YOU GOT UNPARTNERED OVER THIS! - Destiny Vs Own Chat On RittenHouse Takes

It's been more than a year since Kenosha and Destiny's unpartnering. Destiny covers Rittenhouse's trial and continues to fight with his own chat over his self defense takes.
Date streamed: 10 Nov, 2021
Follow Destiny
►STREAM - www.destiny.gg/bigscreen
►DISCORD - discordapp.com/invite/destiny
►REDDIT - / destiny
►INSTAGRAM - / destiny
►MERCH - shop.destiny.gg/
Check Out My Amazon: www.amazon.com/shop/destiny
Buy My Merch: shop.destiny.gg/
#Destiny

[@destiny]

Part 1 of Destiny's coverage of Rittenhouse trial more than a year since Kenosha and Destiny's unpartnering. Vaush vs Destiny Debate - Morality of Kyle Rittenhouse ►kzbin.info/www/bejne/npCTg5KXnrWVY9U Kenosha Shooter TALKS w/ His Victim - Kyle Rittenhouse Breakdown And Debate ►kzbin.info/www/bejne/gqm4YqOAm6-ZiLc

[@chegorilla1468]

@Destiny saying only bad shit happens at night seems generic. I mean, yes, you can expect violence no matter what side your on. Selma 1965 was an example where protestors were peaceful, marched at night and got beat by police. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selma_to_Montgomery_marches

[@MisterNatry]

When does part 2 get released?

[@CourtneyHaynes]

Destiny, the issue of "he wasn't supposed to be there" still stands. Because people were asking why are you caping for this guy who wasn't supposed to be there and who was LARPing? No one is caping for Rosenbaum or any of the other people. But you have been accused of caping for Rittenhouse. And your "no one was supposed to be there" defense seems like a deflection.

[@BackFromSpace]

@@CourtneyHaynes There is no issue. It's irrelevant if he was "supposed to be there" or not. But it's doubly irrelevant if everybody present was not supposed to be there. Rittenhouse was on equal grounds with everybody else, until he was assaulted, at which point he had to defend himself. The whole point of "he was not supposed to be there" is to dismiss the initial assault. It's a textbook bad faith argument. What a moronic hill to die on.

[@sir-punchalot]

12:46 LOL Broke multiple laws to kill people in the middle of the night, in a state he didn't live in, poor kyle

[@casko9626]

"i believed he was trying to kill me" Prosecuter: "But did you die?" LOL WTF

[@BrendanBeckett]

Hey he's got a tough job trying to make a case out of this evidence

[@SuperLotus]

Reminds me of that anime meme "People die if they are killed"

[@urgandma]

Wait that's a prosecutor? I thought vaush cleaned himself up and put on a suit.

[@rohanjarande]

@@urgandma LMAO

[@kokosnotenXD]

Chang really shaped up and got a new job

[@jamrollz]

Unpartnered? Good thing we're polyplatformous

[@SIGSEGV1337]

KZbin? That's a girl's name

[@gaz4553]

Single platforms is for monogacucks.

[@guido9861]

Become ununpartnerable

[@StarShade0]

I’m tired of monoplatformous influencers being the default state of being.

[@jase37]

The only reason for monoplatformy is insecurity

[@trevorpullen3199]

Binger: "you understand how dangerous it is to point a gun at someone, don't you?". Binger during closing arguments: Picks up the AR15 and literally points it at the jury with his finger on the trigger. From Binger's own argument, the jury was provoked and would have been allowed to attack him right there in the courtroom.

[@FACEBANGAH]

Right, ultimately the self defense could have worked for anyone that killed Rittenhouse. That’s why it’s a very messed up situation.

[@trevorpullen3199]

@@FACEBANGAH Agree the situation was messed up. It was caused by the police either choosing to not stop rioters from destroying private property to being told to stand down by political leaders in Wisconsin. When police don't do their job, ordinary citizens are going to try to do it for them.

[@jackfiercetree5205]

At 2:00 Binger thinks he's harping on some profound and deep implication, and he just sounds like an idiot.

[@TheFleckboyz]

@@FACEBANGAH The people that attacked Kyle wouldn't have been able to claim self defense because they caused the situation by chasing him down on the false assumption that he was an active shooter. Kyle was trying to avoid a deadly encounter with all the people by running away from them, if they hadn't overtaken him then no one would've needed to claim self defense in the first place.

[@bryankoerselman5698]

@@FACEBANGAH having a gun is not provocation.

[@jth_printed_designs]

Rittenhouse: **Doesn't let himself be murdered** Prosecutor: "And I took that personally"

[@ultimateblaze23]

yes Rittenhouse who at no point at a gun pointed toward him, was the one in danger of death

[@2ThumbsUp4You]

@@ultimateblaze23 He literally did, it was a big turning point in this trial, everyone was posting the response from the medic. You either just lied or you know nothing about this case.

[@jth_printed_designs]

@@ultimateblaze23 Bicep Boi literally said he aimed his gun at Kyle. Skater dude assaulted him with a deadly weapon (blunt objects kill more people each year than rifles) Pedo baldy was chasing him down to attack him after threatening he would kill him. More people die each year from hands and feet than rifles. He shot at a man that kicked him in the face. More people die each year from hands and feet than rifles.

[@DocEmmettBrown121]

Kyle testified that earlier in the night he pointed his gun at someone standing on a vehicle. So following the logic everyone uses to defend Kyle, apparently he should have been the one shot before he killed two people and disfigure another.

[@canadianteacher2949]

@@ultimateblaze23 next time there’s an aggressor chasing me, I’ll wait for him to attack me before I defend myself!

[@RealFreedomMG]

When the prosecutor started asking Kyle if he played Call of Duty with his friends and if in that game the objective is to shoot as many people to win and Kyle responded back "Yeah, in the video game. It's just a video game, it's not real life." I had to make sure I wasn't watching some comedy skit lol

[@jefferythibodeaux5573]

They used this argument in 2021? Wow lol

[@MH-gq2ii]

Then the prosecutor played it off like he knew exactly how digital zoom works and that it's "common knowledge" 😂

[@aaronbarkley539]

“So in axis and allies you played as the axis correct? “Yes.” So you sympathize with the nazi party?”

[@jefferythibodeaux5573]

@@aaronbarkley539 this is accurate to extremist leftist thinking or conservatives

[@trashtie4854]

link to this?

[@axle84]

"all he did was repeatedly try to kick you in the head" fucking seriously.

[@proudtobeme1ashkente]

As if people haven't been punched and kicked to death before. In those situations you also always have to expect people getting close to you to have some kind of hidden weapon. Because, at least that would be my logic if I had been in Kyle's shoes, no reasonable person would try to get close to and harm an armed person if they weren't armed themselves. And what if he kicks Kyle unconscious, takes the weapon and then goes rogue? I've heard a lot of gun owners talk about their responsibility to never let their weapons get out of their hands unless the other pair of hands are trustworthy/licensed.

[@Rahab111222]

@@proudtobeme1ashkente I've heard of cops having their firearm stolen by suspects who beat them unconscious as well. These leftoids seriously think unarmed=/=harmless. They're either so sheltered, lack imagination or are being dishonest.

[@cheesecakeisgross4645]

@@proudtobeme1ashkente you assume lefties are reasonable.

[@verumbear4836]

@@cheesecakeisgross4645 they’re not, they have never taken the time to rationalize any of their thoughts, often having two conflicting beliefs at the same time.

[@gabago0l]

@@verumbear4836 Can I really define myself as a lefty even though I agree with the above takes? I think rittenhouse was in self defense and all the arguments against him are pretty stupid. I think owning a firearm is perfectly fine as long as you get tested and get a license. Maybe I'm not a Twitter lefty then lol.

[@Glitchbound]

YES. So glad you pointed out the crying thing. When the trial first happened and people started making fun of his crying, I got self conscious for a min about how I look when I have panic attacks and if everyone thinks I’m faking it too.

[@katy9291]

Same.. mine are exactly like his. So i was really sad to see the reactions to it on Twitter

[@FACEBANGAH]

Because that crying was fake af lol. He could have legally defended himself and still hammed up his defense (per the advice of his counsel) on the stand. These aren’t mutually exclusive.

[@katy9291]

@@FACEBANGAH Nope. You are wrong

[@burbsl1672]

@@FACEBANGAH Corey shut your mouth. K?

[@verumbear4836]

People don’t understand how actual panic attacks or PTSD work; very low brow on peoples part making fun of him for it, but I completely expected tons of low blows to come from that.

[@Lithium_82]

Mr. Rittenhouse, I'm going to calmly ask you a series of loaded questions and attempt to bait you into a bad answer because we have no case here.

[@Goodboyobito]

He looked irritated too lol like why isnt he making it easy for me

[@Doomed667]

Steven was right back then, and he still is now. This particular case despite it's tragic ending, has proven to be really useful to observe who actually engages with the substance of the case and who is more interested in painting a specific narrative. Destiny chose to keep it G and got punished for it, put some respect on his name.

[@WhiskeyPatriot]

RESPEK

[@zengara11]

I do not want to be that guy. But wouldn't that mean everyone in this comment section who wants Rittenhouse to win, making jokes of simple questions a lawyer normaly asks, And also since Destiny also pointed out the judge not calling out Rittenhouse actually answering said questions, which is his job? Can't really expect everyone to be none-biased to be completely honest. A mass majority of people who are even watching politics, will not be affected by it at all, just some weird gladiator game for most people.

[@nuncapasaran9374]

It's possible for this to be legally self defense and simultaneously for this kid, his upbringing, and those who worship him to be violent reactionaries seeking vigilantism and placing themselves in the middle of civil rights unrest knowing they're going to provoke. It's possible for Destiny to be right about how the case would play out and what constitutes self defense, and simultaneously to believe unrest is a natural reaction to police blowing away black people over and over, and that Kyle's position was essentially to stand in opposition to that unrest with his "cool" AR-15. And that for him to get into an altercation where he has to shoot someone is a completely predictable thing.

[@retardationnation869]

@@nuncapasaran9374 ur delusion my man. Jacob Blake was a good shoot. Secondly stop defending people burning down random businesses for someone getting shot by the police. Even of the shooting wasn't justified. Keep coping because u can't except the fact that the only vigilantes that night were the people burning down a town for the perceived crimes of the government. Ur take is garbage.

[@chrisprilloisebola]

Exactly. As destiny kinda said here and in another stream, this case is a great litmus test to see who is the delusional brainwashed rejects are

[@winterborn735]

Holy fucking shit dude. The call out on the people dumping on him for crying was amazing. Fan for life regardless of your politics.

[@npcimknot958]

I don’ t really care for destiny, but the fact is.. he can empathize for a life.. and that is really big.. kyle is human.. and people want him to lose his life for ‘politics’. Until it happens to them.. everyone will act like they can do everything

[@MykeruMedia]

I approve of people mocking Kyle Rittenhouse for crying on the stand, or claiming it was fake. It makes the shitty human being so much easier to identify.

[@ahabgaddis7277]

I don't care people make fun of him crying. But there's a real darkness in some of these people that pretend to be good and want good in the world but get very sadistic with Rittenhouse

[@MykeruMedia]

@@ahabgaddis7277 I don't think for a second they want to be good. I think they are all about control. I also think that kind of person thinks entirely in a zero-sum fashion. They have no concept of a rising tide raising all boats. To them for someone to be lifted up someone else has to be pushed down.

[@winterborn735]

@@MykeruMedia i think they see it the other way around bro. They can lift themselves up by pushing someone down.

[@subhasishadhikary1296]

Watching almost every single thing Destiny say a year ago being vindicated one by one in this trial has been slightly refreshing. People had insane takes back then and Destiny was one of very few left/lib guys who actually was honest with his audience in his views on this case. It led to his departnering, receiving a ton of hate, severing ties with fans and other streamers but he was correct from the very start to the very end. This is the reason Destiny remains one of the very few politics people I actually like.

[@ticklord]

It's so crazy to me what garbage people who hate destiny come up with because they have NO actual "dirt" on him. He just speaks the rational truth and people are just upset because that's reality. People just wanna ignore injustice instead of putting fault on multiple parties because MULTIPLE PARTIES were involved.

[@austingoyne3039]

Fr drives me crazy when other left commentators ignore common sense

[@117Ender]

i dont always like destiny's takes but when he does it get it right, ill be there to support him. whats funny is all the ppl he helped bring up and how they burned him are all lefty types who hold no loyalty to anyone

[@arlenspecter8348]

I really hope Rittenhouse goes on a lawsuit spree when this is finished. Major media outlets are guilty of some of the most disgusting lies I've ever seen. Hosts on MSNBC said he was blindly firing into a crowd, hosts on CNN called him a white supremacist, hosts on TYT said he went and killed black people. My trust in the media is at rock bottom. I no longer believe a word I hear from them.

[@zachhee]

@Don 👌

[@SumThingFawful]

Binger: Mr Rittenhouse, is it true you wear a seat belt? Yet you don't want to get into car crashes? Curious isn't it?

[@UnfiItered]

Mr Rittenhouse, is it true that you carry around a EpiPen because you're allergic to peanut? Yeah, because if I eat anything with a slight bit of peanut in it, I may die. That's why I carry it with me. So you're saying that you carry the EpiPen so that you can eat peanut products right? No, that's not what I said. So why do you need the EpiPen if you don't plan on eating peanut products?

[@justice1911]

Gun guy here, Destiny had a question about the calibers of an ar15. Ar15s come in a variety of calibers that have strengths and fallbacks. Most ar15s come in 2 calibers, 5.56, and .223. The 5.56 cartridge is virtually the same size as .223. However, the 5.56 packs a bit more punch, so the chamber is designed to withstand more pressure. You can fire .223 out of any 5.56 firearm. You may technically also shoot 5.56 out of any .223 firearm, but this is considered ill advised because the pressure differential can cause damage to the rifle and, although rare, potential injury to yourself and others.

[@radical026]

Other gun guy here to clarify because this is modern fuddlore. 5.56x45mm NATO and .223 Remington have the same maximum pressure spec when measured using the same method. The reason that they are commonly listed as different is because the C.I.P. (NATO standard) and SAAMI (the de facto commercial standard) test methods are conducted differently, which is unfortunately not reflected properly in most readily available information online. The only issues one might run into are marginal differences in precision between shots, which has led to the development of the .223 Wylde chamber specification. There are (as far as I know) no actual .223 Wylde cartridges produced; rather, the .223 Wylde exists as a sort of average between the chamber dimensions of .223 Remington and 5.56 NATO, to reduce that difference in precision from using 5.56 in a .223 chambered barrel or .223 in a 5.56 chambered barrel (assuming the same barrel twist rate and length). So again, the difference in pressure is one that only exists on paper, due to different specification methods being utilized by different organizations. So when firing the most common ammunition types (usually for both .223 Remington and 5.56 NATO this would be a 55 grain FMJ or a 62 grain SS109 type projectile) there really is not much risk to one's rifle or oneself firing 5.56 in a .223 chamber. It is a shame that Wikipedia as well as many gun blogs continue to propagate this myth.

[@namonama3635]

😂

[@xiqy1959]

@@radical026 glad I didnt have to look far, thanks for clarifying

[@charlesbickel4295]

And the ar15 shoots one of the smallest high power bullets.

[@soragoku8217]

Usually don’t agree with destiny on everything. But seeing how unbiased he was being, and how he wasn’t afraid to show how stupid some of his audience is, gives me a lot of respect for him. Anyone thinking they would’ve done better than what Kyle had done is so ignorant to how real life scenarios work, or so stupid to how guns work that it’s unbelievable that they’d know how to use a phone.

[@TheConvectuoso]

Anyone less trained with a firearm and there would have been a ton more deaths. Plus prosecutor completely ignore the evidence he already had a gun pointed it at him before he fired

[@jackfiercetree5205]

Kyle's control, quick thinking, and most certainly luck, is Fucking MiNDBoGgLiNG! I have nothing but admiration for Kyle's composure through the whole event.

[@LeoInterVir]

This was the first or second time he actually used the AR15. This shows how versatile the platform is for self defense. Hence why gun control authoritarians attack the platform despite illegal handguns overwhelmingly being used in crimes and murders. We have laws in the books, if only they were enforced, and if only criminals cared to follow them. Remember, each additional law selectively enforced, creates another criminal from someone previously law abiding.

[@chrisprilloisebola]

He sounds like a conservative here lmao. Good takes

[@LeoInterVir]

Hur dur, he's a conservative since his view overlaps on this topic. Get off your knees, you're not Binger's type. By the way, good takes jack boot.

[@drewren1231]

Prosecutor: “Why did you lie to the mob that was screaming and chasing you?” What did he expect; Kyle to submit himself to mob justice?

[@josephkerrigan733]

I couldn't believe it when he asked why he didn't offer medical aid to the guy that just pointed a gun at his head. Like can you imagine if he was just attacked then shot the guy in the arm then went over and tried to help him and just got shot it's insanity. Generally I don't want to help people that just tried to kill me.

[@nunyabusiness9056]

The mob is utterly irrelevant. ALl that matters is rosenbaum. We now know after the enhanced drone footage that just came out that kyle lied on the stand when he said rosenbaum grabbed the barrel of his gun. We now know all the witnesses lied when they said he lunged for his gun. It very clearly shows rosenbaum chasign him and kyle turns and shoots from 5 or 6 feet away. All that matters is if the killing of rosenbaum was lawful. If Kyle killed him in justified self defense, then the mob was committing assault with a deadly weapon and he was allowed to defend himself again. If the rosenbaum killing was a murder, then the mob has a right to subdue an active shooter who just committed a murder. You cannot claim self defense in a violent altercation you started and people are allowed to to subdue an active shooter as their own act of self defense.

[@josephkerrigan733]

@@nunyabusiness9056 So much of what you've just put is wrong. The prosecution expert himself said Rosenbaum had to be within 2 feet due to the stripling from the gun. Beyond that you're just saying things that didn't happen on any video and saying anyone that has testified that you don't like is lying.

[@nunyabusiness9056]

@@josephkerrigan733 "But it was unclear from video footage whether Joseph Rosenbaum was grabbing for Rittenhouse's gun or trying to swat it away, said Dr. Doug Kelley, the pathologist with the Milwaukee County medical examiner’s office." Also he testified "four feet" you fucking liar haha.

[@josephkerrigan733]

@@nunyabusiness9056 You haven't watched the testimony so there's no point in talking to you. Also I love that you initially said 5-6 feet but now you're saying it was 4 feet. Haha you lied and then exposed yourself.

[@--.--.--.--.--.--]

I love how Destiny has to explain to his audience that someone doesn't have time to carefully think between firing shots in a situation like this. It's amazing how naive some people are. 4 shots in less than a second is perfectly reasonable if you're being attacked at such a close proximity.

[@crushinnihilism]

Half of his braindead audience has never seen a gun in real life. They havnt seen or been involved in real violence, and theyve never been in a conflict zone with gunshots firing

[@Drugon-Dag]

This is why I always hide the chat, they have some of the dumbest takes

[@undercoverspy123]

But doesn't this just reinforce the entire point of not having random undertrained vigilantes in a violent area? The amount of confusion that can happen in real life situations, and the speed that they happen, just leads to more and more unintended violence, regardless of intention.

[@crushinnihilism]

@@undercoverspy123 which people are the vigilantes? Seems like you could argue the rioters are also dishing out some sort of vigilante justice.

[@KingstonHawke]

And then standing over them and calling your bestie to tell them about it, that's normal too?

[@erikgresham3895]

Destinys honesty is the reasons I as a non left leaning individual subscribe to and watch him. I might not agree with all of his takes but I am confident that he doesn't argue in bad faith.

[@SniperDizzyJohny]

My 2010 to 2016 myself would Just think exactly what u said

[@giovalladares1022]

His debate with Nuance Bro was incredibly bad faith but I just attribute it more to cognitive dissonance and general blind spots like everyone has.

[@DaDandyman]

He constantly argues in bad faith. He just holds positions that you find agreeable. He is an entertainer moreso than someone who's actually concerned about the accuracy of his statements.

[@giovalladares1022]

@@DaDandyman I don’t think you’ll find a perfect political commentator anywhere and I disagree with Destiny a whole lot. He’s more principled than most on twitch. I don’t think he’s intentionally bad faith. His bias and ego is huge tho

[@DaDandyman]

@@giovalladares1022 Hence why I think political commentary is a profession defined primarily by spectacle and sophistry. These people genuinely don't care if they're saying something right. I genuinely think media (and not just big news corps like FOX and CNN, but popular Twitch streamers as well) is straight up ruining any semblance of honesty in political thought, lol.

[@barackobama8869]

8:31 “not on my stream” that shit had me rolling 😂

[@RolaiEckolo]

Saw it right as I read the comment lmao

[@barackobama8869]

@@RolaiEckolo coincidence? I think not

[@nonstickpansexual4540]

@@RolaiEckolo Same lmao

[@neilarmstrong2187]

That take at 10:15 is absolutely rock solid and so important.

[@WayneMercy]

💯

[@whodat417]

Those same people will talk shit about destiny for his take. "How dare you tell me i dont have ". He is 1000% correct though

[@CidsReality]

I was waiting for someone to finally say it. I love Destiny for this.

[@wreonchkusi]

@Supermanfan wow you must be the leading expert of ptsd

[@wreonchkusi]

@Supermanfan so you claim expertise that allows you to deny ptsd, and when someone calls you out on it you call it ad hominem? And destiny’s go to? Do you have basic logic or are you stuck with memes?

[@colinjohnson6454]

The difference between Destiny's Twitch chat and Destiny's KZbin comment section is like day and night.

[@zainsyed3928]

because twitch is a bunch of unemployed losers who dont know anything about the real worl

[@marvelousmoostacheman5560]

His KZbin fans seem to be more conservatives who have come when he started critiquing the left

[@zainsyed3928]

@@marvelousmoostacheman5560 hes not progressive, but he still holds key democratic values I guess that appeals to conservatives idk?

[@matrixfan58]

@@zainsyed3928 More like he criticizes the left more frequently and conservatives have no platform other than "left bad, someone with six followers on twitter said something dumb, left bad"

[@Tsrashi]

As a right-wing libertarian I disagree with Destiny on a lot, but he’s honest and consistent and that’s all I ask for.

[@ichirocharles1]

10:12 I appreciate this, people are so quick to dehumanize others and don't empathize with others they disagree with.

[@unsatiable3860]

Everyone does it like when the sjws were clipped by right wingers crying and screaming and how the left did it to the q type right when they lost 2020

[@goatgoat8603]

@@unsatiable3860 idk I’m just not sure that trump supporters or left wingers crying over politics is comparable to crying over a near death experience. I agree in concept but still lol

[@13enwarner]

I'm always impressed with Destiny's ability to bring up that he worked at a casino.

[@ItsJustMe0585]

How can you claim Rosenbaum was afraid of death if he was actively chasing a person with the gun? Doesn't seem like the same level of fear as the lone person fleeing. If I was afraid of being shot, the minute the gun is aimed at me, especially with like 5-10 yards between he and I, I'm gonna run the other way, not continue to charge.

[@Pirate44444]

Clearly you haven’t watched The Irishman

[@509drone2]

It's amazing how destiny has to break this down to the idiots in chat. Someone said "couldn't the guy chasing him, swinging a skateboard, claim self defense?" LOL

[@0ceanaut]

Well... you could claim that he was trying to prevent him from having time to turn and shoot. I think this could be entirely reasonable. Not saying this was the case.

[@509drone2]

@@0ceanaut I don't think that is a fair argument. You have the duty to retreat.

[@0ceanaut]

@@509drone2 I think it is. Hypothetically we can imagine a situation where preventing someone from having time and space to aim and shoot is logical course of action.

[@Rahab111222]

@@0ceanaut You can't claim self-defense if you're chasing a guy who doesn't engage you until you attack them. You're an aggressor, people go to jail for that.

[@0ceanaut]

@@Rahab111222 I agree

[@zvonomirzuboronovic8662]

At times, it was as if Jesse Lee Peterson was the prosecutor, repeating questions until he gets a yes or no answer.

[@Lightningkuriboh]

Guess jesses madness has some sense after all

[@ThyCorruptor]

Lawyers do that all the time in trails. Sometimes your just need a solid affirmative or negative answer to push the narrative you're trying to show the jury.

[@terrencebell9979]

Imagine just giving a yes or no to a closed-ended question.

[@Hooliganzzz]

Which I understand it's his job to prosecute but HOLY it's so cringe so listen to him cross examine Rittenhouse.

[@ditokelio7860]

The show suits have a really good example of this. Asking someone if they love someone but the difference can be how you love someone. Like I don't love my brother/sister the same way I love my girlfriend. A yes or no answer can really help the prosecution paint a solid image. It's usually up to the defense to question and ask something like "do you love your mother, sister, brother, best friend and girlfriend" after the fact

[@tribal_instincts]

The prosecutors logic is “just go into a game of tug of war with Rosenbaum with the AR”

[@CrestOfArtorias]

The problem is that in court "truth" and "justice" dont really work in the way most of us think. The prosecution tries to make a case even when they have to reach, even if its completely unrealistic or even impossible. Its not about finding the truth its about what you can make stick.

[@luciddream2033]

@@CrestOfArtorias because your actual innocence doesn't matter. I have come out of this disliking lawyers even more.

[@normandy2501]

@@luciddream2033 It's just their job to win regardless of who they are defending for what. If they only chose to work for those you personally feel are morally in the right, then there would be a lot of people representing themselves and likely loosing with no fair chance.

[@nunyabusiness9056]

No the prosecutors logic is that the enhanced drone footage that was just released is the first very clear footage ever shown of the incident and it shows Kyle lied when he claimed rosenbaum grabbed the barrel of his ar15. It shows that all the witnesses lied when they said rosenbaum lunged for his gun. What literally happened was an unarmed guy followed kyle, or chased him, and kyle turned and shot an unarmed guy with a rifle. That is generally not recognized as self defense. People pull guns and shoot people who are unarmed punched them or pushed them or body checked them or threatened them all the time, even in the state of texas that is not lawful self defense.

[@luciddream2033]

@@normandy2501 if you listen to lawyers, they are disingenuous in the way they try and frame stuff. I can understand making a good case, but there should be ethical lines we don't cross. This prosecutor has stepped all over all of it. It's coupled with my experience of being prosecuted for possession of Marijuana for residue in a pipe. I tried to argue to him to drop the Marijuana possession charge and I will plea out to the paraphernalia charge. I tried to explain that possession of Marijuana was possession with intent to for personal use. I tried to explain that the residue is not possessed for personal use and that it's the only thing that made the pipe illegal. He then threatened me jail. He didn't like my argument and said we can sentence you today with 6 months and exclaimed that if the police said I had residue, then the charges stay. Nah these people are generally sleezy people. I even had a lawyer tell me that cops can do whatever they want after I proved that he illegally seized me. Take this case for instance. Here we have a series of violent riots over police involved shootings and the very prosecutors that ruled the Jacob Blake shooting was justified. Part of the same government that failed in protecting property and ultimately life. This is the total failure of government on every front and they using Kyle as their scapegoat. He is a political prisoner being sacrificed by the state. It's horrible to watch honestly.

[@protennis365]

Kyle: There was a mob and this is the reason why I could not help him. Prosecuter: Why did you not submit to the mob? WTF.

[@glitchinthesystem9949]

Person #1: has gun Person #2: attacks man with gun Person #1: shoots Person #2 Destiny's chat: 👁👄👁

[@chaotickreg7024]

Person 1 knew person 2 didn't have a gun, but they used unrelated gunshots as reason to turn and shoot.

[@mindyourbuisness8104]

@@chaotickreg7024 there is absolutely no way to know someone doesn't have a weapon for sure and he clearly grabs for his gun.

[@deadteddybears_7302]

@@chaotickreg7024 you are delusional

[@chaotickreg7024]

@@mindyourbuisness8104 Kyle says the guy was shirtless and was carrying a bag with a transparent side. the bag wasn't heavy enough for a gun. KYLE SAID he knew the guy couldn't have had a gun, I mean he saw the guy pick up a chain earlier and put it back down. HE KNEW the guy was unarmed when he shot him.

[@chaotickreg7024]

@@deadteddybears_7302 That's not a legal argument tho

[@JesseMeza07]

Vaush vs his own chat Destiny vs his own chat The hits keep coming.

[@chanr9531]

It’s like poetry, it rhymes. We need a Vaush & Destiny vs both their chat collab now.

[@zombiepenguin7134]

Destiny's chat vs Vaush's chat would be a blood bath of a colosseum.

[@bigbrowski410]

@@magnanimus9692 we get that already just go to any Destiny Vaush collab/reaction. There are still tons of people who double up Dgg and Vgg and it’s always great content

[@mypartyisprivate8693]

If only we would just submit to mobs already

[@miguelzavaleta1911]

@@magnanimus9692 Given they're mostly the same people it'd be pretty weird.

[@redcommander27]

“Can we play exhibit 14 please?” “Not on my stream” LOL

[@orbitals5281]

as a combat veteran who isn't for or against him, it is very refreshing to see intelligent, unbiased takes on this, with people like lebron making fun of him for crying.

[@gooieglopp]

That is why we love Destiny

[@FatherManus]

I'm not for or against him either. But its very clear that he was justified in shooting in self defence. Pretty much all the right wingers want us to believe Rittenhouse is a hero that deserves sympathy and I don't buy that. He put himself in that situation. And people on the left want us to believe Rittenhouse is a murdering psychopath and I don't buy that either. The funny thing is even people on the left are saying he was legally justified in self defense. There is no way he doesnt walk from the murder charges.

[@edscmidt5193]

@@FatherManus I’m not trying to start shit but say you go to a bar brandishing an assault rifle and start talking shit and a fight starts is it ok to shoot the people at the bar? What’s Wisconsin’s definition and rules for self defense

[@FatherManus]

​@@edscmidt5193 In your scenario, it depends. You can't claim self defense if you start a fight by verbally provoking someone. But if it was just an argument where neither side was provoking and the unarmed person escalates it to a physical fight, the gun owner can defend himself. In any case it doesn't matter since Rittenhouse didn't provoke anyone. He was just there and got attacked.

[@edscmidt5193]

@@FatherManus see I feel like bringing a gun to situations like that is provocation or at least setting yourself up mentally to use it. I’ve been at places where riots broke out and to protest and for whatever reason I always think “you don’t bring a weapon to shit like this” also I was raised to only take guns places that you are going to shoot them. My dad is a Vietnam vet (who volunteered) and It has do with the way I view a approach guns, you just don’t do shit like that cuz then shit like this happens

[@unclegruber5703]

Imagine watching this modern trial, where everything, EVERYTHING, is recorded and shot from multiple angles and thinking that Kyle was at fault. He crossed state lines? He shouldn't have been there? Neither of which are illegal. Imagine in the age of knowledge that we live in and sitting on the side against a 17 year old defending themselves against aggressors.

[@rrchy.]

would he have been attacked if he didnt carry an assault rifle?

[@smolmuscle]

@@rrchy. and the people that were shot would've been perfectly fine if they didn't try to attack them and threaten him with FUCKING murder

[@unclegruber5703]

@@rrchy. who knows, but he did have the rifle and they attacked him. Perhaps I'm missing the point you're trying to make here.

[@smolmuscle]

@@rrchy. sorry i misread your comment. what I meant to say was it is possible that he wouldn't have been attacked, but it's also possible that the people that attacked him were just assholes

[@ZeroNumerous]

@@rrchy. "would she have been raped if she wasn't wearing a short skirt?" If you attack someone, then you can expect them to defend themselves with whatever they have at hand. That is their right as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. Whatever you happen to be carrying is irrelevant to that simple fact. If you don't want to be shot: Don't attack people. It really is that simple.

[@FrodeForhammer]

When people say Kyle were agressing, it's stupid. It's like "oh he has a gun and i can see it? Great! Now i morally get to mame this person".

[@morten8028]

yeah, that was kind of stupid. still, Rittenhouse is a stupid LARPer who probably was eager to shoot his "cool" rifle. insert yourself into a heated situation, bring firepower, and kill anyone when the inevitable conflict ensues. cool strategy.

[@canadianteacher2949]

@@morten8028 that’s like, just your opinion man

[@morten8028]

@@canadianteacher2949 sure, it's all opinions, man. what else is there, really.

[@rrchy.]

@@canadianteacher2949 do u think he would have been in danger without carrying a rifle though?

[@TheMonk72]

@@rrchy. Sorry for dredging up an old post, but I just wondered if you recognize how similar your question is to asking whether a rape victim would have been safe if she hadn't been wearing a short skirt.

[@LCliffhanger]

"no one ever fired a gun at you" My reaction: Well he probably would have died if someone had, and to mitigate the risk to his life, he acted in self defense.

[@LeoInterVir]

This was the first or second time he actually used the AR15. This shows how versatile the platform is for self defense. Hence why gun control authoritarians attack the platform despite illegal handguns overwhelmingly being used in crimes and murders. We have laws in the books, if only they were enforced, and if only criminals cared to follow them. Remember, each additional law selectively enforced, creates another criminal from someone previously law abiding.

[@LunaRose1312]

thag argument from binger really annoyed me, as someone who plays alot of tarkov, it can be hard to tell if you're being shot at or if a gun is just going off in your very near vicinity, given the situation kyle would have been justified in assuming the gunshot was directed at him but missed as he was already taking off running

[@Slenderchunk]

Very impressed with Destiny here. Completely correct and standing strong against chat's ideologically wishful interpretations of events. Much respect gained from me.

[@rideofthevalkyries6671]

Thank you for making that point about people making fun of him for crying who get triggered over online comments. They have no idea what kind of trauma shooting someone can give you.

[@mryagami8448]

I agree, nobody should've been there. That doesn't mean he doesn't have a right to defend himself. I don't get what's so complicated?

[@aslemartinsen5284]

Politics. The answer is politics. Just listen to the patronising prosecutor, who uses the term "AR15" cus he knows his leftist media mates have made people think an AR-15 is a fuckign weapon of mass destruction or something. Prosecutor is acting in bad faith all throughout this trial. Judge will declare a mistrial with prejudice, and Rittenhouse walks and can't be tried on the same charges again.

[@kye4216]

because hes a "right winger" and most people are so ideologically possessed they look at literal video evidence of him being attacked

[@ziquaftynny9285]

@UCVzSs_tdJPbgBkjy5IhCmYA They can be the same thing.

[@wesomek]

Entirely complicated by the fact that people who wanted to get aggressive with someone who has a gun was shot and they didn't expect that. You can't threaten someone, lung for a gun and then expect to not get shot. Same thing for the people running after him. They acted no better then cops who shoot people from running away from the cops. In fact they were even more stupid knowing he had a gun and trying to attack him. It's so simple that people who even dislike the fact that he was there can't deny the facts of the case.

[@ucheobiekwe2287]

What's complicated is the political atmosphere. We saw people defend Chauvin(many still do), even politicians. We saw people defend Ahmaud Arbery's killers aswell. You shouldn't be surprised.

[@youpizzachit]

Destiny:"When I lived in Omaha I had to cross state lines to work at the casino" realizing most of his viewers don't know Omaha, Nebraska and Council Bluffs, Iowa are so close they are connected with a footbridge🤣

[@arlenspecter8348]

Most destiny/vaush/Hasan viewers have probably never left their house. These are the same people who will have a panic attack if they have to order a pizza

[@miguelvaranda7377]

@@arlenspecter8348 I'll have you know Destiny (girls name) orders uber eats every day! So your argument is invalid and stupid!

[@SoldierGeneral64]

Regardless of where one stands crossing states lines in the scenario you describe versus another doesn't really matter legally right? Crossing state lines is crossing state lines. He is bound to follow the laws of both states then.

[@YuRMoMiNHD]

@@SoldierGeneral64 what are you talking about lmao

[@SoldierGeneral64]

@@YuRMoMiNHD to what are you referring to?

[@WestWendigo]

You are the only leftist I know that has a decent knowledge on firearms. Btw, thanks for de-radicalizing me. I’m happily middle fence now.

[@amethystglare]

Destiny is more of a centrist. "Us" on the left, meaning socialists and anarchists consider democrats center right.

[@np4231]

@Don Horrifically biased strawman, wow haha

[@akaneisbae1900]

Destiny said these hands are rated E for everyone

[@Zenbon111]

cringe

[@akaneisbae1900]

@@Zenbon111 A weeb calling someone cringe. Imagine

[@ksilva2848]

@@akaneisbae1900 a weeb talking about a weeb. Imagine

[@TheSpiritof76]

@@ksilva2848 Your name is Silva it's like saliva AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

[@wasteman9548]

@@TheSpiritof76 weebs

[@ThumbsHunter]

i heard hitler crossed state lines in 1939 when he invaded poland.

[@gaussminigun]

THE RESEMBLANCE IS UNCANNY

[@imrolimra]

Checkmate Kyle simps.

[@FlexGC]

Devastating evidence from prosecution. TRIAL IS OVER. COURT IS ADJOURNED. HILTER IS BACK FROM THE DEAD.

[@taylorsouthall739]

"Mr Rittenhouse, one last question, do you love blah peeple?" Bodied.

[@InfernoVor]

This guy isn't even grasping straws. This guy produces and grasps the straws.

[@drdoomer8553]

Im not even a lawyer and I feel like I could’ve done better than the prosecutor. You realize your making him feel like he’s about to die? Yes! If he keeps running at me and posing a threat to my life, the message is that if he keeps trying to attack me he’ll die which I hoped to use to deter him while also not necessarily wanting to kill him……there’s the answer

[@crushinnihilism]

The prosecution says " there were gun shots all night" as if THAT alone isnt a good reason for thinking the guy with a gun pointed at Kyles head may shoot.

[@christophergreen6595]

As if THAT isn't a reason to be afraid of the guy in militia-kit brandishing an AR.

[@crushinnihilism]

@@christophergreen6595 1) he wasnt in militia kit. 2) militia kit doesnt exist. You made ot up. 3) at no point did he brandish a firearm.

[@christophergreen6595]

@@crushinnihilism 1) yes he was 2) thats stupid, people recognize paramilitary gear and he was wearing it 3) witness testimony differs.

[@crushinnihilism]

@@christophergreen6595 youre a liar. Watch the video. No militia kit because thats fake. That's why you had to motte-and-baily from militia kit (which is a fake thing you made you made up) to paramilitary gear. He NEVER brandished a firearm. You have zero idea of what youre saying, and you're to brainwashed to do a google search to see why youre using that term wrong.

[@crushinnihilism]

@@christophergreen6595 just to paint how profoundly stupid your paramilitary claim is...during the night Kyle is wearing a green t-shirt, blue jeans, a baseball cap, and boots. Real fkn paramilitary.

[@InDeathWeLove]

This whole case is just depressing on every level. The protests and riots over a warranted police shooting. The fact that due to political pressure/reasons the police is made to stand down rather than protect their community. The fact that this happens frequently enough that there are people that feel the need to take the law in their own hands. The fact that rioters felt comfortable chasing someone with a gun, threaten and attack him aggressively. The fact that the police and prosecution was so quick to be comfortable arresting and moving to trial when there is clear video evidence showing what any sane person would consider a situation where he might fear for his life warranting self defence. The fact that the media has spun and even was at best wrong and worst misleading about this thing like crazy when it's so open and shut unless there had been some evidence that just hasn't been provided even a year later. Then finally the large portion of Americans just blindly eating that shit up despite everyone complaining you can't trust the media no one seems to be willing to even look at the recording and some of those that do still make excuses after the fact. It's just an indictment on so many levels.

[@ToxicallyMasculinelol]

don't forget that the media facilitated a lie that the people Rittenhouse shot were black, and then refused to inform people that they were actually White for several weeks. they allowed the whole public first impression of Rittenhouse to form within the haze of misinformation. they ran this whole media trial for weeks without dispelling any of the lies about the case. they insisted for weeks that Kyle had no right to have a gun, had no ties to the community, took the gun across state lines, etc. they totally glossed over the prior crimes of the degenerates who attacked Kyle, even the child rape conviction. and somehow worst of all, they allowed their viewers to believe Kyle Rittenhouse was a white supremacist who murdered 3 innocent black protesters in cold blood. they made the whole thing about race. after all, the protest was about a black guy killed by police. so people naturally jumped to the conclusion that the protesters were black, too. they spent a whole lot of time talking about Rittenhouse's race, yet never even mentioned the race of the people Rittenhouse shot. so that even weeks after it happened, most of the leftists I knew at the time still thought Rittenhouse had shot black people. not one leftist friend of mine was aware that he had shot White people until I told them. because every time CNN or MSNBC or NYT mentioned the "victims," they were just discussed as nondescript persons, no photographs, no description of their race, etc. most people didn't even know their names, probably because if the media had mentioned their names, people would know they weren't black, since they had White or Jewish-sounding names. that sounds paranoid, but it's impossible to be too paranoid when it comes to the media. making decisions about what to say and what to omit on the basis of how it would affect their ongoing push for racial tension and anti-White retribution is exactly the kind of thing they routinely do. however much we hate the media, we don't hate them nearly enough

[@alexanderharrold7936]

It’s refreshing to see someone who seems to be on the left, living in reality and mostly acknowledging the facts. I’m not saying we agree on much but he has some good points that are fact based. Seems rare these days.

[@martinnielsen5851]

Destiny has had some : Ra da dada dada da da dada..... 🤡🤡🤡 takes. But this is truely refreshing. 🤔

[@Mrcraigtucker]

"Not on my stream." Gold.

[@michaelregis1015]

I laughed way too much when he said that.

[@Mrcraigtucker]

@@michaelregis1015 me too lmao

[@SwingIsLife]

Smae

[@accountnotfound4209]

@@michaelregis1015 why?

[@TheKonnoisseur11]

Lmao “they are all larping” that’s actually a really good take.

[@belesir8847]

I like how "he was looking for trouble" apparently doesn't apply to people like Rosenbaum who was literally yelling "shoot me ni**a, shoot me!" that night lol.

[@mariomario1462]

Did that guy bring a gun to another state he had no business being there or did Kyle? Moron.

[@Jankyito]

@@mariomario1462 Kyle being there is completely irrelevant to whether it was self defense or not. This is the exact same argument as someone saying "oh but she was wearing a short skirt". Moron

[@LaserLlamas]

@Mario Mario Guess who else had no business being there? Rosenbaum. You can’t have it your way and ignore the other for your own convenience. Probably shouldn’t yell at people to shoot him and he’s going to kill them if he gets alone with them, but uhhh what do I know yeah?

[@abo88jasem]

@@mariomario1462 who taught you the "crossing state lines" meme? I want to know the absolute god that got all lefties to perpetuate his gospel. Also, Kyle stated in his testimony that he crosses Kenosha all the time for work. Edit:grammar

[@mariomario1462]

@@Jankyito no Moron it isnt because he DIRECTLY escalated the incident by illegally bringing a WEAPON inside a protest in police riot gear. This is like leaving a gun out in the open and some toddler shoots themselves with it. It's called reckless negligence. Grow up. The U.S gun culture defending a 17 year old playing hero bringing guns is insane

[@Focus716]

How do people not realize that what he did as far as “self control”, like you said, was movie or video game tier. To shoot somebody in the ONE ARM that is holding the other weapon and ONLY that is fuckin insane. Half our cops in America mag dump at smaller threats and miss every shot

[@Dephino7]

I STARTED DYING WHEN CHAT STARTED SPAMMING "KYLE SUBMIT TO THE MOB"

[@oldwestcreative83]

This is such an obvious case of self-defense, it's a charade that he was even charged and there's even a trial. Each time Kyle pulled the trigger, he was retreating or trying to retreat from people attacking him and the people he shot at were either trying to take his gun, pointing a gun at him and/or hitting him in the head, with the first person shot having threatened to kill him previously. And most importantly, each incident is documented on video from multiple angles, proving this to be the case. Obviously, the DA in this case was motivated by the politics of the day, by the fact this occurred at a BLM/Antifa rally. What a joke.

[@rrchy.]

he surely was defending himself and probably would have been injured badly but i cant understand how you people are missing the fact that if he wouldnt have had an assault rifle he wouldnt have been touched by anyone. idk if that matters in court but he surely brought the attention to himself and didnt need to.

[@oldwestcreative83]

@@rrchy. Well, (1) we don’t know that. The fact that he was down on the street putting out the fires that the rioters were setting is largely what made him the target of Rosenbaum and Zymenski(sp), as much or more than him being armed. And (2) I don’t think anyone is missing this. No one said he made a wise decision to go down there, much less go down there with his AR, but he had as much legal right to be there as anyone else that night. And given he was there to protect people/property while others like Rosenbaum were there to destroy it, I’m not sure why we should single him out in condemnation. Making an unwise/unsafe choice of course doesn’t mean you sacrifice your right to life / bodily autonomy. Isn’t that kind of like victim blaming?

[@npcimknot958]

@@rrchy. no. Becuase he was there the entire night.. what we are seeing is really late that night. There litearlly was no problem that whole night until ziminiskki and Rosenbaum trying to ambush and kill kyle. Rosenbaum is attracted to young boys soo.. Also.. it was reported over 100 guns were at that riot on all sides. So no.. it wasn’t the reason. Kyle is even seen around blm and stuff. Offering water and aide.

[@lolfemfaillol3933]

@@rrchy. Please cite your (psychic) source for claim.

[@Gerald-of-Riviera]

@@rrchy. Even so, that's not ground to allow someone to attack without cause. I can agree that seeing an AR-15 can be intimidating, but at the same time logic also screams don't go near it nor mess with the person with it. We never see Kyle freely shooting/aiming at random people either.

[@Mykulveli]

As someone who was in the military for 7 years, I can't believe the questions along the lines of "The person you just shot asked for a medic and you didnt offer any help?". In the military you are taught to not apply first aid measures until the immediate threat has cleared. Its VERY obvious that the mob chasing, shouting, skateboard smacking, hand gun pulling were an immediate threat. The fact that the judge/prosecution allows such a question as valid is jaw droppingly ignorant.

[@Mykulveli]

@Don Either your reading comprehension needs work or your bad faith statements are on the "ol swing and a miss" level. I'll let you choose which applies here, but your reply roasts itself.

[@WaterYaDune]

@Don 349 comments on a 5 month old account, holy shit you clearly need to go outside

[@Kekkai_]

@Don You really read "immediate threat" and inserted "enemy combatants." Get help.

[@JewTube001]

@@WaterYaDune how do you see someone's youtube comment history?

[@Kekkai_]

@Don "immediate threats" are not always "enemy combatants" that's why they are called "immediate threats." Example: A fire would be an "immediate threat."

[@JakeA6956]

Thing is, everyone saying that kyle is guilty would be singing a FAR different tune if he were instead a black BLM supporter up on trial right now.

[@jasonwhite6463]

You are wasting your ESP in the KZbin comments section. You must not value it very much.

[@JakeA6956]

@@jasonwhite6463 So you do not think there is a political bias from the people claiming kyle is guilty that wouldn't be flipped on its head if he were black? I'm sorry you are so naive.

[@oneigboboy]

lol. If he were a black BLM supporter that shot people, the police would have killed him on the spot so stfu

[@perior7935]

@@JakeA6956 Did you google what ESP means? He is agreeing with you.

[@jasonwhite6463]

@@JakeA6956 Not naive just not so willing to defend reckless murder that I am willing to construct an imaginary scenario. Kyle was reckless and that recklessness precipitated this mess.

[@alecstewart2612]

You kind of want to ask the prosecuting attorney "So if I punch you, personally, in the back of head, you fall down and I start kicking you, you don't think you have any right to defend yourself against me kicking you? Or does that only apply if you have a gun?"

[@NotimetoVero]

We’re those guys punching him or kicking him? Why do DGGers keep comparing chasing someone to rape and assault?

[@chaotickreg7024]

He used a gunshot as a claim for self defense, but in the trial he admits he knew that Zaminksy fired the gun because he knew Rosenbaum was unarmed. Kyle could have kept running but he turned and shot a man he knew could not have shot him.

[@te5461]

@@chaotickreg7024 “could have kept running” yes because as of victim blaming is the smart answer here. What a low iq take. WI self defense law states you don’t have to flee btw 🤡

[@chaotickreg7024]

@@te5461 You don't have to flee, you can just shoot to kill? Sounds like that won't ever be abused.

[@nealhuffman7523]

@@te5461 calling this victim blaming when that's literally what they're trying to figure out in court lol

[@allison3542]

The point about open carry vs brandishing is on point. I think that’s what most people can’t get through their head because they see gun and think “bad”. They don’t understand what “brandishing” actually is

[@fxDELTAx]

"When I say yard just hear meter" Best line

[@Murbz]

I didn't watch the whole trial, but the prosecution seemed pretty terrible at times. I almost thought he was going to use the classic "guilty person says what" tactic when he was asking him if he understood how dangerous pointing a gun was.

[@jwalk6378]

I am always blown away of how well you analyze these videos/situations and address it in such a manner. I agree 100% with everything here you're saying I just wish I had the ability to address it in the way you do.

[@snooglers]

Gary Oldman did great playing the role of prosecution. Man of many talents.

[@martijnnvermeulen7515]

As a european destiny seems like the only american political pundit/streamer that has any nuance in his opinions.

[@Hedgeflexlfz]

Because he is the only one lol

[@mauzki-]

Yeah for sure, American lefties seem to just dismiss things so much. Vaush in uk stuff called Boris a strongman adn seemingly thinks boris is pro austerity, theirs not even a readng of policy. Destiny on the other hand will look deeper into things and as you said have nuance.

[@daveruda]

@@mauzki- thats not very nuanced

[@TheKennyboy92]

As a fellow European I can never understands American's obsession with guns.

[@hctim1]

@@TheKennyboy92 they're fun

[@1986tessie]

Destiny is smart AF. He has some really good takes even if i don't agree with him all the time he always knows how to explain his positions clearly and knowledgeable.

[@blazefa.]

And I get honest, genuine vibes from him, most people even if I agree with most of their takes I find are clearly disingenuous and partisan in some scenarios.

[@Michael-kp4bd]

@@blazefa. until it comes to snide comments about other lefty streamers. I know he can’t stand their bad takes and political posturing, but he manages to throw away his integrity for some small moments JUST to shit on ppl left off him like Vaush or Hasan… I’m REALLY nitpicking (esp cuz Hasan and Vaush do this much worse), but i just wish Destiny cut the last sliver of bad faith arguments out of his habits… because he’s got more integrity than ANYONE on this platform and i respect him more than literally anyone else. …At least for now. There’s days I worry he’s going to break because no one argues on good faith and he’ll just get blackpilled into doing agitprop like everyone else 😅

[@blazefa.]

@@Michael-kp4bd yeh, maybe that’s my biases showing since I do lean a bit more to the right. And I find people like vaush and Hassan very deceitful and insufferable.

[@axle84]

Destiny grows on me daily. I'd be interested if he is aware that insurance companies had started giving businesses the run around on paying out due to riot damage. Since police and fire were not entering the area this would likely result in the total and permanent destruction of businesses and end the employment of lots of innocent working class people many of whom are living pay cheque to pay cheque. In my opinion it give Kyle being there far more legitimacy than the "protestors" especially since we see video of Kyle putting out a fire which immediately instigated the chain of events. I'd love to know what destiny thinks of this?

[@luciddream2033]

@@blazefa. yes he is sincere and is intellectually consistent. I don't agree with him on everything, but I still watch and listen to his arguments.

[@ferrisbueller9991]

10:10 Thank you Destiny, the micro-rant that ensues is vicariously cathartic. I imagine most people could blow away 2 people when cornered into a self-defense situation, fight or flight is one hell of a drug yo. Though the deeper survival mechanism of Freeze is a thing that should not be forgotten. Deer and rabbits like to use it, it helped us back when we were running from T-Rexs whose vision only picked up motion. Except thats a fat fallacy, their vision was remarkable good actually. Fight or flight is preferable. But when that wears off and you come down, no longer just thinking with your Lizard Brain, it will eat at you. Hopefully it will. Only 2 types off people it won't: sociopaths and veteran killers. (discounting the third group who drug themselves out of having to think about it.) Like drone strike operators who wake up with their morning's coffee to weigh how many infants and wives make the high ranking jihadist no longer worth the shot. Like those whose profession is to archive child porn, it takes a special sort of person. That's almost as much trauma as the average they/them ADD OCD twitter user endures in one day, be it when they see their local church painting over the "Rosaries off my Ovaries" spray job or are reminded they don't look like Heidi Klum because an ad for lingerie has interrupted their Vaush viewing experience. The Master Outpacer

[@sHmAaa]

36:35 Destiny walks like a pregnant lady.

[@tommj4365]

So to not threaten his chat

[@unsatiable3860]

Oh my god you're right. Can destiny run at all?

[@LuciusSicarius]

I'm curious about how many people that comment one or the other on this have actually watched the videos or if their knowledge of the event ends with what they learned from twitter. I remember when Destiny and Vaush were arguing over this, Vaush actually said the kid was just sitting on his ass firing into a crowd.

[@keithfilibeck2390]

It's called lying, or more exactly, double-think, Vaush both knows and doesn't know the events, and he can switch at will, as can most modern day idealogues.

[@rohanjarande]

@@keithfilibeck2390 YES!!! It is pure evil and we need to start treating it as such.

[@nopalmlbb3524]

@@sk8n854 it honestly scares me that people will listen to have like one of those rich pastors-followers you see on tv

[@nopalmlbb3524]

@@sk8n854 taking his word as gospel

[@rohanjarande]

@@sk8n854 They simply don't care, they know he's lying but, they use Vaush as some sort of a permissing entity to do and act as they want without having to consult or listen to their conscience, they can blame it all on Vaush and Vaush can always say he's an individual so he can't be responsible for the actions of his followers, the truth is just another obstacle to them. They'll act willfully blind as they bulldoze through innocent people/their homes/useful institutions/social structures, etc, you name it, they'll destroy it while knowing it was unjustified, cause chaos and leave people stranded or even dead, but they'll outsourcing the required justification making process to Vaush, so as to not feel any guilt in their actions. While Vaush will use word games to avoid responsibility but still maintain his intent to his fallowing, who are already in on the game....

[@Ajaws]

“Kyle was looking for trouble” arguments literally have the same energy as “she shouldn’t have gone out alone” or “she was asking for it” energy fr

[@bradmiles1984]

Makes you wonder if Binger asks sexual assault victims what they were wearing when it happened.

[@thrgg]

@@f4rt989 Being armed saved his life.

[@mediumchicago_pizza]

i know little to nothing about the case but didnt he literally travel to the protest with a gun he obtained illegally ?

[@erichooper2794]

@@f4rt989 ok everyone is looking for trouble meaning the guy attacking him started with equal guilt, and by attacking raises his level of guilt justifying the killing.

[@cryptocaesar8972]

@@f4rt989 The fact that there is a trouble does not mean all good people need to run from the area. There are different strategies of how to handle a situation, what Kyle did was try to avoid injury by showing that he will not be an easy target. Perhaps a dumb decision, dumb decisions aren’t why he’s on trial, he’s on trial for killing someone in self defense.

[@Monscent]

100% self defence. Everyone stop pretending.

[@Zachary_Setzer]

One major correction here: the prosecutor's ethical duty is not to grasp at every straw to advocate for conviction. Unlike other attorneys, the prosecutor is ethically obligated to pursue Justice, not the interests of its client (the State). To knowingly pursue a wrongful conviction is misconduct that will result in discipline from the state bar. Not saying for sure Binger is doing that bit it seems REAL close to the line.

[@Ilych367]

The judge, the defense, and the prosecutor all knew what he was trying to pull with that 5th amendment stunt and it’s why the judge was so angry. His strategy : give judge grounds to order a mistrial, sully the jury with propensity, and get the defense to submit a motion for mistrial with prejudice. His case was looking terrible after Gaige testified, and this basic 5th violation could mean he would a) get another crack at running the trial, or b) sway the jury unfairly, or c) have the judge order mistrial with prejudice so it can’t be retried. this would also allow him to act like he didn’t poorly execute his prosecution and blame an unfair judge / ruling,

[@ToxicallyMasculinelol]

didn't destiny say pretty much exactly that in this video?

[@TheTrueRman]

"You just assumed he was gonna use it against you" Cause In the middle of a goddamn riot, a reason someone would reach for your weapon is to have a nice relaxing chat about it's scope or barrel

[@adamcramm]

“All he used was one foot. Correct?” Sure but it’s not like he was doing the hokey pokey.

[@rhegafd]

Destinys Point on the fake mofos making fun of Kyle crying is so insanely on point its mind boggling. Wow...I havent heard something that true in a long time.

[@askechadd2473]

It’s so true. Literally anyone saying it was fake has probably never had or witnessed a serious panic attack before, it was kinda disturbing to watch if I’m honest.

[@sameash3153]

Saw hundreds of comments about crocodile tears on a Forbes article about the case

[@basquegrand8982]

Unless Rittenhouse is actually fuckin Daniel Day Lewis is disguise, his breakdown was absolutely genuine and understandable. People act like shooting people at point blank range is normal.

[@cdonovan72]

I don't buy it as being legitimate though, you can't got out to the bar drinking and celebrating shooting protestors with groups of white guys throwing up proud boy signs then claim how bad you feel.

[@basquegrand8982]

@@cdonovan72 who did that?

[@masterofThardus]

This horseshit case is why Stand Your Ground laws are a thing and why they should be a thing in more places.

[@masterofThardus]

@Don I take it you have no idea what Stand Your Ground laws do, then. Stand Your Ground purely means the state cannot play shitty games like this. If you are attacked, then so long as you are allowed to be where you currently are, you have the right to defend yourself and the state cannot play "yeah but you could've run away" duty-to-retreat games. It does nothing to protect people who are aggressors.

[@matrixfan58]

@@masterofThardus It protected Zimmerman who was absolutely an aggressor

[@atomicwaffle420]

Stand your ground laws lead to more violence and are unnessisary because duty to retreat doesn't mean you can't defend yourself. It just means that if you can escape you should. under duty to retreat kyle would still be valid in his self defence claim because he tried to escape.

[@erichooper2794]

@@atomicwaffle420 and yet Kyle is on trial even though the prosecution has videos showing him retreat to the best of his ability.

[@feelingevaporated2912]

The laws used in the states with the highest gun violence? Great idea lol

[@LXYugioh]

I havent heard much of you before and what i heard wasnt good but standing your ground and being a voice of reason is something very appreciated!

[@ChibiViolin]

His accuracy percentage under stress was 75% landing 6 out of the 8 shots he fired.

[@davethebrahman9870]

Hard to miss at that range with a rifle.

[@filbertovandette]

​@@davethebrahman9870really? Have you been in such a situation?

[@AZURAKAZ]

I keep picturing Vaush, in my head, whenever I hear the prosecutor talk.

[@stoneylonesome4062]

There should be some amazing race-style made-for-youtube Patreon special where Destiny and Vaush are handcuffed together in Times Square in NYC and have to hitchhike it all the way to burning man so they can finally get the key to unlock eachother.

[@carlaustin2324]

All the prosecutor needs to do now is start using marvel movies as examples

[@jimmyjohnjuan]

Yeah, any one who ever had a panic attack or ever been overcome with emotions like grief know its basically uncontrollable.

[@coolboy9979]

Lawyers (or just that one) are so annoying. This feels like JLP asking "Do you love black conservatives"

[@MrMojoman1236]

It’s their job to be repetitive and annoying though. Like they said in the video, the prosecutor is supposed to grasp at any straw to prove guilt, even if it’s stupid.

[@hardhat5406]

are you also angry at mma fighters on tv when they beat someone up?

[@WayneMercy]

They need to make sure they get everything on the record; one missing point can completely ruin your success at an appeal. It’s also why the prosecutor is arguing with the judge so much and dragging it out despite it seeming strange that he’s agitating the judge, he doesn’t care and knows he has to make his point because he needs to make sure it’s on the record otherwise he can’t appeal that point. He’s trying to make sure it’s noted that he objected to particular evidentiary decisions by the judge so he can appeal by arguing that the judge abused his discretion or made a mistake that was severe enough to have changed the outcome of the trial. It’s annoying for non-lawyers to watch but I assure you it’s all extremely important

[@Technohunter682]

its literally their job, all lawyers are like this

[@DB1Dragoon]

@@zachariahmarrero9358 He gave answers though, the defense just didn't give the asked and answered objection for some crazy reason.

[@bison8745]

The argument that Grossskreutz didnt intent to kill Rittenhouse because he got close is just stupid. It would only matter if Grosskreutz was on trial for attempted murder. What matters is the point of view of Rittenhouse. He turned around and saw a guy basically standing over him with a hand gun that he pointed at him. In that split second,its 100% reasonable for Kyle to feared for his life.

[@Marzaries]

But before that he put a cap in that skater boi :o

[@moonshoes8931]

@@Marzaries not okay man

[@Marzaries]

@@moonshoes8931 wym?

[@Tekner436]

@@Marzaries But before that skater boi hit him in the head with skateboard

[@darth_wager]

For those that were wondering why the AR-15 they already went over it at trial he can legally own that AR-15 rifle with a permit at 17 years old. A pistol you have to be 18.

[@Jkon1993]

That is not true

[@perior7935]

@@Jkon1993 Yes, it is true.

[@gaussminigun]

@@perior7935 seconded

[@jfoard1]

When did you hear this? I don’t remember hearing this at the trial at all.

[@marcharms6805]

He didn't have the permit though. He had applied for it and it was still processing when the incident happened. He's application was actually denied because of the shooting incident, he described getting the letter in the mail about it during the trial. It's immaterial to whether or not he was justified in using deadly force in self defense though.

[@kindacoolstuff1595]

"a different weapon would have yielded such a result" You can tell this person has zero knowledge of ballistics. In Gauges instance, he would have 100% lost his entire right arm had Kyle shot him with a pistol, which people seem to think causes less damage. At point blank range the wider the bullet, the more damage. .223 = thin , 9mm = thick

[@StuninRub]

That's not how that works, there is so much more energy behind a 5.56 that despite having a smaller diameter then a 9mm, the 5.56 will almost always be more destructive regardless of distance. Problem is, it would have been illegal for him to carry a pistol, while the rifle is completely legal.

[@kindacoolstuff1595]

@@StuninRub I'm under the impression from other gun experts that that would be the case had the 5.56 hit bone, but in a straight through and through at that range, the pistol bullet had it been a hollow point would have expanded much much more than this 5.56 hollow expanded.

[@StuninRub]

@@kindacoolstuff1595 You might want to check how credible these "experts" are. It's not even close, 5.56mm is substantially more violent on impact. Hollow points expansion does not result in an explosion like Binger states, that is a misconception. 5.56mm kzbin.info/www/bejne/nImXgHeeZsxnm68 9mm kzbin.info/www/bejne/oJbbqnd6dpiHeLc

[@AsylumReaper]

@@kindacoolstuff1595 Two things to consider. A 9mm round travels at around 1200 feet per second. The hollow point projectile blossoms out reducing the velocity on contact but causes more internal damage than a non-hollow point. The reduced velocity is the very thing that wouldn't allow that round to "take the arm off". The pistol round also comes out of a shorter barrel which is where velocity is generated. Longer barrell=higher velocity=more damage. That said, the 223 FMJ round that was fired from KR's rifle accelerate to 3100 feet per second and loses velocity at distance. That round is designed to tumble. Meaning when it hits soft matter, it begins to tumble inside the body. That was the misconception of people saying the .223 is "designed to pass through a target". It isn't. Its meant to penetrate and tumble to cause more soft tissue damage. At point blank range, there is minimal difference in damage to the target between a hollow point 9mm and an FMJ .223.

[@BrokeIn97]

Prosecutor: Do you know point gun make people scared. Rittenhouse: He chase me, make me scared 🔁

[@karlmarx251]

i too run directly at scary things

[@bradmiles1984]

He played the uno reverse card flawlessly.

[@connortation5545]

R: "I point gun to stop him." P: "Why would that stop him?" R: "Because I point gun." P: "Ok but why would just pointing a gun be a deterrent." R: "Because I point gun." P: "What about pointing a gun at someone would compel them to change their behavior." R: "I point gun to stop him." It's like watching Man Ray try to give Patrick his wallet back. Either Rittenhouse doesn't know why people are scared of having guns pointed at them (even after personally killing people with guns), or he knows something about pointing guns at people that would deter a pursuer that is NOT the threat of violence. Being realistic, he was likely just coached by his lawyers to be willfully dense around anything having to do with actually using the gun. Although, I don't see how it helps his case for Rittenhouse to pretend he doesn't know WHY pointing a gun at someone would change their behavior.

[@deadteddybears_7302]

@@connortation5545 as a human who has had a handgun pointed at them, natural reaction is to run the fuck away from that gun not try and take it

[@JBBoli]

@@connortation5545 I don't think he was being dense or supposed to look dense either. The prosecutor was very careful in how he constructed the question about intent and the language he used was purposefully loaded to sound as though it was his intent to kill the man. I can only imagine Rittenhouse felt that if he agreed that the intention was to intimidate, or cause harm then that would later be used against him as he would have admitted he intended to kill the guy. He was likely told by his own lawyers to only admit what can later be used to fit the narative he was acting in self defense.

[@hismajestylordsmenkhare5878]

I love how the surviving guy that got shot destroyed the prosecution's case in cross exam by literally stating Kyle only shot him when he pointed at gun at Kyle and that didn't shoot anyone that backed off with hands up, plus all his omissions to the police and lying about losing his gun when he had it in his hand as he ran after Kyle. This prosecutor though is pretty shady the judge has went off on him for bad conduct several times

[@peterwright5311]

I thought guys with guns were supposed to point them at active shooters - which is what Kyle was at that point? Maybe people just shouldn't be carrying guns around and anyone that does so should rightly be locked the fuck up if they end up killing someone.

[@malluk3065]

@@peterwright5311 Kyle wasn't a active shooter you dunce.

[@mbd251]

@Don Christ my dude if Rosenbaum didn't try to assault Kyle no one would have been killed that night and if Huber didn't hit Kyle with his skateboard he wouldn't have been killed either

[@peterwright5311]

@@malluk3065 Had he or had he not shot someone dead at this point?

[@te5461]

@@peterwright5311 Kyle wasn’t an active shooter by any definition. Gaige also didn’t witness the shooting so detaining / shooting Kyle would be against the law. You have to witness the crime happen and can’t act off of mob hearsay being thrown around. As soon as you do you take full liability of actions that happen.

[@unknownslayer7128]

The prosecutions job is supposed to be justice not winning a case , EVERYONE should know this.... pathetic

[@canadianteacher2949]

Prosecutor’s main argument is why didn’t you wait for the aggressors to attack you first?

[@tyberiusmcintyre3411]

not even that, they DID attack him. the prosecutor was basically asking why he didnt wait til they killed him XD

[@r-pupz7032]

This is such a complex situation but I do have empathy for Kyle after watching this. It's insane the prosecutor was suggesting he should have tended to the dude he shot, the crowd would have torn him apart. I'm a doctor and we are taught to always ensure our safety and not approach someone if there is a risk to us. Sounds callous but it's first aid 101, don't cause yourself to become an additional casualty. I'm a leftist and I've avoided this subject as it is so controversial and I honestly don't know what I think, I don't know enough about what happened, but that point really bugged me. It makes no sense from a medic protocol standpoint AND a self defence standpoint to approach someone you shot while there is a crowd who clearly are upset and angry with you. Whether the shooting was justified or not, leaving the scene was the only sensible course of action. Especially if there is a hospital just over the road, they can help better than you! I think I would have gone into the hospital to call for help and also as protection, and waited for authorities, but I honestly don't know how I'd react in such a stressful situation and whatever else he did, I don't think we should judge him unfairly for that. Everyone thinks they would behave perfectly and we love to critique how others react to shocking or scary situations but when my boyfriend died I reacted really strangely due to stress and shock. It felt so surreal, I couldn't stop laughing and I didn't cry until the next day when it really hit me (and it took me years to get back to normal functioning due to the intense grief.) Humans behave weirdly under duress/in shock.

[@shiitalkiemushrooms4487]

I have a pretty similar feeling on the matter. Let the courts decide what the facts are and let the cards fall where they may. It’s tragic that this kid and those bystanders put themselves in this situation in the first place. I find it so incredibly gross tho that people are praising rittenhouse as some sort of hero. He’s not a hero, he may or may not have acted in self defense, but he definitely put himself in a dangerous situation, and his choices lead him to killing people. There’s no arguing that fact

[@shiitalkiemushrooms4487]

I’m also worried that similar nut jobs will see a successful defense trial and larp in a similar matter. Ps I’m sorry for your loss, best wishes ✊

[@bradmiles1984]

EMS are trained in a very similar fashion and won't go unless the area is secured first. This was shown with the whole shooting in CHAZ/CHOP. They wouldn't let the cops in to secure their safety so EMS refused to go in per policy.

[@shiitalkiemushrooms4487]

@@bradmiles1984 yea the medic aspect they were going for was pretty dumb. My real question is if rittenhouse felt like he was in a dangerous situation, and he was in close proximity to the police line, instead of shooting people, why didn’t he go to them? He did after the fact and they gave him water, what stopped him from doing that instead but prior instead of engaging with the firearm?

[@yacheritsi]

@@shiitalkiemushrooms4487 He was running towards the police line when a pursuer struck him from behind, causing him to fall. Then he was kicked and only then did he fire at the kicker.

[@zdog058]

Steven helps recover a small amount of faith in humanity for me, when I see that he is still capable of rational thought about controversial topics like these.

[@potato1841]

Fr, it’s so refreshing 😂

[@Megelos]

@Don True, but when it comes to specifics that can be displayed through recordings, like the advancements, people like that can still have a reasonable argument. That's what people mean.

[@zdog058]

@Don that's weird because I'm talking about the 17 year old who while trying to stop people burning down a community that he has been part of for a long time. Then while trying to put out fires and give people first aid. Then a convicted child rapist threatens to kill him, then when the 17 year old is alone this same pedo chases him down yelling "fuck you" and tries to take his rifle away. then the 17 year old kid shoots this person who just tried to take his rifle, and notices an approaching mob yelling "get him" or "cranium that boy" then when he is struck with a skateboard, he falls to the ground. where someone tries to kick him in the face, Then he is struck again in the back of the head/neck with a skateboard and that same assailant tries to take his rifle as well. so he shoots that guy. This same guy who threatened to gut his brother with a knife because he didn't clean the house right. then another guy pretends to surrender with a glock in his hand. Then when the 17 year old shows IMMENSE trigger discipline and doesn't shoot anyone else, until this same guy decides to point his glock at that kids head. If you are so mentally impaired as to look at all the video and see anything but self defense you are suffering from a terminal amount of cognitive dissonance. People liek you are so intellectually inept that you can only form opinions based on the particular political commentators you watch.

[@saotomebuster]

@Don my time to shine has come. Define assault rifle.

[@lmSnarkk]

@Don What is rational in your disingenuous framing of the situation? Watch the videos. It was self defense. Just watch the videos.

[@vaasdc9044]

I dont always agree with destiny but i appreciate him calling out the people makig fun of kyle crying.

[@shockwavesyndrome6433]

Kylie is right therefor enemy therefor is ok to laugh at crying. Communist grug don’t understand why you being contrarian?

[@zakkgeorge345]

I appreciate it, but I can also understand the frustration of watching someone kill another man (in their eyes unjustified and excessive) and then watch them cry for themselves. I personally don’t think it’s okay but I can understand what would lead them to do it (making fun of him).

[@MastaOfMonkeyDisasta]

@@zakkgeorge345 Well, you don't run after a lone individual armed who hasn't done anything wrong, with a rioting mob behind you saying, "we'll kill you if you're alone" and pretend to be victims once shit hits the fan. And the *one* defending themselves is being chased and attempts to retreat is being demonized for defending themselves and expressing their liberties against literal criminal and rioters as he attempts to defend a neighborhood, but in this day and age, the innocent are taken advantage of by all levels of criminals, and thusly politically demonized. Kyle Rittenhouse did nothing wrong, and those who say he did are idealogical cultists.

[@zakkgeorge345]

@@MastaOfMonkeyDisasta I never said he did. My post was only that I understand the position of people willing to make fun of him crying and why they might arrive at that being okay (and also mentioned that it’s not my position). So I’m not sure who you are replying to 🤷‍♂️

[@bradmiles1984]

@@zakkgeorge345 You were just explaining their mindset even if their view of the situation was way off from the reality of what happened.

[@TheGravityAxe]

The "15lb piece of wood could never killed anyone" comment was made by someone who does not have the mental capacity to support a human body. How heavy is a baseball bat? How heavy is a 3ft long 2x4? How heavy is a cricket bat? How heavy is a human fist? All of these have killed people.

[@crustycupcake110]

Prosecutor formulating a question purely in first order beliefs is hilarious. You could just respond with higher orders just to trigger the prosecutor. Lmao

[@broplzjuststop]

Let’s all say a prayer that Destiny somehow is a witness in a nationally known case. Would be absolutely hilarious. The reporter from Arizona was running laps around the prosecutor and those questions weren’t even that tough.

[@greenolive9927]

Watching the prosecutor doing his job. I realized JLP would make a prosecutor. Ignore the answers he don’t want and ask him the same question. Amazin isn’t it

[@weebemo1]

Uhmazin

[@MauMight]

JLP is completely detatched from reality. The defense had the opportunity to present his point of view in the best light possible the prosecutor's job is to show what they were trying to hide. An exemple of what he COULD be hiding is that he knew that open carrying an ar15 would provoke people into removing it from him and by trying to do that would start a fire where he could shoot people and call it self defense.

[@Hugodenbeste]

But if you ask a question and don't get an answer what should you do? He repeatedly asked questions that stood unanswered.

[@sp4wn515]

@@Hugodenbeste is this your first trial? This is standard operating procedure. They can rephrase that question as many ways as they like, they just need the answer they're seeking once.

[@Tigo625]

@@MauMight Even if he knew that and did it, it'd still be self defense. The prosecution, and any who think this wasn't self defense in any way, are as detached from reality as JLP, if not more.

[@koalacorps3151]

Never thought I'd be agreeing with Destiny but here I am. Makes me respect him a lot more than other people who just parrot whatever the mob is saying

[@bobvance-]

Also... Frozen Bomb and Gross Grits... lmfao. Closed captioning is amazing.

[@amberpowell2609]

Good for you for saying what you think and sticking to the facts regardless of what your chat is trying to push.

[@wolfwood]

i know the title says "his chat"(and probably the same with vaush's chat) but lets be real, it's less than 10 people arguing with him out of over 1000 chatters

[@tommj4365]

What difference has that ever made?

[@overthis]

Vagsh is such 🗑️

[@waynwastaken]

this court room sounds like someone got tp'd to the admin room on gmod dark rp

[@technojarn]

Destiny. I have been watching your show for about 3 years now. Your analysis on events that occur politically, or an incident, or a debate are always very refreshing. I would say I’m a pretty conservative guy and so I generally don’t watch a lot of more lefty people. You are my favorite lefty to watch and that’s because I believe you are a genuine person. When you were talking about how anyone who saw Kyle crying, then they make fun of him, and also claims they’ve had ptsd. Then they are full of shit. Money. Keep your content up buddy. You have an avid watcher here

[@orenmontgomery8250]

39:00 4 at Rosenbaum (4/4 kill) +2 at Jumpkick Man (0/2) +1 at Huber (1/1 kill) +1 at Grosskreutz (1/1 arm) 8 shots, 6 hits, 3 casualties, 2 fatalities, 2 misses, 1 maiming

[@emperortgp2424]

MISSION COMPLETE

[@lolfemfaillol3933]

1/1 pedos cured

[@Tekner436]

@@emperortgp2424 restart and try again for a perfect score.