ROUND 2:

[@walaknon]

Wallahi brothers, im from Malaysia 🇲🇾 and this is the most beneficial ilmiah Channel I’ve ever subscribed. Thank you Alhamdulillah

[@4lsteppa647]

What does the vid talk about?

[@mahad4866]

@@4lsteppa647 why you asking. Watch it yourself

[@raisurrahman7519]

Absolutely true brother.. from india. This channel has academic level contents in english language, which is like no other in my knowledge. May Allah bless these brothers

[@4lsteppa647]

@@mahad4866 I said just asking cause I’m looking for something and I’m pretty sure this vid is about it but I want to make sure I don’t want to sit here and listen to this for 2hours and it’s not what I’m looking for

[@perilouslambasting6816]

@@4lsteppa647 it's about the names and attributes of Allah, how to affirm them, how the ashaa'ira distort them or chamge/ignore their meanings and the refutation of them in that regard. Rough summary akhi

[@UmmSh]

More serious Aqeedah talks like these plssss. So beneficial Allahuma barik! May Allah increase us in beneficial knowledge 🤲🏾

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Yes we need to organize and teach this info!

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

1st Imam Ashari repented & became close to Athari writing al Ibana before death! Salafis I know, say we don't liken Allah to his creation & affirm his Attributes as in Quran 42 :11 & 7 :180 - affirming Allah's attributes without likening. Allah is All Hearing & Seeing, & also we hear & see - so based on Khulab/"Ashari" logic Allah can't Hear or See! Aw'uthubillah! Ahlul Sunni, here I mean, Islam or salafis teach 3 categories of Tawhid/Oneness. 1. Tawhid Rububiyah - Allah's Lordship or His actions as Creator etc. (Quran 1 :2) 2. Tawhid Ulluhiyah - Allah's Oneness in Godhood or being served as He taught (Quran 6 :162 & 163). 3. Tawhid Asma wa Saffat - Names and Attributes of Allah understood properly... Category 3 has 4 sub pillars to understand Allah's (Tawhid in) Names & Attributes: A) No Tatil or denial - Quran 7 :180. - Affirm Allah's perfect attributes! B) No Tamthil or likening, - Quran 42 -11. - Affirm without likening. C) No Takyif or questioning the how of the unseen - Quran 17 :36. D) No Tahrif or distorting w/o evidence - Quran 7 :33. (Hence directing implying any Tawil is Tawqif/Text based, Quran 3 :7) Some of us believe tahrif may involve tatil as well of the apparent meaning. >>> Clarifications on our view: A) Salafis don't say Attributes of Allah mean an appendage of limb/body... Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: It is well-known that there is no report from any of the Prophets or from the Sahaabah or from the Taabi‘een or from any of the early generations of the ummah to suggest that Allah is a physical entity or that He is not a physical entity. Rather denying or affirming that is an innovation according to Islam. End quote. - Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (5/434). I propose - They, Khulab/Asharis should be nuetral like Ibn Tamiyyah and say we don't say about Allah what isn't revealed & we don't know and affirm what Allah says, following Quran 7 :33 or they open endless shirk & division! We affirm what Allah affirm and nuetral on what Allah hasn't mentioned! Khulab Asharis don't affirm what Allah has affirmed and affirm what Allah hasn't mentioned! - this is enough to show their error! For Khulab Asharis to differentiate attributes all of which Allah said to confirm, shows they are following someone other then Allah showing error! Usually greek philosophers who say bodies are temporary so Khulab Asharis use this logic & say therefore imply foreign logic is here = to Islam & this is wrong, we seek refuge from that! B) Re: "directions" - We say what Islam teaches & don't add or subtract out of humbleness as there is nothing like Allah. Allah's High above the Arsh is a sign of Tawhid taught to the Muslim slave & even firaun in Sura 28 & 40... Direct Evidence Allah is above His Arsh in the Farewell Sermon, Abu Bakr, Abu Hanifa etc. 1. ... I have left among you the Book of Allah, and if you hold fast to it, you would never go astray. And you would be asked about me (on the Day of Resurrection), what would you say? They (the audience) said: We will bear witness that you have conveyed (the message), discharged (the ministry of Prophethood) and given wise (sincere) counsel. He (the narrator Jafar bin Muhammad) said: He (the Blessed Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him) then raised his forefinger towards the sky and pointing it at the people (said):" O Allah, be witness. 0 Allah, be witness," saying it thrice. (Bilal then) pronounced Adhan and later... source : Sahih Muslim 1218 a - book of hajj/pilgrimage. 2. Aqida Tahawiya on Allah above the Throne (الْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ) وَالْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ حَقٌّ - The Throne (al-‘arsh) and the Footstool (al-kursī) are true. وَهُوَ مُسْتَغْنٍ عَنِ الْعَرْشِ وَمَا دُونَهُ - He is independent of the Throne and whatever is beneath it. مُحِيطٌ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَفَوْقَهُ وَقَدْ أَعْجَزَ عَنِ الْإِحَاطَةِ خَلْقَهُ - He encompasses all things and He is above it, and what He has created is incapable of encompassing Him. Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him said I am the most blessed salaf for you - Sahihayn! Salafi Dawa is the path to the Sunna, Quran 9 :100... (Manhaj of Sahabas, 4 mathhabs, etc.) >>>

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Point 2 : Salafis reject Khulab Ashari view of rejecting the description of Allah & jahmiyah reject Allah's description of Himself & at times also try to redefine it going into another error of tahrif or speaking about Allah without knowledge or Quran 7 :33. For examples Ashari say Allah's Hands means power violating Quran 7 :33. But Allah says He has 2 hands. does this mean He has 2 powers? In Hadiths Allah created 3 things with His Hands, Jannah's plantings, Adam and the Torah. So how about the rest of the world created by His power, see Quran 65 :12? So the Ashari view contradicts Islam's teachings, but even before that the error they made is that they are not humble and accepting to Allah's words as he taught... Also see this example... When Allah asked satan why don't you prostrate to who I created with My Own Hands in Surah 38 :75? If Hands meant power satan could of said you made with with Your Hands as well oh Allah... >>> In Summary : With regards to Allah's Attributes (Hands in Quran 5 :64 or Face in Quran 75 :22, or Shin in Quran 68, or Eyes in Quran 54 etc.) Salafis - Affirm (no tatil), without likening (tamthil) leaving takyif/modality... for someone to say affirming the meaning of Allah's words is tamthil is accusing Allah of tamthil, and we seek refuge with Allah from that! To change the meaning of something from the unseen needs evidence from text as only Allah reveals the unseen as He wishes (Quran 6 :50 etc.) As the hadiths say Allah made us in His Image in His will, not the other way around. Asharis type 1 (tahrif) - do tatil and tahrif/tawil (violating Quran 7 :33), denying the apparent and say about Allah what they don't know or... for them to even imply they can do ijtihad is to violate not doing takyif (Quran 17 :36) & only agreeing with Salafis on not likening Allah. Ashari type 2 (tafwid) - do tatil (violating Quran 7 :180) of the meaning but agree with the salafis on not likening or rejecting tamthil and tawil or leaving the takyif/modality! sometimes they say we deny outward meaning for another outward meaning but leave the kayf to Allah, thats a contradiction unless you want to either agree with salafis on outward meaning or ... say their is a secret meaning tahrif violating Quran 7 :33 & Quran 5 :3 that Islam is complete, as Islam is a clear and open religion, showing you open up doors to make up lies on Islam limitlessly and this is the danger of the khulab Ashari bida!

[@clarkstonga]

The previous Ethiopian government tried to enforce upon us Ashari\Alhabash sect for over 10 years but Allah destroyed them! May Allah protects our ummah from such calamity!

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Alhamdulilah... Salafi dawa, dawa Sahabas RAdiyallahu anhum, May Allah guide us to spread it! Jahmi Ashari tahrif is like the christian trinity in that it came like 300 years later and mawlid is like she'a christmas, centuries later!

[@abdiwahaabnoor5949]

Really?

[@abdiwahaabnoor5949]

May Allaah keep you strong brother. Have patience for the help of Allaah is near.

[@SIGSEGV1337]

@Ismail Kasam If they don't rule by the sharia they aren't a Muslim government

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

@@SIGSEGV1337 They aren't an Islamic govt but might be Muslim govt if they establish prayer/athan, as that is what Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him waited for before entering Khaybar.

[@MohammedAlSharif2002]

Oooooh yes I definitely wanted a second one!

[@MohammedAlSharif2002]

@Kafil Haling he did a previous video about the Ash’aris

[@mumin9436]

Do you know the recitation at the beginning of the video?

[@mumin9436]

@Kafil Haling do u know? If anyone knows help me out

[@usmanbinabdurrasheed5949]

@@mumin9436 ﴿وَإِن تَعجَب فَعَجَبٌ قَولُهُم أَإِذا كُنّا تُرابًا أَإِنّا لَفي خَلقٍ جَديدٍ أُولئِكَ الَّذينَ كَفَروا بِرَبِّهِم وَأُولئِكَ الأَغلالُ في أَعناقِهِم وَأُولئِكَ أَصحابُ النّارِ هُم فيها خالِدونَ﴾ [Ar-Ra'd: 5]

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

1st Imam Ashari repented & became close to Athari writing al Ibana before death! Salafis I know, say we don't liken Allah to his creation & affirm his Attributes as in Quran 42 :11 & 7 :180 - affirming Allah's attributes without likening. Allah is All Hearing & Seeing, & also we hear & see - so based on Khulab/"Ashari" logic Allah can't Hear or See! Aw'uthubillah! Ahlul Sunni, here I mean, Islam or salafis teach 3 categories of Tawhid/Oneness. 1. Tawhid Rububiyah - Allah's Lordship or His actions as Creator etc. (Quran 1 :2) 2. Tawhid Ulluhiyah - Allah's Oneness in Godhood or being served as He taught (Quran 6 :162 & 163). 3. Tawhid Asma wa Saffat - Names and Attributes of Allah understood properly... Category 3 has 4 sub pillars to understand Allah's (Tawhid in) Names & Attributes: A) No Tatil or denial - Quran 7 :180. - Affirm Allah's perfect attributes! B) No Tamthil or likening, - Quran 42 -11. - Affirm without likening. C) No Takyif or questioning the how of the unseen - Quran 17 :36. D) No Tahrif or distorting w/o evidence - Quran 7 :33. (Hence directing implying any Tawil is Tawqif/Text based, Quran 3 :7) Some of us believe tahrif may involve tatil as well of the apparent meaning. >>> Clarifications on our view: A) Salafis don't say Attributes of Allah mean an appendage of limb/body... Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: It is well-known that there is no report from any of the Prophets or from the Sahaabah or from the Taabi‘een or from any of the early generations of the ummah to suggest that Allah is a physical entity or that He is not a physical entity. Rather denying or affirming that is an innovation according to Islam. End quote. - Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (5/434). I propose - They, Khulab/Asharis should be nuetral like Ibn Tamiyyah and say we don't say about Allah what isn't revealed & we don't know and affirm what Allah says, following Quran 7 :33 or they open endless shirk & division! We affirm what Allah affirm and nuetral on what Allah hasn't mentioned! Khulab Asharis don't affirm what Allah has affirmed and affirm what Allah hasn't mentioned! - this is enough to show their error! For Khulab Asharis to differentiate attributes all of which Allah said to confirm, shows they are following someone other then Allah showing error! Usually greek philosophers who say bodies are temporary so Khulab Asharis use this logic & say therefore imply foreign logic is here = to Islam & this is wrong, we seek refuge from that! B) Re: "directions" - We say what Islam teaches & don't add or subtract out of humbleness as there is nothing like Allah. Allah's High above the Arsh is a sign of Tawhid taught to the Muslim slave & even firaun in Sura 28 & 40... Direct Evidence Allah is above His Arsh in the Farewell Sermon, Abu Bakr, Abu Hanifa etc. 1. ... I have left among you the Book of Allah, and if you hold fast to it, you would never go astray. And you would be asked about me (on the Day of Resurrection), what would you say? They (the audience) said: We will bear witness that you have conveyed (the message), discharged (the ministry of Prophethood) and given wise (sincere) counsel. He (the narrator Jafar bin Muhammad) said: He (the Blessed Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him) then raised his forefinger towards the sky and pointing it at the people (said):" O Allah, be witness. 0 Allah, be witness," saying it thrice. (Bilal then) pronounced Adhan and later... source : Sahih Muslim 1218 a - book of hajj/pilgrimage. 2. Aqida Tahawiya on Allah above the Throne (الْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ) وَالْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ حَقٌّ - The Throne (al-‘arsh) and the Footstool (al-kursī) are true. وَهُوَ مُسْتَغْنٍ عَنِ الْعَرْشِ وَمَا دُونَهُ - He is independent of the Throne and whatever is beneath it. مُحِيطٌ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَفَوْقَهُ وَقَدْ أَعْجَزَ عَنِ الْإِحَاطَةِ خَلْقَهُ - He encompasses all things and He is above it, and what He has created is incapable of encompassing Him. Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him said I am the most blessed salaf for you - Sahihayn! Salafi Dawa is the path to the Sunna, Quran 9 :100... (Manhaj of Sahabas, 4 mathhabs, etc.) >>>

[@Autismcureforbianca4]

Masha Allah this guy brain is like a whole library , book store, computer. May Allah bless the Muslim who wants to study with this knowledge, wisdom and memory Ameen

[@Hasib588]

Ameen

[@alphatoure3954]

جزاك الله خير جذا you and Abu mussab wajdi are doing a great for the ummah may Allah bless you all

[@Goodborni]

Subhanallah I am so grateful to Allah for finding this channel and your videos brother, may Allah increase you in good knowledge and reward you, you are giving us non arabic speakers, the much needed of knowledge in this time of shubuhat... Also a tip if you could translate everything said as on some matters I feel left out as a non arabic speaker Jakallahu khair

[@Abdullah-vt7ct]

Bro these videos are addictive and beneficial at the same time. Jazakallahu Khairan Ustad

[@tasneemsakifibnealam949]

Appreciate these podcasts. One suggestion though: I know it can be hard to translate sometimes, but please use English translation more frequently. Jazak Allahu khair.

[@nimanfod]

And you have to make efforts to learn Arabic

[@Laymen62]

30:00 You can find this statement - Imām At-Tirmiḏī (رحمه الله) said: “The likes of this has been narrated from Mālik, Sufyān ibn ʿUyaynah and ʿAbdullāh ibn al-Mubārak, who all said about such narrations, ‘Take them as they are, without asking how’ And this is the opinion of Ahl al-ʿIlm from Ahl As-Sunnah wal-Jamāʿah. However, the Jahmiyyah oppose these narrations and say: ‘This is resemblance’ However, Allāh the Most High, has mentioned in various places in His Book, His attribute of Hand, Hearing, and Seeing, but the Jahmīyyah make false interpretations of these verses, explaining them in a way other than how they are explained by Ahl al-ʿIlm,They say, Allāh did not create Adam with His own Hand’, They say that Hand means Power. Isḥāq ibn Ibrāhīm said: Rather likening Allāh to His creation is saying that He has a hand like their hand, or hearing like their hearing. If someone says that Allāh has hearing like their hearing, this is likening Him to His creation. “But if he says, as Allāh, may He be exalted, said: A hand, hearing, sight - without discussing how or saying it is like their (attributes), this is not likening Him to His creation; rather it is as Allāh, may He be exalted, says in His Book (interpretation of the meaning): “There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the Hearing, the Seeing” [Ash-Shūrā 42:11].” [Al-Jāmiʿ al-Kabīr, Vol 2, Page 43 📕]

[@clarkstonga]

What a beautiful discussion! Barakallahu feek ! The knowledge that comes out of ustadh Abdurahman is so full of knowledge that worthy of watching it multiple time to grasp the full knowledge! May Allah enrich you with more knowledge and gives us patience to learn from you!

[@Abdulla_K]

29 asrar rasheeds have disliked this video.

[@mohamudahmed6554]

@____ The debate happened between these two and it is clear who calls upon Allah alone and who calls upon other than Allah Subhanahu wa ta'ala.

[@lishaplayss]

@____ it was asrar rashid who claimed asking the prophet sallahu alayhi waslam was permissable and failed misrably first went back and forth over the contract rules and then went around in circles applying hadiths to his claim. He made the claim and failed to justify it. It was so clear when asrar and co were silent when ARH said it like 3 times " that one side is calling to worship Allah alone while the other is calling to other than Allah......you bring what you want say what you want when they didnt argue that accusation it was clear who was on the haqq.

[@lishaplayss]

@____ Astagfirullah you have one foul attitude and you call yourselves ahlul sunnah while calling us "pagans, wahhabis, murtad" ahlul sunnah are the ones who follow the sunnah and worship Allah alone with the understanding of the salaf as saliheen which use dont do because you would rather follow your pirs and murshids instead. Your beloved asrar failed to understand that invoking is worship so when you invoke the dead that is an act of worship that is rejected and made shirk because you cant call out to the dead. Any way im not gonna engage with such an abusive person may Allah guide you ameen

[@DrJames_YT]

@____ none before the "wahhabis' said it was shirk to call upon the dead? 😭😭😭

[@DrJames_YT]

@Ibn Kamal Al-Hanbali الحمدلله I am with you brother, you should've payed attention and saw the quotation marks around wahhabis

[@Laymen62]

I don’t think there is any video on KZbin more beneficial than this regarding this issue.”

[@soholchoudhury9380]

I find it very hard to understand how the Ashari claim, on the one hand, the need to take Mutawatir Daleel to establish Aqeedah, yet they take conjecture to interpret the Mutawatir Daleel. Subhannallah

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Masha Allah... very well put. They speak about Allah without knowledge using pagan philosophy, opening the door to speaking on the ghaib without knowledge which is how sufi bida on prophecies using the hadith of dreams out of context (Quran 5 :3 says legislation is finished so the only prophecy left is like in surah Yusef dream interpretation that can mean something else) opened up and that ghulu led to sufi grave worship shirk like the batini shi'as.

[@Laymen62]

Also remember most of hadiths are Ahad not mutawatir

[@Wakobear.]

May Allah distance us from Bidah May Allah make us firm upon the path of the salaf till death جزاك الله خيرا

[@hn1695]

@@zccau2316 the prophet is part of the salaf.

[@limitedquantitysufiyyahexp3913]

@@zccau2316 ya yakhi, we follow the Quran and the prophet SAW WITH the understanding of the salaf may Allah bless you

[@forgetfulstranger]

@@zccau2316 bro the salaf INCLUDES the Messenger ﷺ

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

1st Imam Ashari repented & became close to Athari writing al Ibana before death! Salafis I know, say we don't liken Allah to his creation & affirm his Attributes as in Quran 42 :11 & 7 :180 - affirming Allah's attributes without likening. Allah is All Hearing & Seeing, & also we hear & see - so based on Khulab/"Ashari" logic Allah can't Hear or See! Aw'uthubillah! Ahlul Sunni, here I mean, Islam or salafis teach 3 categories of Tawhid/Oneness. 1. Tawhid Rububiyah - Allah's Lordship or His actions as Creator etc. (Quran 1 :2) 2. Tawhid Ulluhiyah - Allah's Oneness in Godhood or being served as He taught (Quran 6 :162 & 163). 3. Tawhid Asma wa Saffat - Names and Attributes of Allah understood properly... Category 3 has 4 sub pillars to understand Allah's (Tawhid in) Names & Attributes: A) No Tatil or denial - Quran 7 :180. - Affirm Allah's perfect attributes! B) No Tamthil or likening, - Quran 42 -11. - Affirm without likening. C) No Takyif or questioning the how of the unseen - Quran 17 :36. D) No Tahrif or distorting w/o evidence - Quran 7 :33. (Hence directing implying any Tawil is Tawqif/Text based, Quran 3 :7) Some of us believe tahrif may involve tatil as well of the apparent meaning. >>> Clarifications on our view: A) Salafis don't say Attributes of Allah mean an appendage of limb/body... Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: It is well-known that there is no report from any of the Prophets or from the Sahaabah or from the Taabi‘een or from any of the early generations of the ummah to suggest that Allah is a physical entity or that He is not a physical entity. Rather denying or affirming that is an innovation according to Islam. End quote. - Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (5/434). I propose - They, Khulab/Asharis should be nuetral like Ibn Tamiyyah and say we don't say about Allah what isn't revealed & we don't know and affirm what Allah says, following Quran 7 :33 or they open endless shirk & division! We affirm what Allah affirm and nuetral on what Allah hasn't mentioned! Khulab Asharis don't affirm what Allah has affirmed and affirm what Allah hasn't mentioned! - this is enough to show their error! For Khulab Asharis to differentiate attributes all of which Allah said to confirm, shows they are following someone other then Allah showing error! Usually greek philosophers who say bodies are temporary so Khulab Asharis use this logic & say therefore imply foreign logic is here = to Islam & this is wrong, we seek refuge from that! B) Re: "directions" - We say what Islam teaches & don't add or subtract out of humbleness as there is nothing like Allah. Allah's High above the Arsh is a sign of Tawhid taught to the Muslim slave & even firaun in Sura 28 & 40... Direct Evidence Allah is above His Arsh in the Farewell Sermon, Abu Bakr, Abu Hanifa etc. 1. ... I have left among you the Book of Allah, and if you hold fast to it, you would never go astray. And you would be asked about me (on the Day of Resurrection), what would you say? They (the audience) said: We will bear witness that you have conveyed (the message), discharged (the ministry of Prophethood) and given wise (sincere) counsel. He (the narrator Jafar bin Muhammad) said: *He (the Blessed Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him) then raised his forefinger towards the sky and pointing it at the people (said):" O Allah, be witness. 0 Allah, be witness," saying it thrice.* (Bilal then) pronounced Adhan and later... source : Sahih Muslim 1218 a - book of hajj/pilgrimage. 2. Aqida Tahawiya on Allah above the Throne (الْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ) وَالْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ حَقٌّ - The Throne (al-‘arsh) and the Footstool (al-kursī) are true. وَهُوَ مُسْتَغْنٍ عَنِ الْعَرْشِ وَمَا دُونَهُ - He is independent of the Throne and whatever is beneath it. مُحِيطٌ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَفَوْقَهُ وَقَدْ أَعْجَزَ عَنِ الْإِحَاطَةِ خَلْقَهُ - He encompasses all things and He is above it, and what He has created is incapable of encompassing Him. Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him said I am the most blessed salaf for you - Sahihayn! Salafi Dawa is the path to the Sunna, Quran 9 :100... (Manhaj of Sahabas, 4 mathhabs, etc.) >>>

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Point 2 : Salafis reject Khulab Ashari view of rejecting the description of Allah & jahmiyah reject Allah's description of Himself & at times also try to redefine it going into another error of tahrif or speaking about Allah without knowledge or Quran 7 :33. For examples Ashari say Allah's Hands means power violating Quran 7 :33. But Allah says He has 2 hands. does this mean He has 2 powers? In Hadiths Allah created 3 things with His Hands, Jannah's plantings, Adam and the Torah. So how about the rest of the world created by His power, see Quran 65 :12? So the Ashari view contradicts Islam's teachings, but even before that the error they made is that they are not humble and accepting to Allah's words as he taught... Also see this example... When Allah asked satan why don't you prostrate to who I created with My Own Hands in Surah 38 :75? If Hands meant power satan could of said you made with with Your Hands as well oh Allah... >>> In Summary : With regards to Allah's Attributes (Hands in Quran 5 :64 or Face in Quran 75 :22, or Shin in Quran 68, or Eyes in Quran 54 etc.) Salafis - Affirm (no tatil), without likening (tamthil) leaving takyif/modality... for someone to say affirming the meaning of Allah's words is tamthil is accusing Allah of tamthil, and we seek refuge with Allah from that! To change the meaning of something from the unseen needs evidence from text as only Allah reveals the unseen as He wishes (Quran 6 :50 etc.) As the hadiths say Allah made us in His Image in His will, not the other way around. Asharis type 1 (tahrif) - do tatil and tahrif/tawil (violating Quran 7 :33), denying the apparent and say about Allah what they don't know or... for them to even imply they can do ijtihad is to violate not doing takyif (Quran 17 :36) & only agreeing with Salafis on not likening Allah. Ashari type 2 (tafwid) - do tatil (violating Quran 7 :180) of the meaning but agree with the salafis on not likening or rejecting tamthil and tawil or leaving the takyif/modality! sometimes they say we deny outward meaning for another outward meaning but leave the kayf to Allah, thats a contradiction unless you want to either agree with salafis on outward meaning or ... say their is a secret meaning tahrif violating Quran 7 :33 & Quran 5 :3 that Islam is complete, as Islam is a clear and open religion, showing you open up doors to make up lies on Islam limitlessly and this is the danger of the khulab Ashari bida!

[@thierrylagrin2859]

Jazak Allahu khair. MashAllah Loud and Clear! valuable and helpful podcast, May Allah safeguard us from Bidah. AMEEN

[@AB-xx7hy]

Looking forward to this insha'Allah. Perhaps you could make another video addressing some of the angry comments that will no doubt appear soon.

[@AH23232]

Haha lol

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

1st Imam Ashari repented & became close to Athari writing al Ibana before death! Salafis I know, say we don't liken Allah to his creation & affirm his Attributes as in Quran 42 :11 & 7 :180 - affirming Allah's attributes without likening. Allah is All Hearing & Seeing, & also we hear & see - so based on Khulab/"Ashari" logic Allah can't Hear or See! Aw'uthubillah! Ahlul Sunni, here I mean, Islam or salafis teach 3 categories of Tawhid/Oneness. 1. Tawhid Rububiyah - Allah's Lordship or His actions as Creator etc. (Quran 1 :2) 2. Tawhid Ulluhiyah - Allah's Oneness in Godhood or being served as He taught (Quran 6 :162 & 163). 3. Tawhid Asma wa Saffat - Names and Attributes of Allah understood properly... Category 3 has 4 sub pillars to understand Allah's (Tawhid in) Names & Attributes: A) No Tatil or denial - Quran 7 :180. - Affirm Allah's perfect attributes! B) No Tamthil or likening, - Quran 42 -11. - Affirm without likening. C) No Takyif or questioning the how of the unseen - Quran 17 :36. D) No Tahrif or distorting w/o evidence - Quran 7 :33. (Hence directing implying any Tawil is Tawqif/Text based, Quran 3 :7) Some of us believe tahrif may involve tatil as well of the apparent meaning. >>> Clarifications on our view: A) Salafis don't say Attributes of Allah mean an appendage of limb/body... Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: It is well-known that there is no report from any of the Prophets or from the Sahaabah or from the Taabi‘een or from any of the early generations of the ummah to suggest that Allah is a physical entity or that He is not a physical entity. Rather denying or affirming that is an innovation according to Islam. End quote. - Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (5/434). I propose - They, Khulab/Asharis should be nuetral like Ibn Tamiyyah and say we don't say about Allah what isn't revealed & we don't know and affirm what Allah says, following Quran 7 :33 or they open endless shirk & division! We affirm what Allah affirm and nuetral on what Allah hasn't mentioned! Khulab Asharis don't affirm what Allah has affirmed and affirm what Allah hasn't mentioned! - this is enough to show their error! For Khulab Asharis to differentiate attributes all of which Allah said to confirm, shows they are following someone other then Allah showing error! Usually greek philosophers who say bodies are temporary so Khulab Asharis use this logic & say therefore imply foreign logic is here = to Islam & this is wrong, we seek refuge from that! B) Re: "directions" - We say what Islam teaches & don't add or subtract out of humbleness as there is nothing like Allah. Allah's High above the Arsh is a sign of Tawhid taught to the Muslim slave & even firaun in Sura 28 & 40... Direct Evidence Allah is above His Arsh in the Farewell Sermon, Abu Bakr, Abu Hanifa etc. 1. ... I have left among you the Book of Allah, and if you hold fast to it, you would never go astray. And you would be asked about me (on the Day of Resurrection), what would you say? They (the audience) said: We will bear witness that you have conveyed (the message), discharged (the ministry of Prophethood) and given wise (sincere) counsel. He (the narrator Jafar bin Muhammad) said: *He (the Blessed Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him) then raised his forefinger towards the sky and pointing it at the people (said):" O Allah, be witness. 0 Allah, be witness," saying it thrice.* (Bilal then) pronounced Adhan and later... source : Sahih Muslim 1218 a - book of hajj/pilgrimage. 2. Aqida Tahawiya on Allah above the Throne (الْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ) وَالْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ حَقٌّ - The Throne (al-‘arsh) and the Footstool (al-kursī) are true. وَهُوَ مُسْتَغْنٍ عَنِ الْعَرْشِ وَمَا دُونَهُ - He is independent of the Throne and whatever is beneath it. مُحِيطٌ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَفَوْقَهُ وَقَدْ أَعْجَزَ عَنِ الْإِحَاطَةِ خَلْقَهُ - He encompasses all things and He is above it, and what He has created is incapable of encompassing Him. Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him said I am the most blessed salaf for you - Sahihayn! Salafi Dawa is the path to the Sunna, Quran 9 :100... (Manhaj of Sahabas, 4 mathhabs, etc.) >>>

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Point 2 : Salafis reject Khulab Ashari view of rejecting the description of Allah & jahmiyah reject Allah's description of Himself & at times also try to redefine it going into another error of tahrif or speaking about Allah without knowledge or Quran 7 :33. For examples Ashari say Allah's Hands means power violating Quran 7 :33. But Allah says He has 2 hands. does this mean He has 2 powers? In Hadiths Allah created 3 things with His Hands, Jannah's plantings, Adam and the Torah. So how about the rest of the world created by His power, see Quran 65 :12? So the Ashari view contradicts Islam's teachings, but even before that the error they made is that they are not humble and accepting to Allah's words as he taught... Also see this example... When Allah asked satan why don't you prostrate to who I created with My Own Hands in Surah 38 :75? If Hands meant power satan could of said you made with with Your Hands as well oh Allah... >>> In Summary : With regards to Allah's Attributes (Hands in Quran 5 :64 or Face in Quran 75 :22, or Shin in Quran 68, or Eyes in Quran 54 etc.) Salafis - Affirm (no tatil), without likening (tamthil) leaving takyif/modality... for someone to say affirming the meaning of Allah's words is tamthil is accusing Allah of tamthil, and we seek refuge with Allah from that! To change the meaning of something from the unseen needs evidence from text as only Allah reveals the unseen as He wishes (Quran 6 :50 etc.) As the hadiths say Allah made us in His Image in His will, not the other way around. Asharis type 1 (tahrif) - do tatil and tahrif/tawil (violating Quran 7 :33), denying the apparent and say about Allah what they don't know or... for them to even imply they can do ijtihad is to violate not doing takyif (Quran 17 :36) & only agreeing with Salafis on not likening Allah. Ashari type 2 (tafwid) - do tatil (violating Quran 7 :180) of the meaning but agree with the salafis on not likening or rejecting tamthil and tawil or leaving the takyif/modality! sometimes they say we deny outward meaning for another outward meaning but leave the kayf to Allah, thats a contradiction unless you want to either agree with salafis on outward meaning or ... say their is a secret meaning tahrif violating Quran 7 :33 & Quran 5 :3 that Islam is complete, as Islam is a clear and open religion, showing you open up doors to make up lies on Islam limitlessly and this is the danger of the khulab Ashari bida!

[@clarkstonga]

The lame blind followers doesn’t understand knowledge comes before statement and actions! May Allah guides us to the path of salafusalih!

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

@@clarkstonga Amin. these asharis sometimes remind me of how christians changed the din 300 years later.

[@KhalidGreen]

بارك الله في جهودكم

[@sami.y]

Who is the reciter from the intro? What a suiting and heart warming voice mashaa Allah. JazakhAllah!

[@muhammady.ibrahim2075]

The interviewee Ustadh Abdur Rahman

[@look4yourself650]

By the way guys, you can find the powerful qoute of Imām Tirmidhi under the Hadīth 662. If you cannot read Arabic, pick up the Darussalam translation in which they translated the statement of Imām Tirmidhi as well.

[@micoberss5579]

Can you quote it here?

[@look4yourself650]

@@micoberss5579 After mentioning the Hadīth [662], Imām Tirmidhī [rahimahullāh] says: "More than one of the people of knowledge have spoken about this Hadtīh, and the narrations that resemble it about the Attributes and the Descent of the Lord, Blessed and Most High, every night to the lowest Heaven. They said: "The narrations about these are affirmed and should be believed in without misinterpreting them nor saying 'how'." It has been reported like this from Mālik [bin Anas - Imām Mālik], Sufyãn bin 'Uyainah, 'Abdullãh bin al-Mubarak; they would say about these Ahadīth: They are conveyed without saying how. This is the view of the people of knowledge among Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā 'ah. As for the Jahmiyyah, they reject these narrations and they say that this is Tashbih. And in other places in His Book, Allah, Blessed and Most High is He, has mentioned the Hand, the Hearing, the Seeing, so the Jahmiyyah misinterpret these Ayãt and give them interpretations other than the interpretations of the people of knowledge. They say that Allah did not create Adam with His Hand, and they say the meaning of Hand is merely power. Ishāq bin Ibrahim [Isḥāq ibn Rāhwayh] said: At-Tashbih is only when one says 'Hand; like a hand or similar to a hand' or 'Hearing; like hearing or similar to hearing.' So when one says 'Hearing; like hearing or similar to hearing' then this is the Tashbih. As for when one says as Allah [Most High] said, Hand, Hearing, Seeing, and he does not say 'how' nor say 'similar to hearing' nor 'like hearing' then this is not Tashbih. It is merely as Allah, Blessed and Most High is He said: 'There is nothing like Him, and He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing.' (Ash-Shüra 42:11). [End qoute] Imām as-Sabūni [d. 449H] said in his book Aqeedah as-Salaf wa Ashābul Hadīth [page 4, (3/6 in Shamila)]: "We affirm what Allāh affirmed for Himself in His book or what the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ affirmed, without changing the words from their apparent meaning or denying it [Tahrīf, Ta’tīl] without saying „how“ they are [Takyīf] and without likening them to the creation [Tamthīl]." [End qoute] Imām al-Awzā’ī [d. 157H] narrates that Imām Makhūl [d. 112H] and Imām Zuhri [d. 124H] would say: „Believe in them as they have come.“ al-Asmā wa-Sifāt lil Bayhaqi [2/377, narration 954 with a Sahīh Isnād]. Imām Ibn Taymiyyah [d. 728H] expounds on these Āthār, of which the rough translation is as follows: „And their saying - may Allāh be pleased with them - that „one should believe in them as they have come" is a refutation of [Mu’tazilah] those that reject the Attributes of Allāh, and their saying: „without the „how““, is a refutation of the Mumassila [who liken Allāh to His creation]. Imām Zuhri and Imām Makhūl were the biggest scholars of the Tabi’īn in their time, whereas the other four [that were mentioned], were Imāms of the time of the Tabi’ut Tabi’īn… And the statement of Imām Mālik regarding: „Istiwā is known, but its „how“ is beyond our imagination, and believing it is obligatory“ is supported by the rest [of the Salaf], i.e.: Believe in them [i.e. the verses of the Qur’ān and the Ahadīth regarding the Attributes of Allāh] as they have come, without a „how“. They have denied the knowledge regarding the kayfiyyah [how] of the Attributes, but they have not denied the reality of the Attributes! If they had only believed in the words without ascribing meaning to them, they would not have said that „Istiwā is known, and the kayfiyyah is beyond our imagination.“, but they said: Believe in them as they have come, without ascribing a „how“ to them. And if the meaning of the words would have been unknown, then there would have been no need to deny knowledge of the „how“, rather the negation of the kayfiyyah is only necessary if you first affirm the Attribute! The one who rejects the Attributes that have been narrated has no need to say that he understands them without a „how“, because if one were to say: „Allāh is not over His Throne“, then he has no need to say „without a how“. If the Madhhab of the Salaf was a negation of the Attributes, then they would not have said that they are to be understood without a „how“. „ Majmū’ al-Fatāwa [5/40-41] So: The belief of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah concerning the Names and Attributes of Allāh is that we affirm all the Names and Attributes of Allāh that Allāh has affirmed for Himself or His Messenger ﷺ affirmed for Him, with their apparent meaning, without interpreting them away from their apparent meaning, nor changing the words or what they indicate, while negating any resemblance between the Names and Attributes of Allāh and the creation. We deny what Allāh ﷻ has denied for Himself or the Prophet ﷺ denied for Him, and in matters Allāh and His Messenger ﷺ were silent, we are silent. We believe that the texts that mention Allāhs Names and Attributes are Muhkam [clear] and not Mutashābih [unclear]. We do not speak about „how“ the Attributes of Allāh are, nor do we speculate regarding them. I hope this made the matter more clear, inshaaAllah.

[@micoberss5579]

I was looking for words of Tirmidhi in Arabic. I found it. Goods words to memorize. Inshaallah I will memorize them. Jazakallah khairan

[@look4yourself650]

@@micoberss5579 Wa iyyakum brother. May Allah aid you and bless you in your time, knowledge, health, family and wealth, Ameen.

[@micoberss5579]

@@look4yourself650 ameen bro. Same to you

[@HiTekNomaschenko]

Alhamdulilah Allah saved me from Ashariyyah

[@asmaam6845]

The interviewer is doing a great job helping the layman clear his doubts! Allahumma barik!

[@jamworthy14]

Even talking about this is a bidah. No one has any right to say this is how Allah is and his essence..

[@arcanumviator]

deserve much more viewers than void subjects

[@hasan2k3]

masha'Allaah... an actual discussion/podcast where you discuss real issues, can learn and benefit... very good video... my only advice would be to have more frequent shots of the speaker and host (front camera shots) just to keep the listener/viewer more engaged in the discussion and so they dont become distracted/bored/switch off... not only that you feel more engaged in the conversation as if you were there... keeps the brain awake viewing more shots and not just one side shot... and Allaah knows best... just advice to allow people to keep engaged and digest the khair/good barakallahufeek/May Allaah bless you

[@oemadam]

No I dont agree with that. Like this one can focus on the words spoken not on the face.. and woman are not supposed to stare at man which happens online, so I am pleased with this way and may Allah accept their dawah.

[@ashanzaib6780]

i found this podcast very beneficial and ustad abdul rahman thank you for clarifying the position of salaf against ashari, maturidi, mutazilla, etc. Arabic quote: "الأستاذ عبد الرحمن، خير عبدٍ لله تعالى في هذا العصر المليء بالضلال وسوء الفهم، ينير دروب العلم بالحكمة والإخلاص، ويثبت على الحق في زمن الفتن والتحديات

[@Hadef_11]

جزاك الله خيرًا على المحتوى المثري والله يهدينا ويهدي الجميع

[@JannahVVIP]

Love from Malaysia. Always educating for haq, Fisabilillah. Alhamdulillah.

[@arcanumviator]

Was looking forward to watching this. Mashallah barakallah fiyk

[@RaihanShaheed]

It annoys me that the clock in the background doesn't work..

[@RaihanShaheed]

@Moin Uddin lol how are u finding my comments from different videos?😂

[@non_012]

Allahumma barak, Abdur Rahman Hassan is like a river amd treasure of knowledge of our times. May Allah Azzawajal preserve him.

[@abdallaomar4673]

May Allah give you highest ranks of janah ustadh and increase you in knowledge . In summary the ustadh is saying understand quran and sunnah according understanding of salaf. And someone else is defending and saying lets Aristotle and Plato (peoplewho are so confused that each one of the philosophers go against their teacher how can we take our understanding from crazy people.) .please don't defending the misguidance and distortion of names of Allah.

[@jaywalker6464]

Can you use English too when you mention what some Imams said about something, not just the arabic. like in 2:12:12, i want really want to know what arrazy said.

[@ghiffariaulia]

I think the audio needs to be sort of adjusted so that it sounds clearer and more amplified. I listen to several episodes in this channel and it benefits me. However, if i dont use my noice-cancelling headphones or am not in a silent circumstance, it kind of couldnt listen to it very well. Hope you take the advice.

[@RijHetWijst]

49:00 “power” isn’t a jism , it is not a bodypart. How can you compare a hand (yad) with power (Qudra) and then act like you have refuted the Asharia...

[@gameoverability1876]

how did you manage to completly miss the point? lol. are you sure this topic is not too much over your head?

[@turkishsalafi9819]

Imaam at-Tirmidhee(d. 279H )said in his Sunan (1/128-129 no. 662): وَقَدْ قَالَ غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ فِي هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ وَمَا يُشْبِهُ هَذَا مِنَ الرِّوَايَاتِ مِنَ الصِّفَاتِ وَنُزُولِ الرَّبِّ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى كُلَّ لَيْلَةٍ إِلَى السَّمَاءِ الدُّنْيَا قَالُوا قَدْ تَثْبُتُ الرِّوَايَاتُ فِي هَذَا وَيُؤْمَنُ بِهَا وَلاَ يُتَوَهَّمُ وَلاَ يُقَالُ كَيْفَ هَكَذَا رُوِيَ عَنْ مَالِكٍ وَسُفْيَانَ بْنِ عُيَيْنَةَ وَعَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ الْمُبَارَكِ أَنَّهُمْ قَالُوا فِي هَذِهِ الأَحَادِيثِ أَمِرُّوهَا بِلاَ كَيْفٍ. وَهَكَذَا قَوْلُ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ مِنْ أَهْلِ السُّنَّةِ وَالْجَمَاعَةِ. وَأَمَّا الْجَهْمِيَّةُ فَأَنْكَرَتْ هَذِهِ الرِّوَايَاتِ وَقَالُوا هَذَا تَشْبِيهٌ. وَقَدْ ذَكَرَ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فِي غَيْرِ مَوْضِعٍ مِنْ كِتَابِهِ الْيَدَ وَالسَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ فَتَأَوَّلَتِ الْجَهْمِيَّةُ هَذِهِ الآيَاتِ فَفَسَّرُوهَا عَلَى غَيْرِ مَا فَسَّرَ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ وَقَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَمْ يَخْلُقْ آدَمَ بِيَدِهِ. وَقَالُوا إِنَّ مَعْنَى الْيَدِ هَاهُنَا الْقُوَّةُ. وَقَالَ إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ إِنَّمَا يَكُونُ التَّشْبِيهُ إِذَا قَالَ يَدٌ كَيَدٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ يَدٍ أَوْ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ. فَإِذَا قَالَ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ فَهَذَا التَّشْبِيهُ وَأَمَّا إِذَا قَالَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى يَدٌ وَسَمْعٌ وَبَصَرٌ وَلاَ يَقُولُ كَيْفَ وَلاَ يَقُولُ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ وَلاَ كَسَمْعٍ فَهَذَا لاَ يَكُونُ تَشْبِيهًا وَهُوَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى فِي كِتَابِهِ: {لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِيرُ}. “It has been stated by more than one person from the People of Knowledge about this hadeeth and other similar narrations regarding the Attributes of Allaah; And our Lord, the Blessed and Most High, descending to the nearest heaven every night. So they said: ‘Affirm these narrations, have Eemaan (faith) in them, do not imagine them, nor ask how.’ The likes of this has been related from Maalik ibn Anas, Sufyaan ath-Thawree, Ibn Uyainah and Abdullaah Ibn al-Mubaarak, who all said about such narrations: ‘Leave them as they are, without asking how.’ Such is the saying of the People of Knowledge from Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Jamaa’ah. However, the Jahmiyyah oppose these narrations and say: ‘This is resemblance (tashbeeh)!’ However, Allaah the Most High, has mentioned in various places in His Book, the Attribute of al-Yad (Hand), as-Sama’ (Hearing), and al-Basr (Seeing) - but the Jahmiyyah make ta’weel (false interpretation) of these aayaat (verses), explaining them in a way other than how they are explained by the People of Knowledge. They say: ‘Indeed, Allaah did not create Aadam with His own Hand - they say that Hand means the Power’.”

[@tdesantos]

Asalaamu Alykum, who is the reciter played at the start of the video? JazakAllahu Khairan

[@Dreamliner473]

The ustad himself

[@haroondabbagh2869]

Is this a good principle to be safe by. “Only say about Allah what he says about himself “

[@سبحاناللهالحمدلله-ر4م]

What only Allah and his messenger said about Himself

[@visita9]

A drian “great sufi sheikh” I can’t take you serious any more after that sentence.

[@perilouslambasting6816]

@@Adrian-yf1zg it is well documented how the sufis have lied about sheikh abdul qaadir jeely rahimahullah and he was in fact from ahlus sunnah. And with regards to your statements about Abu ismail Al harawi, then there is more than one Abu ismail in history. But if it does happen to be that he was praised by ibn Al qayyim, you only need to look at the speech of ibn Al qayyim about the aqeedah of hululiyyah to know that he was opposed to it. Instead of bring any more dead arguments just admit it please, if you're one of the ones who say Allah is everywhere and in everything like "sheikh ul a'dham ibn arabiy" az zindeeq said then just come straight and don't hide it so we don't need to waste time on you.

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

@@Adrian-yf1zg considering Imam Bukari stated that who is an established preserver of sunna its accurate, Imam Ahmad traveled alot and was in prison (for saying Quran is not created - in case you want to be like kawarij fools and say he rebelled). Ghazali did retract didn't he, seems he has little aql if hes repped by you!

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

@Lamin muhammad Kuyateh Jazak Allahu Khayr i was raised in Ashari enviornment too and saw their corruptions.

[@truthoverhappiness7338]

17:27 Ustaad Abdur Rahman says that the Asharis say we follow the greeks and there ilm ul kalaam. Show me any Ashari scholar in his book mentiones such a thing?

[@zaaanc7008]

he s lying

[@truthoverhappiness7338]

@@zaaanc7008 who's lying?

[@zaaanc7008]

@@truthoverhappiness7338 the wahabi guy

[@truthoverhappiness7338]

@Faizal Abubaker Google what? Ilm ul kalaam. It literally means knowledge of speech. The funny thing is all you guys at speakers corner are using Ilm Ul Kalaam. With out realising. Wallahi I never met people as stupid as you. Either your disingenuous or just plain old stupid

[@truthoverhappiness7338]

@@zaaanc7008 Either they full on liars or just straight up ignoramuses I believe its the latter is more accurate. We should make excuses for them.

[@yassinhassan336]

What a masterclass from ustadh Abdulrahman, allahuma barik.

[@alphatoure3954]

Will be very interesting to see you and Abu mussab wajdi together ؟؟؟

[@abusaleh4387]

in 57:49 you said فتح الباري was the commentary of ibn rajab al-hanbali. correct me if i am wrong but i believe that is not correct. Fath is by ibn hajr.

[@Nomprenom9]

Ibn rajab rahimahullah has a book called fathul bari too

[@nawab_ask]

SubhanAllah.. amazing 👌

[@iunais8324]

قَالَ الترمذي في شرح حديث {إِنَّ اللَّهَ يَقْبَلُ الصَّدَقَةَ وَيَأْخُذُهَا بِيَمِينِهِ}: هَذَا حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ وَقَدْ قَالَ غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ فِي هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ وَمَا يُشْبِهُ هَذَا مِنَ الرِّوَايَاتِ مِنَ الصِّفَاتِ وَنُزُولِ الرَّبِّ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى كُلَّ لَيْلَةٍ إِلَى السَّمَاءِ الدُّنْيَا قَالُوا قَدْ تَثْبُتُ الرِّوَايَاتُ فِي هَذَا وَيُؤْمَنُ بِهَا وَلاَ يُتَوَهَّمُ وَلاَ يُقَالُ كَيْفَ هَكَذَا رُوِيَ عَنْ مَالِكٍ وَسُفْيَانَ بْنِ عُيَيْنَةَ وَعَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ الْمُبَارَكِ أَنَّهُمْ قَالُوا فِي هَذِهِ الأَحَادِيثِ أَمِرُّوهَا بِلاَ كَيْفٍ. وَهَكَذَا قَوْلُ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ مِنْ أَهْلِ السُّنَّةِ وَالْجَمَاعَةِ. وَأَمَّا الْجَهْمِيَّةُ فَأَنْكَرَتْ هَذِهِ الرِّوَايَاتِ وَقَالُوا هَذَا تَشْبِيهٌ. وَقَدْ ذَكَرَ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فِي غَيْرِ مَوْضِعٍ مِنْ كِتَابِهِ الْيَدَ وَالسَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ فَتَأَوَّلَتِ الْجَهْمِيَّةُ هَذِهِ الآيَاتِ فَفَسَّرُوهَا عَلَى غَيْرِ مَا فَسَّرَ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ وَقَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَمْ يَخْلُقْ آدَمَ بِيَدِهِ. وَقَالُوا إِنَّ مَعْنَى الْيَدِ هَاهُنَا الْقُوَّةُ. وَقَالَ إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ: إِنَّمَا يَكُونُ التَّشْبِيهُ إِذَا قَالَ يَدٌ كَيَدٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ يَدٍ أَوْ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ. فَإِذَا قَالَ: سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ فَهَذَا التَّشْبِيهُ وَأَمَّا إِذَا قَالَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى: يَدٌ وَسَمْعٌ وَبَصَرٌ وَلاَ يَقُولُ كَيْفَ وَلاَ يَقُولُ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ وَلاَ كَسَمْعٍ، فَهَذَا لاَ يَكُونُ تَشْبِيهًا وَهُوَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى فِي كِتَابِهِ: {لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِيرُ}. HR. At-Tirmidzi (662)

[@micoberss5579]

I was looking for this. Jazakallah khairan

[@donutman6239]

@@micoberss5579 Is there an English version?

[@micoberss5579]

@@donutman6239 there is. Search for Tirmidhi 664. Or 653.

[@donutman6239]

@@micoberss5579 Yes but I can only find the hadith, but not the Imam Tirmidhi’s explanation

[@micoberss5579]

@@donutman6239 At-Tirmidhī stated, “It has been stated by more than one scholar from the People of Knowledge about this narration and similar reports regarding the Attributes of Allah - and that our Lord, the Blessed and Most High, descends to the nearest heaven every night. So the scholars said: ‘Affirm these narrations, have faith in them, do not imagine them, nor ask how.’ The likes of this has been related from Mālik Ibn Anas (d. 179H), Sufyān ath-Thawrī (d. 161H), Sufyān Ibn ‘Uyainah and Abdullāh Ibn Al-Mubārak, who all said about such narrations, ‘Leave them as they are, without asking how.’ Such is the saying of the People of Knowledge from Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamā’ah. However, the Jahmiyyah oppose these narrations and say, ‘This is resemblance (tashbeeh)!’ However, Allah the Most High, has mentioned in various places in His Book, His Attribute of Hand, Hearing, and Seeing but the Jahmiyyah make false interpretations of these verses, explaining them in a way other than how they are explained by the People of Knowledge. They say, ‘Allah did not create Adam with His own Hand.’ They say that Hand means power. Ishāq Ibn Ibrāhīm Ar-Rāhūyah (d. 238H) said, ‘Resemblance is when it is said: ‘Hand like my hand, or similar to my hand.’ Or it is said, ‘Hearing like my Hearing, or similar to my hearing.’ Then this would be resemblance. But if what is being said is what Allah Himself has said, ‘Hand, Hearing and Seeing’ and it is not asked how, nor is it said, ‘Like my hearing or similar to my hearing.’ Then it is not resemblance. Allah, the Most Blessed and Most High, said in His Book, ‘There is none like Unto Him,and he is the all-Hearing,the all-Seeing.’” (See As-Sunan of At-Tirmidhī no. 662

[@Nvmnodvi]

it's seeming like a circular argument jumping between both asharia and salafi concepts

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Hadith 73 sects, all in nar except one, sahabas due to their fiqh asked which is the saved, and it was said those who follow my sunna and sahabas. Asharis use foreign bias of kalam like Qadriya used foreign shirk of maJEWsi. Imam Malik said stay away from bida, the ppl who are not silent on what the sahaba are silent on regarding Allah's Siffat. Md ibn Abdullah ibn Hakim said Imam Shafi debated hafs al fard, & was in utter disappointed, Shafi said it's better to error then to do ilmul kalam and become a zindique. shafi said for a person to do all sins save shirk its better then to be trialed in kalam. Abu Yusef says Ilmul kalam leads to zandiqah. Isnad Ilmul Kalam : Labid ebn Asim* - > Talut -> Aban ebn Sam'an -> Jaad. Labid did sihr on Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him. All sects started by disbeliever, Qadriya started by Suson, She'uh started by ebn Saba. Kulabi - > Jahmiyah - > Labid Assam. 10 :30 - Bukhari in Khalq af al Abbad said, I was present Khalid ibn Abdillah al Qasri in Wasit in Eid Adha said Taqallah mina wa minkum, I will slaughter Jaad Dirham who denies Allah took Ibrahim as a Khalil/friend and Allah didn't speak to Musa, Allah is high above this. Yahya ebn Ayyub said Nuaym al Balkhi said a man of murrow was friend of Jahm Safwan, I recited a certain verse, Jahm said you are smarter then Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him, When he recited Quran 20 :5, Jahm said If I could rub out thhis verse I would do so, then I recited surah Qasas story of Musa...Jahm threw the Quran, So he dropped him. Many Kulabi imams like Razi said our efforts in kalam were in vain & confusion, just he said and she said in kalam... it doesn't bring understanding, Imam Shahabi said in his works there is corruption. May Allah forgive him as he d. on good path, ebn Hajr said in lisan al mizan said he gave a wasiya or tawbah Imam Dhahabi mentioned & this corrected his aqida! It was said Razi spoke like it was sihr! Kulabis confess to use ilmul kalam, they jsut try to justify it saying there is two ilmul kalam etc. Sunnis uses used ilmul Kalam to show internal contradictions but Kulabis use it apart of aqida. Is affirming Siffat Qabr Anthropomorphism? Kulabi. 1. Tatil a. Takyil - says Jannah, Nar etc, are myths. b. Tajyir - says tafwid, we don't know Allah's Siffat c. Tawil - Those who distort Allah's Siffat with interpretation 2. Ahl Tamthil 3. Ahlul Siwa wa sabil. 20 :30 - Ahl Tawil & Tafwid both deny (Tatil) apparent meaning of Allah's Siffat. Muawwil interpret another meaning after their tatil, while tafwid do tatil and say I don't know. Ahl Tamthil was clarified by Isac Rahaway, imam of Bukhari who suggested to Bukhari to compile his sahih, Tamthil is to say Allah's Siffat like Hand is like our hand! Ahl Siwa wa Sabil agree with Allah's Names & attributes in Quran w/o tatil & tamthil. In Aqida we don't take qiyas, only qiyas is only in fiqh. Brother won't use Mutakirin but salaf. Imam Ibn Abdul Bar said Ahl sunna agree to Affirm Allah's Siffat w/o a how but Jahmiya, Mutazilah and Cawarij say those who affirm Allah's Siffat are mutashabi. Imam Tirmidhi in Book of Zakat (Hadith 662), Allah accepts Sadaqah with His right Hand and nurtures it, says the Siffat like descent, Vision, Hearing and Hand are all authentic, we can't say how, this is way of Imam Malik, Sufyan Uyanah, Ibn Mubarak, go over the verses w/o how. The Jahmiya did tahrif other then tawil of people of ilm. They say Allah didn't create Adam with His Hand but His Power... 31 :00 - Imam Malik, Abdullah Mubarak, Sufyan Uyaynah accepted these Siffat. Jahmiyah say this is Tashbih due to the tashbih in their mind. They say Isitwa is Tashbih. Imam tirmidhi also mentions Ishac Ruwaidah. So Mufawwada is also refuted as Tirmidhi says Ahl Sunnah did tawil, and Ahl tahrif of Jahmiya Kulabis follow are rejected. if They say Istiwa means Istawla, did the Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him hiding it? 40 :00 - Why do Kulabis prefer to affirm some, like 7 attributes and not others? Hayat, Iradah, Qudra, Ilm, Sama wa Basra & Kalam. Quran 42 : 11 - ... Quran 76, Allah affirms hearing and seeing in creation! Who said Hand or Yad is a tool. If you affirm Ilm how about Hikma? Human Akl doesn't negate the Sifat Qabr even if you can't reach it on akl alone. Naql affirms the Siffat. 50 :30 - Allah uses the term Dabba in Surah Hajj. Dhabba can be an ant. If I ride a Dhabba, does it mean ant? No. context. Quran 68 isn't proof for Shin but it's known through hadith. Allah is with us... with knowledge, using the attribute present to do tawil. Tawil has conditions. Can it have more then one meaning? Why choose that meaning? What is text of it? Wa Jaa Rabik, is not authentically attributed to Imam Ahmad, Hanbal ibn Ishaq is in this chain but Dhahabi says he opposes the other known students of Imam Ahmad, he is strage, or shad. Khallal or Murudi of his sons don't narrate this. It is not sahih from Imam Malik that he said Allah's descent is Allah's command, there might be a man salih ebn Habib who is critiqued, Abdullah ebn Ahmad critisizes, and is called a liar. 1 :00 :00 - Imam Tirmidhi's said Ahl Ilm gave tafsir other than tafsir of Jahmiya shows tafwid is wrong as the verses of Allah's Siffat has Tafsir. Sufyan ibn Uayanah said just reciting these verses is the tafsir. (source?) without khayf or Mithlihi. Affirm the word & leave the how.

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

1 :10 :00 - Jahmiya say yad is there but it means kudra, ad they did play around with kalmalahu Musa... Bukhari has a hadith asking does Allah laugh? We won't be deprived of Mercy from a Lord Who laughs. So meaning is affirmed. In that time of the imam's Tirmishi mentioned was fitnah of jahmiyah not Mufawid but these hadiths do refute the Mufaid. Brother recites Quran 3 :7 - ... - Is this ayat clearly for Tafwid? Ok how about the 7 you affirm? ( You are like Qadriya affirming & rejecting Siffat based on another religion not Islam) 1 :20 :00 - Ebn Jariri's Tafsir is called Tawil. How can we use a contemporary word and use it in an ancient context. Why are Ashari's 7 not Mutashabi? In whole Quran there is no mutashabi Kalimat... or words. Alif Lam Miim are letters. Mutashabi is subjective (Nisbi not mudlock or unrestricted). Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him knew meaning of all words in Quran. Hadith ebn Umar created 4 with His Yad, and rest was created by Be. There is a difference between restricting something & affirming something. Abu Aaylia, ebn Abbas would sit him up and say ilm increases honor. Ikraima the mole of ebn Abbas, on aya meaning 2 hands... ebn Mulaika 117h. d, he was asked about Yad being one or two, he said 2. 1 :30 :00 - Sufyan Uyaynah said Rabiya ebn Abdur Rahman was asled how did Allah Istiwa, he said Istiwa is not majhul, ghayra Muqlun, Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him 's role is o coney! upon us is tasdiq. Sufyan Thawri said if Tafsir Mujahid comes that's enough. Quran 39 :67 - Walid ebn Musliman, Imam Ahmad was asked about Allah's speech having sound, we narrate the statements as they come & of course. Buhkari in Kalq af al Ibad... Ebn Abbas on Samad says it means Sayyid. Takes the tafwid people out. Ebn Qudama said leaving the meaning to Allah... he means meaning of jahmiyah. Ebn Qudama in Lumat Itiqad explains his belief in detail and has nothing to do with Kulabis Does Allah forget? Allah negates Forgetting in Quran 20 :52. So in Quran 23 when it says Allah will forget you today just as you forgot this day, it means Allah forgets or ignores them deliberately, not unintentionally. 1 :40 :00 - Quran 9 :67 shows the hypocrites forgotten Allah... so Allah forgets them... showing forgetting can also mean on purpose or ignoring. This isn't tawil but bringing it to it's haqiqat meaning in context. To say Yad means body is Tashbih, ithbat/affirming and tatil or negation is done with proofs. Quran says peace be upon the messengers. Some say Allah's speech isn't tied to Allah's will or His speech isn't eternal as He may stop so apart of Allah is created. Quran says Allah spoke to Musa... 1 :50 :00 - Kulabis want to prove Allah exists by always existing and used the wrong path. Siffat is Thatiyah, Fehliya & Both. Kulabis don't know Siffat Fehliya and say Allah's speech is eternal. Some characteristics shared by creation doesn't mean reaity is same, like khummer here isn't the same as Janna which does no harm. ( See Tafsir ibn Kathir Quran 2 :25) Kulabis use terms like prime mover... this is ambiguous misguidance, SAlaf just used the terms already known. Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him was sent to calrify quran. 2 :00 :00 - Allah being over His Throne is mentionedin Quran more than the Siffat Kulabis affirm. Salaf said 1k proofs Allah is over His Arsh. Do Kulabis relly understand things properly? Person was asked how do you know which one to affirm and not affirm? - quiet. We know Allah is above through positions of hands. Kulabis opened unlimited tawil leading people to atheism. When Allah created Adam he was honored and singled out as being made by Allah's Hand so its praiseworthy. There is majaz in Quran but it needs dalil. Quran says ponders over it, so how can it be figurative? Md said Ramadan Buuti, fodah are Kulabis, Azhar teaches it. Hasan Sakov was refuted by imam Albani, Abdul Fata ghufar, Kowthari are also kulabis. 2 :10 :00 - Kowtharis insulted Sahabas and the salaf just to stick to abu Hanifah. Hatim Awni water down Islam. Haqatullahi was refuted on Awni. Quran says there will always be a group of people on truth. Some of the kulabis will say and agree with their own bida when asked. Allah instructed us to know Him, Know Allah is all Hearing All Seeing, Know Allah is Ghafurul Halim, Know Allah is with with Muttaqin so have taqwa Know Allah is All Powerful All Wise. Know is a command. Tawil is where division began. Ibn Qaayim mentiosns this in his nooniyah. hadith 73 sects are those w/in ummah, so they are Muslims and will be in jahunnum temporarily. Choose the sunna and not be a fan of any imam as in qiyamat you will be alone. If the Kulabi imams repented then why don't you? We were created to know Allah in Quran 65 :12! Hadith Sahihayn, learning Allah's attributes leads to jannah!

[@Western.war_edits]

BarakAllahu Feekum 🤍

[@fjfaizaljamalfj]

Jazak Allah Khair for the beneficial lecture. Could you also please do a hot seat podcast about the deviance of deobandis and their off shoots? بارك الله فيك

[@nailfelagund7508]

Look at these Asharis seething in the comments 😂

[@muktarmohamud506]

ROUND 2: another bangger

[@saidrizki6328]

With regards to forgetteness forget mean ignore so the Ayat they forget Allah and Allah forgets them is literary mean they ignore the call of Allah and Allah ignored them because in Arabic nissyan does not mean all time forget but its also mean forget

[@iman3622]

2:13:00 does this mean misunderstanding even in the aqeedah doesn't take one out of the fold of Islam? I think in the Kash as Shubuhat series by Tim bumble (day 4) it's mentioned that problematic aqeedah can put you in hellfire eternally.

[@esaabdullah2762]

These people are still around, they run the masjid and lead the prayer in many masijid in the US. We ask Allah for safety

[@aboeAimen]

mha sha Allah what a beautiful saying from that Sa7habi radija Allah 3anhum. the one about Asamad realy softens the heart. subhaan Allah.

[@ferrysukarno]

بارك الله فيكم. May Allah Ta'ala reward you for this beneficial podcast. And may He give all of us guidance to the right path of the ahlus sawa'i sabeel.

[@mohammedbilal988]

Assalamualaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh I Hope you guys are in the Best Health and Iman. I am reading a book called qala’id al iqyan by imam BalBani which is a summarised book of ibn Hamdan’s book nihaytul mubtadeen fi usool deen, John sterling is the one who translated Qala’id al Iqyan into English. My question is that the tawheed of Allah is 1 he cannot be separated or broken up when you say Allah Has a hand but it’s not like the hand of creation you are adding something to Allah which can be attached or detached. So how do you explain this? JazakAllah khair May Allah reward you with the best of this life and the next. Ameen

[@bilaalal-maghreebi5899]

1:26:06 HEAVY Barakallaah Feek

[@sukurkur]

Brothers Salam Aleikum Can somebody please provide the transcript We are teaching the content to students at our school

[@ummyousef230]

Where can I find the recitation at the beginning of the video?

[@donutman6239]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/q2ncZ3p_g55ojtE

[@Openmind2Openhearts]

What does تشبه نسبي/مطلق mean? 1:24:04

[@hakantekin3047]

Which books would the ustadh recommend? so that we too can learn & talk about this topic like himself may Allah bless him!

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Listen to Abu Uwais Aqidah WAsitiyah lectures!

[@turkishsalafi9819]

Al-Aqeedah al-Wasitiyyah, Al-Aqeedah al-Tahawiyyah, Usool as-Sunnah and many others.

[@InfoHubNow]

Who is the reciter at the intro?

[@galaktikhoroz9338]

ustadh Abdurrahman hassan. the guest

[@ansarad-deen2647]

Round 2? :O Top!

[@taufiqazhar2112]

where is the CC / subtitle :(

[@albiboi123]

What was that course that the sheikh mentioned at the end where he said that he went into detail regarding the hadeeth about the 73 sects

[@jebrilabdulazeez]

Explaining that hadith in detail and perhaps categorizing the 73 groups

[@Ibn-e-Dawood]

Can someone tell me who is the QARI in he start of the video?

[@iftekhartuhin]

It is the ustad himself

[@Ibn-e-Dawood]

MashaAllah! if he has recorded whole quran Tilawat, I will like to get InshaAllah. @@iftekhartuhin

[@iftekhartuhin]

@@Ibn-e-Dawood I don't think he has recorded whole quran recitation. But if you search you may find some clips.

[@Ibn-e-Dawood]

JazakAllah, I will contact him InshaAllah@@iftekhartuhin

[@FidanHasanzadeStudent]

@@Ibn-e-Dawood he has recited the whole quran during ramadan and posted it

[@ahmadsultan23]

I love you for the sake of Allah ❤

[@haadis2986]

I am confused. I honestly have read some statements where salaf said we don’t interpret and we read the verses as they are and move on from them without asking how? That is not the same as giving a meaning. I haven’t really seen scholars give a meaning from the past. Can someone please provide some evidence so my heart can feel at ease? Some evidence stating from early generation that we take the literal meaning? It seems that we are the ones giving a meaning by doing so and claiming this is what a scholar said when in fact he may or may have not intended that. I only understand you leave the verses as they are without questioning how. Allah knows best.

[@galaktikhoroz9338]

look at sahih al Bukhari 4547 brother. may Allah guide the seeker to the truth .

[@abelo2305]

Very easy, darimi for instance

[@humza9460]

Mad Ash'aris in the comments

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

and some of them want to learn others are actually madd...

[@msulaiman21]

The claim that the Sahaabah (r.a.a.) understood the sifaat such as yad implicitly not to mean "hand", so it didn't need to be explained and thus narrated, completely ignores their duty after Rasoolullaah (s.a.w.s.) to communicate Islaam to communities that were not Arabic speakers, and so had absolutely no implicit understanding of yad (for example). As such, the claimed meaning of "not hand" and what the actual meaning was had to be taught explicitly in such words to such people. There is absolutely no narration demonstrating this from any student of any Sahaabi or any of the students of the students of a Sahaabi.

[@awbennaibnghani2307]

The issue is language itself is problematic. By translating يد as hand, means that it has been interpreted whether you like it or not. Instead it should be left as يد i.e it shouldn’t be translated at all

[@awbennaibnghani2307]

If you take a look in any of the classical قواميس you will see يد has many meanings, not just hand

[@ihsanmahmood8789]

@Shafiullah Noory The literal meaning of "Yad" is a body part

[@turkishsalafi9819]

Imaam at-Tirmidhee(d. 279H )said in his Sunan (1/128-129 no. 662): وَقَدْ قَالَ غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ فِي هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ وَمَا يُشْبِهُ هَذَا مِنَ الرِّوَايَاتِ مِنَ الصِّفَاتِ وَنُزُولِ الرَّبِّ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى كُلَّ لَيْلَةٍ إِلَى السَّمَاءِ الدُّنْيَا قَالُوا قَدْ تَثْبُتُ الرِّوَايَاتُ فِي هَذَا وَيُؤْمَنُ بِهَا وَلاَ يُتَوَهَّمُ وَلاَ يُقَالُ كَيْفَ هَكَذَا رُوِيَ عَنْ مَالِكٍ وَسُفْيَانَ بْنِ عُيَيْنَةَ وَعَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ الْمُبَارَكِ أَنَّهُمْ قَالُوا فِي هَذِهِ الأَحَادِيثِ أَمِرُّوهَا بِلاَ كَيْفٍ. وَهَكَذَا قَوْلُ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ مِنْ أَهْلِ السُّنَّةِ وَالْجَمَاعَةِ. وَأَمَّا الْجَهْمِيَّةُ فَأَنْكَرَتْ هَذِهِ الرِّوَايَاتِ وَقَالُوا هَذَا تَشْبِيهٌ. وَقَدْ ذَكَرَ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فِي غَيْرِ مَوْضِعٍ مِنْ كِتَابِهِ الْيَدَ وَالسَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ فَتَأَوَّلَتِ الْجَهْمِيَّةُ هَذِهِ الآيَاتِ فَفَسَّرُوهَا عَلَى غَيْرِ مَا فَسَّرَ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ وَقَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَمْ يَخْلُقْ آدَمَ بِيَدِهِ. وَقَالُوا إِنَّ مَعْنَى الْيَدِ هَاهُنَا الْقُوَّةُ. وَقَالَ إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ إِنَّمَا يَكُونُ التَّشْبِيهُ إِذَا قَالَ يَدٌ كَيَدٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ يَدٍ أَوْ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ. فَإِذَا قَالَ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ فَهَذَا التَّشْبِيهُ وَأَمَّا إِذَا قَالَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى يَدٌ وَسَمْعٌ وَبَصَرٌ وَلاَ يَقُولُ كَيْفَ وَلاَ يَقُولُ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ وَلاَ كَسَمْعٍ فَهَذَا لاَ يَكُونُ تَشْبِيهًا وَهُوَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى فِي كِتَابِهِ: {لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِيرُ}. “It has been stated by more than one person from the People of Knowledge about this hadeeth and other similar narrations regarding the Attributes of Allaah; And our Lord, the Blessed and Most High, descending to the nearest heaven every night. So they said: ‘Affirm these narrations, have Eemaan (faith) in them, do not imagine them, nor ask how.’ The likes of this has been related from Maalik ibn Anas, Sufyaan ath-Thawree, Ibn Uyainah and Abdullaah Ibn al-Mubaarak, who all said about such narrations: ‘Leave them as they are, without asking how.’ Such is the saying of the People of Knowledge from Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Jamaa’ah. However, the Jahmiyyah oppose these narrations and say: ‘This is resemblance (tashbeeh)!’ However, Allaah the Most High, has mentioned in various places in His Book, the Attribute of al-Yad (Hand), as-Sama’ (Hearing), and al-Basr (Seeing) - but the Jahmiyyah make ta’weel (false interpretation) of these aayaat (verses), explaining them in a way other than how they are explained by the People of Knowledge. They say: ‘Indeed, Allaah did not create Aadam with His own Hand - they say that Hand means the Power’.”

[@skyinuri8868]

Excuse me, is syeikh imran hussein a good one? Because lot of countries banned his dakwah eventho he is a farmous scholar for eschatology

[@Urbro_meast]

Trust me , avoid him at all cost . Do you need evidence or do you believe me ?

[@Urbro_meast]

Anyways here is the evidence kzbin.info/www/bejne/oIbIgXimoZt5hbM

[@abdulibnabdul1666]

imran hossain is an alex jones style dajjal. he says he's anit dajjal but supports khomeini who said Ali has a new Quran. he said he is against israelis but supports iran's 79 cia revolt, the oriignal jet bombers who took in exiled al queda and lied on iraq wmds. he says he can interpret Quran verses and its interpretation is incomplete.

[@justabrother356]

Abu mussab also has videos on him.

[@huza1fa]

whose recitation is in the intro?

[@syedsaad1594]

Ustadh Abdul Rahman himself

[@conjugatemethod]

Where is the Ash'ari?

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Asrar has been debated, defeated, caught running as he turned off his own comments in his challenge video calling to shirk, after salafis exposed and beat him and he has been caught lying or misquoting badly if we give him the benefit of the doubt, like on Ibn Kathir etc., shame on him.

[@conjugatemethod]

@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 your delusion about these matters is not surprising given your corrupt beliefs and deviancy.

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

@@conjugatemethod making claims means nothing without evidences! "your delusion" - give evidence & citations if true! everything I said is transparent with proofs I can show openly, but if you want to lies on me w/ no evidence as you soppose to help or bring proof when asked, you can lose good deeds.

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

@@conjugatemethod "your corrupt beliefs and deviancy." - Are you saying Quran & Sunna Fahm Sahaba is corrupt & deviant as its what I follow to my best! But if you truly feel i am in error, bring evidence so I can correct, if not you are a liar, which would be "not surprising" as you put it, you can be losing deeds or sinning!

[@ibnmuhammad886]

Ustadh, what does it mean when the Hadith say Adam ﷺ was created in Allah عزّ وجلّ image? Please respond

[@ussyj8783]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/aJOviWltiNujhdU

[@tahahagar7664]

Thats an Israiliat, same with Hawa being created from the rib of Adam....

[@hmzzrg5045]

Fear Allah the fact that Hawa was created from the rib of Adam is from the Sunnah.

[@ne5788]

That hadith is reported by bukhari and Muslim so is not an israiliyat. Ibn uthaimin mentioned and others scholars before him that the meaning is that Allah created him in his image so he have face, hands, eyes,etc. But that doesn't means that is resembling him with Allah like the prophet salla Allah alaihi wa salam said: the first group of my community will enter jannah have the image of the moon. Reported by bukhari and Muslim. That doesn't means that are rocks and don't have eyes and faces, rather it means that their faces will by brilliant with nur like the moon. Another response that he gave is that this is from attributing the creation to the creation like Allah said about Adam: و نفخت فيه من روحي and doesn't mean that Allah gave his ruh to Adam by it means that he created his ruh and he honored him with that. After that he said that the first response is the strongest one.

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

1st Imam Ashari repented & became close to Athari writing al Ibana before death! Salafis I know, say we don't liken Allah to his creation & affirm his Attributes as in Quran 42 :11 & 7 :180 - affirming Allah's attributes without likening. Allah is All Hearing & Seeing, & also we hear & see - so based on Khulab/"Ashari" logic Allah can't Hear or See! Aw'uthubillah! Ahlul Sunni, here I mean, Islam or salafis teach 3 categories of Tawhid/Oneness. 1. Tawhid Rububiyah - Allah's Lordship or His actions as Creator etc. (Quran 1 :2) 2. Tawhid Ulluhiyah - Allah's Oneness in Godhood or being served as He taught (Quran 6 :162 & 163). 3. Tawhid Asma wa Saffat - Names and Attributes of Allah understood properly... Category 3 has 4 sub pillars to understand Allah's (Tawhid in) Names & Attributes: A) No Tatil or denial - Quran 7 :180. - Affirm Allah's perfect attributes! B) No Tamthil or likening, - Quran 42 -11. - Affirm without likening. C) No Takyif or questioning the how of the unseen - Quran 17 :36. D) No Tahrif or distorting w/o evidence - Quran 7 :33. (Hence directing implying any Tawil is Tawqif/Text based, Quran 3 :7) Some of us believe tahrif may involve tatil as well of the apparent meaning. >>> Clarifications on our view: A) Salafis don't say Attributes of Allah mean an appendage of limb/body... Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: It is well-known that there is no report from any of the Prophets or from the Sahaabah or from the Taabi‘een or from any of the early generations of the ummah to suggest that Allah is a physical entity or that He is not a physical entity. Rather denying or affirming that is an innovation according to Islam. End quote. - Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa (5/434). I propose - They, Khulab/Asharis should be nuetral like Ibn Tamiyyah and say we don't say about Allah what isn't revealed & we don't know and affirm what Allah says, following Quran 7 :33 or they open endless shirk & division! We affirm what Allah affirm and nuetral on what Allah hasn't mentioned! Khulab Asharis don't affirm what Allah has affirmed and affirm what Allah hasn't mentioned! - this is enough to show their error! For Khulab Asharis to differentiate attributes all of which Allah said to confirm, shows they are following someone other then Allah showing error! Usually greek philosophers who say bodies are temporary so Khulab Asharis use this logic & say therefore imply foreign logic is here = to Islam & this is wrong, we seek refuge from that! B) Re: "directions" - We say what Islam teaches & don't add or subtract out of humbleness as there is nothing like Allah. Allah's High above the Arsh is a sign of Tawhid taught to the Muslim slave & even firaun in Sura 28 & 40... Direct Evidence Allah is above His Arsh in the Farewell Sermon, Abu Bakr, Abu Hanifa etc. 1. ... I have left among you the Book of Allah, and if you hold fast to it, you would never go astray. And you would be asked about me (on the Day of Resurrection), what would you say? They (the audience) said: We will bear witness that you have conveyed (the message), discharged (the ministry of Prophethood) and given wise (sincere) counsel. He (the narrator Jafar bin Muhammad) said: **He (the Blessed Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him) then raised his forefinger towards the sky and pointing it at the people (said):" O Allah, be witness. 0 Allah, be witness," saying it thrice.** (Bilal then) pronounced Adhan and later... source : Sahih Muslim 1218 a - book of hajj/pilgrimage. 2. Aqida Tahawiya on Allah above the Throne (الْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ) وَالْعَرْشُ وَالْكُرْسِيُّ حَقٌّ - The Throne (al-‘arsh) and the Footstool (al-kursī) are true. وَهُوَ مُسْتَغْنٍ عَنِ الْعَرْشِ وَمَا دُونَهُ - He is independent of the Throne and whatever is beneath it. مُحِيطٌ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَفَوْقَهُ وَقَدْ أَعْجَزَ عَنِ الْإِحَاطَةِ خَلْقَهُ - He encompasses all things and *He is above it,* and what He has created is incapable of encompassing Him. Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him said I am the most blessed salaf for you - Sahihayn! Salafi Dawa is the path to the Sunna, Quran 9 :100... (Manhaj of Sahabas, 4 mathhabs, etc.) >>> Point 2 : Salafis reject Khulab Ashari view of rejecting the description of Allah & jahmiyah reject Allah's description of Himself & at times also try to redefine it going into another error of tahrif or speaking about Allah without knowledge or Quran 7 :33. For examples Ashari say Allah's Hands means power violating Quran 7 :33. But Allah says He has 2 hands. does this mean He has 2 powers? In Hadiths Allah created 3 things with His Hands, Jannah's plantings, Adam and the "Tablet" Torah. So how about the rest of the world created by His power, see Quran 65 :12? So the Ashari view contradicts Islam's teachings, but even before that the error they made is that they are not humble and accepting to Allah's words as He taught... Also see this example... When Allah asked satan why don't you prostrate to who I created with My Own Hands in Surah 38 :75? If Hands meant power satan could of said you made with with Your Hands as well oh Allah... >>> In Summary : With regards to Allah's Attributes (Hands in Quran 5 :64 or Face in Quran 75 :22, or Shin in Quran 68, or Eyes in Quran 54 etc.) Salafis - Affirm (no tatil), without likening (tamthil) leaving takyif/modality... for someone to say affirming the meaning of Allah's words is tamthil is accusing Allah of tamthil, and we seek refuge with Allah from that! To change the meaning of something from the unseen needs evidence from text as only Allah reveals the unseen as He wishes (Quran 6 :50 etc.) As the hadiths say Allah made us in His Image in His will, not the other way around. Asharis type 1 (tahrif) - do tatil and tahrif/tawil (violating Quran 7 :33), denying the apparent and say about Allah what they don't know or... for them to even imply they can do ijtihad is to violate not doing takyif (Quran 17 :36) & only agreeing with Salafis on not likening Allah. Ashari type 2 (tafwid) - do tatil (violating Quran 7 :180) of the meaning but agree with the salafis on not likening or rejecting tamthil and tawil or leaving the takyif/modality! sometimes they say we deny outward meaning for another outward meaning but leave the kayf to Allah, thats a contradiction unless you want to either agree with salafis on outward meaning or ... say their is a secret meaning tahrif violating Quran 7 :33 & Quran 5 :3 that Islam is complete, as Islam is a clear and open religion, showing you open up doors to make up lies on Islam limitlessly and this is the danger of the khulab Ashari bida!

[@Cj-cv5sl]

does any know if there's a full version of the intro ?

[@HaHa-cq4lr]

Try with surah rad abdurahman hassan

[@nabeel8194]

Pardon the pun, but the hot seat podcast is 🔥

[@limitedquantitysufiyyahexp3913]

...

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

haha@@limitedquantitysufiyyahexp3913

[@dinakhattab6609]

Ashari aqeeda is taught in al-Azhar university today, I have close relatives who teach it there, May Allah keep us steadfast on the correct aqeeda 🤲 I need a pen and paper for this talk and the one before, it is actually very shocking, I didn't know their history and how they came about. I wonder if the ones teaching it in al-Azhar know all this?!

[@pingu.3712]

yes its filled with a lot of goofiness

[@إبنبَطُّوطَة-ظ9ي]

Barakallah kheyran

[@razitube6010]

1:21:19 😂 the verse of quran neither says a letter nor a word its says aya and "aliflammim" is aya plus there some disputes between ulema of the undrestanding of the aya but neither of them did said as he said that mutshabiw is when it is related to persond or subjective lol

[@form.of.dhikr2]

شروط تأويل- لفظ مشترك- واحد كلمة عنده كثير معاني. سبب لتأويل تستطيع أن تجب أسأل لأن أصل في الكلام الظاهر.

[@salafiilm5958]

That outfit of Ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan looks nice! MAA'SHAA'ALLAH!

[@hamzafarah4417]

Here we go

[@showkathussain2589]

Who is the Qari reciting Quran at the start of this vedio

[@saeedjaanz]

Its sheikh Abdur rehman himself. Ma Sha Allah, he has a beautiful Qira'h.

[@ozone2126]

❤❤❤😊😊😊

[@mmmukhtar9242]

Is the sheikh in the group that will go to Jannah?

[@BIEBERLASTIC]

@Faz Abubaker he try say shafii was ashari big LOL. He was against the Kalaam that asharis are upon.

[@BIEBERLASTIC]

@Fawaz Shaikh they should watch this video, and read the books the ustadh is talking about, there is not one lie in this video.

[@BarisTitanX]

I sincerely don't understand why he doesn't view them as kuffaar, even if mutlaqan. All that talk about them being Jahmiyyah (the Salaf unanimously agree that the Jahmiyyah are kuffaar) and many of their maqaalaat are kufr with the Salaf and the Khalaf such as (at the very least) believing the Qur'an is created, denying the sifaat of Allaah, denying Allah is above His Throne, those are three kufriyaat right off the bat. And go look at what the Ashaa'irah usually say about shirkiyaat like tawassul and istighaathah, like 90% of them will not view istighaathah with the Prophet as shirk and even do it themselves. They are usually Quboori's. Noone is saying takfeer al-mu'ayyan (yet), as for mutlaqan, definitely outside of the fold of Islam and thus NOT included in the hadith of the 73 firaq.

[@AbuAbdullahAlHanbali]

What? How is tawassul shirk lol 4 madhabs agree

[@baobaobao208]

@@AbuAbdullahAlHanbali there's weirdo tawassul and then there is the ahlul sunnah tawassul. I think he's talking about the weirdo tawassul

[@ngalong8219]

❤❤❤❤❤ Semoga ada yang translate ke Indonesia

[@زيد-ف6خ7ز]

Ustaadh said that they say "Istawa" means "Istowla". What does "Istowla" mean?

[@adamadv732]

To seize

[@X4XP11]

To take over something.

[@soufyan454]

What is ustadh reciting in the intro?

[@alhomsiyyah]

It's from Surat Al Ra'd

[@soufyan454]

@@alhomsiyyah Jazaka'Allahu khayran

[@thetruebeliever3292]

@@alhomsiyyah link

[@lejamesbron5880]

What do you brothers think about Seekersguidance?

[@carimaelfarrah7800]

Have a look at the Chechnya Conference, 200 scholars from around the world gather to discuss who are ahla sunna wa jamah.

[@abdurrahman_muwahid3053]

MaShaaAllah Allahumma Barik

[@ayyubwajid7528]

1:43:25 He doesn't even know if Allah has a body or not. What kind of aqeedah is this?

[@ayyubwajid7528]

No mental gymnastics. Does Allah have a body? Yes or no.

[@ayyubwajid7528]

@Faz Abubaker So apparently Allah doesn't have hands or a face or a shin.

[@ayyubwajid7528]

@Faz Abubaker To summarize: 1. Allah does not have a body. 2. Allah does have hands and a face in their apparent meaning (literally). This is all people need to know about this aqeedah. Two simultaneous contradictory beliefs held in mind by longwinded doublethink. One belief to be in conformity with the vast majority of Muslims, the other a hidden one for those amongst themselves. That is why the man in the video could not answer yes or no. He had to make an elaborate explanation to obfuscate the initial question. If you read it and it disturbed you, then trust your gut. @Faz Abubaker Since you are so adamant about this joke aqeedah, I invite you to pray that the liar receive a terrible torment in this life immediately, and the truthful to receive immediate blessings. I also invite all readers to pray likewise. I will not reply anymore.

[@turkishsalafi9819]

@@ReturningRuh Imaam at-Tirmidhee(d. 279H )said in his Sunan (1/128-129 no. 662): وَقَدْ قَالَ غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ فِي هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ وَمَا يُشْبِهُ هَذَا مِنَ الرِّوَايَاتِ مِنَ الصِّفَاتِ وَنُزُولِ الرَّبِّ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى كُلَّ لَيْلَةٍ إِلَى السَّمَاءِ الدُّنْيَا قَالُوا قَدْ تَثْبُتُ الرِّوَايَاتُ فِي هَذَا وَيُؤْمَنُ بِهَا وَلاَ يُتَوَهَّمُ وَلاَ يُقَالُ كَيْفَ هَكَذَا رُوِيَ عَنْ مَالِكٍ وَسُفْيَانَ بْنِ عُيَيْنَةَ وَعَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ الْمُبَارَكِ أَنَّهُمْ قَالُوا فِي هَذِهِ الأَحَادِيثِ أَمِرُّوهَا بِلاَ كَيْفٍ. وَهَكَذَا قَوْلُ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ مِنْ أَهْلِ السُّنَّةِ وَالْجَمَاعَةِ. وَأَمَّا الْجَهْمِيَّةُ فَأَنْكَرَتْ هَذِهِ الرِّوَايَاتِ وَقَالُوا هَذَا تَشْبِيهٌ. وَقَدْ ذَكَرَ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فِي غَيْرِ مَوْضِعٍ مِنْ كِتَابِهِ الْيَدَ وَالسَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ فَتَأَوَّلَتِ الْجَهْمِيَّةُ هَذِهِ الآيَاتِ فَفَسَّرُوهَا عَلَى غَيْرِ مَا فَسَّرَ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ وَقَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَمْ يَخْلُقْ آدَمَ بِيَدِهِ. وَقَالُوا إِنَّ مَعْنَى الْيَدِ هَاهُنَا الْقُوَّةُ. وَقَالَ إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ إِنَّمَا يَكُونُ التَّشْبِيهُ إِذَا قَالَ يَدٌ كَيَدٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ يَدٍ أَوْ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ. فَإِذَا قَالَ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ فَهَذَا التَّشْبِيهُ وَأَمَّا إِذَا قَالَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى يَدٌ وَسَمْعٌ وَبَصَرٌ وَلاَ يَقُولُ كَيْفَ وَلاَ يَقُولُ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ وَلاَ كَسَمْعٍ فَهَذَا لاَ يَكُونُ تَشْبِيهًا وَهُوَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى فِي كِتَابِهِ: {لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِيرُ}. “It has been stated by more than one person from the People of Knowledge about this hadeeth and other similar narrations regarding the Attributes of Allaah; And our Lord, the Blessed and Most High, descending to the nearest heaven every night. So they said: ‘Affirm these narrations, have Eemaan (faith) in them, do not imagine them, nor ask how.’ The likes of this has been related from Maalik ibn Anas, Sufyaan ath-Thawree, Ibn Uyainah and Abdullaah Ibn al-Mubaarak, who all said about such narrations: ‘Leave them as they are, without asking how.’ Such is the saying of the People of Knowledge from Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Jamaa’ah. However, the Jahmiyyah oppose these narrations and say: ‘This is resemblance (tashbeeh)!’ However, Allaah the Most High, has mentioned in various places in His Book, the Attribute of al-Yad (Hand), as-Sama’ (Hearing), and al-Basr (Seeing) - but the Jahmiyyah make ta’weel (false interpretation) of these aayaat (verses), explaining them in a way other than how they are explained by the People of Knowledge. They say: ‘Indeed, Allaah did not create Aadam with His own Hand - they say that Hand means the Power’.”

[@hamzaahmed5436]

@@ReturningRuh you might as well say the aqeedah of all the salaf are blasphemous cuz that’s what they said. Look at the video and first video refuteion of hanafi fiqh channel it’s mentioend there

[@changinglifestyle6675]

Where's part 1 please?

[@jebrilabdulazeez]

Check the channel listings or just below this video

[@hamzahassan5282]

Can Ustadh bring back the tafsiir series?

[@hamzahassan5282]

@AMAU

[@MohamedAli-nf8cp]

Using Ilm al-Kalam is not always rejected. There are times where it is permissible to use, provided certain conditions are met. Even Ibn Taymiyyah learned and used Kalami arguments for legitimate purposes, such as defending the religion against heretics such as the Batiniyyah, and their likes. The Hanbalis, along with the majority of scholars allow Kalam, provided the Sunni methodology is followed. Al-Hajjawi (r) says: “The opposite of the Islamic sciences are those that are either disliked or impermissible. The impermissible is like Ilm al-Kalam.” Al-Buhuti explains further, stating: “[It is impermissible] only if purely rational arguments are used. As for using textual evidences, or rational evidences along with textual evidences, then this is the Usūl al-Dīn, and the way of the people of Sunnah. This is the meaning of Sheikh Taqī al-Dīn [Ibn Taymiyyah]’s words.” [See: Kashaf al-Qina] قال الإمام الحجاوي في الإقناع: (وَعَكْسُ الْعُلُومِ الشَّرْعِيَّةِ: عُلُومٌ مُحَرَّمَةٌ أَوْ مَكْرُوهَةٌ، فَالْمُحَرَّمَةُ كَعِلْمِ الْكَلَامِ). قال العلامة البهوتي في الكشاف: (إذَا تَكَلَّمَ فِيهِ بِالْمَعْقُولِ الْمَحْضِ، أَوْ الْمُخَالِفِ لِلْمَنْقُولِ الصَّرِيحِ الصَّحِيحِ. فَإِنْ تَكَلَّمَ فِيهِ بِالنَّقْلِ فَقَطْ، أَوْ بِالنَّقْلِ وَالْعَقْلِ الْمُوَافِقِ لَهُ، فَهُوَ أَصْلُ الدِّينِ، وَطَرِيقَةُ أَهْلِ السُّنَّةِ وَهَذَا مَعْنَى كَلَامِ الشَّيْخِ تَقِيِّ الدِّينِ).

[@RijHetWijst]

1:43:00 loool

[@liamegan171]

This is the aqeedah in Malaysia

[@osamamanan2723]

Can you rectify your methodology by not solely relying on aqwaal of salaf? For example prophet being seated on throne with Allah, there is no athar to back it up. Give us Quran and authentic sunnah to back it up. This is only problem in a few aqaid like this. No problem in Istawa, Yadd, Face, shin of Allah etc. Some scholars like Tabareeh didnt believe that prophet will be seated on throne and he was tortured by some hanabila.

[@osamamanan2723]

@@shaqster8361 i know. I heard that which is why I asked here again. Can't rely on one person.

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

@@shaqster8361 bro hajji has been dubbed bro kariji due to his lying and judeo kawarij views, he even lied like some of the medina yeahood preacher did lying about books while holding them open in front of them. watch : *"Part 4 - Bro Hajji - Obeying the Ruler - Sunnah or Bootlicking? "**

[@salam.r2622]

@@shaqster8361 Hajji isn't a learned brother with respect to him. May Allah guide us and him.

[@salam.r2622]

@Ibrahim Ibn Mahmud He doesn't have any authority as far as i am aware. This just shows ppl take their deen from any tom dicken Harry. If you were severely ill would you go to bro Hajji or qualified Doctor for medical advice?

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

@@shaqster8361 bro kariji lies, why would him being on a podcast change that!