How will it work with a 9900k on 4k along with 4080rtx + 32gb ram? Will i get a crippled performance compared to your 9800x3d?

I a Star Citizen Backer Thanks yee oh testing Lord , I so wanted the 9950x3d come with both chips with 3d cache I'll keep hoping for the 10950x3d lol

FACT: In this year 2025 the new nVidia GPUs (rtx 5090, 5080, 5070) will enable players to experience a smooth +60 fps gameplay. Till now many old and new players did not invest much money and time in Star Citizen because the game is not playable (low fps on "affordable" PC builds and many bugs everywhere). As far as I know, CIG should mainly focus on bug fixing in year 2025 (as they promised). Also this year more powerful and affordable GPUs (coming 2025) will make the game finally "playable" soon. Thus the game Star Citizen will not die because CIG will have many more active customers playing this game in 2025 and also investing more money into buying ships (because the game will finally become stable "playable" in 2025). After Q1-Q4 of the year 2025 CIG will raise MUCH more money that will help CIG finance the development of better gameplay/flight mechanics, build more star systems and produce more playable ships every following year. And with more content/starSystems/fixes the gameplay will be much more interesting for singlePlayer gameplay because more content/mechanics/starSystems will reduce the danger of griefer/pirate problems for the casual single player base (which is probably around 80% of total SC players). P.S. During CitizenCon2024Specs/FPS/prices of new 2025 GPUs were not clearly known, the priority of bugFixing for CIG in year 2025 was also not clear=> thus "unexpected low" funding for CIG during CitizenCon2024, also other reasons contributed to that (ship nerfing and cancelation of "AI crew" so much needed to be able to experience huge ships as a real "Kirk/Spock/StarWars captain" made the playerBase stop funding CIG). Everyone wants to sit in the captain's chair on a large ship, almost no normal player wants to be mainly an unimportant totally bored gunner/mechanic on all flights. Pirate org players could still have fun as gunners, but most players are casual single players that have no time/wish to play in an org. Without the main player base (casual single player makes around 80% of all SC players) wanting to buy large ships (to experience the flights as a real fleet captain/Kirk via "AI crew") the CIG funding is lower now. CIG must make "AI crew" a priority if the company wishes to survive in the long run. Feel free to write your comments if you do not see it this way. [Deleted by Nightrider-CIG] .

not weird at all, you can see in the scene that the fps isnt actually changing, problem solved

My buddy on 32GB keeps crashing around orbituary in pyro. All of us on 64 aren't crashing and that's the only major difference. I popped a r_displayinfo after he crashed last time and had 38GB of ram committed. The rest of the group who didn't crash had similar amounts committed when they checked. Not sure if there is a memory leak in 4.0 or what but it is definitely making a difference there.

Wasn't that to be expected? The B580 states that it needs resizable BAR to function normally and afaik the R5 2600 doesn't support it.

Its a relief to learn those that have beast computures still have the same issues as us average joes. My fps in those stations are 30

the game is RAM bandwith/latency bound, managed to get 95 fps on a 5700xt 5700x3d by optimising the ram. The game constantly does 18-20GBps bandwith on ram

10700k over clocked and I get max 30 on low 720. With a 4070S 32gb

I have a Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core, 32GB of ram, a Radeon RX7800XT 16GB GDDR6 and a NVMe disk(where i installed the game) my system was built by me with 1440p in mind and never had an issue with it, until SC, SC i tried everything and went down to 1080p (with no fancy software from AMD to natively run it at 1080p and then bring it up to 1440p) and still, that thing played like trash, obviously I'm not supposed to talk about the bugs because it's in "Alpha" (for 10years? and adding content aka new star systems?). Everyone that plays it has been kidnapped by the insane price tags and have to play it to justify spending that much on dogshit.

After getting barely 40fps on a city with 9800X3D I give up. Need to give the game even more time..

"aim for 30fps" - what is this console language?

I'm guessing this was on dx11.1. can you test on vulkan? We know that Intel graphics cards used dxvk after launch on the a770? to take care of similar issues at launch... Vulkan in SC has its own problems but I wanted to see if the situation is equal or worse than other vendors

minimum spec is the fastest ram bandwith with lowest latency possible

I would be happy if just a normal mission would work

12400 $100, 12600 $130. PCIe 3.0 won't work. Minimum is 10th gen on PCIe 4.0 and 11th gen that enables INTEL DTT that is needed to run APO. You would have to run higher tier 10th and 11th gen to have decent performance. That said in my opinion anything less than 12th gen is waste of money. AMD you shouldn't even try as the mid tier won't work. As pointed INTEL ARC needs REBAR/E Cores and more from the CPU. These are not optimized on AMD CPU because AMD/Nvidia GPU's won't need it. INTEL ARC is build for INTEL CPU's. 12th, 13th, 14th and Arrow Lake. PCIe 4.0 x8 eliminates PCIe 3.0. There just isn't enough bandwidth on PCIe 3.0 x8 as it also would be cut half from x16. I'm not sure why all this clickbait when INTEL showed the card with i9-14900 and everyone knows better the CPU better the ARC performs. I'm running i7-13700k with A770 and i5-12600 with B580. Both are pretty good and I'm running 4k/1440p/3x1080p.

I don't get the hype around Intel B580, like it's a saviour or something, the other youtubers praise it too much for being the best LOWEST tier gpu, so what? it's slightly above a 4060 just slightly...

Why don't you test the Intel GPU with an Intel CPU?

Base building with out shields, will be a disaster.

Thanks for being only the 3rd channel to ever care about this. Only Hardware Canucks and Hardware Unboxed tested it so far.

I wonder what is the GPU utilization for both cards, this would be a good clue to see if Intel has some head room left with some drivers support

Excellent work. I'd hoped for more with Battlemage.

Cope

The real question is... is the 7600X3D good enough of a CPU for B580? 'cause that's the only CPU that completely makes sense with B580 price-wise

using SC as a game to test technology is crazy, but testing technology in SC to see how the game handles is understandable

I have a 7900x CPU and a 7900xt dual stick 48 gb (96gb) ram at 5000htz a proArt 850b what should I tune my ram? is it a good system to stream or record? thank you for all your support

Actually called that driver overhead on day-one. But the comments were slept on.

awesome, as a starcitizen 5800X3d enjoyer this is neat. Learned that my CPU is prob bottlenecking my 3090 ! Thank you!

Yeah. 😮 Bummer. Star Citizen isn't really good for any low end systems 😢 it's not perfect for high end systems 😕 but every other game runs like butter 😊

U, let's see !!!! I was hoping you'll get your hands on one and test it. After video: Interesting. Seems like Intel still needs a lot of optimization on the software side. However a new idea: compare the B580, 3060 and 6600XT in a FPS/price chart? I mean... Radeon 6600 + Ryzen 7800X3D, 1080p => Max 42.2 FPS and on Amazon it is listed for 205 GBP ( I know it is not 5800X3D, but you've tested this card once only and with that CPU :-D ) RTX 3060 + Ryzen 5800X3D , 1080p => Max 38 FPS and on Amazon it is listed for 255 GBP Intel B580 + Ryzen 5800X3D, 1080p => Max 35 FPS and on Amazon it is listed for 318 GBP This means the FPS/GBP race is won my AMD and the Radeon 6600 (tho I recommend a 6650XT for almost the exact same price, but you've not tested that one yet) - AMD: 4,8 GBP / frame - NVidia: 6,7 GBP / frame - Intel: 8,3 GBP / frame Either I've done something wrong here or the Intel card is way more overpriced than the others. And I've not even considered you can try to make a bargain on ebay for used card as well, so..... AMD Wins? I guess?

❤️❤️👀👀❤️❤️

A more stable 4.0.1 patch plus testing this 'An upcoming NVIDIA App update will support DLSS Overrides, allowing you to choose the new Transformer SR Model, set FG mode, and you can even set DLAA for games that do not have native support 👍' = possible best 1042 video of 2025 :)

is this all still up to date?

Just putting this out there, but I play Star Citizen on a i5 12900k, ASUS RTX3080, and 32gb of Corsair Ram. My CPU runs the game very fluidly, easily 60 fps or more.

Will playing at 4K make any difference on ram usage? Sadly all the examples in the video is all for 1080p and there was no mention it does not make any difference for 1080p vs 4k.

3 pc upgrades in the last decade and none of them can run this. I’m not building anything with Star Citizen consideration until release.

bought this game after covid friends convinced me it was "better then it use to be". ran around a buggy station where nothing worked right. saw people talking to a dev and ran up and said i want my money back. he logged off lol. i played this game for less then 5 hours and i regret every dollar i spent on it.

Can someone test it in 4.0? I would be interested for a friend

I think Ill get the 9700x, it performs well enough close to 7800x3d for half the price when memory is tuned

I have a really old set up r71800x 16gb ram and 1660 super 6gb. I went from 25/30 fps to 60/90 depending on the settings this is honestly unreal how good it is

Does this game have its own frame gen yet or do i have to use lossless scaling?

I'm so lost with this it's disc space that's killing me it's not got space since 4.0 . Does anyone know wether it's worth getting more disc space or new tower The external I bought doesn't like SC . Gutted this was my moral too.