i couldn't care less about the visual design of new champs, but BY GOD is the actual game design shit. what bugs me, and i think could be the reason for this, is that many people from Riot's game design department haven't played the WC3 DotA, or any other MOBA, or perhaps even old (Seasons 1-5?) LoL. their only experience with "good champ design for League" is based only on other, fundamentally broken, new LoL champs

I was looking for Jax Challenger Gameplay on Porofessor and that game popped up. Must've been a hard game considering how fed he got 😁

агент брайтмуна и габена в одном лице

If an item has the word ACTIVE in it, then that means you can activate it. Laning with more than one person in early game is usually bad because you have to share xp and gold with them. Which means you level up slower and dont gain gold as fast as someone who's laning by themselves. The reason why you lane with an adc/bottom is because adcs tend to be very squishy early game. They need someone to keep them alive long enough to become very dangerous and powerful late game. Not leveling up fast enough is the trade-off with keeping an adc alive. Midlaners dont need that support because they have the tower. The distance between the lane and the tower is shorter than the other lanes. If they're in trouble they can just run back under their tower. Top laners don't have that luxury of a support or a convenient distance from the tower. So toplaners need to be able to look after themselves. Which is why most toplane champions tend to be tanks, bruisers or duelists Now, I'm not the best jungler in the world, but I find it's good to prioritize the river monsters: the dragons, void beasts and scuttle crabs. Those buffs are very helpful for the team. Also when enemy champions and/or waves are pushing into one of your towers, you should probably gank it. It helps to treat your map like a chess board and encourage your minion waves to push into enemy territory and conversely stop enemy minions pushing into your territory. It sounds obvious, but there have been too many times when a lane is pushing very well into my territory and no one does anything about it. When it comes to deciding which priority you should chase for, that's just something you're gonna have to trust your instincts with and decide which prio makes more sense at the time

Why support go botlane is because ADCs scale with gold more than with levels and are very vunreable. So you being there keeps them protected, lets them scale up while sharing the XP isnt a huge deal for them. There definitely is a difference in ADC and supports when it comes to how they play the map. Some supports will roam around the map and leave their ADC alone for a lot of the time, some ADCs are fine with the support doing so, others arent.

supports go botlane because it's historically done this way. in pro play we sometimes see teams switch the lanes, so the toplane goes bot, or it's solo ADC and supp+top in the toplane. because the game has closed itself into these very rigid "roles" with not much champion variety, going to a different lane as a support may as well be griefing. also, on why the botlane seems to be the way it is: Dragon. the ADC would want to stay botlane because of how important an early dragon may be for a team. having a champ with high damage stay close to the dragon pit makes it much easier for both teams to contest this objective. and, because the ADC want to go botlane, the support must go there as well, to protect their ADC. ADC is the most volatile role in LoL, as they scale primarily from items, and not from levels, and ADC/marksamn items tend to be expensive. As such, getting killed or otherwise harrassed out of lane could be game-ending for the ADC, and therefore for the team. it is very difficult for an ADC to catch up with gold from behind, so the support NEEDS to be there for the carry for them not to lose out on gold and exp. which is also why you wouldn't (most of the time, not talking about wave managment) last-hit lane minions. you deny your ADC the gold and delay their crucial items (power spikes + tempo)

If u climb a bit more the bots will stop. Feeders and leavers come back around plat emerald and also diamond 4, upwards it's mostly fine for me this split. Scripters were a high and low elo problem (not so much mid) but vanguard should eliminate most.

"Just this split alone I had 1 scripter" First of all This is not an issue my bro, this is actually praise. If you disagree, just go play cs2 where the devs actually don't give a single fuck about their game and come back to delete this comment or at least edit it. Second of all I dont get how you reached the conclusion that bots AND scripters are ruining the game. Bots are almost exclusively prevalent in low elo while scripters are mostly in higher elo brackets. You reaching this conclusion honestly makes it seem like you faced a smurf whom you thought was cheating. 3rdly I believe riot has implemented a compensation system recently. Sucks that they didn't have one before but credit where credit is due. Finally Smurfs are a part of the toxicity problem. Even if they are not toxic to their teammates (if they are masters/emerald on their main, they %100 will be because only animals inhabit those ranks) them stomping on their opponent usually causes their opponents team to flame the opponent even when they know that they are facing a smurf and that they would also get shit on if they were in their shoes.

@@adem4674 You started your entire argument off disingenuously. When you quote something someone says, you're supposed to actually quote what they've said; if it's long there are acceptable ways to shorten it. For example: "Just this split, [. . .], and one scripter (riven)." You're definitely not supposed to add words or alter structure. In this instance, it would have been best to keep the sentence intact for context. "First of all [. . .]" It is an issue in a competative game where your LP losses, more often than not, outweight your gains. I do disagree, but I'm not going to go play CS2 because I want to play League. I could care less about CS2 and it's not relevant to the state of League. CS2 is a perfect example, in my opinion, of a game that is more toxic than League - not only it's player base, but as you've hinted at, it's developers. This is making my points though. . . so. "Second of all [. . .]" I defnitely faced a scripter. My recieved a message thanking me for my report and got a -full- refund on my LP losses, rather than a partial one you normally get from the compensation system when people leave and such. I'm low elo, sure, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to discern the difference between a scripter and smurf. Smurfs play well in all areas, not just in their ability to dodge and auto-combo. The riven script is readily available and pops up with a simple google search. "3rdly [. . .]" They have, but for the most part it's only a partial compensation of roughly a third of the amount you loss, unless something particularly egregious convinces them to do a manual full refund, but that requires you to make the report in game, and submit a ticket. "Finally [. . .]" I'm sorry, but it's just not my experience. Maybe I am lucky, but the majority of the people I encounter seem cool. What I do notice, is that people seem to get back the same energy they give. So if you're being a jerk or pinging the crap out of people, or acting like an entitled brat, you're gonna get a verbal spanking for it. I've made it a habit to say hello to my team mates, wish them all a blessed day, and hope they have a good time. I do the same for my opponents when the game starts and I can type in all chat. I also apologize for my mistakes when they happen, compliment team mates and opponents on cool plays, and just try to be as pleasant as I can. I actually met a smurfing GM player who destroyed me in mid as Qiyana (I was pantheon, whom I picked because I figured it would counter her), and he actually added me and walked me throught the game to show me my mistakes and how to fight a Qiyana next time I run into one.

Only thing that makes League less toxic than other games is that you cannot directly shoot your teammate to death at spawn. Otherwise League is much much more toxic. Smurfs are not a problem. It's players who stop caring about winning and go 0/10.

@@dazeen9591 I would define that as griefing, not being toxic. Toxic, as I've always understood it, is being maliciously unpleasant. If someone has tilted and given up on the game, that is only an indirect slight towards you; it's actually a display of a person's weak mental and emotional fortitude, and likely a sign that they're to immature in those areas to play games/sports competitively.

exactly the same for me, i only played fps entire life and wanted to get good at league since its so difficult. was worth it

If you like the learning process of becoming good in a game I recommend RTS games like age of empires 2-4, Starcraft and similar. They have extremely hard learning courve in the beginning but great feeling once you master them and can control multiple units across a whole map

This is one of the aspects of league that I really enjoy as well, but also on the opposite side of the same coin. I love pushing my lead to the limit and keeping my opponent as far behind as I can. And LoL is the only game that I feel allows me full control over that.

No way same bro i love poppy and i also hate the ranked system of coinflips 50%wr

You are correct but to add to that, Kraken Triforce also made Ashe a bit tankier with more haste. Crit is more damage vs squishies but less W E R spamming. In low elo, I favor the build with the most survivability. So, Kraken Triforce would be my choice since I get more chance to impact the game with more ults. On-hit is also a lot of magic damage and crit is full physical so it also depends on what the enemy team is building. The way I see it, both crit and onhit have the same runes and they start with Kraken slayer. So I would make my decision after building my first item. Do I need crit, or on hit? Glad you find the videos useful 😊

@@ECPlaysLoL Ty! Well that makes sense, according to lolalytics, the on hit build performs better in lower elo than in higher, compared to crit, so it's definetely not worse like I've read on reddit where a it's wroten that on hit Ashe is not recommended. Tbh people on reddit give so often bullsht advices like (I'm a Kayle main, adc secondary) recent discussions about why ad Kayle is better than ap, when AP is clearly the superior version. Idk on what planet are some redditors living 😅😂

16:40 too

I think it is very underrated and people are slowly adapting to it. Zyra has the fastest lvl 4 clear in the game right now and she is very good at abusing the very strong AP items. She can farm fast, she can gank, she has objective control and she has a lot of damage. Her only downside is that shes slow and very weak vs divers like Malphite or Camille etc.. I will make a video on Zyra jungle.

The idea behind the video was to present many different ways that all the roles can carry with, and have you the viewer decide which role is the best for you depending on what you like. Nobody can really answer what the best role is because its a subjective thing. All people think differently.

I mean, if you want a pentakill, look no further than Master Yi, Thats probably your biggest chance. Samira JGL could probably work with her Stridebreaker build and a tiamat but it would not scale very well imo.

I don’t think he is catering to the higher elo players. So this isn’t bad per say.

And what if I do that? I could do that today, but I doubt it would bring any new arguments. The point of this is to see if Kaisa would be viable. if she clears fine, has gank options and scales well then by definition she should be viable. If I played this in a Masters lobby then sure the opponents would be better, but so would my teammates be and they could play around me even better. Is she at risk of being invaded? Yes. But the same goes for Karthus and Zyra who are viable junglers with even less 1v1 potential early than Kaisa has. And just like the other comment said, I dont make content for high elo players. They dont gain much from watching videos. Coaching is time better spent. I agree with you in principal, but the video is not titled "Kaisa is the best jungler". Its literally titled "Trying out Kaisa jungle". I know who my audience is.

@@ECPlaysLoL It was pretty entertaining to watch for sure. Your title was on spot. Is it viable, not THE BEST SLEEPER JUNGLER. Lol

I am 😁

@@ECPlaysLoL jag visste det, haha. KZbin-algoritmen gjorde ett bra jobb för att hitta dig. Sjukt bra content, har studerat dina videos om ADC fundamentals och även jag har klättrat i rank sedan dess. Tack för att du delar!

Det märker man snabbt haha. Gött att du tycker att de hjälper. Lycka till med dina games 👍

I dont think thats possible at all. His early cooldowns are so high it would not be worth it.

@@ECPlaysLoL aphelios jungle

@@ECPlaysLoL tristana jungle

Ideally yes, I would if it was possible