Absolutely flawless video

private browsing & vpn's are going to do nothing to protect your privacy, people. Please just be aware. This is mainly the fault of these types of social media, and if people used federated networks that didn't rely on algorithms, it might not be so bad

Harry Potter does show gender equality in one sense that the men and women fight and die together

This guy has the charisma of a wet napkin, but listening to his instructions -- and then seeing how Trump's media machine works, and then seeing how the "major" media covered the national election -- and here we are -- I think BeardGuy's methods worked on reporters.

Not keeping kids safe isn't shallow why would the Malfoy family send their kids to probably die? And her house system argument is inherently flawed she said " yes there's popular kids,stoners etc" but those kids got to choose that the school chooses and they put the kids in giant echo chambers you put all of the bad ones together of course it's going to create magic Hitler

Gaw Damn this is depressing to view on November 23, 2024.

FINALLY... I feel like I'm being attacked daily by the "beautiful cabin crew"... the shit is all over my feed.

8:15 Would it be? He has no parents a shit family and dumbledoor knows that. So him caring more for Harry makes alot of sense and well Harry in his position putting more trust into dumbledoor also makes alot of sense. He is the ultimate authority in the school and one of the few people there who genuinely care about him besides hagrid, ron and hermione so it makes sense that they would be closer then normal students especially considering Harry's importance to the wizarding world as a whole. Its a relationship sprouting out of the circumstances given. Of course a regular student wouldn't have such a relationship with a normal headmaster but thats not what is happening here

At least I was born in time to live the majority of my life before the collapse of society and extinction of our species

I will always be found of the time I spent with our kids during the Potter mania. Beyond that, the author has soured the work.

i feel like ai summaries of search results, even refined to the point that they don't tell you to eat rocks, are kind of bad for us in general, because they're training people to think like the ai. receive information and accept. all information is of equal value. while obviously it's different for short, facty questions ("what year did event occur?") and more complex research points, the ai doesn't know that! the ability to read multiple sources, that vary in detail or viewpoint, and then draw your own conclusions and gain a better understanding is pretty fundamentally human. it kind of feels like ai is training critical thinking out of people.

Generative AI is the tech bro version of preserving tradition and order. It builds on the idealized fiction of what already exists and never challenges the norm

I cross checked the Google answers with Brave Search and the results are impressive. All of the ridiculous questions had in their answer disclosed that these are jokes or situations in cartoons, also that doing any of the activities might harm or kill you. Well, it's still an AI, which means that everything is based on stolen writings, but at least it has safety measures implemented, and you get scientifically accurate responses.

There’s an ai channel called “unreal documentary” that’s obsessed with Elvis, very demented

Slop me up, Cledus!! HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

lmao this video is so serious but the way u delivered it was so funny. thank you for this amazing video! <3

"friend of the channel Elon Musk" 🤣

Art is the intent, the intention in creating the intent that the artist have throughout the process, the intent feeling and provoking thought the artist want to persuade in the final product. Ai art can look like art but after distilling it down to its bones it simply don’t have an intent simply rendering it meaningless in the end. Because in an human created art you can feel the intensity within the intention of the creator, where as ai is just meaningless blob no matter the style and how finished a rendering seems to be.

scrolling on facebook? no i would bet half of the ppl seen the first min of this have never done any of this

This vid genuinely made me tear up. Quite an in depth analysis on not only what generative A.I. has done to the art world but also what the art world is/means to all of us. We all deserve better than to be expected to ingest the slop but it's first up to us collectively to recognise that the negatives outweigh the projected benefits. A.I. has its uses of course but some moderation is in order despite its decline so good on you for shining a light on how it has harmed people. Well done hoots.

That burning toaster + text to speech section made me feel dizzy sitting down.

the biggest shift in technology since the internet is not ai, it was the invention of the smart phone.

What’s up my migga

She couldn’t even write her own biography 😭😭

Man not a bad video couls do without the 10 mins of begging

I loved this video up until the last 5 minutes. Seriously WTF. The take on Tonks was SOOOO wrong. HP5 came out in 2003! He/they/whatever was transposing himself onto that character while not understanding her AT ALL. Tonks hated her first name so she preferred to be called by her surname and it’s vividly stated in the books. It wasn’t some gender fluid decision. Gender fluidity wasn’t a thing in 2003. Her constant change in appearance was because she had a genetic ability that allowed her to and she liked having fun putting on different “disguises” in conjunction with her job where it was AN IMPERATIVE PART OF HER POSITION. This is also stated in book 5. Idk wtf he was talking about but it’s one of my main gripes with people who identify as such. He didn’t understand her character AT ALL and saw her for who he wanted her to be and not for who she is whilst simultaneously being angry at people who do the same to him/them/whatever. Gender dysphoria and identifying as trans or binary wasn’t even a thing (like it is now at least) when these books came out so again WTF is he talking about? Her decision to put Tonks with Lupin was not an attack on binary or trans people. lol. Though I must admit I hate what they did with her character in book 6 and 7. Her feelings for Lupin came out of nowhere and she was reduced to a weakling. Molly Weasley the housewife was able to defeat Bellatrix but not a fully capable Auror like Tonks? FOH

Tbh her face looks kinda AI-generated to me.

Even here on Brazil it was such a juggernaut phenomenon that I remember taking classes of english just so I could read the newly released english books 1 and 2... And I ALSO remember reading about the sad sad past of JKrowling rolling in poverty or something like that. I still can barely write in english (as you can see), but at least I got something good out of the HP fever and at least I can understand this video. Silverlining.

The guys initials were EORR (eeyore) 💀 15:28

As an actual AI all I can say is: I'm sorry.

I think a person's opinion on "found object"/"found art" will determine which side of the "Is AI art?" argument they take. I see found object art as a grift, and so I see an image farted out by a machine as the same. You can describe the burger in as much detail as you want, but unless you're the one working the grill; you are not the cook.

Honestly, even if AI art could be without flaws, be on par with (or better than) actual human made stuff without having to steal people's work to be trained on... I still wouldn't want it. Why in the world would delegating art to machines ever be desirable? In our depressing society where one's worth is measured by their productivity, why rob ourselves of any creative work rather than developping tools to take care of the "menial" tasks instead? In a society that's past determining whether your survival is going to be assured based on how much money you can make for your boss... why would we even need machines to do art instead of creating it ourselves?

Wait until you can't tell the difference... that's when things are gonna get REALLY bad.

kzbin.info/www/bejne/eISmnnuqpNadmqs

I’ve tried reading Harry Potter multiple times, but I can never get too far past the first book.., I thought I was alone in my opinion but it seems like I’m not!

wow, that was some beautiful vulnerability displayed at the end. what an excellent speech. liked and subscribed.

I've been saying for about 10 years now that we should just abandon this internet to the corporations and start another one. ha ha (but I am half serious)

26:35 This was actually a quandary I came across recently. A finnish metal band called Turmion Kätilöt recently made a music video called Sina 2.0 that clearly showed their rage at a world filled with AI by using AI in a way that was clearly not slop, and had a clear dystopian message, mixing in the shots of AI with real footage of themselves and Lawnmower Man-esque editing at one point. It's been challenging my understanding of art by incorporating AI, something I don't consider art, in an artistic way while simultaneously being something that the band themselves don't consider art either. An additional layer being the incongruence between the high class visuals of the AI with the warpaint-covered viking singers brings an additional element of humanity, a feeling of intense struggle to break free from a dystopian system and return to more human times, something that puts the punk into something extremely cyberpunk. I'd genuinely recommend you go watch it, even if you aren't a fan of metal, to see what you take away from it.

I miss when AI meant either what makes video game NPCs do their thing, or Viki from I, Robot

Who are you reading?

all of the AI slop that ppl have been eating up does genuinely make me question if these people even experience the same reality as i do bc it is so mind boggling to me. I feel like I'm being gaslit

Your cadence sounds similar to V-sauce and I admire it. I don't know if it was your intention but if so it suites you well.

art is the expression of creativity by a human person. therefore, if someone makes something creative, even if it's just a drawing of a penis on a bathroom stall, it's still art. ai doesn't think for itself, it can't express creativity, it's simply copying what it scans. even when someone copies someone else's drawing, the copier is still expressing creativity and is likely doing it to learn and improve their own skills. anyways, awesome video!! :D

This might be really niche but your voice reminds me of the girl who makes those.. it's 2050 and fnaf has gone WOKE parody tiktoks 😭 (/pos)

When Ai powered robots take over the planet, the first thing they are going to do is chop of our annoying hands

ur that one friend whose too woke

NOBODY WANTS UR OPINIONNNN

The thrill of being able to actually visually mock up ideas using AI is what really inspired me to try to learn some art skills. The fear over AI is not well founded IMO. AI can't replace human symbolic thinking and you can't get it exactly like it looks in your mind. However, AI will be great for removing tedious tasks. like sketch something and have it ink and color it the way you have inked and colored before. But ai can't replace actually good art from start to finish. It can replace slop tho, but if someone is making slop then that is probably not very fulfilling in the first place. For what its worth that movie trailer was most likely more work than just putting in a prompt. Probably prompting for each shot and then editing them together and then adding some effects and text.

in my opinion, AI art cannot be art. AI generates pictures, sure. but it is not art, it has no soul. anyone can come up with an idea, but it’s going about the idea that can be challenging, and is why art is valuable. AI pictures are not art because it takes away what art is, the process, and a human connection with what you are making. sure, maybe artists using AI to challenge art ideals might be a decent idea or thing to do, but the reality of AI image generators is the fact that they are 1. becoming very accessible, anyone can do it now. and 2, anyone can do ai art and make some modifications to pretend they have artistic skill, and end up scamming others for commissions. in general, i am against AI in art, and in my personal opinion, it’s being used to cop out of learning new skills.

You are the new data source. What better real-time data than... real-time data to collect and cogitate to gurgitate on a population so hungry for dopamine that they will eat slop, complain about it, and belly up to the bar for more slop at the same MRSP. I wonder who is getting all of that stolen personal data from AT&T? Hhhmmm...