunny9 ай бұрын
@@bababababababa6124 IF you vote for Tories or Labour, you get what you deserve.
@infosuge9 ай бұрын
To be fair. Labour haven’t explained how they will go about their pledges either, and diluted them to “mission statements”
@nicks49349 ай бұрын
Tbf i dont think labour hate migrants 😂
@cun7us9 ай бұрын
@@nicks4934 neither does Reform.
@hhhpolo35519 ай бұрын
@@nicks4934 Are migrants the solutions to UK problems?
@Drabbo9 ай бұрын
@@nicks4934Neither does Reform? Legal and high skilled immigration is key for any Globalist Nation however ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION and PEOPLE SMUGGLING is NOT okay. Our soft laws on kicking these criminals out also need reform.
@Eilfylijokul9 ай бұрын
@@hhhpolo3551they certainly paper over the cracks of declining birthrates and the useless comprehensive education system and general state of demoralisation that prevents people from going into essential jobs. They don't solve the problem and they cause issues themselves but we lose them at our own peril.
@kimwit13079 ай бұрын
So they want to give a huge amount of money to healthcare (and a lot of it to private healthcare) while at the same time do a massive tax-cut. That promises to be a budget as epic as the one Truss the Lettuce came up with.
@thomasbootham27079 ай бұрын
This is possible as there is lots of money going to projects and departments that we don’t need a lot of our tax money is being wasted reform uk is promising to look at where the money is being spent and any project or department that we don’t need or is a waste of money they will either reduce its budget or get rid of it saving money
@Baddy1879 ай бұрын
Someone needs to study the "Leffar Curve". Lowering taxes does not need to create a lower tax income, usually it inceases after a while.
@theravyneffect36109 ай бұрын
@@thomasbootham2707 You don't REALLY believe that there are departments we "don't need" that are receiving tens of billions of pounds... do you? Because it would take tens of billions to fulfil those promises.
@Tannhauser629 ай бұрын
But this is standard rhetoric for every party not in power. Everyone promises to make magical savings by 'cutting inefficiency', blah blah, and deliberately overestimating what might be achieved. Then, if they get into power, all that evaporates. It's just populist nonsense. @@thomasbootham2707
@chrishekman61799 ай бұрын
@@theravyneffect3610 These people never look at the actual expenditure of the government - so they have no idea the absurd amount of money that goes to health already
@KevinTalbotTV8 ай бұрын
the uk is too broken and there's too many sheep voting the for the 2 party system that things are only going to get a lot worse so I voted with my feet and left. I'm not paying 70% tax for all this crime
@fpvDRE8 ай бұрын
its broken due to lazy british people end of the day no wonder the goverment let so many people in to cover them lol
@RenewedAmbience6 ай бұрын
Based kev
@kingmasterfilip29659 ай бұрын
They will split tory vote so much its now probable that they (torys) if labour and LibDem vote tacticaly could be left with only 50 seats
@Andyw1972---9 ай бұрын
I'm not saying you're wrong but what is this based on? I haven't seen any polling/by election performance from reform to suggest they're actually capable of securing that many votes. Even in 2015, when ukip got 3 million votes, it didn't make that kind of impact.
@CrunchyNorbert9 ай бұрын
oh no not the precious tories who fall over each other to sell out their voters time after time
@Psepha9 ай бұрын
Every time our hopes rely on the general voting population voting "tactically" I assume we're going to fail. Again.
@kkho21989 ай бұрын
what a pity
@robinmcara7939 ай бұрын
Good 😂😂😂
@rafaelmartinvannostrand20849 ай бұрын
Say what you will about Farage and I'm not exactly a fan to put it lately. But the guy knows how to read the political situation and take advantage of it. One of the things he has said recently is the Tories might be facing a 100-year kind of event where they might be completely teared up in pieces and Reform UK taking the place as the opposition to Labour
@Wozza3659 ай бұрын
Can't see it being Reform at the next election, there's a very good chance it will be Lib Dems (or maybe SNP if they can recover themselves).
@theredtechnician9 ай бұрын
The non-populist right wing is being replaced everywhere else, it would be no surprise if the Tories suffer the same fate.
@kimwit13079 ай бұрын
Farage is a professional grifter. Being cunning and be able to read your vicitim (in this case the right wing electorate) is a necessary job-skill.
@mysteriousfox889 ай бұрын
its easy to be a goblin, its someone else that cleans up the mess
@BigPurp99 ай бұрын
It does help when you have the target audience he has. Other parties have to have well thought out policies and plans, he can just rattle his keys to keep their attention
@StephenFiorentini9 ай бұрын
Last time around - Split the left This time - Split the right
@mrvwbug44239 ай бұрын
Well with SNP basically dead, a lot of former SNP seats are likely to return to Labour. PC has no problem tactical voting for Labour as long as Labour earmarks enough funding for Wales.
@SaintGerbilUK9 ай бұрын
The left are still split?
@mycodingchannel96909 ай бұрын
we will always be split. I am a commie, so according to the liberal political spectrum, I am far left. I am not a ML (marxist leninist) nor an anarchist and of course not a social democrat. I am an Ultra, a member of the ICP. Even the far left in the left are split, so we will always be split and it's great. Half of us know (except sucdems and anarchists) that communism can't be voted in through represetive democracy. @@SaintGerbilUK Idealogical people will always be split. Left is known to be way more idealogical than the right who are mostly s h e e p single issue voters.
@bigkuriboh38149 ай бұрын
@mycodingchannel9690 the last sentence you spouted is utter rubbish.
@SaintGerbilUK9 ай бұрын
@@mycodingchannel9690 ideologues don't live in reality.
@kyleid34469 ай бұрын
Ah yes, the mysterious "cut spending" that comes out of nowhere, it is just the tories all over again lol
@verystripeyzebra9 ай бұрын
Same with immigration. Until they deal with the need for immigrants reducing immigration will never happen.
@ABombs19 ай бұрын
They've actually given a whole bunch of ways quite, specifically in many cases with numbers and all, in previous interviews. I couldn't tell you if those numbers and strategies are accurate and good, I'm just a comment, but they do seem to at least be trying to be more legit than the tories
@brandonstephens26449 ай бұрын
It's the classic right wing politics of 'cut spending but spend more'
@joshuastebbing74089 ай бұрын
I actually disagree on this! I believe that there’s an incredible waste by governments and councils. And that they could easily make budget cuts, that if done correctly wouldn’t have any effect on the economy or individuals. To be fair as-well £5 out of every £100 sounds pretty feasible!
@reheyesd86669 ай бұрын
Remove immigrants. It has costs us countless billions and social damage.
@jesseberg32719 ай бұрын
Me at the start of the video: _I thought it was just another vehicle for Nigel Farage's ambitions?_ Me midway through the video: _Oh, he's gone._ Me at the end of the video: _No he isn't._
@Alvio649 ай бұрын
I would love you to do a short video like this on all of the parties. Especially with a general election looming
@johnhopkins40129 ай бұрын
Immigration is the key issue especially the illegal boats. The British people have had enough.
@FreeRojava20258 ай бұрын
What problems are they causing exactly? I just see it as an infinite money glitch. Give them a job, get tax. Maybe then we can fund the NHS. Until you give me an actual issue, well I guess i won’t be able to change your view.
@mattclayton84746 ай бұрын
@ArmUkraine how about the millions being spent on housing them? Or the reduction in available housing, which has hiked cost of property?
@indiekiddrugpatrol31176 ай бұрын
@@FreeRojava2025many of them arent in jobs and arent paying taxes so are actually doing the opposite and most arent qualified for NHS positions so are therefore putting more strain on the NHS as well as the already undersupplied housing market
@FreeRojava20256 ай бұрын
@@indiekiddrugpatrol3117 so give them one then.
@FreeRojava20256 ай бұрын
@@mattclayton8474 how about the millions spent sending them to Rwanda?
@farright1189 ай бұрын
BREAKING.... Lee Andersok has joined Reform UK
@krisdaschwab9129 ай бұрын
Breaking: Nobody cares
@Nabium9 ай бұрын
@@krisdaschwab912 It does mean reform party has it's first ever MP, so, I do think somebody cares.
@SamPhoenix_9 ай бұрын
@@Nabium For a whole... what... 9 months max?
@Nabium9 ай бұрын
@@SamPhoenix_ Nine months more than no months, which legitimises them in the upcoming election. You desperately want this to not matter at all, so you project that onto the situation instead of being objective.
@xelthiavice42769 ай бұрын
and he is right about islam
@inbb5109 ай бұрын
How to win an outright majority in the UK: -Pledge to lower net immigration with a Danish style policy -Pledge to house young people prioritising those that are already married and have children -Tax cuts for overtime -Tax cuts for key start-up businesses in fields of green tech, weapons engineering, computer vision, robotics and AI. -Tram networks in the North -Federalisation. -Change income tax bracket to tax free until the first £25000 and offset that with 1% increase in cooperation tax for "old" industries.
@HistoryBuff_09 ай бұрын
"Federalisation"😭😱😰🤮
@noodles61319 ай бұрын
Based
@incurableromantic40069 ай бұрын
Step 1 - "Pledge to lower net immigration with a Danish style policy" Step 2 - "Massively increase immigration as soon as you have power"
@inbb5109 ай бұрын
@@incurableromantic4006 , the people on benefits will have to be willing to work if we do reduce immigration though. They need to want to be trained. If not then what you described will keep happening. Taking £3000 per month in benefits (which my dad who works in the job centre knows a lot of people who do this) will have to end.
@lewis1234179 ай бұрын
I live in Wales and federalisation is the worst most rediculous idea possible. We barely even wanted our own assembly
@richardbrown11899 ай бұрын
I would have thought that the main difference is that Reform UK is not a party. It's a private pressure group owned by Richard Tice. It has supporters, not members. That is to say, people who financially contribute to it without having any say in its policies or the way it is run.
@DrDanielHoward6 ай бұрын
For all of you still undecided I offer intellectual reasons for voting REFORM UK in my channel vid. It requires you to watch for fifteen minutes which I am sure you have the attention span to do, and I have added some time stamps for younger viewers. We need to vote REFORM UK it is existential and I give my reasons. Dr D Howard, former fellow of University of Oxford and later former fellow of the UK Defence Research Agency.
@myoldtapes91876 ай бұрын
mmm, isn't that a definition of dictatorship?
@lewis1234175 күн бұрын
100,000 members only 30,000 less than the conservatives and almost 15% of the vote at the last election, now polling at 21%
@lewis1234175 күн бұрын
@@myoldtapes9187no lol. Private pressure groups aren't dictatorships 😂
@jacobhogan32089 ай бұрын
The problem with comparing Reform UK to Canadian Reform is that Canadian reform had a core regionalized base with a huge seat count (Western Canada), even after years they still failed to win many seats west of Manitoba. Reform Uk could cost the Tories many seats and even win a few constituencies. But if their vote spread isn't concentrated enough, they could do well but still not win many seats. (As seen with UKIP in 2015.) There are other factors. The LibDems are arguably in a stronger position then the NDP was in 1993-2000. The SNP isn't as strong as the Bloc was in 1993 either. But I could see an Ontario 1993-2000 situation where Labour sweeps England while the Tories and Reform win only some constituencies. Scotland and Wales would be more complicated to determine, while Northern Ireland would practically be having their own separate election that could barely factor into parliament depending on how well SF does. Eventually I think Reform falls apart in an election cycle or two as the Conservatives regroup and get away from government for long enough that people forget why they even voted for Reform in the first place.
@rmccaw76 ай бұрын
Got to be honest, I'm all over this party now. I didn't know what they were about, but if this really is their manifesto I can't see what's not to like.
@jxpt89356 ай бұрын
Because its a whole lot of words with no 'how'
@rmccaw76 ай бұрын
@jxpt8935 Tbh the how is not really important. Even if they do absolutely nothing, it's better that nothing god-awful happens, and whatever does happen happens in line with their stated principles. Not every government has to do something.
@joeysd84896 ай бұрын
@@rmccaw71) any political party following this election has to do something, else things will get worse. 2) many of the pledges in Reform's manifesto are unfunded, meaning any action will result in cuts elsewhere or a Truss-style inflatory market crash as nonexistent money is spent.
@mabeSc9 ай бұрын
2:52 I've already seen that bus, just with other writings on there... The promises back then were not kept, why should I believe them now? What's so different?
@gerhardaigner51089 ай бұрын
Yes, it’s the same kind of people
@_jpg9 ай бұрын
The bus is blue this time!
@johnbrereton52299 ай бұрын
Remoners seem to get all their information from the side of buses. 😂😂😂😂
@harambae70149 ай бұрын
The people who commissioned that bus were not the government, they were a group campaigning to leave the EU. The Tory government were completely split on the issue if you remember. Therefore the statement written on the bus wasn't a promise, it was a suggestion. They literally did not have the authority to promise government policy. I don't know why people believed it was a promise and still insist it was to this day.
@johnbrereton52299 ай бұрын
@@harambae7014 It's because Remoaners are so desperate to discredit Brexit that they seize on any scrap of information to bolster their flimsy case against it.
@jameshogben22439 ай бұрын
Sensible and solid journalism in action!
@gezci9 ай бұрын
Wrong. Tories do NOT dominate the House of Lords. They are significantly outnumbered.
@jormungandrtheworldserpent83829 ай бұрын
could you guys please do a similar videos on other small partys
@AlexanderTheEvenGreater9 ай бұрын
Like the Monster Raving Loony Party, who wanted to introduce a 99p coin? Yes Please!!!!!
@EddieOWright9 ай бұрын
Love the image choice at 5:53… i wonder who in history had loads of images taken of him in a similar pose 😂
@GeorgeGwiazda9 ай бұрын
Yes because Nigel is calling for the extermination of Jews and imperium over mainland Europe. He is, isn’t he…?
@Nayfus9Ай бұрын
There's one where he does it accurately
@9delta9889 ай бұрын
Looking at the biggest party in the Netherlands, there is no need to be democratic to be successful. The PVV officially only has one member..
@evanman10116 ай бұрын
Britain's new low: Millions of people willingly voting a registered corporation for government & its shareholder for prime minister 🤣
@trevorlandy1529 ай бұрын
something very wrong with the graph at 17 seconds. Add up the percentages of all the parties at each of the monthly iterations and there is no consistency, or there is missing data.
@tomooo26379 ай бұрын
Reform UK = cut the NHS waiting lists, by getting rid of the NHS.
@samiuddin90279 ай бұрын
Smartest american ever
@erikzoe19 ай бұрын
Are you saying that is what should happen, in which case I strongly disagree with you, or are you saying that's what Deform UK will do, in which case you're probably right?
@chesterdonnelly12129 ай бұрын
The Tories' policy is to cut NHS waiting lists by waiting for people to die.
@tomooo26379 ай бұрын
@@erikzoe1 Edited my original post
@internethardcase6 ай бұрын
yeah importing another 3 million over this next decade should fix all that.
@VainerToast6 ай бұрын
The more research I do about Reform the more I seem to want to vote for them, coming from a pro labour person, if things continue this way reform will have my vote for the next few elections
@jackmonaghan84779 ай бұрын
"Why Reform UK is unlike any party?" - More like, it's just like any other Westminster party only completely mask-off about its bigotry, jingoism and Friedman/Hayek influenced economic illiteracy.
@verystripeyzebra9 ай бұрын
It is not structured like a party, it is a private limited company. It has no membership as such. It's policy is all decided by the majority shareholder, entirely at his whim and discretion.
@OnlineEnglish-wl5rp9 ай бұрын
"bigotry"? What did you say when the scandals in Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, Newcastle, Manchester, Oldham, Oxford etc were revealed? Let me guess - you talked away the actual hateful bigotry at play there
@ecnalms8519 ай бұрын
It's not bigotry. Research about what happened in Cologne, 2015 in Germany on New Years Eve - Journeyman Pictures have a good documentary about it on KZbin. This incident happened the same year Germany accepted 1 million refugees from Muslim countries. Also research why Norway had to introduce compulsory women's rights classes for male migrants - the Guardian also has a good documentary about this on KZbin. Instead of being intellectually lazy and blasting people as "bigots" - try to actually research why people are voting for the right-wing parties and the far-right in Europe.
@Seeker71729 ай бұрын
@@OnlineEnglish-wl5rp Get over it. Most sexual assaults are done by white people, just they're not in your bloody right-wing rag. If you want to know who causes the problems, look to those who come here in private jets, not a dinghy.
@noodles61319 ай бұрын
You’re obviously a leftist lol, immigration has skyrocketed under the Conservatives and they’re always going on about their “diversity” nonsense, they’re literally woke lol, our entire establishment is far left
@JayAndNightASMR9 ай бұрын
The funniest/saddest thing is people falling for the same tricks over and over.
@YellowSpaceMarine9 ай бұрын
It's seems like their views on tax policy are: promise everything, don't say how you'll do it.
@scotttracy93339 ай бұрын
Just like Brexit, from some of the same people also
@user-fk9mo2ld6w8 ай бұрын
What do you mean they don't say how they will do it? If they gain power they will have the authority to cut tax 🤔
@scotttracy93338 ай бұрын
@@user-fk9mo2ld6w Having the authority and then actually cutting taxes are two separate things
@Yeosprings9 ай бұрын
Can agree with them regarding changing the voting system.
@lewis1234179 ай бұрын
Like that would work. Just look at the Netherlands and Italy and germanies second largest party. Europe is riddled with PR systems that have elected radical right wing government
@manana14449 ай бұрын
Sadly, pledges like this often go unpromised. Most parties won't go changing the electoral system after being elected by it.
@bishboshs9 ай бұрын
@@manana1444 What political party has promised to change the electoral system who then actually went into government? It's only small parties, who don't beenfit from FPTP promise it and by definition they never get into government.
@erikzoe19 ай бұрын
Yes, but don't trust them to honour that. Remember that Farage deliberately manipulated the 2019 election in an attempt to make the result even less proportional than it would already have been under FPTP. Just like he bangs on ad nauseum about the so-called "will of the people", but totally supported Trump becoming president despite mmore people having voted for Hillary Clinton. This lot only favour a fair voting system, or anything else, when it's to their advantage to do so.
@alekm56469 ай бұрын
@@lewis123417 That,s hoe democracy works lol.
@rogue9 ай бұрын
Didn’t think I’d say this but a lot of 6:20 actually sounds pretty good to me.
@WhichDoctor19 ай бұрын
So they want to reform everything, but with actually having any solid ideas as to what they’d reform then into. Kind of like brexit. Make the change and they hope you can work out what that change is afterwards
@_jpg9 ай бұрын
Not only that, it's even the same people who told many of the Brexit lies 😂
@scottessery1009 ай бұрын
@@_jpgreform democracy to nationalism
@mrvwbug44239 ай бұрын
With every far right party is answer is always the same, they are all authoritarian Fascists.
@davescott76809 ай бұрын
Hey now, they have detailed some of the plans. ... And they are genuinely moronic plans.
@rationalroundhead67399 ай бұрын
Oh, they know exactly what they want to reform it into. We're just on the wrong side of the grift.
@0xCAFEF00D9 ай бұрын
4:25 Wow what a revolutionary idea. Make the smaller private healthcare industry fabulously wealthy through taxing the people and removing any form of buyer pricing. You'd be raking it in more than US private healthcare with this scheme. It's also not solving the waiting lists because they're simply far too small. 2019 11.2% of UK healthcare was privately provided. And they obviously don't have massive amounts of people just sitting on their asses doing nothing in private care. I don't want to pull numbers out my ass but it's easier to understand my argument this way. Imagine they have people working 50%(!) of time they could be working. So the average employed private healthcare doctor only takes half-days _relative to NHS doctors_ because they don't have enough sick people coming to them. Then the total private portion of the UK Healthcare system could amount to (11.2*(1/50%)) 22.4%, double capacity with the suggested 100% subsidy. It's not a solution even when the case is just absolutely ludicrous like that. If private healthcare is more busy than that the increased capacity quickly decreases to near zero (75% current active time -> 2.8% capacity increase or private healthcare making up 14% total healthcare). It also relies on the only inefficiency in private healthcare providers being this assumed lack of patients. Very unlikely considering the waiting lists and private healthcares profit motive providing a lot of pressure on it to not idle doctors. How do people fall for this crap?
@CartoonDrama449 ай бұрын
I think their long-term strategy here ( if they have one) is to keep expanding the private healthcare service while making the NHS even more defunct, so that eventually you get a US-style healthcare.
@d.ag.b11359 ай бұрын
Well maffs is hard, innit?
@davescott76809 ай бұрын
@@CartoonDrama44Exactly. The plan is to turn it into US system and royally fuck anyone whose not rich.
@pelinoregeryon65939 ай бұрын
I think it's more a case of "this is where we are, the NHS has been gutted (starting under Blair if not before with all the 'public private partnerships' he instigated that burdened it with so much debt / interest repayment) isn't getting things done on time, people need treatment now not in six months so how do we make that happen". Leaving us with an immediate situation that needs handling any which way you can. I would hope that further investment in and restructuring of the NHS* to get the NHS back up to spec and on track would put an end to the need for any substantial outspending to the private healthcare industry to take up the slack within 5-10 years. * to get rid of extraneous management layers that add no value to the end 'product' and service provision of the NHS .. like all of the EID managers and staff we never had before (it functioned fine before without them, it can again) that unnecessarily swallow so much NHS money.
@LukeofSmeg9 ай бұрын
They don't believe it, I bet you 80-90% of their voters have no idea about this policy. They are buggered come election time when it faces scrutiny. Could be a distraction maybe? Get the press worked up about that, when they know there own voters don't care about that policy only "getting rid of Johnny Foreigner" - Although they don't have any idea how to do that either without authoritarianism and breaking international law.
@iankeeley18549 ай бұрын
As far as I can see same party didn't farage stand with Johnson over brexit
@Andy-eo3mq9 ай бұрын
People are outraged at Reforms ideas, but if the Conservative Party were actually Conservative, then there wouldn't be a need for Reform UK. As it is, there's basically no difference between the Tories and Labour. Hard working Brits feel like we're being squeezed and squeezed; with the main 2 parties offering zero policies that benefit us.
@ZakGriffiths-zq9lj7 ай бұрын
Conservatism refers to being cautious and careful in your actions, and rejecting rapid change. Attempting to halt immigration trends overnight, cut government spending by orders of magnitude and directly interfere with primary and secondary school curricula are all very radical policies. They are not conservative policies, they are reactionary - aiming to reverse current trends through radical change.
@andrewfulton34357 ай бұрын
Social conservatism champions the same views as it did in the fifties, in respect to religion & demographics, the main issues for people who call themselves socially conservative, is inflexible and fringe.
@anthonyfrancis23746 ай бұрын
Lazy ineptitude!
@baileyharrison10306 ай бұрын
@@ZakGriffiths-zq9lj Regardless of what words people choose to use, if we have a party that is constantly trying to change the status quo and push it further to the left (the Labour Party) and a party that is only trying to maintain the status quo (the Conservative Party), the Overton window will only ever shift to the left. This is the major problem with current British politics. And if this is the case, you have to concede that the Conservative Party doesn’t hold any real fundamental values.
@ZakGriffiths-zq9lj6 ай бұрын
@@baileyharrison1030 I agree that the conservative party does not hold any fundamental values, except that of gradual change. That is what it is to be a conservative: to move with the times, only slowly and cautiously. I also agree that this means the overton window moves left as a general rule. This is because the left and right are defined in terms of their relationship to hierarchy - the left opposing existing hierarchies and the right supporting them. Democracies with a full electoral franchise, by their nature, ought to trend towards a more egalitarian stance as people vote for their interests (which, for the majority, is equality). Further, the political culture, at least in the west, since the French Revolution just seems to prefer the left. Equality is an attractive idea I suppose. Therefore, you’re right, there is no major political party with a platform of actively rolling back progress and changing the status quo to recreate abolished hierarchies. The reason there isn’t is because, post-WW2, there was general agreement in the West that trying to do so was immensely dangerous. That consensus seems to have broken down to some extent, as evidenced by the rise of reactionary parties across europe. So you’re right, the reform party is the only party offering a genuine option of undoing social progress and moving society backwards. That is exactly why I think you shouldn’t vote for them
@mdshiblu19279 ай бұрын
Hi, I hope you are well. I visit your channel and your video making is very good. Your content idea are very good and huge informatics. Thank you
@mdshiblu19279 ай бұрын
Can i suggest you how to grow your channel and best seo rank?
@LFX279 ай бұрын
I’d rather take my chances with a reform government than Tory or Labour-Tory.
@scarfholdgraphicsmedia95019 ай бұрын
Why?
@wft159 ай бұрын
@@scarfholdgraphicsmedia9501labour have bankrupted my city and the tories are useless.
@Riya-ho5zv9 ай бұрын
"Fighting woke" is so funny
@Endeavour66449 ай бұрын
You are the problem.
@karankapoor27019 ай бұрын
Being a they/them is wayy funnier than that
@randomguy-tg7ok9 ай бұрын
Funny... in what kind of way?
@kingmasterfilip29659 ай бұрын
@@karankapoor2701 I understand if u are conservative and not like trans people or gay people, but understand this PM is most powerfull political office in Britain and is in charge of every goverement fuction, so when u see fighting woke as their only well detailed and most elabarated platform and not u know anything else it looks funny as that person in theory is not an activist it's a politician
@kingmasterfilip29659 ай бұрын
@@randomguy-tg7ok In a way that they are running for most powerful political office in Britain and their main concern and/or most detailed platform isn't on the economy nor on bad government services but on American culture wars
@CARL_0939 ай бұрын
reform party will replace torries
@RogerMellie-yk3gw9 ай бұрын
Lol. I doubt Reform could even get a seat. They're small fry
@lewis1234175 күн бұрын
@@RogerMellie-yk3gwlol they got 5 seats and 15% of the vote with paper candidates, no party structure and no money. Their now polling at 21%. Maybe you're out of touch
@RogerMellie-yk3gw5 күн бұрын
@lewis123417 You're out of touch. They aren't polling at 21% at all. Five seats is pathetic. And they'll be forgotten about like ukip by the next general election. There's alway a fringe party that has minor success then disappears
@DRKrust4929 ай бұрын
Reform UK is a business. Not a party.
@Baddy1879 ай бұрын
It is a smart move. I like it.
@1inchPunchBowl9 ай бұрын
@@Baddy187 Vote for them then. Good luck with that.
@robinmcara7939 ай бұрын
They are a joke 😂😂😂
@kisfekete9 ай бұрын
Bankrolled from Russia with love.
@richardcooley97309 ай бұрын
@MickDunn-ql7si and if you look at the Companies House records of the Brexit party you will see a lot of money disappear in "expenses".
@SamLowryDZ-0159 ай бұрын
They are NOT a party. They are a privately owned company.
@spoonkus58939 ай бұрын
And doesn’t it just scare you to bits how successful they’ve become?…
@CityWhisperer9 ай бұрын
@@spoonkus5893 Successful? Far from that. Last thing the country needs is a corporation running it.
@MichaelGGarry9 ай бұрын
@@spoonkus5893 Because 10% of the electorate are bigotted vermin. No surprise there.
@SamLowryDZ-0159 ай бұрын
@@spoonkus5893 Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. oh wait you're serious let me laugh harder. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
@spoonkus58939 ай бұрын
@@SamLowryDZ-015 where’s the lie?
@seanonraet83279 ай бұрын
So it's another one of Nigel's grifts, what a surprise
@quackcement7 ай бұрын
funny how Their LOGO looks like your KZbin channel logo
@colinrogers22149 ай бұрын
A MAN WITH A BACKBONE AND A PAIR OF BALLS WELL DONE LEE
@localreviewking1349 ай бұрын
🦤
@Charlielinja9 ай бұрын
Billionaire's balls, in his mouth.
@mtw_jjones92429 ай бұрын
14% and growing🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
@FreeRojava20258 ай бұрын
They are expected to win 0 seats. And they better not win any.
@Teadrinker-kg4ve8 ай бұрын
You'll have a lot of crying to do.
@lewis1234175 күн бұрын
@FreeRojava2025they won 5 seats now polling on 21%
@lewis1234175 күн бұрын
@Teadrinker-kg4veI guess you were the one doing the crying? They won 5 seats and are now polling at 21%, they've grown 7% in the polls since June alone
@barwick66906 ай бұрын
I agree with a lot of reforms ideas but I don’t trust them to maintain our human rights
@lewis1234175 күн бұрын
Then you have allowed yourself to be terrified by false smears
@yusaki80649 ай бұрын
The following is a poem from Michael Rosen: I sometimes fear that people think that fascism arrives in fancy dress worn by grotesques and monsters as played out in endless re-runs of the Nazis. Fascism arrives as your friend. It will restore your honour, make you feel proud, protect your house, give you a job, clean up the neighbourhood, remind you of how great you once were, clear out the venal and the corrupt, remove anything you feel is unlike you... It doesn't walk in saying, "Our programme means militias, mass imprisonments, transportations, war and persecution."
@bunnystrasse9 ай бұрын
Islam is that fascism
@ObnoxiousOtter89 ай бұрын
@@bunnystrassehow fucking thick are you
@wft159 ай бұрын
The left is currently the fascist party - no freedom of speech 1984 is what we’re currently experiencing
@LukeofSmeg9 ай бұрын
@@bunnystrasse No but it is usually a dogmatic religion. Although Islamists do have alot in common with the far right and that does make me laugh quite often.
@clairee49396 ай бұрын
I take the point, however being fascist makes one fascist, not any of those promises.
@farscape10766 ай бұрын
I was interested in finding out about Reform until Nigel Farage said he is trying to help Trump get in to power again. If they are aligned with the US Republican party they clearly have fascist leanings.
@theboraxbandit95636 ай бұрын
lmao... do you have any reason to think that other than ornj man bad? god forbid they don't want biden handlers back in again
@DrDanielHoward6 ай бұрын
We are importing immigrants from places where people live in sewers in Africa. Even Indians say "do not fill the UK with indians you will ruin the place". This is much more important than this issue of a private party. For all of you still undecided I offer intellectual reasons for voting REFORM UK in my channel vid. It requires you to watch for fifteen minutes which I am sure you have the attention span to do, and I have added some time stamps for younger viewers. We need to vote REFORM UK it is existential and I give my reasons. Dr D Howard, former fellow of University of Oxford and later former fellow of the UK Defence Research Agency.
@lewis1234175 күн бұрын
Facist leanings 😂 no it's just that trump in the Whitehouse who is famously pro Britain is far better for our interests than famously anti UK biden
@samjenko9 ай бұрын
Why do rich people hate renewable energy so much? Do they make money out of the existing system or something?
@stonehengemaca9 ай бұрын
And why is it the people that stand to benefit from it hate it too? Ignoring experts and demanding we do the opposite to what they advise. It's a crazy world full of crazy people.
@dariusonly13849 ай бұрын
Many rich people in the US invested in it so it’s probably just UK millionaires aren’t as caught up
@thomasmerlin49909 ай бұрын
it makes no sense to hate them a priori, but we must take note that they are not sufficient (except for nations that can rely on hydroelectricity) and that in many European states they live on subsidies.
@karstenkunneman52199 ай бұрын
Anyone who understands the shortcomings of renewable energy understands how much of a waste of resources it is, unless it's nuclear or hydro
@f-86zoomer379 ай бұрын
@@stonehengemaca lack of education, lots of religious brainwashing too
@grumpygit-sv1cg9 ай бұрын
As with so many news outlets you keep using the term far right for anyone who is both traditionalists and considers themselves patriotic. I know these values are looked down upon these days but I do not remember one election where opening up Britain to mass immigration was ever on the manifesto of any party. Many true working class people, who would never identify as Tories feel ignored by both Labour and Tories alike. I know many of you think of the Tories voters as a bunch of toffs but millions of working class people vote Tory because they are small c conservatives but now feel abandoned by them too . To be honest I would imagine most Reform voters would turn out to be working class, maybe equal to the number of middle class Labour voters, as Labour doesn't represent the white working class anymore. Maybe all parties need to start listening until a true right wing party appears on the political horizon.
@LukeofSmeg9 ай бұрын
Traditionalists in the age of information, of social media, or AI is called being reactionary. Reactionary politics are far right politics. Maybe you don't like the term but from what you describe you fit the bill. Quite funny that you don't like the term aswell, because it proves deep down you know that it is morally wrong, but yet you still find ways of justifying it to yourself. I consider myself a patriot for instance, but patriotism has f-all with hating migrants, our multicultural society makes me feel proud to be British. I'd say the idea that foreigners come over and destroy our culture is anti-British. The EU is not going to change British culture, the Americans have given it a good go, but here we are, still as British as ever. Also "as Labour doesn't represent the white working class anymore" - Why do you lot obsess over bringing race into everything? You also think Labour need to listen until they become a true right wing party? You are barmy mate, absolutely gone.
@richriley80408 ай бұрын
Well said.
@FreeRojava20258 ай бұрын
Im patriotic, and I hate reform. They will not fix the country, only cut taxes and increase spending, something that really doesn’t work. Labour will actually do “patriotic” things, like funding the military, making bank of nationalising transport systems, increasing employment by opening factories for munitions etc.
@grumpygit-sv1cg8 ай бұрын
@@FreeRojava2025 Reform have nothing to do with my post. But if you believe in Labour I'm afraid you will end up very disappointed.
@LukeofSmeg7 ай бұрын
@@FreeRojava2025 I'm 110% behind arming and supporting Ukraine, especially given the recent lack of support from the US (hopefully that will change soon) but the UK seriously does not need increased military spending. We are in a cost of living crisis, mental health crisis, NHS waiting lists through the roof. Dealing with those issues and the massive black hole of legalised corruption in the British economy is more important, more pressing patriotic issue than increased funding for the military. That doesn't mean the UK should stop giving Ukraine arms and support though.
@jamessteel90169 ай бұрын
It’s the Tory extreme right fringe of the party, the fact they are taking lumps out of eachother is great for the opposition
@feffermickel9 ай бұрын
It’s cathartic to see them suffer the same fragmentation that’s always plagued the left. But also terrifying that it’s legitimising insane far right ideology.
@MrJudgementday999 ай бұрын
Extreme right wing! Hmmmn
@paradisehub93829 ай бұрын
Most of the Tories are either left wing, incompetent or both! Labour and the rest are extreme left.
@OnlineEnglish-wl5rp9 ай бұрын
What's extreme about them?
@krisdaschwab9129 ай бұрын
They're not extreme right. Just right. They're also wrong about literally everything, but that's a different story.
@aivars_video9 ай бұрын
If the manifesto is called a contract, isn’t it legally binding and can’t they be sued for its breach?
@LukeofSmeg9 ай бұрын
It's about as legally binding as EU law. 😂
@joacom9 ай бұрын
Guys, where is the video on the Ireland referendum???
@damienreilly43479 ай бұрын
No one cares
@joacom9 ай бұрын
@@damienreilly4347 Now say it without crying
@damienreilly43479 ай бұрын
@@joacom ok, no one cares 😭😭😭😭
@earthball20249 ай бұрын
Oh Boy That Was Destroyed. Its Vagueness On Families and Equal Rights Caused its Defeat. Another Defeat for Fine Gael and Fianna Fail! Also We Are In Recession Now. Great!
@clairee49396 ай бұрын
That’ll be the one where 90% of the people of Northern Ireland backed the Good Friday Agreement.
@nathanstake9 ай бұрын
I will certainly be voting for reform!
@mysteriousfox889 ай бұрын
its just ukip
@chesterdonnelly12129 ай бұрын
No it isn't. UKIP still exists and it's a farce. That's why Farage set up a new party he can control. UKIP attracted embarrassing thugs.
@RogerMellie-yk3gw9 ай бұрын
It's just the Nazis
@scotttracy93339 ай бұрын
@@RogerMellie-yk3gw Check out 5.53 of this video
@RogerMellie-yk3gw9 ай бұрын
@@scotttracy9333 I'd vote for Reform if I believed those were its policies. But politcal parties never stick to their promises. Plus, their followers are mainly thick chavs. And they didn't even mention reforming the Lords or royal family.
@wft159 ай бұрын
@@RogerMellie-yk3gw no it’s not 😂 wft
@stevedunn55469 ай бұрын
I was going to vote reform. Now I am definitely going to vote reform. Thank you for the video.
@camillelebreton57789 ай бұрын
what made you make this joice ? Wanting to destroy and scarecrow you can't even define ? Stupidity ? Racism ?
@remoanersrknts67369 ай бұрын
@@camillelebreton5778 . Time to grow up silly child.
@ElectroMotoko9 ай бұрын
@@remoanersrknts6736dumb
@scarfholdgraphicsmedia95019 ай бұрын
Let's hear from you why Reform is the solution. That is, if you provide a grown up response.
@stevedunn55469 ай бұрын
@@scarfholdgraphicsmedia9501 Labour are not the Labour of the past and do not represent the working man or the majority of Britain. The Conservative government seems to despise the working man, British values and history. Reform though not perfect by any means deserve a chance to be able to represent the majority and not the minority.
@jakel86279 ай бұрын
Reform is like doubling down on Brexit, despite the fact it's clearly not benefited anyone in this country and has cost hundreds of billions of economic output. Voting for Labour under Starmer this time. Always been Lib Dem, but they look like a minor political force compared to Labour under Kier Starmer's leadership.
@reheyesd86669 ай бұрын
" hundreds of billions of economic output" Sounds like you read that from the guardian mate. Ease up on parroting propaganda lol.
@Hector-bj3ls9 ай бұрын
I don't know why anyone would vote for Labour. They've already displayed to the nation how weak they are. Voting for them will only make things worse. Tories are no better. They're just as weak and useless. To be fair though, since you voted for Lib Dem you're probably the type that likes the idea of living in a third world country. Just wish you lot would move there instead of importing it here.
@Quotheraving9 ай бұрын
That NHS vouchers solution to long waiting lists in the NHS is beyond boneheaded. Private Health care providers are more expensive and have absolutely no requirement to bill fairly especially when they know that the government is footing the bill. Therefore this extra cost must either be added to the amount allocated to the NHS or removed from it's current budget. Clearly this can't work as a long-term solution without either further eroding the NHS or simply throwing money at the problem in the most inefficient way imaginable! A far better and more efficient solution would be simply to better fund the NHS, set measures in place to ensure the wellbeing of NHS workers while giving tax breaks to the most essential NHS workers, thereby making working for the NHS a more viable and attractive solution. Simultaneously management needs to be assessed on how able they are to ensure that their district are providing a quality service based on cost and feedback from patients and staff.
@andybrice27119 ай бұрын
It's an idea which seems to work well in practice, both here and abroad. I've had various NHS treatments at private facilities. The NHS has the power to negotiate very reasonable prices. And they don't have to shoulder all the initial investment and risk of building the facilities. It's far preferable to the government contracting out health services. Which is massively open to cronyism and corruption. I don't think a voucher system should replace NHS facilities. But it seems like an entirely sensible way of supplementing them.
@inbb5109 ай бұрын
Semi privatised healthcare is literally the norm in Western Europe and places like Japan. Only the UK makes a big fuss out of it cos "MeRiCA" as if the US style healthcare is the only option we have other than the NHS. Do you understand why the NHS is getting more difficult to fund? Aging population maybe??? Also the NHS is very inefficient due to lack of innovation. Personnel isn't an issue per se. The NHS is one of the biggest employers in Western Europe with some of the most well paid. Many other countries actually attempt to use the capacity offered in private hospitals when the capacity is full but because we Brits have this binary "public good, private bad" mentality, that's what's also contributing to the very long waiting lists we have.
@Quotheraving9 ай бұрын
@@andybrice2711 The scale of the problem (nearly 8 million people on NHS waiting lists, 50% seen in 12 hours and a 90% bed occupancy in hospitals) isn't merely one of supplementation, this is bordering on replacement. At the small scale bargaining power is greater due to simple supply and demand but we're no longer talking about the small scale here and as such the supply/demand equation starts to swing the other way. If we had money to burn and were able to cut down waiting lists by accessing Private health services while also renovating the NHS then I'd be inclined to agree, but this proposal isn't a solution, it's at best a sticking plaster on a very deep wound. The sheer cost involved in alleviating a problem of this scale while simultaneously claiming to reduce public spending means that it's almost a foregone conclusion that this will actually further damage the NHS due to essential problems being ignored and likely lead to it's being dismantled.
@nothereandthereanywhere9 ай бұрын
@@andybrice2711 It isn't a solution though. If you think of it, UK has a large aging population, meaning the facilities should be built to accommodate it. Or do you want the private company build it, let the government pay for it over it + few billions extra to shareholders? NHS will not cope, unless it is expanded due to elderly people - those elderly will coming for decades. Do you think decades of voucher system is financially feasible?
@Quotheraving9 ай бұрын
@@inbb510 "Brits have this binary "public good, private bad" mentality, that's what's also contributing to the very long waiting lists we have." So nothing to do with a history of being chronically underfunded then? "NHS is very inefficient due to lack of innovation."!? If anything consecutive new regimes with conflicting 'innovative' approaches are part of the problem and a leading cause of inefficiency as providers are forced to adopt, scrap and change entire systems! Also at this point let's just admit the Straw-man in the room. We're not talking about a root and branch restructuring of the entire health system toward an integrated private/public system but rather a stop-gap diversion of funds towards the private sector, likely to the detriment of the public. The point being that the claim of "we'll just pay them to go private" doesn't gel with the "We'll tax you less" promise. Now let's examine the "other countries operate as a combined private / public" claim to see if we're comparing apples with apples and whether these are systems that display significantly greater efficiency or whether they just cost more. Currently the No.1 health care system globally is Singapore which operates a combined private/public system. This is paid for by an enforced saving program termed 'Medisave' which takes between 7 - 9.5% of earnings (a de-facto tax) 'Medishield' a national insurance program and 'Medifund' a 3 Billion reserve (of public money) that helps support the system. While it is undoubtedly providing a better outcome than the UK it is also a significantly more costly one for the individual. The No.1 European health care system is Norway but I was unable to find any in-depth data on it other than that it incurs a per-capita cost of $6,072 as compared to the UK's $4,725 (no.10 overall). That's a 28% higher level of funding. However, the No.2 European health care system is the Netherlands' with a per-capita cost of $6,128. This is partly funded by a statutory health insurance system (another de-facto tax) and has fully integrated the private and public sectors into a single system that is in effect public plus. So in conclusion. Firstly these are very different systems that place a higher portion of the cost on the individual. Secondly judging purely by the per-capita costs involved the NHS is clearly a more efficient service ranking as no.10 globally at only 2/3rds the cost. The per-capita cost of these higher performing systems average out at around 30% more than the UK which simply reinforces my assertion that the NHS isn't underperforming due to inefficiency, but rather due to a lack of funding.
@ballisticmissl79199 ай бұрын
The mess of a party I expected. Completely devoid of science, heartless, and just a lot of promises that certainly shall not be fulfilled.
@Jarmint9 ай бұрын
muh soyence
@elizabeth.6018 ай бұрын
Reform sounds brilliant ❤. I'd vote for them!
@MultipleUselessness9 ай бұрын
5:52 This all seem pretty great to me. Didn't know much about reform, thanks for filling me in. I'll have to look into them more but they seem like a good contendor for my vote.
@FreeRojava20258 ай бұрын
No. Just please rethink this. These are all things the tories pledged, but they could never get them through. It won’t work, it’ll just be a waste of money and make our country poorer and less relevant than ever before, and make it harder to fix. Please
@Godonstilts9 ай бұрын
As much as I loathe Farage and his cronies, and even though I consider myself quite left wing - there are few items that I agree with, and in general politics does need a massive reform from the "Punch and Judy" show that it is, especially in terms of never seemingly being able hold people to account for all the massive amounts of corruption we have going on!!
@pragueuprising5609 ай бұрын
The reform party seems like more of a punch and judy show than the main parties.
@theboraxbandit95636 ай бұрын
Why do you loathe Farage? I'm not too involved with politics but I've been told to hate him for years but I really can't understand why. Usually the only response I get is "he's a racist" never a real critique.
@Godonstilts6 ай бұрын
@@theboraxbandit9563 How is calling someone a racist not a 'real critique'? Racism IS bad. Also, he is a populist grifter. His only ability is to denounce how bad everything is, and promise that he will fix things, but has not actual substance on the details. If you read his 'contract', it promises the Earth, but he cannot declare how any of it will be achieved. He is not an MP, never has been and is incredibly fringe. Yet, somehow has been getting increasingly more air time with his populist nonsense. He blames all our problems on 'immigrants' with no evidence to back it up, and there are many, many economic reports that show that immigrants are actually GOOD for us and keeping the country afloat. He is an incredibly childish buffoon if you ever watched how he conducted himself as part of the EU Parliament, he was a belligerent toddler who rarely showed up, still collected a salary, and when he did the best he could ever come up with was "Nya nyah nyah nyah nyah - we are British, so we are great and you are foreign". He is also a massive hypocrite, declaring how broken and useless the EU is, but still ensuring his children could have EU passports through his German links before we left the EU and travel is now shafted for everyone else. ... I could go on all day, there really is a very long list. Just search for "led by donkeys" and add his name.
@DanielleTinkov9 ай бұрын
I don’t think Reform stands much chance of replacing the Tories unless they outright beat them at the polls. They will definitely help Labour but the FPTP system and the existing HoL situation give way too much institutional advantage to established parties. This is why the Liberals (LibDems) are still around almost a century after they were replaced by Labour as the main opposition. Meanwhile any future Labour government will make sure to amplify its own advantage alongside the Tories. The best result for Reform is to get the Tories to adopt some of their policies before merging with them (like UKIP did before them). Despite what delusional right wingers think, this country is quite moderate and if anything slightly to the left, so radical policies will not give you a majority. Corbyn proved that on the left and he wasn’t even that radical compared to Reform.
@DrDanielHoward6 ай бұрын
We are importing immigrants from places where people live in sewers in Africa. Even Indians say "do not fill the UK with indians you will ruin the place". This is much more important than this issue of a private party. For all of you still undecided I offer intellectual reasons for voting REFORM UK in my channel vid. It requires you to watch for fifteen minutes which I am sure you have the attention span to do, and I have added some time stamps for younger viewers. We need to vote REFORM UK it is existential and I give my reasons. Dr D Howard, former fellow of University of Oxford and later former fellow of the UK Defence Research Agency.
@lewis1234175 күн бұрын
I mean Britain is generally center right, the conservatives have dominated our politics for decades, always been sceptical of radical socialism, especially since the 70s. Let's not forget corbyn did lead labour to its worst electoral defeat since the 1930s
@1960sz6 ай бұрын
"Who are the reform party" hopefully the UKs next Government, VOTE REFORM UK. 🇬🇧
@HarryTurney9 ай бұрын
I so much want to move to a proportional voting system but that's all I can say about them. Funding with money we don't have and all that "anti-woke" crap just shows they're stuck in the past.
@lewis1234175 күн бұрын
Being "anti woke" is the popular view. Upwards of 90% of the public dont think children should have puberty blockers for example. I would say Britain generally is center right and would prefer some common sense on the issue. A lot of people have been deeply uncomfortable about the cultural takeover of institutions like the national trust, the NHS and civil service in general
@Ruddpocalypse9 ай бұрын
Something about Leopards eating faces party something something
@gamewithadam72359 ай бұрын
We need compulsory voting. I just CBA doing it without proper reforms like equal votes and proportional representation.
@monkeyboy84249 ай бұрын
Breaking news; Penny Mordaunt was spotted in B&Q designing a new kitchen, with breakfast bar, for number 10.
@JKR94889 ай бұрын
Who ever will bring an end to the nightmare that is mass immigration, I will happily vote for.
@kumstuke9 ай бұрын
You can't end this and will never be possible. Climate change will accelerate this even more
@fergfighter9 ай бұрын
-"fighting woke" is one of the three core policies- we really do live in an embarrassing timeline
@Dylanesque9 ай бұрын
Although 'Woke' has an entire history of its own, dating back more than a century, it has also been recognised as the 'Golden Rule' Simply defined it means, *being tolerant and decent to each other*
@ludicrousreality09 ай бұрын
@@Dylanesque Nah nowadays it means pandering to certain groups and supporting equality of outcome instead of equality of opportunity.
@GeorgeGwiazda9 ай бұрын
Woke describes ideas which put down tradition and white people. It’s not that hard to understand.
@Dylanesque9 ай бұрын
@@ludicrousreality0 "We share the same world, but not the same opportunities" Queen Elizabeth II
@Hector-bj3ls9 ай бұрын
@@Dylanesque If only it were "being tolerant and decent to each other". This is the thing with the left. They have lovely sounding names for the movements and then do the worst possible things. --- BLM --- Statement: Black lives matter, black people have been oppressed and what not so we shouldn't do that. Actions: Riot in and burn down black neighbourhoods. White university students telling black people to shut up while they save them. Destroying black businesses. Running a scam to buy mansions. --- Antifa --- Statement: Fascism is bad and we should get rid of it. Actions: Riot in and burn down multiple areas in multiple cities across the US and elsewhere. Patrol the streets in full black get up intimidating people and in some cases killing them. Promoting Communism. --- LGBT... --- Statement: Just let us exist. Actions: Ruins the lives of people that don't want children to be mutilated or sexually abused. --- Globalists --- Statement: We should allow people to move and work in any place Actions: Import millions of people over a short period of time. Many of whom refuse to integrate into our societies and conform to our cultural norms. A significant portion of whom are murderers, sex offenders, and worse. Refuse to deal with the social issues they've created in our countries. Tell us we're racist if we don't like it. --- Rant --- These are the things that "woke" does. And let me be crystal clear. No one that I know disagrees with the statement part of any of these movements. And I do not wish to associate with those that do. We disagree with the actions part. My wife is immigrant (the legal kind that works hard), and my sister is a lesbian. I have friends from all over the world and I've lived in multiple countries. My parents have also immigrated to another country and do their best to integrate there. If you looked at my actions you'd be forgiven for thinking I supported any or all of these groups. Instead. I'm in support of people like Reform. I support nationalist movements all over the world. People deserve to have a home. You can't just take somewhere and claim it to be your own. That's happened in the past and most people think it was wrong now. We can't go back in time to fix it and we can't just kick hundreds of millions of people out of their adopted homes now. Taiwan, America, Australia, New Zealand, etc. The UK is the homeland of the white British. It's just as wrong to take it from them and erase their culture as it was for the Europeans and the Chinese in the cases from the countries I just mentioned. Why are we so obsessed with repeating the failures of the past? Some want revenge. But why should our children pay for the crimes of our ancestors. We don't believe the things they did. Our children (in some cases) haven't even been born yet.
@amazer7479 ай бұрын
My fear in the longer term is that the Muslim vote splits from Labour to form its own Muslim Party and which then holds the balance of power in a minority Govt. I agree with Lee, the Torys have let down the Red Wall in a big way. The Torys are completely visionless, cowardly and incompetent for how can an 80 seat majority be so poorly managed?
@scarfholdgraphicsmedia95019 ай бұрын
That's an irrational fear.
@LukeofSmeg9 ай бұрын
@@scarfholdgraphicsmedia9501 Exactly, people genuinely believe this shit because if you read the daily mail/express/Torygraph etc, you would think all Muslim are some sort of enemy invading force that no one cares about, when in fact they are all unique people with completely different opinions. If a larger Muslim party formed, it would get well under 10% of the vote tops, and that's including non-muslims like me voting for them just to wind these fascist pricks up.
@LukeofSmeg9 ай бұрын
*not fascist or even far right, I don't mean to offend them. I meant authoritarian conservative Christian nationalism - that's much better apparently.
@DrDanielHoward6 ай бұрын
@@LukeofSmeg Do you understand where these Muslim Africans and Muslim Asians hail from??? My German "green" friend just came back from Muslim Kenya and wrote me this: "the Muslims think the prayers contribute a lot to noise and the Chinese tuk-tuks and bikes people shit on the street poisonous drinking water in the old town they have only saltwater rats, insects they have malaria IN TOWN ... and that is by far their smallest problem i just say: open sewage! also i feel like having smoked two packs every time i spend a day in a African city kids running around absolutely high on glue or whatever disabled people all over the streets power outages or no power at all the dirt omg all these Chinese vehicles that would not even be allowed to be in an inspection scammers and beggars everywhere they have no bridge in Mombasa so everybody loses 4 h a day waiting for ferries we went to a kfc, 2 sec guards, 12 people in the kitchen no customer for lunch there were raw goat skins on the sidewalk you cant imagine the smell horses and camels on the street potholes as deep as volcanic craters " and this from a Kenyan "had a Kenyan asking me today what's wrong with the UK. why they let Indians take over" PLEASE DO YOURSELF A FAVOUR VOTE REFORM AND WATCH THE VID IN MY CHANNEL ABOUT WHY REFORM UK.
@dillonhillier9 ай бұрын
Sounds like a great party
@jifincherian75519 ай бұрын
Sounds great. As a legal immigrant i love this and would be great for the UK.
@RyanSargent9 ай бұрын
Promising political integrity if the company already overdue a confirmation statement...
@danielcraig49749 ай бұрын
Reform Uk ( Tufton Street ) - What they really stand for * Small state - Not in the countries and the people's interest. The state needs to stop with the vanity projects, get a grip on government waste and corruption. The country now needs rebuilding after the Tories. *Small tax take - For the rich and their shady donors to pay less. Tax them Ffs. * Low regulation - Again not in the country of the people/consumers interest. You have high reg to protect people/ society. They want these safe guards removed so they make more money for their business friends.
@bishboshs9 ай бұрын
Did you know that the UK tax niequality is actually far higher than european peers. In the UK 40% of people pay no income tax and it's far lower in scandanavia. You might want the rich to pay more which is a fair opinion. But don't go thinking that taxing the rich more is how other countries have managed to fund social services. In the UK 80% of income tax is paid by the top 5% of earners.
@DrDanielHoward6 ай бұрын
We are importing immigrants from places where people live in sewers in Africa. Even Indians say "do not fill the UK with indians you will ruin the place". This is much more important than this issue of a private party. For all of you still undecided I offer intellectual reasons for voting REFORM UK in my channel vid. It requires you to watch for fifteen minutes which I am sure you have the attention span to do, and I have added some time stamps for younger viewers. We need to vote REFORM UK it is existential and I give my reasons. Dr D Howard, former fellow of University of Oxford and later former fellow of the UK Defence Research Agency.
@DrDanielHoward6 ай бұрын
I made a fifteen minute video on my channel with intellectual reasons to vote for REFORM UK. I am a former fellow of the UK Defence Evaluation and Research Agency and I introduce you to Gunnar Heinsohn's Youth Bulge Theory. Please watch.
@Hexagonal_Goblin9 ай бұрын
Providing a voucher for private service to people can't get NHS care in a timely manner is actually not a bad idea. I mean, it's only a band-aid for the NHS' problems, a first step towards privatization, and probably very costly, but in the short term I think it would be a very effective band-aid for people in need of care. Edit: proportional vote and house of lords reform is also based, actually, though their exact plan could be less ideal. Still, several surprising Ws given they're "anti-woke" morons.
@bh44629 ай бұрын
"Let's make Britain Great" Are these people *seriously* copying the American "Make America Great Again" slogan and just slapping Britain on it?
@remoanersrknts67369 ай бұрын
Why not?
@-JT-5439 ай бұрын
@@remoanersrknts6736Because it’s a shit slogan with negative connotations
@freddieweaver-g2s9 ай бұрын
Yes because usa is totally so much better with Biden in charge, yeah, run by the deep state and all, as well as taking money from Ukraine but yeah, for real bro. Hahahahah. Note sarcasm Trump 2024 usususususus @@-JT-543
@remoanersrknts67369 ай бұрын
@@-JT-543 . Millions like me think it is a very positive remark . 👍
@blob72829 ай бұрын
@@-JT-543 I don't mind living in a 'great' country. Sounds pretty good to me
@user093979 ай бұрын
Its funny how in UK no-one ever would start a political party presentation with: where the money coming from? What companies are behind them? Who influences their policies? Nooooo lets talk about everything else and make it sound important.
@callummorgan74959 ай бұрын
Healthcare policies are interesting, but the funding element seems really unclear?Reducing income tax revenue by exempting medical staff, but giving vouchers for private care which tends to be more expensive?
@daniels79079 ай бұрын
More of a wish list than a manifesto. Farage has experience with that, having made so many promises about benefits of Brexit that never materialized.
@remoanersrknts67369 ай бұрын
They have for the working class Comrade! 👍
@daniels79079 ай бұрын
@@remoanersrknts6736 - Indeed, congratulations on now having unchallenged access to janitorial jobs.
@remoanersrknts67369 ай бұрын
@@daniels7907 I'm a self employed HGV driver my son is a plumber and thanks to Brexit we're coining it in since eu dross went home. Thank Farage for Brexit! 👍
@internethardcase6 ай бұрын
Well, hard to materialize the benefits when the Tories never acted on enacting them. The UK is still signed up to the EU courts.
@daniels79076 ай бұрын
@@internethardcase - That was because they had PR, but not an actual *plan*. The mentality was "Get Brexit done....and then everything else should sort itself."
@mustafarecep4369 ай бұрын
Anderson and farage oh my god
@richardcooley97309 ай бұрын
Stop the mythical war on motorists ? There are people who will buy that narrative but stopping the war on pedestrians will save more lives.
@krisdaschwab9129 ай бұрын
Conservatives love their cars more than life itself. Which actually tracks, given the number of deaths attributed to air quality.
@iambicpentakill9719 ай бұрын
Reminds me of the Onion article about the "War on Christmas" featuring people hiding in the sewer huddled around a scrawny tree
@NeilOosthuizen9 ай бұрын
Thanks for a well balanced video.
@theantagonist21479 ай бұрын
This channel really represents the affluent middle class demographic politically
@Steven_Rowe9 ай бұрын
It was George Galloway who coined the phrase that the Tories and Labour are two cheeks of the same arse , I think voters deserve better than the two party same arse system. Proportional voting is a much better system that we use in Aus, however the only thing I don't like is during an election the parties are allowed to hand out how to vote cards where they recommended where your preferences go and I think this should be stopped as it appeals to the donkey voters. As far as the House of Lords is concerned, it's an utter non democratic joke, the people should decided who is 9n the upper house. Just look at the aConservwtive party which installed an unelected David Cameron in the House of Lords but he then able to be part of an elected government. That is pure a riducle state of affairs.
@enigmaaoe35036 ай бұрын
Dont ever quote george galloway, he's a grifter
@DrDanielHoward6 ай бұрын
We are importing immigrants from places where people live in sewers in Africa. Even Indians say "do not fill the UK with indians you will ruin the place". This is much more important than this issue of a private party. For all of you still undecided I offer intellectual reasons for voting REFORM UK in my channel vid. It requires you to watch for fifteen minutes which I am sure you have the attention span to do, and I have added some time stamps for younger viewers. We need to vote REFORM UK it is existential and I give my reasons. Dr D Howard, former fellow of University of Oxford and later former fellow of the UK Defence Research Agency.
@TheBooban9 ай бұрын
This is the first time I’ve heard of Reform UK :)
@YourGayOverlord9 ай бұрын
How I envy your blissful ignorance. If only we could live without knowing the name "Nigel Farage"
@Bushflare9 ай бұрын
@@YourGayOverlord Man wouldn’t have a voice if Labour and the Tories just did their jobs.
@bazzatron94829 ай бұрын
They're pushing an incredible amount of propaganda on the short video formats like TikTok. It's clear that they're trying to capture the votes of younger people that haven't learned the realities of the world (which isn't to say that young people cannot be aware, just that this is the combination that reform are targeting with their predatory marketing)
@ecnalms8519 ай бұрын
@@YourGayOverlord UKIP gained 13% vote share in 2015. People voted for them for a reason. You should try to understand where them voters are coming from instead of being patronizing. This is happening all across Europe too - far right is rising in Europe such as Afd in Germany, Marine le pen in France, Meloni in Italy, Sweden Democrats in Italy, Geert Wilders (PVV party) in Netherlands.
@nothereandthereanywhere9 ай бұрын
@@Bushflare What do you mean? Labour and Tories ran this country for centuries. Have you got no democracy, free speech and so on?
@RafaelW89 ай бұрын
Mr. Brexit himself. Nigel fuckin Farage
@jamessteel90169 ай бұрын
7 times an election loser
@dannyarcher63709 ай бұрын
We say SIR now, bigot!
@AdamWebb19829 ай бұрын
a legend
@_jpg9 ай бұрын
@capri2673 Such a patriot, wanting to leave his own country and comparing it to 1943 Germany, Russia as well as today's China...
@izaakdamon19799 ай бұрын
@@_jpg because he airn wrong in some of those statements.
@PeasMinister9 ай бұрын
Now Lee Anderson’s joined them 😂
@Hector-bj3ls9 ай бұрын
That's a good thing. Lee speaks for 10s of millions of people in this country.
@stevenhenry52679 ай бұрын
Lol
@ThePerks20109 ай бұрын
He was labour they went to shit, he was Tory they went to shit, joined gb news losing money going to shit, come on big man keep up the streak! He's a political jinx😂😂😂
@stonehengemaca9 ай бұрын
@@Hector-bj3ls Where are you getting this data from? Why do you thing reform did so poorly in the last bi-election then? I don't know 10 people that have fallen for their nonsense. Nobody I know thinks the problems/issues facing the UK are as simple as the vague solutions offered by reform.
@shoootme9 ай бұрын
The thing is they will never have to face the music with any of there policies. Cut NHS waiting time to zero sounds good, but how? Are they going to give more funding? No they said they want to cut spending, and the voucher for private healthcare is money from the NHS to a 3rd party, meaning the NHS will still have the same if not higher cost. So they can sit there yelling get good, keeping themselves in the news cycle and getting paid to appear of GB news, but never having to implement any policy.
@bishboshs9 ай бұрын
hint...they know they aren't going to be in government so they can promise whatever they want. Same with the greens and other small parties.
@mrvwbug44239 ай бұрын
Cutting healthcare wait time to zero is a pipe dream, even the awful US "healthcare" system doesn't accomplish that unless you're extremely rich.
@davescott76809 ай бұрын
Their plan to cut wait times to zero, by handing out private credits. Is genuinely the most moronic thing I've fucking heard as a policy. It'll cost the government vastly more, while fixing very little. If they want a radical reform proposal, I'd go with tearing up the PFI contracts labour started and Tories continued. They're what's really fucked the NHS.
@BigBenn20149 ай бұрын
It works in Kent. I’ve had two knee replacements performed at a private hospital yet paid for by the NHS. Didn’t cost me a penny, and the first op was about six weeks after first diagnosis, second op was four months later. I’m very pleased with that.
@shoootme9 ай бұрын
@@BigBenn2014whilst I am glad to hear you got your op done promptly. My point is still, why the NHS was unable to do the OP, and would giving a voucher to a 3rd party fix the reason they were unable to deal with you promptly?
@sonictelephone15266 ай бұрын
Kinda agree with reform on some points, but would never vote for anything to do with farage. The man who brought us Brexit... he's nothing but a snake oil salesman
@chosone26 ай бұрын
For now, as abhorrent as some of Reform UK's policies are to me, I think they're good for politics in this country. Short-term, the right-wing of politics has been split, which levels out the playing field and allows parties to have more nuanced policies. And long-term, having a party that's pro-proportional voting is a good thing, regardless of whether the Tories recover or if Reform UK rise up to take their place at the primary right-wing party
@KingGF079 ай бұрын
How on Earth can a business run for Parliament? Why doesn’t Barclays Bank make its own political party at this rate?
@jhfdhgvnbjm759 ай бұрын
It doesn't need to, it can afford to just take the MP's and Civil Servants to lunch...
@stephensanderson89209 ай бұрын
Thanks for that. I will steer well clear.
@emersonmsd9 ай бұрын
Finding ways of saving money is part of a manager's job.
@andylewis73609 ай бұрын
Then they’d better DO their jobs or find other jobs. The British tax payers can’t afford passengers
@xelthiavice42769 ай бұрын
can always stop paying billions for all the "immigretns"
@nickrails9 ай бұрын
@xelthiavice4276 If you want to not have millions of immigrants over a 5 year period you need policies to massively increase the number of children born in the UK, or else you'll have a demographic crisis VERY quickly.
@bishboshs9 ай бұрын
@@xelthiavice4276 presumably you meant 'immigrants' and if so why would it be in quotation marks?
@stonehengemaca9 ай бұрын
Managers are infamous for saving the boss money by taking it away from the staff.
@Jnthnpg6 ай бұрын
To be honest I don’t think other manifestos are granular with their finances either, all are just statements with little to back them up.
@christopherspriggs41799 ай бұрын
At the moment we have a centre-right party and a centre-left party. That leaves space for the far right, the far left and a proper centrist party.
@tomturton9 ай бұрын
Yes to PR (STV please). No to pretty much everything else.
@mrvwbug44239 ай бұрын
STV without PR. PR just empowers extremists by being kingmakers in coalition negotiations as it makes it harder for a major party to get a majority government. STV without PR favors more reasonable and moderate candidates at the expense of extremists. It also keeps territorial constituencies which means you have a MP who is local to you and hopefully understands the issues effecting your local area.