ROUND 2:

[@walaknon]

Wallahi brothers, im from Malaysia 🇲🇾 and this is the most beneficial ilmiah Channel I’ve ever subscribed. Thank you Alhamdulillah

[@4lsteppa647]

What does the vid talk about?

[@mahad4866]

@@4lsteppa647 why you asking. Watch it yourself

[@raisurrahman7519]

Absolutely true brother.. from india. This channel has academic level contents in english language, which is like no other in my knowledge. May Allah bless these brothers

[@4lsteppa647]

@@mahad4866 I said just asking cause I’m looking for something and I’m pretty sure this vid is about it but I want to make sure I don’t want to sit here and listen to this for 2hours and it’s not what I’m looking for

[@perilouslambasting6816]

@@4lsteppa647 it's about the names and attributes of Allah, how to affirm them, how the ashaa'ira distort them or chamge/ignore their meanings and the refutation of them in that regard. Rough summary akhi

[@UmmSh]

More serious Aqeedah talks like these plssss. So beneficial Allahuma barik! May Allah increase us in beneficial knowledge 🤲🏾

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Yes we need to organize and teach this info!

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

1st Imam Ashari repented & became close to Athari writing al Ibana before death! Salafis I know, say we don't liken Allah to his creation & affirm his Attributes as in Quran 42 :11 & 7 :180 - affirming Allah's attributes without likening. Allah is All Hearing & Seeing, & also we hear & see - so based on Khulab/"Ashari" logic Allah can't Hear or See! Aw'uthubillah! Ahlul Sunni, here I mean, Islam or salafis teach 3 categories of Tawhid/Oneness. 1. Tawhid Rububiyah - Allah's Lordship or His actions as Creator etc. (Quran 1 :2) 2. Tawhid Ulluhiyah - Allah's Oneness in Godhood or being served as He taught (Quran 6 :162 & 163). 3. Tawhid Asma wa Saffat - Names and Attributes of Allah understood properly... Category 3 has 4 sub pillars to understand Allah's (Tawhid in) Names & Attributes: A) No Tatil or denial - Quran 7 :180. - Affirm Allah's perfect attributes! B) No Tamthil or likening, - Quran 42 -11. - Affirm without likening. C) No Takyif or questioning the how of the unseen - Quran 17 :36. D) No Tahrif or distorting w/o evidence - Quran 7 :33. (Hence directing implying any Tawil is Tawqif/Text based, Quran 3 :7) Some of us believe tahrif may involve tatil as well of the apparent meaning. >>> Clarifications on our view: A) Salafis don't say Attributes of Allah mean an appendage of limb/body... Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: It is well-known that there is no report from any of the Prophets or from the Sahaabah or from the Taabi‘een or from any of the early generations of the ummah to suggest that Allah is a physical entity or that He is not a physical entity. Rather denying or affirming that is an innovation according to Islam. End quote. - Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (5/434). I propose - They, Khulab/Asharis should be nuetral like Ibn Tamiyyah and say we don't say about Allah what isn't revealed & we don't know and affirm what Allah says, following Quran 7 :33 or they open endless shirk & division! We affirm what Allah affirm and nuetral on what Allah hasn't mentioned! Khulab Asharis don't affirm what Allah has affirmed and affirm what Allah hasn't mentioned! - this is enough to show their error! For Khulab Asharis to differentiate attributes all of which Allah said to confirm, shows they are following someone other then Allah showing error! Usually greek philosophers who say bodies are temporary so Khulab Asharis use this logic & say therefore imply foreign logic is here = to Islam & this is wrong, we seek refuge from that! B) Re: "directions" - We say what Islam teaches & don't add or subtract out of humbleness as there is nothing like Allah. Allah's High above the Arsh is a sign of Tawhid taught to the Muslim slave & even firaun in Sura 28 & 40... Direct Evidence Allah is above His Arsh in the Farewell Sermon, Abu Bakr, Abu Hanifa etc. 1. ... I have left among you the Book of Allah, and if you hold fast to it, you would never go astray. And you would be asked about me (on the Day of Resurrection), what would you say? They (the audience) said: We will bear witness that you have conveyed (the message), discharged (the ministry of Prophethood) and given wise (sincere) counsel. He (the narrator Jafar bin Muhammad) said: He (the Blessed Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him) then raised his forefinger towards the sky and pointing it at the people (said):" O Allah, be witness. 0 Allah, be witness," saying it thrice. (Bilal then) pronounced Adhan and later... source : Sahih Muslim 1218 a - book of hajj/pilgrimage. 2. Aqida Tahawiya on Allah above the Throne (الْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ) وَالْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ حَقٌّ - The Throne (al-‘arsh) and the Footstool (al-kursī) are true. وَهُوَ مُسْتَغْنٍ عَنِ الْعَرْشِ وَمَا دُونَهُ - He is independent of the Throne and whatever is beneath it. مُحِيطٌ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَفَوْقَهُ وَقَدْ أَعْجَزَ عَنِ الْإِحَاطَةِ خَلْقَهُ - He encompasses all things and He is above it, and what He has created is incapable of encompassing Him. Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him said I am the most blessed salaf for you - Sahihayn! Salafi Dawa is the path to the Sunna, Quran 9 :100... (Manhaj of Sahabas, 4 mathhabs, etc.) >>>

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Point 2 : Salafis reject Khulab Ashari view of rejecting the description of Allah & jahmiyah reject Allah's description of Himself & at times also try to redefine it going into another error of tahrif or speaking about Allah without knowledge or Quran 7 :33. For examples Ashari say Allah's Hands means power violating Quran 7 :33. But Allah says He has 2 hands. does this mean He has 2 powers? In Hadiths Allah created 3 things with His Hands, Jannah's plantings, Adam and the Torah. So how about the rest of the world created by His power, see Quran 65 :12? So the Ashari view contradicts Islam's teachings, but even before that the error they made is that they are not humble and accepting to Allah's words as he taught... Also see this example... When Allah asked satan why don't you prostrate to who I created with My Own Hands in Surah 38 :75? If Hands meant power satan could of said you made with with Your Hands as well oh Allah... >>> In Summary : With regards to Allah's Attributes (Hands in Quran 5 :64 or Face in Quran 75 :22, or Shin in Quran 68, or Eyes in Quran 54 etc.) Salafis - Affirm (no tatil), without likening (tamthil) leaving takyif/modality... for someone to say affirming the meaning of Allah's words is tamthil is accusing Allah of tamthil, and we seek refuge with Allah from that! To change the meaning of something from the unseen needs evidence from text as only Allah reveals the unseen as He wishes (Quran 6 :50 etc.) As the hadiths say Allah made us in His Image in His will, not the other way around. Asharis type 1 (tahrif) - do tatil and tahrif/tawil (violating Quran 7 :33), denying the apparent and say about Allah what they don't know or... for them to even imply they can do ijtihad is to violate not doing takyif (Quran 17 :36) & only agreeing with Salafis on not likening Allah. Ashari type 2 (tafwid) - do tatil (violating Quran 7 :180) of the meaning but agree with the salafis on not likening or rejecting tamthil and tawil or leaving the takyif/modality! sometimes they say we deny outward meaning for another outward meaning but leave the kayf to Allah, thats a contradiction unless you want to either agree with salafis on outward meaning or ... say their is a secret meaning tahrif violating Quran 7 :33 & Quran 5 :3 that Islam is complete, as Islam is a clear and open religion, showing you open up doors to make up lies on Islam limitlessly and this is the danger of the khulab Ashari bida!

[@clarkstonga]

The previous Ethiopian government tried to enforce upon us Ashari\Alhabash sect for over 10 years but Allah destroyed them! May Allah protects our ummah from such calamity!

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Alhamdulilah... Salafi dawa, dawa Sahabas RAdiyallahu anhum, May Allah guide us to spread it! Jahmi Ashari tahrif is like the christian trinity in that it came like 300 years later and mawlid is like she'a christmas, centuries later!

[@abdiwahaabnoor5949]

Really?

[@abdiwahaabnoor5949]

May Allaah keep you strong brother. Have patience for the help of Allaah is near.

[@SIGSEGV1337]

@Ismail Kasam If they don't rule by the sharia they aren't a Muslim government

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

@@SIGSEGV1337 They aren't an Islamic govt but might be Muslim govt if they establish prayer/athan, as that is what Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him waited for before entering Khaybar.

[@alphatoure3954]

جزاك الله خير جذا you and Abu mussab wajdi are doing a great for the ummah may Allah bless you all

[@MohammedAlSharif2002]

Oooooh yes I definitely wanted a second one!

[@MohammedAlSharif2002]

@Kafil Haling he did a previous video about the Ash’aris

[@mumin9436]

Do you know the recitation at the beginning of the video?

[@mumin9436]

@Kafil Haling do u know? If anyone knows help me out

[@usmanbinabdurrasheed5949]

@@mumin9436 ﴿وَإِن تَعجَب فَعَجَبٌ قَولُهُم أَإِذا كُنّا تُرابًا أَإِنّا لَفي خَلقٍ جَديدٍ أُولئِكَ الَّذينَ كَفَروا بِرَبِّهِم وَأُولئِكَ الأَغلالُ في أَعناقِهِم وَأُولئِكَ أَصحابُ النّارِ هُم فيها خالِدونَ﴾ [Ar-Ra'd: 5]

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

1st Imam Ashari repented & became close to Athari writing al Ibana before death! Salafis I know, say we don't liken Allah to his creation & affirm his Attributes as in Quran 42 :11 & 7 :180 - affirming Allah's attributes without likening. Allah is All Hearing & Seeing, & also we hear & see - so based on Khulab/"Ashari" logic Allah can't Hear or See! Aw'uthubillah! Ahlul Sunni, here I mean, Islam or salafis teach 3 categories of Tawhid/Oneness. 1. Tawhid Rububiyah - Allah's Lordship or His actions as Creator etc. (Quran 1 :2) 2. Tawhid Ulluhiyah - Allah's Oneness in Godhood or being served as He taught (Quran 6 :162 & 163). 3. Tawhid Asma wa Saffat - Names and Attributes of Allah understood properly... Category 3 has 4 sub pillars to understand Allah's (Tawhid in) Names & Attributes: A) No Tatil or denial - Quran 7 :180. - Affirm Allah's perfect attributes! B) No Tamthil or likening, - Quran 42 -11. - Affirm without likening. C) No Takyif or questioning the how of the unseen - Quran 17 :36. D) No Tahrif or distorting w/o evidence - Quran 7 :33. (Hence directing implying any Tawil is Tawqif/Text based, Quran 3 :7) Some of us believe tahrif may involve tatil as well of the apparent meaning. >>> Clarifications on our view: A) Salafis don't say Attributes of Allah mean an appendage of limb/body... Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: It is well-known that there is no report from any of the Prophets or from the Sahaabah or from the Taabi‘een or from any of the early generations of the ummah to suggest that Allah is a physical entity or that He is not a physical entity. Rather denying or affirming that is an innovation according to Islam. End quote. - Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (5/434). I propose - They, Khulab/Asharis should be nuetral like Ibn Tamiyyah and say we don't say about Allah what isn't revealed & we don't know and affirm what Allah says, following Quran 7 :33 or they open endless shirk & division! We affirm what Allah affirm and nuetral on what Allah hasn't mentioned! Khulab Asharis don't affirm what Allah has affirmed and affirm what Allah hasn't mentioned! - this is enough to show their error! For Khulab Asharis to differentiate attributes all of which Allah said to confirm, shows they are following someone other then Allah showing error! Usually greek philosophers who say bodies are temporary so Khulab Asharis use this logic & say therefore imply foreign logic is here = to Islam & this is wrong, we seek refuge from that! B) Re: "directions" - We say what Islam teaches & don't add or subtract out of humbleness as there is nothing like Allah. Allah's High above the Arsh is a sign of Tawhid taught to the Muslim slave & even firaun in Sura 28 & 40... Direct Evidence Allah is above His Arsh in the Farewell Sermon, Abu Bakr, Abu Hanifa etc. 1. ... I have left among you the Book of Allah, and if you hold fast to it, you would never go astray. And you would be asked about me (on the Day of Resurrection), what would you say? They (the audience) said: We will bear witness that you have conveyed (the message), discharged (the ministry of Prophethood) and given wise (sincere) counsel. He (the narrator Jafar bin Muhammad) said: He (the Blessed Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him) then raised his forefinger towards the sky and pointing it at the people (said):" O Allah, be witness. 0 Allah, be witness," saying it thrice. (Bilal then) pronounced Adhan and later... source : Sahih Muslim 1218 a - book of hajj/pilgrimage. 2. Aqida Tahawiya on Allah above the Throne (الْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ) وَالْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ حَقٌّ - The Throne (al-‘arsh) and the Footstool (al-kursī) are true. وَهُوَ مُسْتَغْنٍ عَنِ الْعَرْشِ وَمَا دُونَهُ - He is independent of the Throne and whatever is beneath it. مُحِيطٌ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَفَوْقَهُ وَقَدْ أَعْجَزَ عَنِ الْإِحَاطَةِ خَلْقَهُ - He encompasses all things and He is above it, and what He has created is incapable of encompassing Him. Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him said I am the most blessed salaf for you - Sahihayn! Salafi Dawa is the path to the Sunna, Quran 9 :100... (Manhaj of Sahabas, 4 mathhabs, etc.) >>>

[@Goodborni]

Subhanallah I am so grateful to Allah for finding this channel and your videos brother, may Allah increase you in good knowledge and reward you, you are giving us non arabic speakers, the much needed of knowledge in this time of shubuhat... Also a tip if you could translate everything said as on some matters I feel left out as a non arabic speaker Jakallahu khair

[@Autismcureforbianca4]

Masha Allah this guy brain is like a whole library , book store, computer. May Allah bless the Muslim who wants to study with this knowledge, wisdom and memory Ameen

[@Hasib588]

Ameen

[@Abdullah-vt7ct]

Bro these videos are addictive and beneficial at the same time. Jazakallahu Khairan Ustad

[@tasneemsakifibnealam949]

Appreciate these podcasts. One suggestion though: I know it can be hard to translate sometimes, but please use English translation more frequently. Jazak Allahu khair.

[@nimanfod]

And you have to make efforts to learn Arabic

[@clarkstonga]

What a beautiful discussion! Barakallahu feek ! The knowledge that comes out of ustadh Abdurahman is so full of knowledge that worthy of watching it multiple time to grasp the full knowledge! May Allah enrich you with more knowledge and gives us patience to learn from you!

[@Abdulla_K]

29 asrar rasheeds have disliked this video.

[@mohamudahmed6554]

@____ The debate happened between these two and it is clear who calls upon Allah alone and who calls upon other than Allah Subhanahu wa ta'ala.

[@lishaplayss]

@____ it was asrar rashid who claimed asking the prophet sallahu alayhi waslam was permissable and failed misrably first went back and forth over the contract rules and then went around in circles applying hadiths to his claim. He made the claim and failed to justify it. It was so clear when asrar and co were silent when ARH said it like 3 times " that one side is calling to worship Allah alone while the other is calling to other than Allah......you bring what you want say what you want when they didnt argue that accusation it was clear who was on the haqq.

[@lishaplayss]

@____ Astagfirullah you have one foul attitude and you call yourselves ahlul sunnah while calling us "pagans, wahhabis, murtad" ahlul sunnah are the ones who follow the sunnah and worship Allah alone with the understanding of the salaf as saliheen which use dont do because you would rather follow your pirs and murshids instead. Your beloved asrar failed to understand that invoking is worship so when you invoke the dead that is an act of worship that is rejected and made shirk because you cant call out to the dead. Any way im not gonna engage with such an abusive person may Allah guide you ameen

[@DrJames_YT]

@____ none before the "wahhabis' said it was shirk to call upon the dead? 😭😭😭

[@DrJames_YT]

@Ibn Kamal Al-Hanbali الحمدلله I am with you brother, you should've payed attention and saw the quotation marks around wahhabis

[@thierrylagrin2859]

Jazak Allahu khair. MashAllah Loud and Clear! valuable and helpful podcast, May Allah safeguard us from Bidah. AMEEN

[@non_012]

Allahumma barak, Abdur Rahman Hassan is like a river amd treasure of knowledge of our times. May Allah Azzawajal preserve him.

[@AB-xx7hy]

Looking forward to this insha'Allah. Perhaps you could make another video addressing some of the angry comments that will no doubt appear soon.

[@AH23232]

Haha lol

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

1st Imam Ashari repented & became close to Athari writing al Ibana before death! Salafis I know, say we don't liken Allah to his creation & affirm his Attributes as in Quran 42 :11 & 7 :180 - affirming Allah's attributes without likening. Allah is All Hearing & Seeing, & also we hear & see - so based on Khulab/"Ashari" logic Allah can't Hear or See! Aw'uthubillah! Ahlul Sunni, here I mean, Islam or salafis teach 3 categories of Tawhid/Oneness. 1. Tawhid Rububiyah - Allah's Lordship or His actions as Creator etc. (Quran 1 :2) 2. Tawhid Ulluhiyah - Allah's Oneness in Godhood or being served as He taught (Quran 6 :162 & 163). 3. Tawhid Asma wa Saffat - Names and Attributes of Allah understood properly... Category 3 has 4 sub pillars to understand Allah's (Tawhid in) Names & Attributes: A) No Tatil or denial - Quran 7 :180. - Affirm Allah's perfect attributes! B) No Tamthil or likening, - Quran 42 -11. - Affirm without likening. C) No Takyif or questioning the how of the unseen - Quran 17 :36. D) No Tahrif or distorting w/o evidence - Quran 7 :33. (Hence directing implying any Tawil is Tawqif/Text based, Quran 3 :7) Some of us believe tahrif may involve tatil as well of the apparent meaning. >>> Clarifications on our view: A) Salafis don't say Attributes of Allah mean an appendage of limb/body... Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: It is well-known that there is no report from any of the Prophets or from the Sahaabah or from the Taabi‘een or from any of the early generations of the ummah to suggest that Allah is a physical entity or that He is not a physical entity. Rather denying or affirming that is an innovation according to Islam. End quote. - Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (5/434). I propose - They, Khulab/Asharis should be nuetral like Ibn Tamiyyah and say we don't say about Allah what isn't revealed & we don't know and affirm what Allah says, following Quran 7 :33 or they open endless shirk & division! We affirm what Allah affirm and nuetral on what Allah hasn't mentioned! Khulab Asharis don't affirm what Allah has affirmed and affirm what Allah hasn't mentioned! - this is enough to show their error! For Khulab Asharis to differentiate attributes all of which Allah said to confirm, shows they are following someone other then Allah showing error! Usually greek philosophers who say bodies are temporary so Khulab Asharis use this logic & say therefore imply foreign logic is here = to Islam & this is wrong, we seek refuge from that! B) Re: "directions" - We say what Islam teaches & don't add or subtract out of humbleness as there is nothing like Allah. Allah's High above the Arsh is a sign of Tawhid taught to the Muslim slave & even firaun in Sura 28 & 40... Direct Evidence Allah is above His Arsh in the Farewell Sermon, Abu Bakr, Abu Hanifa etc. 1. ... I have left among you the Book of Allah, and if you hold fast to it, you would never go astray. And you would be asked about me (on the Day of Resurrection), what would you say? They (the audience) said: We will bear witness that you have conveyed (the message), discharged (the ministry of Prophethood) and given wise (sincere) counsel. He (the narrator Jafar bin Muhammad) said: *He (the Blessed Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him) then raised his forefinger towards the sky and pointing it at the people (said):" O Allah, be witness. 0 Allah, be witness," saying it thrice.* (Bilal then) pronounced Adhan and later... source : Sahih Muslim 1218 a - book of hajj/pilgrimage. 2. Aqida Tahawiya on Allah above the Throne (الْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ) وَالْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ حَقٌّ - The Throne (al-‘arsh) and the Footstool (al-kursī) are true. وَهُوَ مُسْتَغْنٍ عَنِ الْعَرْشِ وَمَا دُونَهُ - He is independent of the Throne and whatever is beneath it. مُحِيطٌ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَفَوْقَهُ وَقَدْ أَعْجَزَ عَنِ الْإِحَاطَةِ خَلْقَهُ - He encompasses all things and He is above it, and what He has created is incapable of encompassing Him. Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him said I am the most blessed salaf for you - Sahihayn! Salafi Dawa is the path to the Sunna, Quran 9 :100... (Manhaj of Sahabas, 4 mathhabs, etc.) >>>

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Point 2 : Salafis reject Khulab Ashari view of rejecting the description of Allah & jahmiyah reject Allah's description of Himself & at times also try to redefine it going into another error of tahrif or speaking about Allah without knowledge or Quran 7 :33. For examples Ashari say Allah's Hands means power violating Quran 7 :33. But Allah says He has 2 hands. does this mean He has 2 powers? In Hadiths Allah created 3 things with His Hands, Jannah's plantings, Adam and the Torah. So how about the rest of the world created by His power, see Quran 65 :12? So the Ashari view contradicts Islam's teachings, but even before that the error they made is that they are not humble and accepting to Allah's words as he taught... Also see this example... When Allah asked satan why don't you prostrate to who I created with My Own Hands in Surah 38 :75? If Hands meant power satan could of said you made with with Your Hands as well oh Allah... >>> In Summary : With regards to Allah's Attributes (Hands in Quran 5 :64 or Face in Quran 75 :22, or Shin in Quran 68, or Eyes in Quran 54 etc.) Salafis - Affirm (no tatil), without likening (tamthil) leaving takyif/modality... for someone to say affirming the meaning of Allah's words is tamthil is accusing Allah of tamthil, and we seek refuge with Allah from that! To change the meaning of something from the unseen needs evidence from text as only Allah reveals the unseen as He wishes (Quran 6 :50 etc.) As the hadiths say Allah made us in His Image in His will, not the other way around. Asharis type 1 (tahrif) - do tatil and tahrif/tawil (violating Quran 7 :33), denying the apparent and say about Allah what they don't know or... for them to even imply they can do ijtihad is to violate not doing takyif (Quran 17 :36) & only agreeing with Salafis on not likening Allah. Ashari type 2 (tafwid) - do tatil (violating Quran 7 :180) of the meaning but agree with the salafis on not likening or rejecting tamthil and tawil or leaving the takyif/modality! sometimes they say we deny outward meaning for another outward meaning but leave the kayf to Allah, thats a contradiction unless you want to either agree with salafis on outward meaning or ... say their is a secret meaning tahrif violating Quran 7 :33 & Quran 5 :3 that Islam is complete, as Islam is a clear and open religion, showing you open up doors to make up lies on Islam limitlessly and this is the danger of the khulab Ashari bida!

[@clarkstonga]

The lame blind followers doesn’t understand knowledge comes before statement and actions! May Allah guides us to the path of salafusalih!

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

@@clarkstonga Amin. these asharis sometimes remind me of how christians changed the din 300 years later.

[@Wakobear.]

May Allah distance us from Bidah May Allah make us firm upon the path of the salaf till death جزاك الله خيرا

[@hn1695]

@@zccau2316 the prophet is part of the salaf.

[@limitedquantitysufiyyahexp3913]

@@zccau2316 ya yakhi, we follow the Quran and the prophet SAW WITH the understanding of the salaf may Allah bless you

[@forgetfulstranger]

@@zccau2316 bro the salaf INCLUDES the Messenger ﷺ

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

1st Imam Ashari repented & became close to Athari writing al Ibana before death! Salafis I know, say we don't liken Allah to his creation & affirm his Attributes as in Quran 42 :11 & 7 :180 - affirming Allah's attributes without likening. Allah is All Hearing & Seeing, & also we hear & see - so based on Khulab/"Ashari" logic Allah can't Hear or See! Aw'uthubillah! Ahlul Sunni, here I mean, Islam or salafis teach 3 categories of Tawhid/Oneness. 1. Tawhid Rububiyah - Allah's Lordship or His actions as Creator etc. (Quran 1 :2) 2. Tawhid Ulluhiyah - Allah's Oneness in Godhood or being served as He taught (Quran 6 :162 & 163). 3. Tawhid Asma wa Saffat - Names and Attributes of Allah understood properly... Category 3 has 4 sub pillars to understand Allah's (Tawhid in) Names & Attributes: A) No Tatil or denial - Quran 7 :180. - Affirm Allah's perfect attributes! B) No Tamthil or likening, - Quran 42 -11. - Affirm without likening. C) No Takyif or questioning the how of the unseen - Quran 17 :36. D) No Tahrif or distorting w/o evidence - Quran 7 :33. (Hence directing implying any Tawil is Tawqif/Text based, Quran 3 :7) Some of us believe tahrif may involve tatil as well of the apparent meaning. >>> Clarifications on our view: A) Salafis don't say Attributes of Allah mean an appendage of limb/body... Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: It is well-known that there is no report from any of the Prophets or from the Sahaabah or from the Taabi‘een or from any of the early generations of the ummah to suggest that Allah is a physical entity or that He is not a physical entity. Rather denying or affirming that is an innovation according to Islam. End quote. - Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (5/434). I propose - They, Khulab/Asharis should be nuetral like Ibn Tamiyyah and say we don't say about Allah what isn't revealed & we don't know and affirm what Allah says, following Quran 7 :33 or they open endless shirk & division! We affirm what Allah affirm and nuetral on what Allah hasn't mentioned! Khulab Asharis don't affirm what Allah has affirmed and affirm what Allah hasn't mentioned! - this is enough to show their error! For Khulab Asharis to differentiate attributes all of which Allah said to confirm, shows they are following someone other then Allah showing error! Usually greek philosophers who say bodies are temporary so Khulab Asharis use this logic & say therefore imply foreign logic is here = to Islam & this is wrong, we seek refuge from that! B) Re: "directions" - We say what Islam teaches & don't add or subtract out of humbleness as there is nothing like Allah. Allah's High above the Arsh is a sign of Tawhid taught to the Muslim slave & even firaun in Sura 28 & 40... Direct Evidence Allah is above His Arsh in the Farewell Sermon, Abu Bakr, Abu Hanifa etc. 1. ... I have left among you the Book of Allah, and if you hold fast to it, you would never go astray. And you would be asked about me (on the Day of Resurrection), what would you say? They (the audience) said: We will bear witness that you have conveyed (the message), discharged (the ministry of Prophethood) and given wise (sincere) counsel. He (the narrator Jafar bin Muhammad) said: *He (the Blessed Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him) then raised his forefinger towards the sky and pointing it at the people (said):" O Allah, be witness. 0 Allah, be witness," saying it thrice.* (Bilal then) pronounced Adhan and later... source : Sahih Muslim 1218 a - book of hajj/pilgrimage. 2. Aqida Tahawiya on Allah above the Throne (الْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ) وَالْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ حَقٌّ - The Throne (al-‘arsh) and the Footstool (al-kursī) are true. وَهُوَ مُسْتَغْنٍ عَنِ الْعَرْشِ وَمَا دُونَهُ - He is independent of the Throne and whatever is beneath it. مُحِيطٌ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَفَوْقَهُ وَقَدْ أَعْجَزَ عَنِ الْإِحَاطَةِ خَلْقَهُ - He encompasses all things and He is above it, and what He has created is incapable of encompassing Him. Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him said I am the most blessed salaf for you - Sahihayn! Salafi Dawa is the path to the Sunna, Quran 9 :100... (Manhaj of Sahabas, 4 mathhabs, etc.) >>>

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Point 2 : Salafis reject Khulab Ashari view of rejecting the description of Allah & jahmiyah reject Allah's description of Himself & at times also try to redefine it going into another error of tahrif or speaking about Allah without knowledge or Quran 7 :33. For examples Ashari say Allah's Hands means power violating Quran 7 :33. But Allah says He has 2 hands. does this mean He has 2 powers? In Hadiths Allah created 3 things with His Hands, Jannah's plantings, Adam and the Torah. So how about the rest of the world created by His power, see Quran 65 :12? So the Ashari view contradicts Islam's teachings, but even before that the error they made is that they are not humble and accepting to Allah's words as he taught... Also see this example... When Allah asked satan why don't you prostrate to who I created with My Own Hands in Surah 38 :75? If Hands meant power satan could of said you made with with Your Hands as well oh Allah... >>> In Summary : With regards to Allah's Attributes (Hands in Quran 5 :64 or Face in Quran 75 :22, or Shin in Quran 68, or Eyes in Quran 54 etc.) Salafis - Affirm (no tatil), without likening (tamthil) leaving takyif/modality... for someone to say affirming the meaning of Allah's words is tamthil is accusing Allah of tamthil, and we seek refuge with Allah from that! To change the meaning of something from the unseen needs evidence from text as only Allah reveals the unseen as He wishes (Quran 6 :50 etc.) As the hadiths say Allah made us in His Image in His will, not the other way around. Asharis type 1 (tahrif) - do tatil and tahrif/tawil (violating Quran 7 :33), denying the apparent and say about Allah what they don't know or... for them to even imply they can do ijtihad is to violate not doing takyif (Quran 17 :36) & only agreeing with Salafis on not likening Allah. Ashari type 2 (tafwid) - do tatil (violating Quran 7 :180) of the meaning but agree with the salafis on not likening or rejecting tamthil and tawil or leaving the takyif/modality! sometimes they say we deny outward meaning for another outward meaning but leave the kayf to Allah, thats a contradiction unless you want to either agree with salafis on outward meaning or ... say their is a secret meaning tahrif violating Quran 7 :33 & Quran 5 :3 that Islam is complete, as Islam is a clear and open religion, showing you open up doors to make up lies on Islam limitlessly and this is the danger of the khulab Ashari bida!

[@soholchoudhury9380]

I find it very hard to understand how the Ashari claim, on the one hand, the need to take Mutawatir Daleel to establish Aqeedah, yet they take conjecture to interpret the Mutawatir Daleel. Subhannallah

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Masha Allah... very well put. They speak about Allah without knowledge using pagan philosophy, opening the door to speaking on the ghaib without knowledge which is how sufi bida on prophecies using the hadith of dreams out of context (Quran 5 :3 says legislation is finished so the only prophecy left is like in surah Yusef dream interpretation that can mean something else) opened up and that ghulu led to sufi grave worship shirk like the batini shi'as.

[@JannahVVIP]

Love from Malaysia. Always educating for haq, Fisabilillah. Alhamdulillah.

[@arcanumviator]

deserve much more viewers than void subjects

[@look4yourself650]

By the way guys, you can find the powerful qoute of Imām Tirmidhi under the Hadīth 662. If you cannot read Arabic, pick up the Darussalam translation in which they translated the statement of Imām Tirmidhi as well.

[@micoberss5579]

Can you quote it here?

[@look4yourself650]

@@micoberss5579 After mentioning the Hadīth [662], Imām Tirmidhī [rahimahullāh] says: "More than one of the people of knowledge have spoken about this Hadtīh, and the narrations that resemble it about the Attributes and the Descent of the Lord, Blessed and Most High, every night to the lowest Heaven. They said: "The narrations about these are affirmed and should be believed in without misinterpreting them nor saying 'how'." It has been reported like this from Mālik [bin Anas - Imām Mālik], Sufyãn bin 'Uyainah, 'Abdullãh bin al-Mubarak; they would say about these Ahadīth: They are conveyed without saying how. This is the view of the people of knowledge among Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā 'ah. As for the Jahmiyyah, they reject these narrations and they say that this is Tashbih. And in other places in His Book, Allah, Blessed and Most High is He, has mentioned the Hand, the Hearing, the Seeing, so the Jahmiyyah misinterpret these Ayãt and give them interpretations other than the interpretations of the people of knowledge. They say that Allah did not create Adam with His Hand, and they say the meaning of Hand is merely power. Ishāq bin Ibrahim [Isḥāq ibn Rāhwayh] said: At-Tashbih is only when one says 'Hand; like a hand or similar to a hand' or 'Hearing; like hearing or similar to hearing.' So when one says 'Hearing; like hearing or similar to hearing' then this is the Tashbih. As for when one says as Allah [Most High] said, Hand, Hearing, Seeing, and he does not say 'how' nor say 'similar to hearing' nor 'like hearing' then this is not Tashbih. It is merely as Allah, Blessed and Most High is He said: 'There is nothing like Him, and He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing.' (Ash-Shüra 42:11). [End qoute] Imām as-Sabūni [d. 449H] said in his book Aqeedah as-Salaf wa Ashābul Hadīth [page 4, (3/6 in Shamila)]: "We affirm what Allāh affirmed for Himself in His book or what the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ affirmed, without changing the words from their apparent meaning or denying it [Tahrīf, Ta’tīl] without saying „how“ they are [Takyīf] and without likening them to the creation [Tamthīl]." [End qoute] Imām al-Awzā’ī [d. 157H] narrates that Imām Makhūl [d. 112H] and Imām Zuhri [d. 124H] would say: „Believe in them as they have come.“ al-Asmā wa-Sifāt lil Bayhaqi [2/377, narration 954 with a Sahīh Isnād]. Imām Ibn Taymiyyah [d. 728H] expounds on these Āthār, of which the rough translation is as follows: „And their saying - may Allāh be pleased with them - that „one should believe in them as they have come" is a refutation of [Mu’tazilah] those that reject the Attributes of Allāh, and their saying: „without the „how““, is a refutation of the Mumassila [who liken Allāh to His creation]. Imām Zuhri and Imām Makhūl were the biggest scholars of the Tabi’īn in their time, whereas the other four [that were mentioned], were Imāms of the time of the Tabi’ut Tabi’īn… And the statement of Imām Mālik regarding: „Istiwā is known, but its „how“ is beyond our imagination, and believing it is obligatory“ is supported by the rest [of the Salaf], i.e.: Believe in them [i.e. the verses of the Qur’ān and the Ahadīth regarding the Attributes of Allāh] as they have come, without a „how“. They have denied the knowledge regarding the kayfiyyah [how] of the Attributes, but they have not denied the reality of the Attributes! If they had only believed in the words without ascribing meaning to them, they would not have said that „Istiwā is known, and the kayfiyyah is beyond our imagination.“, but they said: Believe in them as they have come, without ascribing a „how“ to them. And if the meaning of the words would have been unknown, then there would have been no need to deny knowledge of the „how“, rather the negation of the kayfiyyah is only necessary if you first affirm the Attribute! The one who rejects the Attributes that have been narrated has no need to say that he understands them without a „how“, because if one were to say: „Allāh is not over His Throne“, then he has no need to say „without a how“. If the Madhhab of the Salaf was a negation of the Attributes, then they would not have said that they are to be understood without a „how“. „ Majmū’ al-Fatāwa [5/40-41] So: The belief of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah concerning the Names and Attributes of Allāh is that we affirm all the Names and Attributes of Allāh that Allāh has affirmed for Himself or His Messenger ﷺ affirmed for Him, with their apparent meaning, without interpreting them away from their apparent meaning, nor changing the words or what they indicate, while negating any resemblance between the Names and Attributes of Allāh and the creation. We deny what Allāh ﷻ has denied for Himself or the Prophet ﷺ denied for Him, and in matters Allāh and His Messenger ﷺ were silent, we are silent. We believe that the texts that mention Allāhs Names and Attributes are Muhkam [clear] and not Mutashābih [unclear]. We do not speak about „how“ the Attributes of Allāh are, nor do we speculate regarding them. I hope this made the matter more clear, inshaaAllah.

[@micoberss5579]

I was looking for words of Tirmidhi in Arabic. I found it. Goods words to memorize. Inshaallah I will memorize them. Jazakallah khairan

[@look4yourself650]

@@micoberss5579 Wa iyyakum brother. May Allah aid you and bless you in your time, knowledge, health, family and wealth, Ameen.

[@micoberss5579]

@@look4yourself650 ameen bro. Same to you

[@jamworthy14]

Even talking about this is a bidah. No one has any right to say this is how Allah is and his essence..

[@HiTekNomaschenko]

Alhamdulilah Allah saved me from Ashariyyah

[@abdallaomar4673]

May Allah give you highest ranks of janah ustadh and increase you in knowledge . In summary the ustadh is saying understand quran and sunnah according understanding of salaf. And someone else is defending and saying lets Aristotle and Plato (peoplewho are so confused that each one of the philosophers go against their teacher how can we take our understanding from crazy people.) .please don't defending the misguidance and distortion of names of Allah.

[@KhalidGreen]

بارك الله في جهودكم

[@hasan2k3]

masha'Allaah... an actual discussion/podcast where you discuss real issues, can learn and benefit... very good video... my only advice would be to have more frequent shots of the speaker and host (front camera shots) just to keep the listener/viewer more engaged in the discussion and so they dont become distracted/bored/switch off... not only that you feel more engaged in the conversation as if you were there... keeps the brain awake viewing more shots and not just one side shot... and Allaah knows best... just advice to allow people to keep engaged and digest the khair/good barakallahufeek/May Allaah bless you

[@oemadam]

No I dont agree with that. Like this one can focus on the words spoken not on the face.. and woman are not supposed to stare at man which happens online, so I am pleased with this way and may Allah accept their dawah.

[@Hadef_11]

جزاك الله خيرًا على المحتوى المثري والله يهدينا ويهدي الجميع

[@arcanumviator]

Was looking forward to watching this. Mashallah barakallah fiyk

[@yassinhassan336]

What a masterclass from ustadh Abdulrahman, allahuma barik.

[@iunais8324]

قَالَ الترمذي في شرح حديث {إِنَّ اللَّهَ يَقْبَلُ الصَّدَقَةَ وَيَأْخُذُهَا بِيَمِينِهِ}: هَذَا حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ وَقَدْ قَالَ غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ فِي هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ وَمَا يُشْبِهُ هَذَا مِنَ الرِّوَايَاتِ مِنَ الصِّفَاتِ وَنُزُولِ الرَّبِّ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى كُلَّ لَيْلَةٍ إِلَى السَّمَاءِ الدُّنْيَا قَالُوا قَدْ تَثْبُتُ الرِّوَايَاتُ فِي هَذَا وَيُؤْمَنُ بِهَا وَلاَ يُتَوَهَّمُ وَلاَ يُقَالُ كَيْفَ هَكَذَا رُوِيَ عَنْ مَالِكٍ وَسُفْيَانَ بْنِ عُيَيْنَةَ وَعَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ الْمُبَارَكِ أَنَّهُمْ قَالُوا فِي هَذِهِ الأَحَادِيثِ أَمِرُّوهَا بِلاَ كَيْفٍ. وَهَكَذَا قَوْلُ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ مِنْ أَهْلِ السُّنَّةِ وَالْجَمَاعَةِ. وَأَمَّا الْجَهْمِيَّةُ فَأَنْكَرَتْ هَذِهِ الرِّوَايَاتِ وَقَالُوا هَذَا تَشْبِيهٌ. وَقَدْ ذَكَرَ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فِي غَيْرِ مَوْضِعٍ مِنْ كِتَابِهِ الْيَدَ وَالسَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ فَتَأَوَّلَتِ الْجَهْمِيَّةُ هَذِهِ الآيَاتِ فَفَسَّرُوهَا عَلَى غَيْرِ مَا فَسَّرَ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ وَقَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَمْ يَخْلُقْ آدَمَ بِيَدِهِ. وَقَالُوا إِنَّ مَعْنَى الْيَدِ هَاهُنَا الْقُوَّةُ. وَقَالَ إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ: إِنَّمَا يَكُونُ التَّشْبِيهُ إِذَا قَالَ يَدٌ كَيَدٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ يَدٍ أَوْ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ. فَإِذَا قَالَ: سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ فَهَذَا التَّشْبِيهُ وَأَمَّا إِذَا قَالَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى: يَدٌ وَسَمْعٌ وَبَصَرٌ وَلاَ يَقُولُ كَيْفَ وَلاَ يَقُولُ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ وَلاَ كَسَمْعٍ، فَهَذَا لاَ يَكُونُ تَشْبِيهًا وَهُوَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى فِي كِتَابِهِ: {لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِيرُ}. HR. At-Tirmidzi (662)

[@micoberss5579]

I was looking for this. Jazakallah khairan

[@donutman6239]

@@micoberss5579 Is there an English version?

[@micoberss5579]

@@donutman6239 there is. Search for Tirmidhi 664. Or 653.

[@donutman6239]

@@micoberss5579 Yes but I can only find the hadith, but not the Imam Tirmidhi’s explanation

[@micoberss5579]

@@donutman6239 At-Tirmidhī stated, “It has been stated by more than one scholar from the People of Knowledge about this narration and similar reports regarding the Attributes of Allah - and that our Lord, the Blessed and Most High, descends to the nearest heaven every night. So the scholars said: ‘Affirm these narrations, have faith in them, do not imagine them, nor ask how.’ The likes of this has been related from Mālik Ibn Anas (d. 179H), Sufyān ath-Thawrī (d. 161H), Sufyān Ibn ‘Uyainah and Abdullāh Ibn Al-Mubārak, who all said about such narrations, ‘Leave them as they are, without asking how.’ Such is the saying of the People of Knowledge from Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah. However, the Jahmiyyah oppose these narrations and say, ‘This is resemblance (tashbeeh)!’ However, Allah the Most High, has mentioned in various places in His Book, His Attribute of Hand, Hearing, and Seeing but the Jahmiyyah make false interpretations of these verses, explaining them in a way other than how they are explained by the People of Knowledge. They say, ‘Allah did not create Adam with His own Hand.’ They say that Hand means power. Ishāq Ibn Ibrāhīm Ar-Rāhūyah (d. 238H) said, ‘Resemblance is when it is said: ‘Hand like my hand, or similar to my hand.’ Or it is said, ‘Hearing like my Hearing, or similar to my hearing.’ Then this would be resemblance. But if what is being said is what Allah Himself has said, ‘Hand, Hearing and Seeing’ and it is not asked how, nor is it said, ‘Like my hearing or similar to my hearing.’ Then it is not resemblance. Allah, the Most Blessed and Most High, said in His Book, ‘There is none like Unto Him,and he is the all-Hearing,the all-Seeing.’” (See As-Sunan of At-Tirmidhī no. 662

[@aboeAimen]

mha sha Allah what a beautiful saying from that Sa7habi radija Allah 3anhum. the one about Asamad realy softens the heart. subhaan Allah.

[@form.of.dhikr2]

شروط تأويل- لفظ مشترك- واحد كلمة عنده كثير معاني. سبب لتأويل تستطيع أن تجب أسأل لأن أصل في الكلام الظاهر.

[@muktarmohamud506]

ROUND 2: another bangger

[@nawab_ask]

SubhanAllah.. amazing 👌

[@Western.war_edits]

BarakAllahu Feekum 🤍

[@RaihanShaheed]

It annoys me that the clock in the background doesn't work..

[@RaihanShaheed]

@Moin Uddin lol how are u finding my comments from different videos?😂

[@ferrysukarno]

بارك الله فيكم. May Allah Ta'ala reward you for this beneficial podcast. And may He give all of us guidance to the right path of the ahlus sawa'i sabeel.

[@ahmadsultan4374]

I love you for the sake of Allah ❤

[@alphatoure3954]

Will be very interesting to see you and Abu mussab wajdi together ؟؟؟

[@esaabdullah2762]

These people are still around, they run the masjid and lead the prayer in many masijid in the US. We ask Allah for safety

[@ghiffariaulia]

I think the audio needs to be sort of adjusted so that it sounds clearer and more amplified. I listen to several episodes in this channel and it benefits me. However, if i dont use my noice-cancelling headphones or am not in a silent circumstance, it kind of couldnt listen to it very well. Hope you take the advice.

[@Nvmnodvi]

it's seeming like a circular argument jumping between both asharia and salafi concepts

[@tdesantos]

Asalaamu Alykum, who is the reciter played at the start of the video? JazakAllahu Khairan

[@Dreamliner473]

The ustad himself

[@fjfaizaljamalfj]

Jazak Allah Khair for the beneficial lecture. Could you also please do a hot seat podcast about the deviance of deobandis and their off shoots? بارك الله فيك

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Hadith 73 sects, all in nar except one, sahabas due to their fiqh asked which is the saved, and it was said those who follow my sunna and sahabas. Asharis use foreign bias of kalam like Qadriya used foreign shirk of maJEWsi. Imam Malik said stay away from bida, the ppl who are not silent on what the sahaba are silent on regarding Allah's Siffat. Md ibn Abdullah ibn Hakim said Imam Shafi debated hafs al fard, & was in utter disappointed, Shafi said it's better to error then to do ilmul kalam and become a zindique. shafi said for a person to do all sins save shirk its better then to be trialed in kalam. Abu Yusef says Ilmul kalam leads to zandiqah. Isnad Ilmul Kalam : Labid ebn Asim* - > Talut -> Aban ebn Sam'an -> Jaad. Labid did sihr on Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him. All sects started by disbeliever, Qadriya started by Suson, She'uh started by ebn Saba. Kulabi - > Jahmiyah - > Labid Assam. 10 :30 - Bukhari in Khalq af al Abbad said, I was present Khalid ibn Abdillah al Qasri in Wasit in Eid Adha said Taqallah mina wa minkum, I will slaughter Jaad Dirham who denies Allah took Ibrahim as a Khalil/friend and Allah didn't speak to Musa, Allah is high above this. Yahya ebn Ayyub said Nuaym al Balkhi said a man of murrow was friend of Jahm Safwan, I recited a certain verse, Jahm said you are smarter then Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him, When he recited Quran 20 :5, Jahm said If I could rub out thhis verse I would do so, then I recited surah Qasas story of Musa...Jahm threw the Quran, So he dropped him. Many Kulabi imams like Razi said our efforts in kalam were in vain & confusion, just he said and she said in kalam... it doesn't bring understanding, Imam Shahabi said in his works there is corruption. May Allah forgive him as he d. on good path, ebn Hajr said in lisan al mizan said he gave a wasiya or tawbah Imam Dhahabi mentioned & this corrected his aqida! It was said Razi spoke like it was sihr! Kulabis confess to use ilmul kalam, they jsut try to justify it saying there is two ilmul kalam etc. Sunnis uses used ilmul Kalam to show internal contradictions but Kulabis use it apart of aqida. Is affirming Siffat Qabr Anthropomorphism? Kulabi. 1. Tatil a. Takyil - says Jannah, Nar etc, are myths. b. Tajyir - says tafwid, we don't know Allah's Siffat c. Tawil - Those who distort Allah's Siffat with interpretation 2. Ahl Tamthil 3. Ahlul Siwa wa sabil. 20 :30 - Ahl Tawil & Tafwid both deny (Tatil) apparent meaning of Allah's Siffat. Muawwil interpret another meaning after their tatil, while tafwid do tatil and say I don't know. Ahl Tamthil was clarified by Isac Rahaway, imam of Bukhari who suggested to Bukhari to compile his sahih, Tamthil is to say Allah's Siffat like Hand is like our hand! Ahl Siwa wa Sabil agree with Allah's Names & attributes in Quran w/o tatil & tamthil. In Aqida we don't take qiyas, only qiyas is only in fiqh. Brother won't use Mutakirin but salaf. Imam Ibn Abdul Bar said Ahl sunna agree to Affirm Allah's Siffat w/o a how but Jahmiya, Mutazilah and Cawarij say those who affirm Allah's Siffat are mutashabi. Imam Tirmidhi in Book of Zakat (Hadith 662), Allah accepts Sadaqah with His right Hand and nurtures it, says the Siffat like descent, Vision, Hearing and Hand are all authentic, we can't say how, this is way of Imam Malik, Sufyan Uyanah, Ibn Mubarak, go over the verses w/o how. The Jahmiya did tahrif other then tawil of people of ilm. They say Allah didn't create Adam with His Hand but His Power... 31 :00 - Imam Malik, Abdullah Mubarak, Sufyan Uyaynah accepted these Siffat. Jahmiyah say this is Tashbih due to the tashbih in their mind. They say Isitwa is Tashbih. Imam tirmidhi also mentions Ishac Ruwaidah. So Mufawwada is also refuted as Tirmidhi says Ahl Sunnah did tawil, and Ahl tahrif of Jahmiya Kulabis follow are rejected. if They say Istiwa means Istawla, did the Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him hiding it? 40 :00 - Why do Kulabis prefer to affirm some, like 7 attributes and not others? Hayat, Iradah, Qudra, Ilm, Sama wa Basra & Kalam. Quran 42 : 11 - ... Quran 76, Allah affirms hearing and seeing in creation! Who said Hand or Yad is a tool. If you affirm Ilm how about Hikma? Human Akl doesn't negate the Sifat Qabr even if you can't reach it on akl alone. Naql affirms the Siffat. 50 :30 - Allah uses the term Dabba in Surah Hajj. Dhabba can be an ant. If I ride a Dhabba, does it mean ant? No. context. Quran 68 isn't proof for Shin but it's known through hadith. Allah is with us... with knowledge, using the attribute present to do tawil. Tawil has conditions. Can it have more then one meaning? Why choose that meaning? What is text of it? Wa Jaa Rabik, is not authentically attributed to Imam Ahmad, Hanbal ibn Ishaq is in this chain but Dhahabi says he opposes the other known students of Imam Ahmad, he is strage, or shad. Khallal or Murudi of his sons don't narrate this. It is not sahih from Imam Malik that he said Allah's descent is Allah's command, there might be a man salih ebn Habib who is critiqued, Abdullah ebn Ahmad critisizes, and is called a liar. 1 :00 :00 - Imam Tirmidhi's said Ahl Ilm gave tafsir other than tafsir of Jahmiya shows tafwid is wrong as the verses of Allah's Siffat has Tafsir. Sufyan ibn Uayanah said just reciting these verses is the tafsir. (source?) without khayf or Mithlihi. Affirm the word & leave the how.

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

1 :10 :00 - Jahmiya say yad is there but it means kudra, ad they did play around with kalmalahu Musa... Bukhari has a hadith asking does Allah laugh? We won't be deprived of Mercy from a Lord Who laughs. So meaning is affirmed. In that time of the imam's Tirmishi mentioned was fitnah of jahmiyah not Mufawid but these hadiths do refute the Mufaid. Brother recites Quran 3 :7 - ... - Is this ayat clearly for Tafwid? Ok how about the 7 you affirm? ( You are like Qadriya affirming & rejecting Siffat based on another religion not Islam) 1 :20 :00 - Ebn Jariri's Tafsir is called Tawil. How can we use a contemporary word and use it in an ancient context. Why are Ashari's 7 not Mutashabi? In whole Quran there is no mutashabi Kalimat... or words. Alif Lam Miim are letters. Mutashabi is subjective (Nisbi not mudlock or unrestricted). Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him knew meaning of all words in Quran. Hadith ebn Umar created 4 with His Yad, and rest was created by Be. There is a difference between restricting something & affirming something. Abu Aaylia, ebn Abbas would sit him up and say ilm increases honor. Ikraima the mole of ebn Abbas, on aya meaning 2 hands... ebn Mulaika 117h. d, he was asked about Yad being one or two, he said 2. 1 :30 :00 - Sufyan Uyaynah said Rabiya ebn Abdur Rahman was asled how did Allah Istiwa, he said Istiwa is not majhul, ghayra Muqlun, Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him 's role is o coney! upon us is tasdiq. Sufyan Thawri said if Tafsir Mujahid comes that's enough. Quran 39 :67 - Walid ebn Musliman, Imam Ahmad was asked about Allah's speech having sound, we narrate the statements as they come & of course. Buhkari in Kalq af al Ibad... Ebn Abbas on Samad says it means Sayyid. Takes the tafwid people out. Ebn Qudama said leaving the meaning to Allah... he means meaning of jahmiyah. Ebn Qudama in Lumat Itiqad explains his belief in detail and has nothing to do with Kulabis Does Allah forget? Allah negates Forgetting in Quran 20 :52. So in Quran 23 when it says Allah will forget you today just as you forgot this day, it means Allah forgets or ignores them deliberately, not unintentionally. 1 :40 :00 - Quran 9 :67 shows the hypocrites forgotten Allah... so Allah forgets them... showing forgetting can also mean on purpose or ignoring. This isn't tawil but bringing it to it's haqiqat meaning in context. To say Yad means body is Tashbih, ithbat/affirming and tatil or negation is done with proofs. Quran says peace be upon the messengers. Some say Allah's speech isn't tied to Allah's will or His speech isn't eternal as He may stop so apart of Allah is created. Quran says Allah spoke to Musa... 1 :50 :00 - Kulabis want to prove Allah exists by always existing and used the wrong path. Siffat is Thatiyah, Fehliya & Both. Kulabis don't know Siffat Fehliya and say Allah's speech is eternal. Some characteristics shared by creation doesn't mean reaity is same, like khummer here isn't the same as Janna which does no harm. ( See Tafsir ibn Kathir Quran 2 :25) Kulabis use terms like prime mover... this is ambiguous misguidance, SAlaf just used the terms already known. Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him was sent to calrify quran. 2 :00 :00 - Allah being over His Throne is mentionedin Quran more than the Siffat Kulabis affirm. Salaf said 1k proofs Allah is over His Arsh. Do Kulabis relly understand things properly? Person was asked how do you know which one to affirm and not affirm? - quiet. We know Allah is above through positions of hands. Kulabis opened unlimited tawil leading people to atheism. When Allah created Adam he was honored and singled out as being made by Allah's Hand so its praiseworthy. There is majaz in Quran but it needs dalil. Quran says ponders over it, so how can it be figurative? Md said Ramadan Buuti, fodah are Kulabis, Azhar teaches it. Hasan Sakov was refuted by imam Albani, Abdul Fata ghufar, Kowthari are also kulabis. 2 :10 :00 - Kowtharis insulted Sahabas and the salaf just to stick to abu Hanifah. Hatim Awni water down Islam. Haqatullahi was refuted on Awni. Quran says there will always be a group of people on truth. Some of the kulabis will say and agree with their own bida when asked. Allah instructed us to know Him, Know Allah is all Hearing All Seeing, Know Allah is Ghafurul Halim, Know Allah is with with Muttaqin so have taqwa Know Allah is All Powerful All Wise. Know is a command. Tawil is where division began. Ibn Qaayim mentiosns this in his nooniyah. hadith 73 sects are those w/in ummah, so they are Muslims and will be in jahunnum temporarily. Choose the sunna and not be a fan of any imam as in qiyamat you will be alone. If the Kulabi imams repented then why don't you? We were created to know Allah in Quran 65 :12! Hadith Sahihayn, learning Allah's attributes leads to jannah!

[@humza9460]

Mad Ash'aris in the comments

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

and some of them want to learn others are actually madd...

[@salafiilm5958]

That outfit of Ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan looks nice! MAA'SHAA'ALLAH!

[@ansarad-deen2647]

Round 2? :O Top!

[@إبنبَطُّوطَة-ظ9ي]

Barakallah kheyran

[@bilaalal-maghreebi5899]

1:26:06 HEAVY Barakallaah Feek

[@abdurrahman_muwahid3053]

MaShaaAllah Allahumma Barik

[@hamzafarah4417]

Here we go

[@nailfelagund7508]

Look at these Asharis seething in the comments 😂

[@dinakhattab6609]

Ashari aqeeda is taught in al-Azhar university today, I have close relatives who teach it there, May Allah keep us steadfast on the correct aqeeda 🤲 I need a pen and paper for this talk and the one before, it is actually very shocking, I didn't know their history and how they came about. I wonder if the ones teaching it in al-Azhar know all this?!

[@pingu.3712]

yes its filled with a lot of goofiness

[@nabeel8194]

Pardon the pun, but the hot seat podcast is 🔥

[@limitedquantitysufiyyahexp3913]

...

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

haha@@limitedquantitysufiyyahexp3913

[@jaywalker6464]

Can you use English too when you mention what some Imams said about something, not just the arabic. like in 2:12:12, i want really want to know what arrazy said.

[@haroondabbagh2869]

Is this a good principle to be safe by. “Only say about Allah what he says about himself “

[@سبحاناللهالحمدلله-ر4م]

What only Allah and his messenger said about Himself

[@visita9]

A drian “great sufi sheikh” I can’t take you serious any more after that sentence.

[@perilouslambasting6816]

@@Adrian-yf1zg it is well documented how the sufis have lied about sheikh abdul qaadir jeely rahimahullah and he was in fact from ahlus sunnah. And with regards to your statements about Abu ismail Al harawi, then there is more than one Abu ismail in history. But if it does happen to be that he was praised by ibn Al qayyim, you only need to look at the speech of ibn Al qayyim about the aqeedah of hululiyyah to know that he was opposed to it. Instead of bring any more dead arguments just admit it please, if you're one of the ones who say Allah is everywhere and in everything like "sheikh ul a'dham ibn arabiy" az zindeeq said then just come straight and don't hide it so we don't need to waste time on you.

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

@@Adrian-yf1zg considering Imam Bukari stated that who is an established preserver of sunna its accurate, Imam Ahmad traveled alot and was in prison (for saying Quran is not created - in case you want to be like kawarij fools and say he rebelled). Ghazali did retract didn't he, seems he has little aql if hes repped by you!

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

@Lamin muhammad Kuyateh Jazak Allahu Khayr i was raised in Ashari enviornment too and saw their corruptions.

[@saidrizki6328]

With regards to forgetteness forget mean ignore so the Ayat they forget Allah and Allah forgets them is literary mean they ignore the call of Allah and Allah ignored them because in Arabic nissyan does not mean all time forget but its also mean forget

[@carimaelfarrah7800]

Have a look at the Chechnya Conference, 200 scholars from around the world gather to discuss who are ahla sunna wa jamah.

[@waseemsajjad239]

MA SHA ALLAH bros

[@msulaiman21]

The claim that the Sahaabah (r.a.a.) understood the sifaat such as yad implicitly not to mean "hand", so it didn't need to be explained and thus narrated, completely ignores their duty after Rasoolullaah (s.a.w.s.) to communicate Islaam to communities that were not Arabic speakers, and so had absolutely no implicit understanding of yad (for example). As such, the claimed meaning of "not hand" and what the actual meaning was had to be taught explicitly in such words to such people. There is absolutely no narration demonstrating this from any student of any Sahaabi or any of the students of the students of a Sahaabi.

[@AzaK154]

Ibn Abdul Barr رحمه الله in al Tamhid with its own chain: قال الامام ابن عبد البر في التمهيد أخبرنا محمد بن عبدالملك قال حدثنا عبدالله بن يونس قال حدثنا بقي بن مخلد قال حدثنا بكار بن عبدالله القرشي قال حدثنا مهدي بن جعفر عن مالك بن أنس أنه سأله عن قول الله تعالى الرحمن على العرش استوى كيف استوى قال فأطرق مالك ثم قال استواؤه مجهول والفعل منه غير معقول والمسألة عن هذا بدعة. التمهيد الجزء 7 صفحة 151 In this narration Malik says: His Istawa’ is unkown. Ustad is this authentic from Malik رحمه الله .

[@ibnrashid]

According to I m getting It means we believe in it without any how. And Allah knows best.

[@abuhatimabdirahmanadani7799]

Are you Ashari?or مشكك? The way of Ashaaira is to shaadh narration to oppose what is established from the imam Imam Adhahabi said its authentic from malik that he said الاستواء معلوم. Secondly what imam ibn Abdulbar established and what his Aqiidah ? Also ibn Abdulbar mentioned so many narrations from Malik saying الاستواء معلوم or الاستواء غير مجهول which are same why you only picked this narration? Imam Abul hassan Alshari in his books like Alibaanah he says Allah above his throne and refutes Almu'tazilah May Allah guide me and you to the haq

[@AzaK154]

@@abuhatimabdirahmanadani7799 hold your horses brother, no one is ashari here... I knew all the narrations from Malik except this one, I just needed some clarification on its authenticity... that's all. Baarakallaah feek.

[@sukurkur]

Brothers Salam Aleikum Can somebody please provide the transcript We are teaching the content to students at our school

[@khoyrulislam]

1:08:36 أمروها كما جاءت

[@bashir675]

Love you brothers for the sake off Allah

[@mohammedbilal988]

Assalamualaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh I Hope you guys are in the Best Health and Iman. I am reading a book called qala’id al iqyan by imam BalBani which is a summarised book of ibn Hamdan’s book nihaytul mubtadeen fi usool deen, John sterling is the one who translated Qala’id al Iqyan into English. My question is that the tawheed of Allah is 1 he cannot be separated or broken up when you say Allah Has a hand but it’s not like the hand of creation you are adding something to Allah which can be attached or detached. So how do you explain this? JazakAllah khair May Allah reward you with the best of this life and the next. Ameen

[@abusaleh4387]

in 57:49 you said فتح الباري was the commentary of ibn rajab al-hanbali. correct me if i am wrong but i believe that is not correct. Fath is by ibn hajr.

[@Nomprenom9]

Ibn rajab rahimahullah has a book called fathul bari too

[@hakantekin7018]

Which books would the ustadh recommend? so that we too can learn & talk about this topic like himself may Allah bless him!

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Listen to Abu Uwais Aqidah WAsitiyah lectures!

[@turkishsalafi9819]

Al-Aqeedah al-Wasitiyyah, Al-Aqeedah al-Tahawiyyah, Usool as-Sunnah and many others.

[@karimdaghmash7853]

Wa alaykum asalam wa rahmatulahi wa barakatu

[@aliinowshed7967]

Ma shee Allah

[@albiboi123]

What was that course that the sheikh mentioned at the end where he said that he went into detail regarding the hadeeth about the 73 sects

[@jebrilabdulazeez]

Explaining that hadith in detail and perhaps categorizing the 73 groups

[@ummyousef230]

Where can I find the recitation at the beginning of the video?

[@donutman6239]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/q2ncZ3p_g55ojtE

[@abdullahishino123]

(هُوَ ٱلَّذِیۤ أَنزَلَ عَلَیۡكَ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبَ مِنۡهُ ءَایَـٰتࣱ مُّحۡكَمَـٰتٌ هُنَّ أُمُّ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبِ وَأُخَرُ مُتَشَـٰبِهَـٰتࣱۖ فَأَمَّا ٱلَّذِینَ فِی قُلُوبِهِمۡ زَیۡغࣱ فَیَتَّبِعُونَ مَا تَشَـٰبَهَ مِنۡهُ ٱبۡتِغَاۤءَ ٱلۡفِتۡنَةِ وَٱبۡتِغَاۤءَ تَأۡوِیلِهِۦۖ وَمَا یَعۡلَمُ تَأۡوِیلَهُۥۤ إِلَّا ٱللَّهُۗ وَٱلرَّ ٰ⁠سِخُونَ فِی ٱلۡعِلۡمِ یَقُولُونَ ءَامَنَّا بِهِۦ كُلࣱّ مِّنۡ عِندِ رَبِّنَاۗ وَمَا یَذَّكَّرُ إِلَّاۤ أُو۟لُوا۟ ٱلۡأَلۡبَـٰبِ) [سورة آل عمران 7] Now I know whom's following the shubuhaat.

[@liamegan171]

This is the aqeedah in Malaysia

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

1st Imam Ashari repented & became close to Athari writing al Ibana before death! Salafis I know, say we don't liken Allah to his creation & affirm his Attributes as in Quran 42 :11 & 7 :180 - affirming Allah's attributes without likening. Allah is All Hearing & Seeing, & also we hear & see - so based on Khulab/"Ashari" logic Allah can't Hear or See! Aw'uthubillah! Ahlul Sunni, here I mean, Islam or salafis teach 3 categories of Tawhid/Oneness. 1. Tawhid Rububiyah - Allah's Lordship or His actions as Creator etc. (Quran 1 :2) 2. Tawhid Ulluhiyah - Allah's Oneness in Godhood or being served as He taught (Quran 6 :162 & 163). 3. Tawhid Asma wa Saffat - Names and Attributes of Allah understood properly... Category 3 has 4 sub pillars to understand Allah's (Tawhid in) Names & Attributes: A) No Tatil or denial - Quran 7 :180. - Affirm Allah's perfect attributes! B) No Tamthil or likening, - Quran 42 -11. - Affirm without likening. C) No Takyif or questioning the how of the unseen - Quran 17 :36. D) No Tahrif or distorting w/o evidence - Quran 7 :33. (Hence directing implying any Tawil is Tawqif/Text based, Quran 3 :7) Some of us believe tahrif may involve tatil as well of the apparent meaning. >>> Clarifications on our view: A) Salafis don't say Attributes of Allah mean an appendage of limb/body... Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: It is well-known that there is no report from any of the Prophets or from the Sahaabah or from the Taabi‘een or from any of the early generations of the ummah to suggest that Allah is a physical entity or that He is not a physical entity. Rather denying or affirming that is an innovation according to Islam. End quote. - Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (5/434). I propose - They, Khulab/Asharis should be nuetral like Ibn Tamiyyah and say we don't say about Allah what isn't revealed & we don't know and affirm what Allah says, following Quran 7 :33 or they open endless shirk & division! We affirm what Allah affirm and nuetral on what Allah hasn't mentioned! Khulab Asharis don't affirm what Allah has affirmed and affirm what Allah hasn't mentioned! - this is enough to show their error! For Khulab Asharis to differentiate attributes all of which Allah said to confirm, shows they are following someone other then Allah showing error! Usually greek philosophers who say bodies are temporary so Khulab Asharis use this logic & say therefore imply foreign logic is here = to Islam & this is wrong, we seek refuge from that! B) Re: "directions" - We say what Islam teaches & don't add or subtract out of humbleness as there is nothing like Allah. Allah's High above the Arsh is a sign of Tawhid taught to the Muslim slave & even firaun in Sura 28 & 40... Direct Evidence Allah is above His Arsh in the Farewell Sermon, Abu Bakr, Abu Hanifa etc. 1. ... I have left among you the Book of Allah, and if you hold fast to it, you would never go astray. And you would be asked about me (on the Day of Resurrection), what would you say? They (the audience) said: We will bear witness that you have conveyed (the message), discharged (the ministry of Prophethood) and given wise (sincere) counsel. He (the narrator Jafar bin Muhammad) said: **He (the Blessed Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him) then raised his forefinger towards the sky and pointing it at the people (said):" O Allah, be witness. 0 Allah, be witness," saying it thrice.** (Bilal then) pronounced Adhan and later... source : Sahih Muslim 1218 a - book of hajj/pilgrimage. 2. Aqida Tahawiya on Allah above the Throne (الْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ) وَالْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ حَقٌّ - The Throne (al-‘arsh) and the Footstool (al-kursī) are true. وَهُوَ مُسْتَغْنٍ عَنِ الْعَرْشِ وَمَا دُونَهُ - He is independent of the Throne and whatever is beneath it. مُحِيطٌ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَفَوْقَهُ وَقَدْ أَعْجَزَ عَنِ الْإِحَاطَةِ خَلْقَهُ - He encompasses all things and *He is above it,* and what He has created is incapable of encompassing Him. Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him said I am the most blessed salaf for you - Sahihayn! Salafi Dawa is the path to the Sunna, Quran 9 :100... (Manhaj of Sahabas, 4 mathhabs, etc.) >>> Point 2 : Salafis reject Khulab Ashari view of rejecting the description of Allah & jahmiyah reject Allah's description of Himself & at times also try to redefine it going into another error of tahrif or speaking about Allah without knowledge or Quran 7 :33. For examples Ashari say Allah's Hands means power violating Quran 7 :33. But Allah says He has 2 hands. does this mean He has 2 powers? In Hadiths Allah created 3 things with His Hands, Jannah's plantings, Adam and the "Tablet" Torah. So how about the rest of the world created by His power, see Quran 65 :12? So the Ashari view contradicts Islam's teachings, but even before that the error they made is that they are not humble and accepting to Allah's words as He taught... Also see this example... When Allah asked satan why don't you prostrate to who I created with My Own Hands in Surah 38 :75? If Hands meant power satan could of said you made with with Your Hands as well oh Allah... >>> In Summary : With regards to Allah's Attributes (Hands in Quran 5 :64 or Face in Quran 75 :22, or Shin in Quran 68, or Eyes in Quran 54 etc.) Salafis - Affirm (no tatil), without likening (tamthil) leaving takyif/modality... for someone to say affirming the meaning of Allah's words is tamthil is accusing Allah of tamthil, and we seek refuge with Allah from that! To change the meaning of something from the unseen needs evidence from text as only Allah reveals the unseen as He wishes (Quran 6 :50 etc.) As the hadiths say Allah made us in His Image in His will, not the other way around. Asharis type 1 (tahrif) - do tatil and tahrif/tawil (violating Quran 7 :33), denying the apparent and say about Allah what they don't know or... for them to even imply they can do ijtihad is to violate not doing takyif (Quran 17 :36) & only agreeing with Salafis on not likening Allah. Ashari type 2 (tafwid) - do tatil (violating Quran 7 :180) of the meaning but agree with the salafis on not likening or rejecting tamthil and tawil or leaving the takyif/modality! sometimes they say we deny outward meaning for another outward meaning but leave the kayf to Allah, thats a contradiction unless you want to either agree with salafis on outward meaning or ... say their is a secret meaning tahrif violating Quran 7 :33 & Quran 5 :3 that Islam is complete, as Islam is a clear and open religion, showing you open up doors to make up lies on Islam limitlessly and this is the danger of the khulab Ashari bida!

[@ozone2126]

❤❤❤😊😊😊

[@imranmalik4012]

To say that the Ashari creed only take the intellect as a proof is false. Not only have they referred back to the Explicit verses of Al Qur'aan they also refer back to the sayings of the prophet ﷺ and the companions. It was reported by ^Imraan ibn Husayn as narrated in Sahih Al Bukhari vol 4 page 6 hadith 3191 that the Prophet ﷺ said: كَانَ اللَّهُ وَلَمْ يَكُنْ شَيْءٌ غَيْرُهُ Which means that Allaah existed eternally and there was nothing else Imam Abu Manṣūr al-Baghdadiyy narrated in his book Al-Farqu Baynal-Firaq that Imam ^Aliyy said كانَ الله وَلَا مَكَان وَهُوَ الْآنَ عَلَى مَا عَلَيْهِ كَانَ Which means Allah existed eternally and there was no place, and He now is as He was [without a place] The Asharis beleive that Allaah exists without place,direction,time or anything that was created (anything which exists other than Allaah) and that after creating the place that Allaah did not change as stated in the above texts. It is an intellectual necessity that Allaah exists and its an intellectual necessity that Allaah is not like the creation what so ever but they refer back to religious texts to prove this, they dont base their belief on just logic on its own. From this we know that Allaah is free from 'change' and that anything which changes from one state to another state is among the creation and they give textual proofs for this also from Al Qur'aan and Imams of the Salaf, Ahlus Sunnah believe that 'change' does not apply to Allaah and they have textual proofs, if some one believes that God existed without place but then God changed to being in a place (in one place or in every place,above or below) then theyre saying God has changed, where in the religious texts does it say God is attributed with change? Also to finish with: Al Imam At-Tahawiyy In his book Al ^Aqidah At-Tahawiyy (very famous book) says: وَمَنْ وَصَفَ اللهُ بِمَعْنَى مِنْ مَعَانِي الْبَشَرِ فَقَدْ كَفَر Which means 'who ever ascribes to Allah any attribute of the human is not a muslim' Imam Shafi^iyy said that the 'Mujassim is not a believer' (the one who ascribes to Allaah a body) which was documented in Al-Ashbaah Wan-Nadhaa'ir

[@awbennaibnghani2307]

The issue is language itself is problematic. By translating يد as hand, means that it has been interpreted whether you like it or not. Instead it should be left as يد i.e it shouldn’t be translated at all

[@awbennaibnghani2307]

If you take a look in any of the classical قواميس you will see يد has many meanings, not just hand

[@ihsanmahmood8789]

@Shafiullah Noory The literal meaning of "Yad" is a body part

[@turkishsalafi9819]

Imaam at-Tirmidhee(d. 279H )said in his Sunan (1/128-129 no. 662): وَقَدْ قَالَ غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ فِي هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ وَمَا يُشْبِهُ هَذَا مِنَ الرِّوَايَاتِ مِنَ الصِّفَاتِ وَنُزُولِ الرَّبِّ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى كُلَّ لَيْلَةٍ إِلَى السَّمَاءِ الدُّنْيَا قَالُوا قَدْ تَثْبُتُ الرِّوَايَاتُ فِي هَذَا وَيُؤْمَنُ بِهَا وَلاَ يُتَوَهَّمُ وَلاَ يُقَالُ كَيْفَ هَكَذَا رُوِيَ عَنْ مَالِكٍ وَسُفْيَانَ بْنِ عُيَيْنَةَ وَعَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ الْمُبَارَكِ أَنَّهُمْ قَالُوا فِي هَذِهِ الأَحَادِيثِ أَمِرُّوهَا بِلاَ كَيْفٍ. وَهَكَذَا قَوْلُ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ مِنْ أَهْلِ السُّنَّةِ وَالْجَمَاعَةِ. وَأَمَّا الْجَهْمِيَّةُ فَأَنْكَرَتْ هَذِهِ الرِّوَايَاتِ وَقَالُوا هَذَا تَشْبِيهٌ. وَقَدْ ذَكَرَ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فِي غَيْرِ مَوْضِعٍ مِنْ كِتَابِهِ الْيَدَ وَالسَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ فَتَأَوَّلَتِ الْجَهْمِيَّةُ هَذِهِ الآيَاتِ فَفَسَّرُوهَا عَلَى غَيْرِ مَا فَسَّرَ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ وَقَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَمْ يَخْلُقْ آدَمَ بِيَدِهِ. وَقَالُوا إِنَّ مَعْنَى الْيَدِ هَاهُنَا الْقُوَّةُ. وَقَالَ إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ إِنَّمَا يَكُونُ التَّشْبِيهُ إِذَا قَالَ يَدٌ كَيَدٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ يَدٍ أَوْ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ. فَإِذَا قَالَ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ فَهَذَا التَّشْبِيهُ وَأَمَّا إِذَا قَالَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى يَدٌ وَسَمْعٌ وَبَصَرٌ وَلاَ يَقُولُ كَيْفَ وَلاَ يَقُولُ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ وَلاَ كَسَمْعٍ فَهَذَا لاَ يَكُونُ تَشْبِيهًا وَهُوَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى فِي كِتَابِهِ: {لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِيرُ}. “It has been stated by more than one person from the People of Knowledge about this hadeeth and other similar narrations regarding the Attributes of Allaah; And our Lord, the Blessed and Most High, descending to the nearest heaven every night. So they said: ‘Affirm these narrations, have Eemaan (faith) in them, do not imagine them, nor ask how.’ The likes of this has been related from Maalik ibn Anas, Sufyaan ath-Thawree, Ibn Uyainah and Abdullaah Ibn al-Mubaarak, who all said about such narrations: ‘Leave them as they are, without asking how.’ Such is the saying of the People of Knowledge from Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Jamaa’ah. However, the Jahmiyyah oppose these narrations and say: ‘This is resemblance (tashbeeh)!’ However, Allaah the Most High, has mentioned in various places in His Book, the Attribute of al-Yad (Hand), as-Sama’ (Hearing), and al-Basr (Seeing) - but the Jahmiyyah make ta’weel (false interpretation) of these aayaat (verses), explaining them in a way other than how they are explained by the People of Knowledge. They say: ‘Indeed, Allaah did not create Aadam with His own Hand - they say that Hand means the Power’.”

[@Cj-cv5sl]

does any know if there's a full version of the intro ?

[@HaHa-cq4lr]

Try with surah rad abdurahman hassan

[@Naijiri.]

These podcasts are very interesting. Would be nice to have an Ashari on.

[@Moses-jo5ox]

Nah that’s going to be headache fam. Because they might start lying. And some people are really arrogant and can’t except the truths.

[@abdullahalam4929]

@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud Oh is it like when Ibn Taymiyyah Rh lied about ar-Razi Rh and said ar-Razi Rh apostated and participated in magic?

[@abdullahalam4929]

@@IbnJama-al-Jabarti I am not lying. Ibn Taymiyyah Rh legit accused ar-Razi Rh of apostasy and black magic. It’s in Bayan Tablis al-Jahmiyyah Volume 7 Page 53. How can it be slandering when Ibn Taymiyyah Rh himself wrote it in his own book? His statement is a lie too. There is no authentic report that points to ar-Razi Rh committing apostasy and black magic.

[@abdullahalam4929]

@@IbnJama-al-Jabarti Ah yes just like every Ash’aris or Maturidi, at the end of their life they magically repent and die. Bro no offense but some Atharis need to chill on the deathbed repentance thing. Apparently al-Asha’ri Rh repented at death, al-Ghazali Rh repented at death, ar-Razi Rh also repented at death etc.

[@abdullahalam4929]

@@IbnJama-al-Jabarti al-Ashari only repented once and that was when he left the Mu’tazilah. The only report that says al-Ash’ari repented before his death is by Ibn Taymiyyah. That report is weak to fabricated.

[@RijHetWijst]

49:00 “power” isn’t a jism , it is not a bodypart. How can you compare a hand (yad) with power (Qudra) and then act like you have refuted the Asharia...

[@gameoverability1876]

how did you manage to completly miss the point? lol. are you sure this topic is not too much over your head?

[@turkishsalafi9819]

Imaam at-Tirmidhee(d. 279H )said in his Sunan (1/128-129 no. 662): وَقَدْ قَالَ غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ فِي هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ وَمَا يُشْبِهُ هَذَا مِنَ الرِّوَايَاتِ مِنَ الصِّفَاتِ وَنُزُولِ الرَّبِّ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى كُلَّ لَيْلَةٍ إِلَى السَّمَاءِ الدُّنْيَا قَالُوا قَدْ تَثْبُتُ الرِّوَايَاتُ فِي هَذَا وَيُؤْمَنُ بِهَا وَلاَ يُتَوَهَّمُ وَلاَ يُقَالُ كَيْفَ هَكَذَا رُوِيَ عَنْ مَالِكٍ وَسُفْيَانَ بْنِ عُيَيْنَةَ وَعَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ الْمُبَارَكِ أَنَّهُمْ قَالُوا فِي هَذِهِ الأَحَادِيثِ أَمِرُّوهَا بِلاَ كَيْفٍ. وَهَكَذَا قَوْلُ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ مِنْ أَهْلِ السُّنَّةِ وَالْجَمَاعَةِ. وَأَمَّا الْجَهْمِيَّةُ فَأَنْكَرَتْ هَذِهِ الرِّوَايَاتِ وَقَالُوا هَذَا تَشْبِيهٌ. وَقَدْ ذَكَرَ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فِي غَيْرِ مَوْضِعٍ مِنْ كِتَابِهِ الْيَدَ وَالسَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ فَتَأَوَّلَتِ الْجَهْمِيَّةُ هَذِهِ الآيَاتِ فَفَسَّرُوهَا عَلَى غَيْرِ مَا فَسَّرَ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ وَقَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَمْ يَخْلُقْ آدَمَ بِيَدِهِ. وَقَالُوا إِنَّ مَعْنَى الْيَدِ هَاهُنَا الْقُوَّةُ. وَقَالَ إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ إِنَّمَا يَكُونُ التَّشْبِيهُ إِذَا قَالَ يَدٌ كَيَدٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ يَدٍ أَوْ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ. فَإِذَا قَالَ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ فَهَذَا التَّشْبِيهُ وَأَمَّا إِذَا قَالَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى يَدٌ وَسَمْعٌ وَبَصَرٌ وَلاَ يَقُولُ كَيْفَ وَلاَ يَقُولُ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ وَلاَ كَسَمْعٍ فَهَذَا لاَ يَكُونُ تَشْبِيهًا وَهُوَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى فِي كِتَابِهِ: {لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِيرُ}. “It has been stated by more than one person from the People of Knowledge about this hadeeth and other similar narrations regarding the Attributes of Allaah; And our Lord, the Blessed and Most High, descending to the nearest heaven every night. So they said: ‘Affirm these narrations, have Eemaan (faith) in them, do not imagine them, nor ask how.’ The likes of this has been related from Maalik ibn Anas, Sufyaan ath-Thawree, Ibn Uyainah and Abdullaah Ibn al-Mubaarak, who all said about such narrations: ‘Leave them as they are, without asking how.’ Such is the saying of the People of Knowledge from Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Jamaa’ah. However, the Jahmiyyah oppose these narrations and say: ‘This is resemblance (tashbeeh)!’ However, Allaah the Most High, has mentioned in various places in His Book, the Attribute of al-Yad (Hand), as-Sama’ (Hearing), and al-Basr (Seeing) - but the Jahmiyyah make ta’weel (false interpretation) of these aayaat (verses), explaining them in a way other than how they are explained by the People of Knowledge. They say: ‘Indeed, Allaah did not create Aadam with His own Hand - they say that Hand means the Power’.”

[@ismailmartinez9401]

Barakah'allah fiqhm

[@hamzahassan5282]

Can Ustadh bring back the tafsiir series?

[@hamzahassan5282]

@AMAU

[@Openmind2Openhearts]

What does تشبه نسبي/مطلق mean? 1:24:04

[@taufiqazhar2112]

where is the CC / subtitle :(

[@BarisTitanX]

I sincerely don't understand why he doesn't view them as kuffaar, even if mutlaqan. All that talk about them being Jahmiyyah (the Salaf unanimously agree that the Jahmiyyah are kuffaar) and many of their maqaalaat are kufr with the Salaf and the Khalaf such as (at the very least) believing the Qur'an is created, denying the sifaat of Allaah, denying Allah is above His Throne, those are three kufriyaat right off the bat. And go look at what the Ashaa'irah usually say about shirkiyaat like tawassul and istighaathah, like 90% of them will not view istighaathah with the Prophet as shirk and even do it themselves. They are usually Quboori's. Noone is saying takfeer al-mu'ayyan (yet), as for mutlaqan, definitely outside of the fold of Islam and thus NOT included in the hadith of the 73 firaq.

[@AbuAbdullahAlHanbali]

What? How is tawassul shirk lol 4 madhabs agree

[@baobaobao208]

@@AbuAbdullahAlHanbali there's weirdo tawassul and then there is the ahlul sunnah tawassul. I think he's talking about the weirdo tawassul

[@iman3622]

2:13:00 does this mean misunderstanding even in the aqeedah doesn't take one out of the fold of Islam? I think in the Kash as Shubuhat series by Tim bumble (day 4) it's mentioned that problematic aqeedah can put you in hellfire eternally.

[@MohamedAli-nf8cp]

Using Ilm al-Kalam is not always rejected. There are times where it is permissible to use, provided certain conditions are met. Even Ibn Taymiyyah learned and used Kalami arguments for legitimate purposes, such as defending the religion against heretics such as the Batiniyyah, and their likes. The Hanbalis, along with the majority of scholars allow Kalam, provided the Sunni methodology is followed. Al-Hajjawi (r) says: “The opposite of the Islamic sciences are those that are either disliked or impermissible. The impermissible is like Ilm al-Kalam.” Al-Buhuti explains further, stating: “[It is impermissible] only if purely rational arguments are used. As for using textual evidences, or rational evidences along with textual evidences, then this is the Usūl al-Dīn, and the way of the people of Sunnah. This is the meaning of Sheikh Taqī al-Dīn [Ibn Taymiyyah]’s words.” [See: Kashaf al-Qina] قال الإمام الحجاوي في الإقناع: (وَعَكْسُ الْعُلُومِ الشَّرْعِيَّةِ: عُلُومٌ مُحَرَّمَةٌ أَوْ مَكْرُوهَةٌ، فَالْمُحَرَّمَةُ كَعِلْمِ الْكَلَامِ). قال العلامة البهوتي في الكشاف: (إذَا تَكَلَّمَ فِيهِ بِالْمَعْقُولِ الْمَحْضِ، أَوْ الْمُخَالِفِ لِلْمَنْقُولِ الصَّرِيحِ الصَّحِيحِ. فَإِنْ تَكَلَّمَ فِيهِ بِالنَّقْلِ فَقَطْ، أَوْ بِالنَّقْلِ وَالْعَقْلِ الْمُوَافِقِ لَهُ، فَهُوَ أَصْلُ الدِّينِ، وَطَرِيقَةُ أَهْلِ السُّنَّةِ وَهَذَا مَعْنَى كَلَامِ الشَّيْخِ تَقِيِّ الدِّينِ).

[@muslimbynature5960]

I know my lord the tremendous spiritual holy purest light upon light exalted in might.

[@RijHetWijst]

1:43:00 loool

[@skyinuri8868]

Excuse me, is syeikh imran hussein a good one? Because lot of countries banned his dakwah eventho he is a farmous scholar for eschatology

[@Urbro_meast]

Trust me , avoid him at all cost . Do you need evidence or do you believe me ?

[@Urbro_meast]

Anyways here is the evidence kzbin.info/www/bejne/oIbIgXimoZt5hbM

[@abdulibnabdul1666]

imran hossain is an alex jones style dajjal. he says he's anit dajjal but supports khomeini who said Ali has a new Quran. he said he is against israelis but supports iran's 79 cia revolt, the oriignal jet bombers who took in exiled al queda and lied on iraq wmds. he says he can interpret Quran verses and its interpretation is incomplete.

[@justabrother356]

Abu mussab also has videos on him.

[@sufyanalthawri1257]

Likewise Imam Ahmed bn Hanbil and Imam Abu Zur'a Al Raazi also mention the same thing as Imam Ishaaq ibn Rahawayh if someone says Hand like hand feet like feet seeing like seeing its tashbeeh And i think also Imam Uthman bn Saeed Al dareemi says something similar

[@sufyanalthawri1257]

@M A He said had allah wanted to sit on it he could of. The imams of the salaf all praised who r u now a hanafi maturidi in the 21st century to takk abiut imam uthman bn saeed.

[@sufyanalthawri1257]

@M A not really death is impossible for Allah because Allah negated it 4 himself and also death is from the attributes of deficiency which Allah is free from anyway even if there wasent a verse or hadith which mentions a negation of allah from a specific attirbute of deficiency we would have negated it. As the salaf refuting imam uthman bn saeed al daarami LOOOOOL ur lying to my face they all praised him who refuted him from the salaf don't name me Ashari/Maturidi scholars from the 4th, 5th or 6th centuray u said salaf so tell who from the salaf called him a zindeeq????? Remember we're talking about uthman al darimi not abu fulana from Kufa

[@ibnmuhammad886]

Ustadh, what does it mean when the Hadith say Adam ﷺ was created in Allah عزّ وجلّ image? Please respond

[@ussyj8783]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/aJOviWltiNujhdU

[@tahahagar7664]

Thats an Israiliat, same with Hawa being created from the rib of Adam....

[@hmzzrg5045]

Fear Allah the fact that Hawa was created from the rib of Adam is from the Sunnah.

[@ne5788]

That hadith is reported by bukhari and Muslim so is not an israiliyat. Ibn uthaimin mentioned and others scholars before him that the meaning is that Allah created him in his image so he have face, hands, eyes,etc. But that doesn't means that is resembling him with Allah like the prophet salla Allah alaihi wa salam said: the first group of my community will enter jannah have the image of the moon. Reported by bukhari and Muslim. That doesn't means that are rocks and don't have eyes and faces, rather it means that their faces will by brilliant with nur like the moon. Another response that he gave is that this is from attributing the creation to the creation like Allah said about Adam: و نفخت فيه من روحي and doesn't mean that Allah gave his ruh to Adam by it means that he created his ruh and he honored him with that. After that he said that the first response is the strongest one.

[@lejamesbron5880]

What do you brothers think about Seekersguidance?

[@haadis2986]

I am confused. I honestly have read some statements where salaf said we don’t interpret and we read the verses as they are and move on from them without asking how? That is not the same as giving a meaning. I haven’t really seen scholars give a meaning from the past. Can someone please provide some evidence so my heart can feel at ease? Some evidence stating from early generation that we take the literal meaning? It seems that we are the ones giving a meaning by doing so and claiming this is what a scholar said when in fact he may or may have not intended that. I only understand you leave the verses as they are without questioning how. Allah knows best.

[@galaktikhoroz9338]

look at sahih al Bukhari 4547 brother. may Allah guide the seeker to the truth .

[@abelo2305]

Very easy, darimi for instance

[@awbennaibnghani2307]

Also, if I’m not mistaken imam Ahmad r.a actually instructed his son to do تاويل. This was in the context of Hadith of اصبع الرحمن which imam Ahmed’s son narrated, and whilst narrating gestured with his fingers, upon which Imam Ahmed said اوّلوه. Unfortunately, I don’t have the مصدر for this

[@InfoHubNow]

Who is the reciter at the intro?

[@galaktikhoroz9338]

ustadh Abdurrahman hassan. the guest

[@changinglifestyle6675]

Where's part 1 please?

[@jebrilabdulazeez]

Check the channel listings or just below this video

[@Muslim_and_proud1]

Lol killer over 2h talks no toilet break 😍

[@conjugatemethod]

if you are sincere in your claim to the truth then debate these issues with an Ash'ari in public.

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Asrar in the comments was getting owned so he blocked ppl. Let me post to you how he got owned! Read : 1st Imam Ashari repented & became close to Athari writing al Ibana before death! Salafis I know, say we don't liken Allah to his creation & affirm his Attributes as in Quran 42 :11 & 7 :180 - affirming Allah's attributes without likening. Allah is All Hearing & Seeing, & also we hear & see - so based on Khulab/"Ashari" logic Allah can't Hear or See! Aw'uthubillah! Ahlul Sunni, here I mean, Islam or salafis teach 3 categories of Tawhid/Oneness. 1. Tawhid Rububiyah - Allah's Lordship or His actions as Creator etc. (Quran 1 :2) 2. Tawhid Ulluhiyah - Allah's Oneness in Godhood or being served as He taught (Quran 6 :162 & 163). 3. Tawhid Asma wa Saffat - Names and Attributes of Allah understood properly... Category 3 has 4 sub pillars to understand Allah's (Tawhid in) Names & Attributes: A) No Tatil or denial - Quran 7 :180. - Affirm Allah's perfect attributes! B) No Tamthil or likening, - Quran 42 -11. - Affirm without likening. C) No Takyif or questioning the how of the unseen - Quran 17 :36. D) No Tahrif or distorting w/o evidence - Quran 7 :33. (Hence directing implying any Tawil is Tawqif/Text based, Quran 3 :7) Some of us believe tahrif may involve tatil as well of the apparent meaning. >>> Clarifications on our view: A) Salafis don't say Attributes of Allah mean an appendage of limb/body... Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: It is well-known that there is no report from any of the Prophets or from the Sahaabah or from the Taabi‘een or from any of the early generations of the ummah to suggest that Allah is a physical entity or that He is not a physical entity. Rather denying or affirming that is an innovation according to Islam. End quote. - Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (5/434). I propose - They, Khulab/Asharis should be nuetral like Ibn Tamiyyah and say we don't say about Allah what isn't revealed & we don't know and affirm what Allah says, following Quran 7 :33 or they open endless shirk & division! We affirm what Allah affirm and nuetral on what Allah hasn't mentioned! Khulab Asharis don't affirm what Allah has affirmed and affirm what Allah hasn't mentioned! - this is enough to show their error! For Khulab Asharis to differentiate attributes all of which Allah said to confirm, shows they are following someone other then Allah showing error! Usually greek philosophers who say bodies are temporary so Khulab Asharis use this logic & say therefore imply foreign logic is here = to Islam & this is wrong, we seek refuge from that! B) Re: "directions" - We say what Islam teaches & don't add or subtract out of humbleness as there is nothing like Allah. Allah's High above the Arsh is a sign of Tawhid taught to the Muslim slave & even firaun in Sura 28 & 40... Direct Evidence Allah is above His Arsh in the Farewell Sermon, Abu Bakr, Abu Hanifa etc. 1. ... I have left among you the Book of Allah, and if you hold fast to it, you would never go astray. And you would be asked about me (on the Day of Resurrection), what would you say? They (the audience) said: We will bear witness that you have conveyed (the message), discharged (the ministry of Prophethood) and given wise (sincere) counsel. He (the narrator Jafar bin Muhammad) said: He (the Blessed Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him) then raised his forefinger towards the sky and pointing it at the people (said):" O Allah, be witness. 0 Allah, be witness," saying it thrice. (Bilal then) pronounced Adhan and later... source : Sahih Muslim 1218 a - book of hajj/pilgrimage. 2. Aqida Tahawiya on Allah above the Throne (الْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ) وَالْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ حَقٌّ - The Throne (al-‘arsh) and the Footstool (al-kursī) are true. وَهُوَ مُسْتَغْنٍ عَنِ الْعَرْشِ وَمَا دُونَهُ - He is independent of the Throne and whatever is beneath it. مُحِيطٌ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَفَوْقَهُ وَقَدْ أَعْجَزَ عَنِ الْإِحَاطَةِ خَلْقَهُ - He encompasses all things and He is above it, and what He has created is incapable of encompassing Him. Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him said I am the most blessed salaf for you - Sahihayn! Salafi Dawa is the path to the Sunna, Quran 9 :100... (Manhaj of Sahabas, 4 mathhabs, etc.) >>>

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Point 2 : Salafis reject Khulab Ashari view of rejecting the description of Allah & jahmiyah reject Allah's description of Himself & at times also try to redefine it going into another error of tahrif or speaking about Allah without knowledge or Quran 7 :33. For examples Ashari say Allah's Hands means power violating Quran 7 :33. But Allah says He has 2 hands. does this mean He has 2 powers? In Hadiths Allah created 3 things with His Hands, Jannah's plantings, Adam and the Torah. So how about the rest of the world created by His power, see Quran 65 :12? So the Ashari view contradicts Islam's teachings, but even before that the error they made is that they are not humble and accepting to Allah's words as he taught... Also see this example... When Allah asked satan why don't you prostrate to who I created with My Own Hands in Surah 38 :75? If Hands meant power satan could of said you made with with Your Hands as well oh Allah... >>> In Summary : With regards to Allah's Attributes (Hands in Quran 5 :64 or Face in Quran 75 :22, or Shin in Quran 68, or Eyes in Quran 54 etc.) Salafis - Affirm (no tatil), without likening (tamthil) leaving takyif/modality... for someone to say affirming the meaning of Allah's words is tamthil is accusing Allah of tamthil, and we seek refuge with Allah from that! To change the meaning of something from the unseen needs evidence from text as only Allah reveals the unseen as He wishes (Quran 6 :50 etc.) As the hadiths say Allah made us in His Image in His will, not the other way around. Asharis type 1 (tahrif) - do tatil and tahrif/tawil (violating Quran 7 :33), denying the apparent and say about Allah what they don't know or... for them to even imply they can do ijtihad is to violate not doing takyif (Quran 17 :36) & only agreeing with Salafis on not likening Allah. Ashari type 2 (tafwid) - do tatil (violating Quran 7 :180) of the meaning but agree with the salafis on not likening or rejecting tamthil and tawil or leaving the takyif/modality! sometimes they say we deny outward meaning for another outward meaning but leave the kayf to Allah, thats a contradiction unless you want to either agree with salafis on outward meaning or ... say their is a secret meaning tahrif violating Quran 7 :33 & Quran 5 :3 that Islam is complete, as Islam is a clear and open religion, showing you open up doors to make up lies on Islam limitlessly and this is the danger of the khulab Ashari bida!

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

maybe you can respond?

[@conjugatemethod]

@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 What you have written above shows you are a jahil and completely ignorant of the Ash'ari creed. At least read the works of the Ash'aris before you insert yourself into these debates.

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

@@conjugatemethod Actually I'm an ex ashari student imam, so either you or jahmi Ashari imams are jahil/liars or both, not me. can't blame me if this is what you teach, I saw it myself! why not bring proof yourself? or recommend Ashari works or ppl? Islam is open! take your own advice until you bring proof as Islam teaches.

[@huza1fa]

whose recitation is in the intro?

[@syedsaad1594]

Ustadh Abdul Rahman himself

[@khaderlander2429]

George Makdisi labels Ibn Taymiyya a Sufi of the Qadiriyya order on the basis of a spiritual initiation chain that he found linking him back to the Hanbali ‘Abd al-Qadir al-Jilani (d. 1166), the eponym of the Qadiriyya order. Makdisi also found two statements in which Ibn Taymiyya says that he donned the Sufi cloak of ‘Abd al-Qadir. “Donning the cloak” is an initiation ritual into a Sufi chain of spiritual authority. Ibn Taymiyya calls ‘Abd al-Qadir “our shaykh” in his commentary on parts of ‘Abd al-Qadir’s Openings of the Unseen (MF 10:455-548). Makdisi also cites the fact that Ibn Taymiyya was buried in a Sufi cemetery. Excerpt From: "Ibn Taymiyya" by Jon Hoover. Scribd.

[@mohamudahmed6554]

Ridiculous, your source is George Makdisi? A orientalist that invents the most unheard stories about Ibm Taymiyyah? You are lost.

[@khaderlander2429]

@@mohamudahmed6554 I retract the earlier statement. Others have cast doubt on Makdisi’s evidence. Initiation chains are often forged. The two statements about donning the Sufi cloak appear in texts written by other scholars after Ibn Taymiyya’s death, and they could also have been forged. Ibn Taymiyya criticizes the Sufi initiation ritual of donning the Sufi cloak in his own writings, and no evidence has been found in his works that he participated in such a ritual himself. As for the commentary, Ibn Taymiyya does show much appreciation for ‘Abd al-Qadir’s moral insights and calls him “our shaykh,” but the work does not provide any further evidence that Ibn Taymiyya belonged to a Sufi order. Moreover, the Qadiriyya Sufi order was still in the process of formation in Ibn Taymiyya’s time. So it is not clear that there yet existed a well-formed Qadiriyya order to join. It only gained its widespread popularity later on. Finally, Ibn Taymiyya did not call himself a Sufi, and the significance of being buried in a Sufi cemetery is uncertain. Despite the ambiguous nature of the evidence, it remains possible that Ibn Taymiyya participated in organized Sufism in his early years. The spiritual concert anecdote translated earlier in this chapter shows that he did associate with Sufis at some point, even if he refused to participate in their spiritual concert on that occasion. He may have joined in with spiritual concerts before that, but it is highly unlikely that he participated in organized Sufi activities in his later years. If Ibn Taymiyya is to be called a Sufi, it must be strictly on his own terms of a highly ethicized spirituality. A more illuminating approach to the question is Ibn Taymiyya’s legal assessment of Sufism. In a short treatise on Sufi origins (MF 11:5-24), he says that the term “Sufi” became well-known only after the first three Islamic centuries. Sufis first appeared in the Iraqi city of Basra, which was known for extremes in asceticism and piety.

[@mohamudahmed6554]

@@khaderlander2429 Nothing you said has any basis and everything you say can and will be rejected due to it being pure misinformation and lies.

[@khaderlander2429]

@@mohamudahmed6554 You can not refute those statements, all I see is cognitive dissonance you can't bear Sheikh ul Islam been associated with Sufism and him liking Abdul Qadir Jalani.

[@fuseable9944]

Ibn Taymiyyah was a Sufi in the sense that he was a strict ascetic (who rejected all religious bid’ah). Ibn Taymiyyah did indeed praise Abdul Qadir Jeylani, however Ibn Taymiyyah also said that a lot of books and lies were spread about Abdul Qadir Jeylani. Ibn Taymiyyah also considers Abdul Qadir Jeylani to have the same basic salafi creedal beliefs. And Abdul Qadir does btw^, he’s a sound salafi athari. And Ibn Taymiyyah is buried in a Sufi Cemetery and so is Ibn Al Qayyim iirc, however this was against their will. + Ibn Taymiyyah saw celebrating Mawlid as haram, rejected every religious bid’ah and deemed Istighatha through the dead as Shirk Akbar. So he’s not your typical modern day Sufi.